New Drug Approvals

Home » Uncategorized (Page 58)

Category Archives: Uncategorized

DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO .....FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE

Blog Stats

  • 4,878,161 hits

Flag and hits

Flag Counter

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 37.8K other subscribers
Follow New Drug Approvals on WordPress.com

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Flag Counter

ORGANIC SPECTROSCOPY

Read all about Organic Spectroscopy on ORGANIC SPECTROSCOPY INTERNATIONAL 

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 37.8K other subscribers
DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, Born in Mumbai in 1964 and graduated from Mumbai University, Completed his Ph.D from ICT, 1991,Matunga, Mumbai, India, in Organic Chemistry, The thesis topic was Synthesis of Novel Pyrethroid Analogues, Currently he is working with AFRICURE PHARMA, ROW2TECH, NIPER-G, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Govt. of India as ADVISOR, earlier assignment was with GLENMARK LIFE SCIENCES LTD, as CONSUlTANT, Retired from GLENMARK in Jan2022 Research Centre as Principal Scientist, Process Research (bulk actives) at Mahape, Navi Mumbai, India. Total Industry exp 32 plus yrs, Prior to joining Glenmark, he has worked with major multinationals like Hoechst Marion Roussel, now Sanofi, Searle India Ltd, now RPG lifesciences, etc. He has worked with notable scientists like Dr K Nagarajan, Dr Ralph Stapel, Prof S Seshadri, etc, He did custom synthesis for major multinationals in his career like BASF, Novartis, Sanofi, etc., He has worked in Discovery, Natural products, Bulk drugs, Generics, Intermediates, Fine chemicals, Neutraceuticals, GMP, Scaleups, etc, he is now helping millions, has 9 million plus hits on Google on all Organic chemistry websites. His friends call him Open superstar worlddrugtracker. His New Drug Approvals, Green Chemistry International, All about drugs, Eurekamoments, Organic spectroscopy international, etc in organic chemistry are some most read blogs He has hands on experience in initiation and developing novel routes for drug molecules and implementation them on commercial scale over a 32 PLUS year tenure till date Feb 2023, Around 35 plus products in his career. He has good knowledge of IPM, GMP, Regulatory aspects, he has several International patents published worldwide . He has good proficiency in Technology transfer, Spectroscopy, Stereochemistry, Synthesis, Polymorphism etc., He suffered a paralytic stroke/ Acute Transverse mylitis in Dec 2007 and is 90 %Paralysed, He is bound to a wheelchair, this seems to have injected feul in him to help chemists all around the world, he is more active than before and is pushing boundaries, He has 100 million plus hits on Google, 2.5 lakh plus connections on all networking sites, 100 Lakh plus views on dozen plus blogs, 227 countries, 7 continents, He makes himself available to all, contact him on +91 9323115463, email amcrasto@gmail.com, Twitter, @amcrasto , He lives and will die for his family, 90% paralysis cannot kill his soul., Notably he has 38 lakh plus views on New Drug Approvals Blog in 227 countries......https://newdrugapprovals.wordpress.com/ , He appreciates the help he gets from one and all, Friends, Family, Glenmark, Readers, Wellwishers, Doctors, Drug authorities, His Contacts, Physiotherapist, etc He has total of 32 International and Indian awards

Verified Services

View Full Profile →

Archives

Categories

Flag Counter

Flow Grignard and Lithiation: Screening Tools and Development of Continuous Processes for a Benzyl Alcohol Starting Material

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D's avatarORGANIC CHEMISTRY SELECT

str1

Abstract Image

Efficient continuous Grignard and lithiation processes were developed to produce one of the key regulatory starting materials for the production of edivoxetine hydrochoride. For the Grignard process, organometallic reagent formation, Bouveault formylation, reduction, and workup steps were run in continuous stirred tank reactors (CSTRs). The lithiation utilized a hybrid approach where plug flow reactors (PFRs) were used for the metal halogen exchange and Bouveault formylation steps, while the reduction and workup steps were performed in CSTRs. Relative to traditional batch processing, both approaches offer significant advantages. Both processes were high-yielding and produced the product in high purity. The two main processes were directly compared from a number of perspectives including reagent and operational safety, fouling potential, process footprint, need for manual operation, and product yield and purity.

Flow Grignard and Lithiation: Screening Tools and Development of Continuous Processes for a Benzyl Alcohol Starting Material

View original post 103 more words

Olopatadine

Olopatadine.svg

OLPATADINE

SEE FOR SYNTHESIS http://www.allfordrugs.com/2016/08/10/olopatadine/

Olopatadine hydrochloride is an antihistamine (as well as anticholinergic and mast cell stabilizer), sold as a prescription eye dropmanufactured by Alcon in one of three strengths: 0.7% solution or Pazeo in the US, 0.2% solution or Pataday (also called Patanol Sin some countries), and 0.1% or Patanol (also called Opatanol in some countries). It is used to treat itching associated with allergicconjunctivitis (eye allergies). A decongestant nasal spray formulation is sold as Patanase, which was approved by the FDA on April 15, 2008.[1] It is also available as an oral tablet in Japan under the tradename Allelock, manufactured by Kyowa Hakko Kogyo.[2]

It should not be used to treat irritation caused by contact lenses. The usual dose for Patanol is 1 drop in each affected eye 2 times per day, with 6 to 8 hours between doses. Both Pazeo and Pataday are dosed 1 drop in each eye daily.

There is potential for Olopatadine as a treatment modality for steroid rebound (red skin syndrome).[3]

Olopatadine was developed by Kyowa Hakko Kogyo.[4]

Side Effects

Some known side effects include headache (7% of occurrence), eye burning and/or stinging (5%), blurred vision, dry eyes, foreign body sensation, hyperemia, keratitis, eyelid edema, pruritus, asthenia, sore throat (pharyngitis), rhinitis, sinusitis, and taste perversion.

Synthesis

Olopatadine synthesis:[5]

References

  1.  Drugs.com, Alcon’s Patanase Nasal Spray Approved by FDA for Treatment of Nasal Allergy Symptoms
  2.  Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. (2007). “ALLELOCK Tablets 2.5 & ALLELOCK Tablets 5 (English)” (PDF). Retrieved2008-08-10.
  3. Jump up^ Tamura T; Matsubara M; Hasegawa K; Ohmori K; Karasawa A. (2005). “Olopatadine hydrochloride suppresses the rebound phenomenon after discontinuation of treatment with a topical steroid in mice with chronic contact hypersensitivity.”.
  4. Jump up^ Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. (2002). “Company History”.Company Information. Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Co., Ltd. Retrieved16 September 2010.
  5. Jump up^ Ueno, K.; Kubo, S.; Tagawa, H.; Yoshioka, T.; Tsukada, W.; Tsubokawa, M.; Kojima, H.; Kasahara, A. (1976). “6,11-Dihydro-11-oxodibenz[b,e]oxepinacetic acids with potent antiinflammatory activity”. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 19 (7): 941.doi:10.1021/jm00229a017.

External links

 

 

Olopatadine
Olopatadine.svg
Systematic (IUPAC) name
{(11Z)-11-[3-(dimethylamino)propylidene]-6,11-
dihydrodibenzo[b,e]oxepin-2-yl}acetic acid
Clinical data
Trade names Patanol and others
AHFS/Drugs.com Monograph
MedlinePlus a602025
Pregnancy
category
  • C
Routes of
administration
Ophthalmic, intranasal, oral
Pharmacokinetic data
Biological half-life 3 hours
Identifiers
CAS Number 113806-05-6 Yes
ATC code S01GX09 (WHO)R01AC08 (WHO)
PubChem CID 5281071
DrugBank DB00768 Yes
ChemSpider 4444528 Yes
UNII D27V6190PM Yes
KEGG D08293 Yes
ChEMBL CHEMBL1189432 
Chemical data
Formula C21H23NO3
Molar mass 337.412 g/mol

/////////////

Nacubactam, A diazabicyclooctane beta-lactamase inhibitor, for treating bacterial infection

 

Nacubactam

RG-6080,  FPI-1459,  OP-0595, WK ?, WK-?, WK?

 CAS 1452458-86-4,  MF C9 H16 N4 O7 S, MW 324.31
Sulfuric acid, mono[(1R,2S,5R)-2-[[(2-aminoethoxy)amino]carbonyl]-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-6-yl] ester,

(2S,5R)-N-(2-amino ethoxy)-6-(sulfooxy)-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxamide

Beta lactamase inhibitor

Roche, under license from Meiji Seika Pharma and Fedora Pharmaceuticals is developing nacubactam hydrate

Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., Meiji Seikaファルマ株式会社

A diazabicyclooctane beta-lactamase inhibitor, for treating bacterial infection. In July 2016, nacubactam was reported to be in phase 1 clinical development

PATENTS , IN2015MU287, WO2016116878WO 2016120752, INDICATE INTEREST FROM WOCKHARDT

 

Sulfuric acid, mono[(1R,2S,5R)-2-[[(2-aminoethoxy)amino]carbonyl]-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-6-yl] ester

A β-lactamase inhibitor potentially for the treatment of bacterial infections.

RG-6080; FPI-1459; OP-0595

CAS No. 1452458-86-4

Molecular Formula C9 H16 N4 O7 S
Formula Weight 324.31
  • Originator Fedora Pharmaceuticals
  • Developer Meiji Seika Pharma
  • Class Antibacterials; Azabicyclo compounds
  • Mechanism of Action Beta lactamase inhibitors
  • Phase I Bacterial infections

Most Recent Events

  • 13 Jan 2015  OP 0595 licensed to Roche worldwide, except Japan ,
  • 30 Nov 2014 Meiji Seika Pharma completes a phase I trial in Healthy volunteers in Australia (NCT02134834)
  • 01 May 2014 Phase-I clinical trials in Bacterial infections (in volunteers) in Australia (IV)

In September 2014, preclinical data were presented at the 54th ICAAC Meeting in Washington, DC. Nacubactam hydratedemonstrated Ki values of 0.24, 3 and 0.79 microM against AmpC P99 derived from Enterobacter cloacae, KPC-3, and CTX-M-15 enzymes, respectively; the Ki values were lower than that of cefepime

Bacterial infections continue to remain one of the major causes contributing towards human diseases. One of the key challenges in treatment of bacterial infections is the ability of bacteria to develop resistance to one or more antibacterial agents over time. Examples of such bacteria that have developed resistance to typical antibacterial agents include: Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci, and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The problem of emerging drug-resistance in bacteria is often tackled by switching to newer antibacterial agents, which can be more expensive and sometimes more toxic. Additionally, this may not be a permanent solution as the bacteria often develop resistance to the newer antibacterial agents as well in due course. In general, bacteria are particularly efficient in developing resistance, because of their ability to multiply very rapidly and pass on the resistance genes as they replicate.

The persistent exposure of bacterial strains to a multitude of beta- lactam antibacterial agents has led to overproduction and mutation of beta-lactamases. These new extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) are capable of hydrolyzing penicillins, cephalosporins, monobactams and even carbapenems. Such a wide spread resistance to many of the existing beta-lactam antibacterial agents, either used alone or in combination with other agents, is posing challenges in treating serious bacterial infections.

Due to various reasons, the oral therapeutic options for treating bacterial infections (including those caused by ESBL strains) are limited. For example, a combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid is effective against Class A ESBLs producing bacteria. However, the usefulness of this combination is compromised against bacteria producing multiple or mixed beta-lactamase enzymes (such as, for example, bacteria producing Class A and Class C ESBLs concurrently), and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemases (KPCs). Therefore, oral antibacterial agents or combinations with activity against a range of bacterial strains (including those producing multiple ESBLs and KPCs) are urgently desired.

Cephalosporin antibacterial agents are known for treatment for various bacterial infections. Surprisingly, it has been found that pharmaceutical compositions comprising a cephalosporin antibacterial agent and certain nitrogen containing bicyclic compound (disclosed in PCT/IB2013/053092, PCT/JP2013/064971 and PCT/IB 2012/002675) exhibit unexpectedly synergistic antibacterial activity, even against highly resistant bacterial strains.

SYNTHESIS

WO 2015046207,

STR1

CONTD…………………..

STR1

CONTD………………………………..

STR1

Patent

The novel heterocyclic compound in Japanese Patent 4515704 (Patent Document 1), preparation and shown for their pharmaceutical use, sodium trans-7-oxo-6- (sulfooxy) as a representative compound 1,6-diazabicyclo [3 .2.1] discloses an octane-2-carboxamide (NXL104). Preparation in regard to certain piperidine derivatives which are intermediates Patent 2010-138206 (Patent Document 2) and JP-T 2010-539147 (Patent Document 3) are shown at further WO2011 / 042560 (Patent Document 4) NXL104 to disclose a method for producing the crystals.

 In Patent 5038509 (Patent Document 5) (2S, 5R) -7- oxo -N- (piperidin-4-yl) -6- (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] octane – 2- carboxamide (MK7655) is shown, discloses the preparation of certain piperidine derivatives with MK7655 at Patent 2011-207900 (Patent Document 6) and WO2010 / 126820 (Patent Document 7).

 The present inventors also disclose the novel diazabicyclooctane derivative represented by the following formula (VII) in Japanese Patent Application 2012-122603 (Patent Document 8).

Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent No. 4515704 Pat

Patent Document 2: Japanese Patent Publication 2010-138206 Pat

Patent Document 3: Japanese patent publication 2010-539147 Pat

Patent Document 4: International Publication No. WO2011 / 042560 Patent

Patent Document 5: Japanese Patent No. 5038509 Pat

Patent Document 6: Japanese Patent Publication 2011-207900 Pat

Patent Document 7: International Publication No. WO2010 / 126820 Patent

Patent Document 8: Japanese Patent application 2012-122603 Pat.

[Chemical formula 1] (In the formula, R 3 are the same as those described below)

Reference Example

5 of 5 (2S, 5R)-N- (2-aminoethoxy) -7-oxo-6- (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] octane-2-carboxamide (VII-1)

Formula 43]

step 1 tert-butyl {2 – [({[( 2S, 5R) -6- benzyloxy-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl } amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate  (IV-1)(2S, 5R)-6-(benzyloxy) -7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] octane-2-carboxylic acid (4 .30g, dehydrated ethyl acetate (47mL) solution of 15.56mmol) was cooled to -30 ℃, isobutyl chloroformate (2.17g, washing included dehydration ethyl acetate 1mL), triethylamine (1.61g, washing included dehydration ethyl acetate 1 mL), successively added dropwise, and the mixture was stirred 1 hour at -30 ° C.. To the reaction solution tert- butyl 2-dehydration of ethyl acetate (amino-oxy) ethyl carbamate (3.21g) (4mL) was added (washing included dehydration ethyl acetate 1mL), raising the temperature over a period of 1.5 hours to 0 ℃, It was further stirred overnight. The mixture of 8% aqueous citric acid (56 mL), saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (40 mL), sequentially washed with saturated brine (40 mL), dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate, filtered, concentrated to 5 mL, up to 6mL further with ethanol (10 mL) It was replaced concentrated. Ethanol to the resulting solution (3mL), hexane the (8mL) in addition to ice-cooling, and the mixture was stirred inoculated for 15 minutes. The mixture was stirred overnight dropwise over 2 hours hexane (75 mL) to. Collected by filtration the precipitated crystals, washing with hexane to give the title compound 5.49g and dried in vacuo (net 4.98 g, 74% yield). HPLC: COSMOSIL 5C18 MS-II 4.6 × 150 mm, 33.3 mM phosphate buffer / MeCN = 50/50, 1.0 mL / min, UV 210 nm, Retweeted 4.4 min; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) [delta] 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.56-1.70 (m, 1H), 1.90-2.09 (m, 2H), 2.25-2.38 (m, 1H), 2.76 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (br.d., J = 11.6 Hz , 1H), 3.24-3.47 (m, 3H), 3.84-4.01 (m, 3H), 4.90 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (br. . s, 1H), 7.34-7.48 (yd, 5H), 9.37 (Br.S., 1H); MS yd / z 435 [M + H] + .

Step 2

tert-butyl {2 – [({[( 2S, 5R) -6- hydroxy-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate

(V-1) tert-butyl {2 – [({[( 2S, 5R) -6- benzyloxy-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl ] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate (3.91 g, to a methanol solution (80 mL) of 9.01mmol), 10% palladium on carbon catalyst (50% water, 803 mg) was added, under hydrogen atmosphere and stirred for 45 minutes . The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite, after concentrated under reduced pressure to give 3.11g of the title compound (quantitative).

HPLC: COSMOSIL 5C18 MS-II 4.6 × 150 mm, 33.3 mM phosphate buffer / MeCN = 75/25, 1.0 mL / min, UV 210 nm, Retweeted 3.9 from min; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CD 3 OD) [delta] 1.44 (s, 9H) , 1.73-1.83 (m, 1H), 1.86-1.99 (m, 1H), 2.01-2.12 (m, 1H), 2.22 (br.dd., J = 15.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (d, J= 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (br.d., J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.25-3.35 (m, 2H), 3.68-3.71 (m, 1H), 3.82-3.91 (m, 3H); MS M / Z 345 [M Tasu H] Tasu .

Step 3

Tetrabutylammonium tert- butyl {2 – [({[( 2S, 5R) -7- oxo-6 (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl } amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate

(VI-1) tert-butyl {2 – [({[( 2S, 5R) -6- hydroxy-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct 2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate (3.09g, in dichloromethane (80mL) solution of 8.97mmol), 2,6- lutidine (3.20mL), sulfur trioxide – pyridine complex (3 .58g) was added, and the mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was poured into half-saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution, washed the aqueous layer with chloroform, tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate to the aqueous layer and (3.47 g) chloroform (30 mL) was added and stirred for 10 minutes. The aqueous layer was extracted with chloroform, drying the obtained organic layer with anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give the title compound 5.46g (91% yield).

HPLC: COSMOSIL 5C18 MS-II 4.6X150mm, 33.3MM Phosphate Buffer / MeCN = 80/20, 1.0ML / Min, UV210nm, RT 2.0 Min; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3 ) Deruta 1.01 (T, J = 7.4 Hz, 12H), 1.37-1.54 (m , 8H), 1.45 (s, 9H), 1.57-1.80 (m, 9H), 1.85-1.98 (m, 1H), 2.14-2.24 (m, 1H), 2.30- 2.39 (m, 1H), 2.83 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.20-3.50 (m, 11H), 3.85-3.99 (m, 3H), 4.33-4.38 (m, 1H), 5.51 (br s , 1H), 9.44 (Br.S., 1H); MS yd / z 425 [M-Bu 4 N + 2H] + .

Step 4 (2S, 5R)-N- (2-aminoethoxy) -7-oxo-6- (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] octane-2-carboxamide (VII-1)

tetra butylammonium tert- butyl {2 – [({[( 2S, 5R) -7- oxo-6 (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate (5.20g, 7.82mmol) in dichloromethane (25mL) solution of ice-cold under trifluoroacetic acid (25mL), and the mixture was stirred for 1 hour at 0 ℃. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure, washed the resulting residue with diethyl ether, adjusted to pH7 with aqueous sodium bicarbonate, subjected to an octadecyl silica gel column chromatography (water), after freeze drying, 1.44 g of the title compound obtained (57% yield).

HPLC: COSMOSIL 5C18 MS-II 4.6X150mm, 33.3MM Phosphate Buffer / MeCN = 99/1, 1.0ML / Min, UV210nm, RT 3.1 Min; 1 H NMR (400 MHz, D 2O) Deruta 1.66-1.76 (M, 1H), 1.76-1.88 (m, 1H ), 1.91-2.00 (m, 1H), 2.00-2.08 (m, 1H), 3.02 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (t, J = 5.0 Hz , 2H), 3.18 (br d , J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.95 (dd, J = 7.8, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 4.07 (dd, J = 6.4 3.2 Hz &, 1H); MS yd / z 325 [M + H] + .

PATENT

Example 

64 tert-butyl {2 – [({[( 2S, 5R) -6- hydroxy-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy ] ethyl} carbamate (V-1) 

[of 124] 

tert- butyl {2 – [({[(2S, 5R) -6- benzyloxy-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl } carbamate (example 63q, net 156.42g, 360mmol) in methanol solution (2.4L) of 10% palladium carbon catalyst (50% water, 15.64g) was added, under an atmosphere of hydrogen, stirred for 1.5 hours did. The catalyst was filtered through celite, filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure until 450mL, concentrated to 450mL by adding acetonitrile (1.5 L), the mixture was stirred ice-cooled for 30 minutes, collected by filtration the precipitated crystals, washing with acetonitrile, and vacuum dried to obtain 118.26g of the title compound (net 117.90g, 95% yield). Equipment data of the crystals were the same as those of the step 2 of Reference Example 3.

Example

65 (2S, 5R)-N- (2-aminoethoxy) -7-oxo-6- (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] octane-2-carboxamide (VI-1)

 

 tert- butyl {2 – [({[(2S, 5R) -1,6- -6- hydroxy-7-oxo-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate (example 64,537.61g, 1.561mol) in acetonitrile (7.8L) solution of 2,6-lutidine (512.08g), sulfur trioxide – pyridine complex (810.3g) was added, at room temperature in the mixture was stirred overnight. Remove insolubles and the mixture was filtered, the filtrate concentrated to 2.5 L, diluted with ethyl acetate (15.1L). The mixture was extracted with 20% phosphoric acid 2 hydrogencarbonate aqueous solution (7.8L), the resulting aqueous layer into ethyl acetate (15.1L), added tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate (567.87g), was stirred for 20 min. The organic layer was separated layers, dried over anhydrous magnesium sulfate (425 g), after filtration, concentration under reduced pressure, substituted concentrated tetrabutylammonium tert- butyl with dichloromethane (3.1L) {2 – [({[(2S, 5R ) -7-oxo-6 (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate was obtained 758g (net 586.27g, Osamu rate 84%).

 The tetra-butyl ammonium salt 719g (net 437.1g, 0.656mol) in dichloromethane (874mL) solution was cooled to -20 ℃, dropping trifluoroacetic acid (874mL) at 15 minutes, 1 the temperature was raised to 0 ℃ It was stirred time. The reaction was cooled to -20 ° C. was added dropwise diisopropyl ether (3.25L), and the mixture was stirred for 1 hour the temperature was raised to 0 ° C.. The precipitate is filtered, washed with diisopropyl ether to give the title compound 335.36g of crude and vacuum dried (net 222.35g, 99% yield).

 The title compound of crude were obtained (212.99g, net 133.33g) and ice-cold 0.2M phosphate buffer solution of pH5.3 mix a little at a time, alternating between the (pH6.5,4.8L). The solution was concentrated under reduced pressure to 3.6L, it was adjusted to pH5.5 at again 0.2M phosphate buffer (pH6.5,910mL). The solution resin purification (Mitsubishi Kasei, SP207, water ~ 10% IPA solution) is subjected to, and concentrated to collect active fractions, after lyophilization, to give the title compound 128.3 g (96% yield). Equipment data of the crystals were the same as those of step 3 of Reference Example 3.

PATENT

US 20140288051

WO 2014091268

WO 2013180197

US 20130225554

PATENT

IN2015MU287

PATENT

WO2013180197

Example 59
(2S, 5R) -N- (2- aminoethoxy) -7-oxo-6- (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] octane-2-carboxamide (II-059)

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-C000130

Step 1
tert- butyl {2 – [({[(2S, 5R) -6- Benzyloxy-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl } carbamate

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-C000131

Acid of Example 9 or 16 (6b, 1.34g, 4.87mmol) in methylene chloride (35mL) solution of triethylamine (2.71mL), N- ethyl -N ‘- (3- dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (1.41g), 1- hydroxybenzotriazole monohydrate (1.15g), were added tert- butyl of Reference Example 9, wherein 2- (amino-oxy) ethyl carbamate (1.12g), room temperature It was stirred overnight Te.Water was added to the reaction solution to a residue obtained by concentration under reduced pressure, and extracted with ethyl acetate. The resulting organic layer with 0.1M hydrochloric acid, saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution, washed with saturated aqueous sodium chloride solution, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated.The resulting residue was purified by silica gel column and purified by chromatography (hexane / ethyl acetate = 8 / 2-0 / 10) to give the title compound 1.77g (84% yield).
[Α] D 20 -0.08 ° (c 0.29, CHCl 3); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3), δ: 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.56-1.70 (m, 1H), 1.90-2.09 (m , 2H), 2.25-2.38 (m, 1H), 2.76 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (br d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.24-3.47 (m, 3H), 3.84-4.01 (m, 3H), 4.90 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 5.05 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 5.44 (br s, 1H), 7.34-7.48 (m, 5H), 9.37 (br s, 1H); MS m / z 435 [M + H] +; enantiomeric excess of 99.9% or higher ee (CHIRALPAK AD-H, 4.6x150mm, hexane / ethanol = 2/1, UV210nm, flow rate 1mL / min, retention time 4.95min (2R, 5S), 6.70min (2S, 5R).

Step 2
tert- butyl {2 – [({[(2S, 5R) -1,6- -6- hydroxy-7-oxo-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate

Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-C000132

Compound of the above Step 1 (3.91g, 9.01mmol) in methanol (80mL), 10% palladium on carbon catalyst (50% water, 803mg) was added, under hydrogen atmosphere and stirred for 45 minutes. The reaction mixture was filtered through Celite, then concentrated under reduced pressure, to give 3.11g of the title compound (quantitative).
1 H NMR (400 MHz, CD 3 OD), δ: 1.44 (s, 9H), 1.73-1.83 (m, 1H), 1.86-1.99 (m, 1H), 2.01-2.12 (m, 1H), 2.22 ( br dd, J = 15.0, 7.0 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (br d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.25-3.35 (m, 2H), 3.68-3.71 (m, 1H), 3.82-3.91 (m, 3H); MS m / z 345 [M + H] +.

Step 3
(2S, 5R) -N- (2- aminoethoxy) -7-oxo-6- (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] octane-2-carboxamide The above step 2 compound (3. 09g, in methylene chloride (80mL) solution of 8.97mmol), 2,6- lutidine (3.20mL), sulfur trioxide – was added pyridine complex (3.58g), and stirred at room temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was poured into half-saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution, and washed the aqueous layer with chloroform, and tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate (3.47g) and chloroform (30mL) was added to the aqueous layer and stirred for 10 minutes. After extracting the aqueous layer with chloroform, drying the resulting organic layer over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, concentrated under reduced pressure tetrabutylammonium tert- butyl {2 – [({[(2S, 5R) -7- oxo – 6- (sulfooxy) 1,6-diazabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl] carbonyl} amino) oxy] ethyl} carbamate was obtained 5.46g (91% yield).
1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl 3), δ: 1.01 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 12H), 1.37-1.54 (m, 8H), 1.45 (s, 9H), 1.57-1.80 (m, 9H), 1.85-1.98 (m, 1H), 2.14-2.24 (m, 1H), 2.30-2.39 (m, 1H), 2.83 (d, J = 11.6 Hz, 1H), 3.20-3.50 (m, 11H), 3.85- 3.99 (m, 3H), 4.33-4.38 (m, 1H), 5.51 (br s, 1H), 9.44 (br s, 1H); MS m / z 425 [M-Bu 4 N + 2H] +.

The tetrabutyl ammonium salt (5.20g, 7.82mmol) in methylene chloride (25mL) solution of under ice-cooling trifluoroacetic acid (25mL), and the mixture was stirred for 1 hour at 0 ℃. The reaction mixture was concentrated under reduced pressure, washed resulting residue with diethyl ether, at aqueous sodium bicarbonate was adjusted to pH7, it performs an octadecyl silica gel column chromatography (water), after freeze-drying, 1.44g of the title compound The obtained (57% yield).
[Α] D 24 -63.5 ° (c 0.83, H 2 O); 1 H NMR (400 MHz, D 2 O), δ: 1.66-1.76 (m, 1H), 1.76-1.88 (m, 1H), 1.91 -2.00 (m, 1H), 2.00-2.08 (m, 1H), 3.02 (d, J = 12.0 Hz, 1H), 3.15 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 3.18 (br d, J = 12.0 Hz , 1H), 3.95 (dd, J = 7.8, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.04 (t, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 4.07 (dd, J = 6.4, 3.2 Hz, 1H); MS m / z 325 [ M + H] +.

PATENT

WO2016116878

ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOSITIONS OF A BETA-LACTAMASE INHIBITOR WITH A CEPHALOSPORINAbstract:

Pharmaceutical compositions comprising: (a) at least one cephalosporin antibacterial agent and (b) a compound of Formula (I) or a stereoisomer or a pharmaceutically acceptable derivative thereof are disclosed. Formula (I)

PATENT

WO 2016120752, WOCKHARDT, NEW PATENT, Nacubactam

Formula (I), chemically known as (25, 5i?)-N-(2-aminoethoxy)-6-(sulfooxy)-7-oxo-l ,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1 ]octane-2-carboxamide has antibacterial properties and is disclosed in PCT International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2013/053092, PCT/JP2013/064971 and PCT/IB2012/002675. The present invention discloses a process for preparation of a compound of Formula (I).

Formula (I)

 

(VII) (VIII) (IX)

Scheme 2

Example 1

Synthesis of fert-butyl-r2-(aminooxy) ethyllcarbamate (III)

Preparation of fert-butyl-2-hydroxy ethylcarbamate (VIII):

Formula (VIII)

To a stirred solution of ethanolamine (50.0 g, 0.8186 mol) in dichloromethane (1000 ml), was added triethylamine (124 g, 1.228 mol) at 0°C. After 10 minutes, di-teri-butyl dicarbonate (VII, 214.15 g, 0.9823 mol) was added drop wise at 0°C under continuous stirring. Then reaction mass was allowed to warm to 25°C and stirred further for 3 hours. After completion of reaction, the resulting reaction mixture was poured into water (250 ml) and the organic layer was separated and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The dried organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain 130 g of the titled product as colorless oil in 98% yield.

Analysis:

Mass: 162 (M+l); for Molecular Weight of 161.2 and Molecular Formula of C7H15NO3.

1H NMR (400MHz, CDC13): δ 4.92(br s,lH), 3.72-3.68(q,2H), 3.30-3.26(q,2H), 2.33(br s,lH), 1.44(s,9H).

Preparation of A7-Boc-2-(2-aminoethoxy)isoindoline-l,3-dione (IX):

To a stirred solution of teri;butyl-2-hydroxy-ethylcarbamate (VIII, 50 g, 0.3106 mol) in tetrahydrofuran (500 ml), was added triphenylphosphine (89.5 g, 0.3416 mol) at 25°C. After stirring for 10 minutes, a solution of N-hydroxyphthalimide (50.66 g, 0.3106 mol) in dichloromethane (250 ml) was added to the reaction mass at 25 °C over a period of 10 minutes. After stirring for further 10 minutes, diisopropyl azodicarboxylate (69.1 g, 0.3416 mol) was added to the reaction mass in small portions (exothermic reaction was observed up to 34°C). The resulting reaction mass was stirred further at 25°C. After 16 hours, the reaction mass was concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain colorless oily material. The oily residue was diluted with diisopropyl ether (200 ml) and stirred for 30 minutes. The separated solid was filtered under suction. The filtrate was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue subjected to di-isopropyl ether treatment (200 ml). This procedure was repeated once again. The filtrate was concentrated to obtain a solid product. The obtained solid was washed with diisopropyl ether (50 ml) and dried under reduced pressure. This solid contains small amount of triphenylphosphine oxide, along with the product. This was used as such for the next reaction without further purification.

Analysis:

Mass: 307.2 (M+l); for Molecular Weight of 306.3 and Molecular Formula of Ci5Hi8N205; 1H NMR of purified material (400MHz, CDC13): 7.85-7.25 (m,4H), 5.62(br s,lH), 4.26-4.23(t,2H), 3.46-3.42(q,2H), 1.46(s,9H).

Step 3: Preparation of fert-butyl-[ -(aminooxy) ethyl]carbamate (III):

Formula (III)

To a stirred solution of N-Boc-2-(2-aminoethoxy)isoindoline-l ,3-dione (IX, 97 g, 0.3167 mol) in dichloromethane (970 ml) was added hydrazine hydrate (31.7 g, 0.6334 mol) , at 0°C, drop wise, over a period of 45 minutes and the stirring continued further. After 2 hours, the reaction mass was filtered under suction. Filtrate was washed with water (485 ml), and the organic layer was diluted with an aq. solution of 10% potassium hydrogen sulfate (485 ml) and stirred for 15 minutes. The aqueous layer was separated, neutralized with solid sodium hydrogen carbonate and extracted with dichloromethane (2 x 485 ml). The organic layer was separated, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain colorless oil, this was used as such for further reaction immediately (28g, overall yield of step II and step III was 60%)

Analysis:

Mass: 177.2 (M+l) for Molecular Weight of 176.2 and Molecular Formula of C7H16N2O3.

Example 2

Synthesis of (25,5R)-jV-(2-aminoethoxy)-6-(sulfooxy)-7-oxo-l,6-diaza-bicvclor3.2.11octane-2- carboxamide (I)

Step 1: Preparation of (25,5R)-iV-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(benzyloxy)-7-oxo-l,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxamide (IV):

To a clear solution of sodium (25,5i?)-6-(benzyloxy)-7-oxo-l,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate (II, 42.67 g, 0.143 mol; prepared according to the procedure disclosed in Indian Patent Application No. 699/MUM/2013) in water (426 ml) was added EDC.HC1 (67.1 g, 0.349 mol) at 15°C

under stirring. After 10 minutes, a solution of teri-butyl-[2-(aminooxy) ethyl]carbamate (III, 28.0g, 0.159 mol; prepared as per the literature procedure depicted in Scheme 2) in dimethylformamide (56 ml) was added drop wise at 10°C under continuous stirring. The temperature of the reaction mass was allowed to warm to 25°C and then HOBt (21.5g, 0.159 mol) was added in small portions over a period of 15 minutes and the resulting mixture was further stirred at room temperature for 16 hours. The reaction was continuously monitored using thin layer chromatography using mixture of acetone and hexane (35 :65) as solvent system. After completion of reaction, the resulting mixture was filtered and the residue was washed with water (130 ml). The obtained white residue was suspended in water (130 ml) and the mixture stirred at 50°C for 3 hours. The resulting suspension was filtered, the residue dried under reduced pressure to obtain 51 g of (2S,5R)-N-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(benzyloxy)-7-oxo-l ,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxamide (IV) as off white solid in 73% yield.

Analysis:

Mass: 433.4 (M-l ); for Molecular Weight of 434.5 and Molecular Formula of C21H30N4O6;

1H-NMR (400MHz, CDC13): δ 9.32 (br s, 1H), 7.41 -7.26(m,5H), 5.41(br s, 1H), 5.06-4.88(dd, 2H), 3.98-3.96(d,lH), 3.91-3.90(m,2H), 3.39(m, 1H), 3.31-3.26(m, 2H), 3.04-3.01(d,lH), 2.77-2.74(d, 1H), 2.33-2.28(m, 1H), 2.03-1.93(m, 2H), 1.67-1.64(m, 1H), 1.44(s, 9H);

Purity as determined by HPLC: 99.4%.

Step 2: Preparation of (2S,5R)-iV-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(hydroxy)-7-oxo-l,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxamide (V):

A solution of (25,5i?)-N-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(benzyloxy)-7-oxo-l ,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1] octane-2-carboxamide (IV, 38 g, 0.0875 mol) in a mixture of dimethylformamide and dichloromethane (2: 8, 76 ml: 304 ml), containing 10% Pd/C (7.6 g, 50% wet) was hydrogenated at 50 psi hydrogen atmosphere at 25°C for 3 hours. The resulting mixture was filtered through a celite pad. The residue was washed with dichloromethane (75 ml). The solvent from the combined filtrate was evaporated

under reduced pressure to obtain 30 g (25,5i?)-N-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(hydroxy)-7-oxo-l ,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1 ]octane-2-carboxamide (V) as an oil, which was used as such for the next reaction without further purification.

Analysis:

Mass: 343.3 (M-l ) for Molecular Weight of 344.3 and Molecular Formula of C14H24N4O6.

Step 3: Preparation of (25,5R)-iV-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(sulfooxy)-7-oxo-l,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxamide,tetrabutyl ammonium salt (VI):

To a stirred solution of (25,5i?)-N-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(hydroxy)-7-oxo-l ,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1 ]octane-2-carboxamide (V, 30.0 g, 0.0875 mol) in dimethylformamide (150 ml) was added sulphur trioxide dimethylformamide complex (16.06 g, 0.105 mol) in one portion, at 10°C. The reaction mass was stirred at the same temperature for 30 minutes and then allowed to warm to room temperature. After 2 hours, a solution of tetrabutylammonium acetate (31.6 g, 0.105 mol) in water (95 ml) was slowly added to the reaction mixture and stirred for another 2 hours. The solvent from the reaction mixture was evaporated under reduced pressure to obtain an oily residue. The oily mass was co-evaporated with xylene (2 x 60 ml) to obtain thick mass. This mass was partitioned between 1 : 1 mixture of dichloromethane (300 ml) and water (300 ml). The organic layer was separated and the aqueous layer re-extracted with dichloromethane (150 ml). The combined organic extracts were washed with water (3 x 150 ml) and dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the resulting oily mass was triturated with ether (3 x 60 ml). Each time the ether layer was decanted and the residue was finally concentrated under reduced pressure to obtain the sticky mass. The so obtained material was purified by column chromatography over silica gel using mixture of methanol and dichloromethane as elution solvent. The solvent from the combined fractions was evaporated to obtain 47.5 g of (25,5i?)-N-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(sulfooxy)-7-oxo-l ,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1 ]octane-2-carboxamide,tetrabutyl ammonium salt as white foam in 70% yield.

Analysis:

Mass: 423.4 (M-l) as free sulphonic acid; for Molecular Weight of 665.9 and Molecular Formula of C30H59N5O9 S;

1H- NMR (400MHz, CDC13): δ 9.52(br s, 1H), 5.53(br s, 1H), 4.33(s, 1H), 3.95-3.92(m,3H), 3.37-3.27(m, 1 1H), 2.87-2.84(d, 1H), 2.35-2.30(m, 1H), 2.17(m, 1H), 1.96-1.88(m, 2H), 1.74-1.60(m,8 H), 1.47-1.40(m, 17H), 1.02-0.98(m, 12H).

Step 4: Preparation of (2S R)-iV-(2-aminoethoxy)-6-(sulfooxy)-7-oxo-l,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxamide (I):

Formula (I)

To a stirred solution of (2S,5i?)-N-(2-Boc-aminoethoxy)-6-(sulfooxy)-7-oxo-l ,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1 ]octane-2-carboxamide, tetrabutyl ammonium salt (VI, 17 g, 0.0225 mol) in dichloromethane (85 ml) was added trifluoroacetic acid (85 ml) drop wise at -10°C over a period of 45 minutes. The resulting mass was further stirred at same temperature for 1 hour. The resulting reaction mixture was poured into cyclohexane (850 ml), stirred well for 30 minutes and the separated oily layer was collected. This procedure was repeated one more time and finally the separated oily layer was added to tert-butyl methyl ether (170 ml) under vigorous stirring at 25°C. The ether layer was removed by decantation from the precipitated solid. This procedure was repeated twice again with tert-butyl methyl ether (2 x 170 ml). The solid thus obtained was stirred with fresh dichloromethane (170 ml) for 30 minutes and filtered. The residual solid was dried at 45°C under reduced pressure to yield 7.3g of the titled compound in crude form. The obtained solid was further dissolved in water, (7.3 ml) and to this solution was added basic resin (Amberlyst A-26 -OH ion exchange resin, 4.4 g) under stirring. After 0.5 hour, the resin was filtered and to the filtrate isopropanol (51 ml) was added slowly at 25°C. The solution was further stirred for 12 hours. The separated solid was filtered and washed with additional isopropanol (7.5 ml) and dried under reduced pressure to obtain 4.3 g of (2S ,5R)-N-(2-aminoethoxy)-6-(sulfooxy)-7-oxo-l ,6-diaza-bicyclo[3.2.1 ]octane-2-carboxamide as off-white solid in 52 % yield.

Analysis:

Mass: 323.1 (M-l); for Molecular Weight of 324.31 and Molecular Formula of C9H16N4O7S; 1H-NMR (400MHz, D20): δ 4.07-4.06(d, 1H), 4.05-4.03(t, 2H), 3.96-3.94(d, 1H), 3.20(br s, 1H), 3.16-3.13(t, 2H), 3.02-2.99(d, 1H), 2.04-1.68(m, 4H);

Purity as determined by HPLC: 94.88%.

REF

http://www.pewtrusts.org/~/media/assets/2015/02/antibioticsinnovationproject_datatable_201502_v3.pdf?la=en

WO2015110969A3 * Jan 21, 2015 Nov 26, 2015 Wockhardt Limited Nitrogen containing compounds and their use as antibacterial agents
WO2015150941A1 * Mar 12, 2015 Oct 8, 2015 Wockhardt Limited A process for preparation of sodium (2s, 5r)-6-(benzyloxy)-7-oxo-1,6-diazabicyclo[3.2.1]octane-2-carboxylate
WO2016088863A1 * Dec 4, 2015 Jun 9, 2016 Meiji Seikaファルマ株式会社 Method for producing crystals of diazabicyclooctane derivative and stable lyophilized preparation
EP2931723A4 * Dec 11, 2012 Jun 1, 2016 Fedora Pharmaceuticals Inc New bicyclic compounds and their use as antibacterial agents and -lactamase inhibitors
US8933232 Mar 29, 2013 Jan 13, 2015 Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1,3,4-oxadiazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole beta-lactamase inhibitors
US8933233 Mar 29, 2013 Jan 13, 2015 Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1,3,4-oxadiazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole β-lactamase inhibitors
US8940897 Mar 29, 2013 Jan 27, 2015 Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1,3,4-oxadiazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole β-lactamase inhibitors
US8962843 Mar 29, 2013 Feb 24, 2015 Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1,3,4-oxadiazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole beta-lactamase inhibitors
US8962844 Mar 29, 2013 Feb 24, 2015 Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 1,3,4-oxadiazole and 1,3,4-thiadiazole β-lactamase inhibitors
US9120795 Mar 14, 2014 Sep 1, 2015 Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Crystalline form of a β-lactamase inhibitor
US9120796 Oct 2, 2014 Sep 1, 2015 Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. B-lactamase inhibitor picoline salt
US9309245 Apr 2, 2013 Apr 12, 2016 Entasis Therapeutics Limited Beta-lactamase inhibitor compounds
US9393239 Apr 15, 2014 Jul 19, 2016 Fedora Pharmaceuticals Inc. Bicyclic compounds and their use as antibacterial agents and betalactamase inhibitors

/////////////IN2015MU287, WO-2016120752, nacubactam, WOCKHARDT, NEW PATENT, WK ?, WK-?, WK?,  CAS 1452458-86-4C9 H16 N4 O7 S, 324.31, Beta lactamase inhibitor, Roche, Meiji Seika Pharma,  Fedora Pharmaceuticals, nacubactam hydrate , PHASE 1, A diazabicyclooctane beta-lactamase inhibitor, bacterial infection, July 2016,  phase 1 clinical development, RG-6080, 1452458-86-4, FPI-1459,  OP-0595, Phase I ,  β-lactamase inhibitor, bacterial infections, Fedora parmaceuticals, Meiji Seika Pharma

NCCONC(=O)[C@@H]2CC[C@@H]1C[N@]2C(=O)N1OS(=O)(=O)O

MICONAZOLE NITRATE , Миконазол , ミコナゾール硝酸塩

Miconazole            C18H14Cl4N2O    416.13             [22916478]

Miconazole Nitrate            C18H14Cl4N2O.HNO3              479.14             [22832877]

ミコナゾール硝酸塩 JP16
Miconazole Nitrate

C18H14Cl4N2O▪HNO3 : 479.14
[22832-87-7]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


click on above image for clear view











MORE GRAPHS

13C






1D 1H, n/a spectrum for Miconazole

2D [1H,1H]-TOCSY  BELOW

2D [1H,1H]-TOCSY, n/a spectrum for Miconazole

1D DEPT90

1D DEPT90, n/a spectrum for Miconazole

1D DEPT135

1D DEPT135, n/a spectrum for Miconazole

 

2D [1H,13C]-HSQC

2D [1H,13C]-HSQC, n/a spectrum for Miconazole

2D [1H,13C]-HMBC

2D [1H,13C]-HMBC, n/a spectrum for Miconazole

2D [1H,1H]-COSY

2D [1H,1H]-COSY, n/a spectrum for Miconazole

2D [1H,13C]-HMQC

2D [1H,13C]-HMQC, n/a spectrum for Miconazole
Miconazole is an imidazole antifungal agent, developed by Janssen Pharmaceutica, commonly applied topically to the skin or tomucous membranes to cure fungal infections. It works by inhibiting the synthesis of ergosterol, a critical component of fungal cell membranes. It can also be used against certain species of Leishmania protozoa which are a type of unicellular parasites that also contain ergosterol in their cell membranes. In addition to its antifungal and antiparasitic actions, it also has some antibacterialproperties. It is marketed in various formulations under various brand names.

Miconazole is also used in Ektachrome film developing in the final rinse of the Kodak E-6 process and similar Fuji CR-56 process, replacing formaldehydeFuji Hunt also includes miconazole as a final rinse additive in their formulation of the C-41RA rapid access color negative developing process.
It is on the World Health Organization’s List of Essential Medicines, the most important medications needed in a basic health system.[1]

ALTERNATIVE ROUTES beginning with the racemic raw material will likely be more costly or more time-consuming to develop, Cox says. Crystallization might be tricky because the stereogenic center does not have a group that can readily undergo acid-base chemistry. Catalytic asymmetric chemistry will necessitate converting the raw material to an appropriate substrate and identifying effective, as well as usable, chemical catalysts or biocatalysts.
What happens to the unwanted enantiomer also depends on the economics. Reracemizing and feeding the racemate back into the process is ideal but not always practical. In the miconazole case, the raw material costs $32 per kg. It is unlikely that reracemizing would be less costly in this example, Cox explains.
People should not forget that the goal of chiral technologies–enantiopure product–also may be achieved with chemistry that already exists, notes David R. Dodds, founder of Dodds & Associates LLC, Manlius, N.Y., a consulting service for biotechnology and chemical companies. Process chemists seek the most robust, most productive, and least expensive synthetic route and aim to find it as fast as possible. Any reaction that can help reach this goal is useful. It is the overall process cost that will dictate which reactions will be used. And that cost covers not only reagents but also waste streams, utilities, equipment use, unit operations, and downstream requirements. Thus, it may be more commercially attractive to replace an elegant but expensive single reaction with several more mundane ones that have a lower total cost, he says. Such a situation is likely to arise when an asymmetric step requires an expensive chiral catalyst or chiral auxiliary.

Brief background information

 

Salt ATC Formula MM CAS
A01AB09 
A07AC01 
D01AC02 
G01AF04 
J02AB01 
S02AA13
18 H 14 Cl 4 N 2 O 416.14 g / mol 22916-47-8
mononitrate A01AB09 
A07AC01 
D01AC02 
G01AF04 
J02AB01 
S02AA13
18 H 14 Cl 4 N 2 O ⋅ HNO 3 479.15 g / mol 22832-87-7

Using

 

  • antifungal agent for topical use
  • antimycotic agent

Classes substance

 

  • Imidazoles, 1- (hlorfenetil) imidazoles

synthesis Way

 

Synthesis of a)

trade names

 

A country Tradename Manufacturer
Germany Castellani Hollborn
Daktar McNeil
Derma-Mikotral Rosen Pharma
Fungur HEXAL
Gyno-Daktar Janssen-Cilag, 1974
Gyno-Mikotral Rosen Pharma
Infektozoor Mundgel Infectopharm
Mikobeta betapharm
Mikotar Dermapharm
Mikoderm Engelhard
Mikotin Ardeypharm
Vobamik Almirall Hermal
France Daktapin Janssen-Cilag
Gyno-Daktapin Janssen-Cilag
Loramik Bioalliance
United Kingdom Gyno-Daktapin Janssen-Cilag
Italy Daktapin Janssen-Cilag
Mikonal Ecobi
Mikotef LPB
Miderm Mendelejeff
Nizakol PS Pharma
Pivanazolo Medestea
Prilagin Sofar
Japan Florid Mochida
USA Fungoid Pedinol
Ukraine GІNEZOL 7 Sagmel, Іnk., USA
MІKONAZOL-Darnitsa CJSC “Farmatsevtichna FIRMA” Darnitsa “, m. Kyiv, Ukraine
MІKOGEL BAT “Kiїvmedpreparat”, m. Kyiv, Ukraine
various generic drugs

Formulations

 

  • ampoule 200 mg / 20 ml;
  • cream 1%, 2 g / 100 g 20 mg / g;
  • losyon 1%;
  • ointment 1%;
  • 2% oral gel;
  • Powder 2 g / 100 g 20 mg / g (in the form mononitrate);
  • solution of 20 mg / ml;
  • 100 mg suppositories;
  • Tablets of 250 mg (free base form);
  • vaginal cream 20 mg / g;
  • bottles of 400 mg / 40 ml

references

 

  1. Synthesis of a)
    • DAS 1,940,388 (Janssen; appl 8.8.1969;. USA-prior 19.8.1968, 23.7.1969.).
    • US 3,717,655 (Janssen; 20.2.1973; appl 19.8.1968.).
    • US 3,839,574 (Janssen; 1.10.1974; prior 23.7.1969.).

Miconazole nitrate was prepared by Godefori et
al
[5­
7]. Imidazole 1 was coupled with
brominated 2,4‑dichloroacetophenone 2 and the resulting ketonic product 3
was reduced with sodium borohydride to its corresponding alcohol 4. The
latter compound 4 was then coupled with 2,4-dichlorotoluene by sodium borohydride
in hexamethylphosphoramide (an aprotic solvent) which was then extracted with
nitric acid to give miconazole nitrate.

 

 

2-     Miconazole was also
prepared by Molina Caprile [8] as follows:
Phenyl methyl ketone 1 was brominated to give
1-phenyl-2-bromoethanone 2. Compound 2 was treated with
methylsulfonic acid to yield the corresponding methylsulfonate 3.
Etherification of 3 gave the a‑benzyloxy derivative 4 and compound 4 was
then chlorinated to give the 2,4‑dichlorinated derivative in both aromatic ring
systems 5. Compound 5 reacted with imidazole in dimethylformamide
to give miconazole 6 [7] which is converted to miconazole nitrate.

 

3-     Ye
et al reported that the reduction of 2,4-dichlorophenyl-2-chloroethanone
1 with potassium borohydride in dimethylformamide to give 90% a‑chloromethyl-2,4-dichlorobenzyl
alcohol 2. Alkylation of imidazole with compound 2 in dimethyl­formamide
in the presence of sodium hydroxide and triethylbenzyl ammonium chloride, gave
1-(2,4‑dichlorophenyl-2-imidazolyl)ethanol 3 and etherification of 3
with 2,4-dichlorobenzyl chloride under the same condition, 62% yield of
miconazole [9].
4-     Liao
and Li enantioselectively synthesized and studied the antifungal activity of
optically active miconazole and econazole. The key step was the
enantioselective reduction of 2‑chloro-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)ethanone catalyzed
by chiral oxazaborolidine [10].
5-     Yanez
et al reported the synthesiz of miconazole and analogs through a
carbenoid intermediate. The process involves the intermolecular insertion of
carbenoid species to imidazole from a‑diazoketones with copper acetylacetonate as the key
reaction of the synthetic route [11].
5-11 as 1-7
1.             E.F. Godefori and J. Heeres, Ger. Pat. 1,940,388
(1970).
2.
E.F. Godefori and J. Heeres, U.S. Pat. 3,717,655
(1973).
3.
E.F. Godefori, J. Heeres, J. van Cutsem and P.A.J.
Janssen, J. Med. Chem., 12, 784 (1969).
4.
F. Molina Caprile, Spanish Patent ES 510870 A1
(1983).
5.
B. Ye, K. Yu and Q. Huang, Zhongguo Yiyao Gongye
Zazhi
, 21, 56 (1990).
6.
Y.W. Liao and H.X. Li, Yaoxue Xuebao, 28,
22 (1993).
7.
E.C. Yanez, A.C. Sanchez, J.M.S. Becerra, J.M.
Muchowski and C.R. Almanza, Revista de la Sociedad Quimica de Mexico, 48,
49 (2004).

MiconazoleTitle: Miconazole

CAS Registry Number: 22916-47-8
CAS Name: 1-[2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-2-[(2,4-dichlorophenyl)methoxy]ethyl]-1H-imidazole
Additional Names: 1-[2,4-dichloro-b-[(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)oxy]phenethyl]imidazole
Molecular Formula: C18H14Cl4N2O
Molecular Weight: 416.13
Percent Composition: C 51.95%, H 3.39%, Cl 34.08%, N 6.73%, O 3.84%
Literature References: Prepn: E. F. Godefroi et al., J. Med. Chem. 12, 784 (1969); E. F. Godefroi, J. Heeres, DE 1940388;eidem, US 3717655 (1970, 1973 to Janssen). Clinical evaluation: Brugmans et al., Arch. Dermatol. 102, 428 (1970); Godts et al.,Arzneim.-Forsch. 21, 256 (1971). Review: P. Janssen, W. Van Bever, in Pharmacological and Biochemical Properties of Drug Substances vol. 2, M. E. Goldberg, Ed. (Am. Pharm. Assoc., Washington, DC, 1979) pp 333-354; R. C. Heel et al., Drugs 19, 7-30 (1980).
Derivative Type: Nitrate
CAS Registry Number: 22832-87-7
Manufacturers’ Codes: R-14889
Trademarks: Aflorix (Gramon); Albistat (Ortho); Andergin (ISOM); Brentan (Janssen); Conoderm (C-Vet); Conofite (Mallinckrodt); Daktar (Janssen); Daktarin (Janssen); Deralbine (Andromaco); Dermonistat (Ortho); Epi-Monistat (Cilag); Florid (Mochida); Fungiderm (Janssen); Fungisdin (Isdin); Gyno-Daktarin (Janssen); Gyno-Monistat (Cilag-Chemie); Micatin (J & J); Miconal Ecobi (Ecobi); Micotef (LPB); Monistat (Cilag-Chemie); Prilagin (Gambar); Vodol (Andromaco)
Molecular Formula: C18H14Cl4N2O.HNO3
Molecular Weight: 479.14
Percent Composition: C 45.12%, H 3.16%, Cl 29.60%, N 8.77%, O 13.36%
Properties: Crystals, mp 170.5° (Godefroi, Heeres, 1970); 184-185° (Godefroi).
Melting point: mp 170.5° (Godefroi, Heeres, 1970); 184-185° (Godefroi)
Derivative Type: (+)-Form nitrate
Properties: mp 135.3°. [a]D20 +59° (methanol).
Melting point: mp 135.3°
Optical Rotation: [a]D20 +59° (methanol)
Derivative Type: (-)-Form nitrate
Properties: mp 135°. [a]D20 -58° (methanol).
Melting point: mp 135°
Optical Rotation: [a]D20 -58° (methanol)
Therap-Cat: Antifungal (topical).
Therap-Cat-Vet: Antifungal (topical).
Keywords: Antifungal (Synthetic); Imidazoles.

References

  1. Jump up^ “WHO Model List of EssentialMedicines” (PDF)World Health Organization. October 2013. Retrieved 22 April 2014.
  2. Jump up^ British National Formulary ’45’ March 2003
  3. Jump up^ “Strange Beauty: Monistat Effectively Increases Hair Growth?”. Black Girl With Long Hair. Retrieved 12 April 2012.
  4. Jump up^ Ju, Jiang; Tsuboi, Ryoji; Kojima, Yuko; Ogawa, Hideoki (2005). “Topical application of ketoconazole stimulates hair growth in C3H/HeN mice”Journal of dermatology32: 243–247.
  5. Jump up^ S., Venturoli; O. Marescalchi; F. M. Colombo; S. Macrelli; B. Ravaioli; A. Bagnoli; R. Paradisi; C. Flamigni (April 1999). “A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Low Dose Flutamide, Finasteride, Ketoconazole, and Cyproterone Acetate-Estrogen Regimens in the Treatment of Hirsutism”The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism84 (4): 1304–1310. doi:10.1210/jc.84.4.1304. Retrieved 12 April 2012.
  6. Jump up^ Duret C, Daujat-Chavanieu M, Pascussi JM, Pichard-Garcia L, Balaguer P, Fabre JM, Vilarem MJ, Maurel P, Gerbal-Chaloin S (2006). “Ketoconazole and miconazole are antagonists of the human glucocorticoid receptor: consequences on the expression and function of the constitutive androstane receptor and the pregnane X receptor”. Mol. Pharmacol70 (1): 329–39. doi:10.1124/mol.105.022046PMID 16608920.
  7. Jump up^ Najm, Fadi J.; Madhavan, Mayur; Zaremba, Anita; Shick, Elizabeth; Karl, Robert T.; Factor, Daniel C.; Miller, Tyler E.; Nevin, Zachary S.; Kantor, Christopher (2015-01-01).“Drug-based modulation of endogenous stem cells promotes functional remyelination in vivo”Nature522 (7555). doi:10.1038/nature14335.
  8. Jump up^ United States Patent 5461068

External links

Medical

Photographic

 

Miconazole
Miconazole2DCSD.svg
Miconazole ball-and-stick.png
Systematic (IUPAC) name
(RS)-1-(2-(2,4-Dichlorobenzyloxy)-2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)ethyl)-1H-imidazole
Clinical data
Trade names Desenex, Monistat, Zeasorb-AF
AHFS/Drugs.com Monograph
MedlinePlus a601203
Pregnancy
category
  • AU: A
  • US: C (Risk not ruled out)
  • In Australia, it is category A when used topically. In the US, the pregnancy category is C for oral and topical treatment.
Routes of
administration
topicalvaginalsublabial,oral
Legal status
Legal status
  • AU: S2 (Pharmacy only)
  • UK: POM (Prescription only)
  • US: OTC
  • Schedule 2 in Australia for topical formulations, schedule 3 (Aus) for vaginal use and for oral candidiasis, otherwise schedule 4 in Australia
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability n/a
Metabolism n/a
Biological half-life n/a
Excretion n/a
Identifiers
CAS Number 22916-47-8 Yes
ATC code A01AB09 (WHO)A07AC01 (WHO)D01AC02 (WHO)G01AF04 (WHO)J02AB01 (WHO)S02AA13 (WHO)
PubChem CID 4189
IUPHAR/BPS 2449
DrugBank DB01110 Yes
ChemSpider 4044 Yes
UNII 7NNO0D7S5M Yes
KEGG D00416 Yes
ChEBI CHEBI:6923 Yes
ChEMBL CHEMBL91 Yes
Chemical data
Formula C18H14Cl4N2O
Molar mass 416.127 g/mol
Chirality Racemic mixture

Day 2 of the 2016 Doodle Fruit Games! Find out more at g.co/fruit

DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO …..FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE

 

Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK

Join me on twitterFollow amcrasto on Twitter
Join me on google plus Googleplus

 amcrasto@gmail.com

Day 3 of the 2016 Doodle Fruit Games! Find out more at g.co/fruit
///////////

Lovastatin

Lovastatin3Dan.gifLovastatin.svg

Lovastatin
(+)-Mevinolin
(1S,3R,7S,8S,8aR)-1,2,3,7,8,8a-Hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-[(2R,4R)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-yl]ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl (S)-2-Methylbutyrate
(2S)-2-Methylbutanoic acid (1S,3R,7S,8S,8aR)-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-[(2R,4R)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-yl]ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl ester
[1S-[1a(R*),3a,7b,8b(2S*,4S*),8ab]]-2-Methylbutanoic Acid1,2,3,7,8,8a-Hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-(tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-yl)ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl Ester
1,2,6,7,8,8a-Hexahydro-b,d-dihydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-8-(2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)-1-naphthaleneheptanoic Acid d-Lactone
2b,6a-Dimethyl-8a-(2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)mevinic Acid Lactone
6a-Methylcompactin
75330-75-5

Lovastatin (Merck’s Mevacor) is a statin drug, used for lowering cholesterol (hypolipidemic agent) in those withhypercholesterolemia to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease. Lovastatin is a naturally occurring compound found in food such asoyster mushrooms,[2] red yeast rice,[3] and Pu-erh.[4]

Medical uses

The primary uses of lovastatin is for the treatment of dyslipidemia and the prevention of cardiovascular disease.[5] It is recommended to be used only after other measures, such as diet, exercise, and weight reduction, have not improved cholesterol levels.[5]

Pleurotus ostreatus, the oyster mushroom, naturally contains up to 2.8% lovastatin on a dry weight basis.[15]

Structure

 

 

History

 Compactin and lovastatin, natural products with a powerful inhibitory effect on HMG-CoA reductase, were discovered in the 1970s, and taken into clinical development as potential drugs for lowering LDL cholesterol.

However, in 1980, trials with compactin were suspended for undisclosed reasons (rumoured to be related to serious animal toxicity). Because of the close structural similarity between compactin and lovastatin, clinical studies with lovastatin were also suspended, and additional animal safety studies initiated.

In 1982 some small-scale clinical investigations of lovastatin, a polyketide derived natural product isolated from Aspergillus terrus, in very high-risk patients were undertaken, in which dramatic reductions in LDL cholesterol were observed, with very few adverse effects. After the additional animal safety studies with lovastatin revealed no toxicity of the type thought to be associated with compactin, clinical studies resumed.

Large-scale trials confirmed the effectiveness of lovastatin. Observed tolerability continued to be excellent, and lovastatin was approved by the US FDA in 1987.

Lovastatin at its maximal recommended dose of 80 mg daily produced a mean reduction in LDL cholesterol of 40%, a far greater reduction than could be obtained with any of the treatments available at the time. Equally important, the drug produced very few adverse effects, was easy for patients to take, and so was rapidly accepted by prescribers and patients. The only important adverse effect is myopathy/rhabdomyolysis. This is rare and occurs with all HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

 Mechanism of action

Lovastatin is an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase), an enzyme which catalyzes the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate. Mevalonate is a required building block for cholesterol biosynthesis and lovastatin interferes with its production by acting as a competitive inhibitor for HMG-CoA which binds to the HMG-CoA reductase. Lovastatin, being inactive in the native form, the form in which it is administered, is hydrolysed to the β-hydroxy acid form in the body and it is this form which is active. Presumably, the reductase acts on the hydrolyzed lovastatin to reduce the carboxylic acid moiety.

Discovery, Biochemistry and Biology

 It is now generally accepted that a major risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease is an elevated concentration of plasma cholesterol, especially lowdensity lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. The objective is to decrease excess levels of cholesterol to an amount consistent with maintainence of normal body function. Cholesterol is biosynthesized in a series of more than 25 separate enzymatic reactions that initially involves 3 successive condensations of acetyl-CoA units to form a 6-carbon compound, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA). This is reduced to mevalonate and then converted in a series of reactions to the isoprenes that are building blocks of squalene, the immediate precursor to sterols, which cyclizes to lanosterol (a methylated sterol) and further metabolized to cholesterol. A number of early attempts to block the synthesis of cholesterol resulted in agents that inhibited late in the biosynthetic pathway between lanosterol and cholesterol. A major rate limiting step in the pathway is at the level of the microsomal enzyme which catalyzes the conversion of HMG CoA to mevalonic acd and which has been considered to be a prime target for pharmacologic intervention for several years.

            HMG CoA reductase occurs early in the biosynthetic pathway and is among the first commited steps to cholesterol formulation. Inhibition of this enzyme could lead to accumulation of HMG CoA, a water-soluble intermediate that is then capable of being readily metabolized that is then capable of being readily metabolized to simpler molecules. This inhibition of reductase would nto lead to accumulation of lipophylic intermediates having a formal sterol ring.

            Lovastatin is the first specific inhibitor of HMG CoA reductase to receive approval for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. The first breakthrough in efforts to find a potent, specific, competitive inhibitor of HMG CoA reductase occurred in 1976 when Endo et al reported discovery of mevastatin, a highly functionalized fungal metabolite, isolated from cultures of  Penicillium citrium. Mevastatin was demonstrated to be an unusually potent inhibitor of the target enzyme and of cholesterol biosynthesis. Subsequent to the first reports describing mevastatin, efforts were initiated to search for other naturally occurring inhibitors oh HMG CoA reductase. This led to the discovery of a novel fungal metabolite – Lovastatin. The structure of Lovastatin was determined to be different from that of mevastatin by the presence of a 6 alphamethyl group in the hexahydronaphthalene ring.

Key points from the study of the Biosynthesis of Lovastatin :-

– Lovastatin is comprised of 2 polyketide chains derived from acetate that are 8- and 4-

  carbons long coupled in head to tail fashion.

– 6 alphamethyl group and the methyl group on the 4-carbon side chain are derived from

  the methyl group of methionine, and

– 6 alphamethyl group is added before closure of the rings.

This implies that lovastatin is a unique compound synthesized by A. terreus and that mevastatin is not an intermediate in its fornmation.

Cholesterol Biosynthetic Pathway

 

The HMG CoA reductase reaction

 

Biosynthesis — Diels-Alder Catalyzed Cyclization

            In vitro formation of a triketide lactone using a genetically-modified protein derived from 6-deoxyerythronolide B synthase has been demonstrated. The stereochemistry of the molecule supports the intriguing idea that an enzyme-catalyzed Diels-Alder reaction may occur during assembly of the polyketide chain. It thus appears that biological Diels-Alder reactions may be triggered by generation of reactive triene systems on an enzyme surface.

 

Biosynthesis – Using Broadly specific Acyltransferase

It has been found that a dedicated acyltransferase, LovD, is encoded in the lovastatin biosynthetic pathway. LovD has a broad substrate specificity towards the acyl carrier, the acyl substrate and the decalin acyl acceptor. It efficiently catalyzes the acyl transfer from coenzyme A thoesters or N-acetylcysteamine (SNAC) thioesters to monacolin J.

            The biosynthesis of Lovastatin is coordinated by two iterative type I polyketide synthases and numerous accessory enzymes. Nonketide, the intermediate biosynthetic precursor of Lovastatin, is assembeled by the upstream megasynthase LovB (also known as lovastatin nonaketide synthase), enoylreductase LovC, and CYP450 oxygenases. The five carbon unit side chain is synthesized by LovF (also known as lovastatin diketide synthase) through a single condensation diketide undergoes methylation and reductive tailoring by the individual LovF catalytic domains to yield an α-S-methylbutyryl thioester covalently attached to the phosphopantetheine arm on the acyl carrier protein (ACP) domain of LovF. Encoded in the gene cluster is a 46kDa protein, LovD, which was initially identified as an esterase homolog. LovD, which was initially identified as an esterase homolog. LovD was suggested to catalyze the last step of lovastatin biosynthesis that regioselectively transacylates the acyl group from LovF to the C8 hydroxyl group of the Nonaketide to yield Lovastatin. 

 

  

K. Auclair, A. Sutherland, J. Kennedy, D. J. Witter, J. P. Van den Heever, C. R. Hutchinson and J. C. Vederas, Lovastatin Nonaketide Synthase Catalyses An Intramolecular Diels-Alder Reaction Of A Substrate Analogue, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 11519-11520. DOI: 10.1021/ja003216+

JACS(Lov2)

http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/np/c2np20069d/unauth#!divAbstract

196264.fig.002

http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2012/196264/#B30

  1. Z. Jia, X. Zhang, Y. Zhao, and X. Cao, “Enhancement of lovastatin production by supplementing polyketide antibiotics to the submerged culture of Aspergillus terreus,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 160, no. 7, pp. 2014–2025, 2010. 

Patent

https://www.google.com/patents/US6307066

PATENT

https://www.google.com/patents/WO2002009697A1?cl=en

https://www.google.com/patents/EP0625208B1?cl=en

Total Synthesis

A major bulk of work in the synthesis of Lovastatin was done by M. Hirama in the 1980’s. Hirama synthesized Compactin and used one of the intermediates to follow a different path to get to Lovastatin. The synthetic sequence is shown in the schemes below. The γ-lactone was synthesized using Yamada methodology starting with aspartic acid. Lactone opening was done using lithium methoxide in methanol and then silylation to give a separable mixture of the starting lactone and the silyl ether. The silyl ether on hydrogenolysis followed by Collins oxidation gave the aldehyde. Stereoselective preparation of (E,E)-diene was accomplished by addition of trans-crotyl phenyl sulfone anion, followed by quenching with Ac2O and subsequent reductive elimination of sulfone acetate. Condensation of this with Lithium anion of dimethyl methylphosphonate gave compound 1.Compound 2 was synthesized as shown in the scheme in the synthetic procedure. Compounds 1 and 2 were then combined together using 1.3eq sodium hydride in THF followed by reflux in chlorobenzene for 82 hrs under nitrogen to get the enone 3.

Simple organic reactions were used to get to Lovastatin as shown in the scheme.

 

 

 

 

Pharmacopoeia Information

Lovastatin tablets are preserved in well closed, light resistant containers. Protected from light and stored either in a cool place or at controlled room temperature.

Lovastatin tablets are tested for Dissolution and Assay as per the USP.

Limit for Dissolution – Not less than 80% (Q) of the labeled amount of Lovastatin is dissolved in 30 mins.

Limit for Assay – Each tablet contains not less than 90% and not more than 110% of the labeled amount of Lovastatin, tested by HPLC analysis.

Lovastatin raw material contains 5 impurities – A, B, C, D and E (as shown below).

 

 

Market brands and other analogues  

There are other derivatives of Lovastatin which possess cholesterol reducing activity. Simvastatin (Zocor®) is another statin closely related to Lovastatin, differing only by the presence of a methyl group in the butanoyl ester moiety. Both effective in lowering total cholesterol.

Another statin having vastly different structure but a popular drug – Atorvastatin (Lipitor®), administered as a calcium salt is a pyrrole derivative and a synthetic compound rather than a natural product.

NMR

  1 H NMR spectrum of lovastatin, 300 MHz, solvent CDCl 3 . 

STR1 str2 STR3

STR1 str2 STR3UV LOVASTATIN

Figure 6. The mean FT-IR spectra (the calibration set) and variables selected after application of UVE-PLS for modelling lovastatin (triangles) and wavenumbers for characteristic peaks for lovastatin IR spectrum (dots).

PATENT

https://www.google.com/patents/EP0702679B1?cl=en

Lovastatin is produced as a secondary metabolite of the fungusAspergillus terreus (US 4,231,938) deposited in American Type Culture Collection under Nos. ATCC 20541, ATCC 20542, and Monascus ruberdeposited in Fermentation Research Institute Agency of Industrial Science and Technology, Ministry of International Trade and Industry, Japan (DE 30 06 216 A1) under No. Ferm 4822. Other kinds of microorganisms producing lovastatin are known as well, e.g. a mutant of the microorganism Aspergillus terreus andAspergillus oryzae marked ATCC 74135.

Lovastatin is chemically 1′,2′,6′,7′,8a’-hexahydro-3,5-dihydroxy-2′,6′-dimethyl-8′-2″-methyl-1″-oxobutoxy)-1-naphtalene heptanoic acid-5-lactone (Stubbs et al., 1986) of the formula (EP 0 033 537 A1)

Figure 00010001

An active form of lovastatin is also an acid, which is chemically 1,2,6,8,8a-hexahydro-β,δ-dihydroxy-1-naphtalene heptanoic acid (Alberts et al., 1980) of the formula (EP 0 022 478 A1)

Figure 00020001

The lactone form of lovastatin is used as an agent for reducing cholesterol level in blood (Scott M.G. and Vega G.L, 1985). It inhibits the biosynthesis of mevalonic acid by inhibition of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl A reductase coenzyme (HMG-CoA reductase, E.C. 1.1.1.34) (Zubay et al., 1984).

Prior Art

After the completed fermentation, lovastatin is present in the broth in the lactone form (compound I) and in the acid form (compound II). In the isolation process as disclosed in EP 0 033 536 A2, lovastatin is extracted from the broth with ethyl acetate. The extract is concentrated by vacuum distillation. Since lovastatin is present in the lactone form as well as in the acid form and only the lactone is of commercial interest, the acid form should be converted into the lactone. The lactonisation is carried out by the reflux of the concentrate in toluene at 106 °C for 2 hours. After the lactonisation is complete, the solution is concentrated to a small volume. A pure substance is obtained by means of purifying the concentrate on columns packed with silica gel, in the presence of solvents such as ethyl acetate or n-hexane. The collected fractions are again concentrated in vacuo and then pure lovastatin crystallizes in the lactone form.

Due to the sophisticated multi-step procedure and vigorous conditions applied during the isolation, the yields of lovastatin are generally low. Different solvents, which in part exhibit toxicity, are used such as benzene, toluene, acetonitrile or ethyl acetate. Hence working with these solvents endangers the health of the persons involved and poses a problem with respect to the environment.

https://www.google.com/patents/EP0702679B1?cl=en

The structure was confirmed by IR spectroscopy (Fig.1), mass spectroscopy (Fig. 2), NMR (Fig. 3) and UV spectroscopy (Fig. 4).

STR1 str2

IR spectrum of lovastatin.IR spectrum of lovastatin.

 Lovastatin

Title: Lovastatin
CAS Registry Number: 75330-75-5
CAS Name: (2S)-2-Methylbutanoic acid (1S,3R,7S,8S,8aR)-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-[(2R,4R)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-yl]ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl ester
Additional Names: (1S,3R,7S,8S,8aR)-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydro-3,7-dimethyl-8-[2-[(2R,4R)-tetrahydro-4-hydroxy-6-oxo-2H-pyran-2-yl]ethyl]-1-naphthalenyl (S)-2-methylbutyrate; 1,2,6,7,8,8a-hexahydro-b,d-dihydroxy-2,6-dimethyl-8-(2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)-1-naphthaleneheptanoic acid d-lactone; 2b,6a-dimethyl-8a-(2-methyl-1-oxobutoxy)mevinic acid lactone; mevinolin; 6a-methylcompactin; monacolin K
Manufacturers’ Codes: MK-803
Trademarks: Lovalip (Merck & Co.); Mevacor (Merck & Co.); Mevinacor (Merck & Co.); Mevlor (Merck & Co.); Sivlor (Sidus)
Molecular Formula: C24H36O5
Molecular Weight: 404.54
Percent Composition: C 71.26%, H 8.97%, O 19.77%
Literature References: Fungal metabolite; potent inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate controlling enzyme in cholesterol biosynthesis. Isoln from Monascus ruber: A. Endo, J. Antibiot. 32, 852 (1979); from Aspergillus terreus: R. L. Monaghan et al., US4231938 (1980 to Merck & Co.). Structure and biochemical properties: A. W. Alberts et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 3957 (1980). Total synthesis: M. Hirama, M. Iwashita, Tetrahedron Lett. 24, 1811 (1983). Review of syntheses: T. Rosen, C. H. Heathcock, Tetrahedron 42, 4909-4951 (1986). Biosynthesis: M. D. Greenspan, J. B. Yudkovitz, J. Bacteriol. 162, 704 (1985); R. N. Moore et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 107, 3694 (1985). HPLC determn in plasma and bile: R. J. Stubbs et al., J. Chromatogr. 383,438 (1986). Clinical pharmacology: S. M. Grundy, G. L. Vega, J. Lipid Res. 26, 1464 (1985). Clinical comparison with gemfibrozil,q.v.: M. J. Tikkanen et al., Am. J. Cardiol. 62, 35J (1988). Review of clinical experience: J. A. Tobert, Am. J. Cardiol. 62, 28J-34J (1988). Comprehensive description: G. S. Brenner et al., Anal. Profiles Drug Subs. Excip. 21, 277-305 (1992). Prevention of acute coronary events in men and women with average cholesterol levels: J. R. Downs et al., J. Am. Med. Ass

References

  1.  Neuvonen, PJ; Backman, JT; Niemi, M (2008). “Pharmacokinetic comparison of the potential over-the-counter statins simvastatin, lovastatin, fluvastatin and pravastatin.”. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 47 (7): 463–74. doi:10.2165/00003088-200847070-00003. PMID 18563955.
  2.  . Gunde-Cimerman N; Cimerman A. (Mar 1995). “Pleurotus fruiting bodies contain the inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase-lovastatin.”. Exp Mycol. 19 (1): 1–6.doi:10.1006/emyc.1995.1001. PMID 7614366.
  3. Jump up^ Liu J, Zhang J, Shi Y, Grimsgaard S, Alraek T, Fønnebø V (2006).“Chinese red yeast rice (Monascus purpureus) for primary hyperlipidemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials”.Chin Med. 1 (1): 4. doi:10.1186/1749-8546-1-4. PMC 1761143free to read.PMID 17302963.
  4. Jump up^ Zhao ZJ, Pan YZ, Liu QJ, Li XH (2013). “Exposure assessment of lovastatin in Pu-erh tea”. International Journal of Food Microbiology.164 (1): 26–31. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.03.018.PMID 23587710.
  5. ^ Jump up to:a b “Lovastatin”. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Retrieved 3 April 2011.
  6. ^ Jump up to:a b “Mevacor, Altoprev (lovastatin) dosing, indications, interactions, adverse effects, and more”. Medscape Reference. WebMD. Retrieved 17 March 2014.
  7. ^ Jump up to:a b “Lovastatin”. MedlinePlus. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 15 June 2012. Retrieved 1 December 2012.
  8. Jump up^ “Lovastatin”. LactMed. U.S. National Library of Medicine. Retrieved 1 December 2012.
  9. Jump up^ Stöppler, Melissa. “Mevacor Side Effects Center”. RxList. Retrieved 1 December 2012.
  10. Jump up^ David G. Bailey, J. Malcolm, O. Arnold, J. David Spence (1998). “Grapefruit juice-drug interactions”. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46 (2): 101–110. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00764.x. PMC 1873672. PMID 9723817.
  11. Jump up^ Kantola T, Kivistö KT, Neuvonen PJ (Apr 1998). “Grapefruit juice greatly increases serum concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin acid”. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 63 (4): 397–402. doi:10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90034-0. PMID 9585793.
  12. ^ Jump up to:a b Alberts AW (1998). “Discovery, biochemistry and biology of lovastatin”. The American Journal of Cardiology. 62 (15): 10J–15J.doi:10.1016/0002-9149(88)90002-1. PMID 3055919.
  13. Jump up^ Katz MS (2005). “Therapy insight: Potential of statins for cancer chemoprevention and therapy”. Nature Clinical Practice Oncology. 2(2): 82–9. doi:10.1038/ncponc0097. PMID 16264880.
  14. Jump up^ Rao S, Porter DC, Chen X, Herliczek T, Lowe M, Keyomarsi K (July 1999). “Lovastatin-mediated G1 arrest is through inhibition of the proteasome, independent of hydroxymethyl glutaryl-CoA reductase”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96 (14): 7797–802.doi:10.1073/pnas.96.14.7797. PMC 22141free to read. PMID 10393901.
  15. Jump up^ Alarcón J, Aguila S, Arancibia-Avila P, Fuentes O, Zamorano-Ponce E, Hernández M (Jan–Feb 2003). “Production and purification of statins from Pleurotus ostreatus (Basidiomycetes) strains”. Z Naturforsch C. 58 (1–2): 62–4. doi:10.1515/znc-2003-1-211.PMID 12622228.
  16. Jump up^ Vederas JC, Moore RN, Bigam G, Chan KJ (1985). “Biosynthesis of the hypocholesterolemic agent mevinolin by Aspergillus terreus. Determination of the origin of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen by 13C NMR and mass spectrometry”. J Am Chem Soc. 107 (12): 3694–701.doi:10.1021/ja00298a046.
  17. Jump up^ Alberts AW, Chen J, Kuron G, Hunt V, Huff J, Hoffman C, Rothrock J, Lopez M, Joshua H, Harris E, Patchett A, Monaghan R, Currie S, Stapley E, Albers-Schonberg G, Hensens O, Hirshfield J, Hoogsteen K, Liesch J, Springer J (July 1980). “Mevinolin: a highly potent competitive inhibitor of hydroxymethlglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase and a cholesterol-lowering agent”. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 77(7): 3957–61. doi:10.1073/pnas.77.7.3957. PMC 349746free to read.PMID 6933445.
  18. Jump up^ FDA Orange Book Detail for application N019643 showing approval for 20 mg tablets on Aug 31, 1987 and 40 mg tablets on Dec 14, 1988
  19. Jump up^ Endo, Akira (Oct 2004). “The origin of the statins”. Atheroscler. Suppl. 5 (3): 125–30.doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2004.08.033. PMID 15531285.
  20. ^ Jump up to:a b Bobek P, Ozdín L, Galbavý S (1998). “Dose- and time-dependent hypocholesterolemic effect of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) in rats”. Nutrition. 14 (3): 282–6. doi:10.1016/S0899-9007(97)00471-1. PMID 9583372.
  21. Jump up^ Hossain S, Hashimoto M, Choudhury EK, et al. (July 2003). “Dietary mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) ameliorates atherogenic lipid in hypercholesterolaemic rats”. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 30(7): 470–5. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1681.2003.03857.x.PMID 12823261.
  22. Jump up^ Bobek P, Galbavý S (October 1999). “Hypocholesterolemic and antiatherogenic effect of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) in rabbits”. Nahrung. 43 (5): 339–42. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3803(19991001)43:5<339::AID-FOOD339>3.0.CO;2-5.PMID 10555301.
  23. Jump up^ Opletal L, Jahodár L, Chobot V, et al. (December 1997). “Evidence for the anti-hyperlipidaemic activity of the edible fungus Pleurotus ostreatus”. Br. J. Biomed. Sci. 54 (4): 240–3. PMID 9624732.
  24. Jump up^ Bajaj M, Vadhera S, Brar AP, Soni GL (October 1997). “Role of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus florida) as hypocholesterolemic/antiatherogenic agent”. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 35(10): 1070–5. PMID 9475042.
  25. Jump up^ Bobek P, Ozdín L, Kuniak L, Hromadová M (March 1997). “[Regulation of cholesterol metabolism with dietary addition of oyster mushrooms (Pleurotus ostreatus) in rats with hypercholesterolemia]”.Cas. Lek. Cesk. (in Slovak). 136 (6): 186–90. PMID 9221192.
  26. Jump up^ Bobek P, Ozdín L, Kuniak L (August 1996). “Effect of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus Ostreatus) and its ethanolic extract in diet on absorption and turnover of cholesterol in hypercholesterolemic rat”.Nahrung. 40 (4): 222–4. doi:10.1002/food.19960400413.PMID 8810086.
  27. Jump up^ Bobek P, Ozdín O, Mikus M (1995). “Dietary oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) accelerates plasma cholesterol turnover in hypercholesterolaemic rat”. Physiol Res. 44 (5): 287–91.PMID 8869262.
  28. Jump up^ Bobek P, Ozdin L, Kuniak L (1995). “The effect of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus), its ethanolic extract and extraction residues on cholesterol levels in serum, lipoproteins and liver of rat”. Nahrung. 39(1): 98–9. doi:10.1002/food.19950390113. PMID 7898579.
  29. Jump up^ Bobek P, Ozdin L, Kuniak L (March 1994). “Mechanism of hypocholesterolemic effect of oyster mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) in rats: reduction of cholesterol absorption and increase of plasma cholesterol removal”. Z Ernahrungswiss. 33 (1): 44–50.doi:10.1007/BF01610577. PMID 8197787.
  30. Jump up^ Chorváthová V, Bobek P, Ginter E, Klvanová J (1993). “Effect of the oyster fungus on glycaemia and cholesterolaemia in rats with insulin-dependent diabetes”. Physiol Res. 42 (3): 175–9.PMID 8218150.
  31. Jump up^ Bobek P, Ginter E, Jurcovicová M, Kuniak L (1991). “Cholesterol-lowering effect of the mushroom Pleurotus ostreatus in hereditary hypercholesterolemic rats”. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 35 (4): 191–5.doi:10.1159/000177644. PMID 1897899.
  32. Jump up^ Khatun K, Mahtab H, Khanam PA, Sayeed MA, Khan KA (January 2007). “Oyster mushroom reduced blood glucose and cholesterol in diabetic subjects”. Mymensingh Med J. 16 (1): 94–9.doi:10.3329/mmj.v16i1.261. PMID 17344789.
  33. Jump up^ “FDA bans red yeast rice product” by Michael McCarthy, The Lancet, Volume 351, Issue 9116, Page 1637, 30 May 1998
  34. Jump up^ Cholesterol Treatment Upheld, The New York Times, February 18, 1999
  35. Jump up^ Coronary heart disease: MedLine Plus Medical Encyclopedia
  36. Jump up^ Endo, Akira; Kuroda M.; Tsujita Y. (December 1976). “ML-236A, ML-236B, and ML-236C, new inhibitors of cholesterogenesis produced by Penicillium citrinium”. Journal of Antibiotics (Tokyo). 29(12): 1346–8. doi:10.7164/antibiotics.29.1346. PMID 1010803.
  37. Jump up^ Witter, DJ; Vederas, JC (1996). “Putative Diels-Alder catalyzed cyclization during the biosynthesis of lovastatin”. J Org Chem. 61 (8): 2613–23. doi:10.1021/jo952117p. PMID 11667090.
  38. Jump up^ Hirama M, Vet M (1982). “A chiral total synthesis of compactin”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104 (15): 4251. doi:10.1021/ja00379a037.
  39. Jump up^ Hirama M, Iwashita; Iwashita, Mitsuko (1983). “Synthesis of (+)-Mevinolin starting from Naturally occurring building blocks and using an asymmetry inducing reaction”. Tetrahedron Lett. 24 (17): 1811–1812. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)81777-3.
  40. Jump up^ Javernik S, Kreft S, Strukelj B, Vrecer F (2001). “Oxidation of lovastatin in the solid state and its stabilization with natural antioxidants”. Die Pharmazie. 56 (9): 738–40. PMID 11593996.
  41. Jump up^ Hartig K, Beck E (2005). “Assessment of lovastatin application as tool in probing cytokinin-mediated cell cycle regulation”. Physiologia Plantarum. 125 (2): 260–267. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00556.x.
Lovastatin
Lovastatin.svg
Lovastatin3Dan.gif
Systematic (IUPAC) name
(1S,3R,7S,8S,8aR)-8-{2-[(2R,4R)-4-Hydroxy-6-oxooxan-2-yl]ethyl}-3,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,7,8,8a-hexahydronaphthalen-1-yl (2S)-2-methylbutanoate
Clinical data
Trade names Mevacor
AHFS/Drugs.com Monograph
MedlinePlus a688006
Pregnancy
category
  • US: X (Contraindicated)
Routes of
administration
Oral
Legal status
Legal status
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability <5%[1]
Protein binding >98%[1]
Metabolism Hepatic (CYP3A andCYP2C8 substrate)[1]
Biological half-life 2–5 hours[1]
Excretion Faeces (83%), urine (10%)[1]
Identifiers
CAS Number 75330-75-5 Yes
ATC code C10AA02 (WHO)
PubChem CID 53232
IUPHAR/BPS 2739
DrugBank DB00227 Yes
ChemSpider 48085 Yes
UNII 9LHU78OQFD Yes
KEGG D00359 Yes
ChEBI CHEBI:40303 Yes
ChEMBL CHEMBL503 Yes
Synonyms Monacolin K, Mevinolin
Chemical data
Formula C24H36O5
Molar mass 404.54 g/mol

////////////////

FDA published generic user fee for 2017: for ANDA, DMF, and for Facility (API, FDF)

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D's avatarDRUG REGULATORY AFFAIRS INTERNATIONAL

.

placeholder+image

http://www.raps.org/Regulatory-Focus/News/2016/07/26/25394/FDA-Lowers-ANDA-Fee-Rates-for-2017/

Generic drugmakers submitting abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs) and prior approval supplements (PAS) will see their US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) fee rates drop in 2017, though all other rates, including those for drug master files (DMF) and facility fees will increase when compared to 2016.

For FY 2017, the generic drug fee rates are: ANDA ($70,480, down from $76,030 in 2016), PAS ($35,240, down from $38,020 in 2016), DMF ($51,140, up from $42,170 in 2016), domestic active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) facility ($44,234, up from $40,867 in 2016), foreign API facility ($59,234, up from $55,867 in 2016), domestic finished dose formulation (FDF) facility ($258,646, up from $243,905), and foreign FDF facility ($273,646, up from $258,905 in 2016).

The new fees are effective 1 October 2016 and will remain in effect through 30 September 2017.

FDA explained the increases and decreases in fees, noting that for ANDA…

View original post 413 more words

Gemfibrozil

Gemfibrozil.svg

Gemfibrozil
CAS: 25812-30-0
 5-(2,5-Dimethylphenoxy)-2,2-dimethylpentanoic acid
2,2-dimethyl-5-(2,5-xylyloxy)valeric acid
Manufacturers’ Codes: CI-719
Trademarks: Decrelip (Ferrer); Genlip (Teofarma); Gevilon (Pfizer); Lipozid (Pfizer); Lipur (Pfizer); Lopid (Pfizer)
MF: C15H22O3
MW: 250.33
Percent Composition: C 71.97%, H 8.86%, O 19.17%
Properties: Crystals from hexane, mp 61-63°. bp0.02 158-159°. LD50 in mice, rats (mg/kg): 3162, 4786 orally (Kurtz).
Melting point: mp 61-63°
Boiling point: bp0.02 158-159°
Toxicity data: LD50 in mice, rats (mg/kg): 3162, 4786 orally (Kurtz)
Therap-Cat: Antilipemic.
 

Gemfibrozil

5-(2,5-Dimethylphenoxy)-2,2-dimethylpentanoic Acid

Gemfibrozil is classified as a fibric acid derivative and is used in the treatment of hyperlipidaemias. It has effects on plasma-lipid concentrations similar to those described under bezafibrate. The major effects of gemfibrozil have been a reduction in plasma-triglyceride concentrations and an increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations. A reduction in very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-triglyceride appears to be largely responsible for the fall in plasma triglyceride although reductions in HDL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-triglycerides have also been reported.
The effects of gemfibrozil on total cholesterol have been more variable: in general, LDL-cholesterol may be decreased in patients with pre-existing high concentrations and raised in those with low concentrations. The increase in HDL-cholesterol concentrations has resulted in complementary changes to the ratios of HDL-cholesterol to LDL-cholesterol and to total cholesterol. Gemfibrozil has successfully raised HDL-cholesterol concentrations in patients with isolated low levels of HDL-cholesterol but otherwise normal cholesterol concentrations.The Helsinki heart study assessed gemfibrozil for the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged men with hyperlipidaemia. The usual dose, by mouth, is 1.2 g daily in two divided doses given 30 min before the morning and evening meals. Gemfibrozil is available as tablets for oral administration (Lopid: USP).

IR (KBr, cm–1): 2959.03, 2919.78, 2877.65, 1709.42, 1613.44, 1586.60, 1511.07, 1473.81, 1414.01, 1387.89, 1317.61, 1286.34, 1271.91, 1214.39, 1159.26, 1048.83, 996.57, 803.75;

1H NMR (DMSO, 500 MHz, δ ppm): 1.12 (s, 6H), 1.60 and 1.67 (m, 4H), 2.08 (s, 3H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 3.90 (t, 2H), 6.62 (d, 1H), 6.70 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, 1H);

13C NMR and DEPT (DMSO, 500 MHz, δ ppm): 15.39 (CH3), 20.94 (CH3), 24.67 (CH2), 24.87 (CH3, CH3), 36.43 (CH2), 40.91 (C), 67.57 (CH2), 112.07 (CH), 120.45 (CH), 122.44 (C), 129.96 (CH), 135.93 (C), 156.43 (C), 178.56 (C);

MS M/Z (ESI): 251.16 [(MH)+].

STR1

Solvent:CDCl3Instrument Type:JEOLNucleus:1HFrequency:400 MHzChemical Shift Reference:TMS

 

1H NMR spectrum of C15H22O3 in CDCL3 at 400 MHz

Gemfibrozil is the generic name for an oral drug used to lower lipid levels. It belongs to a group of drugs known as fibrates. It is most commonly sold as the brand name, Lopid. Other brand names include Jezil and Gen-Fibro.

history

Gemfibrozil was selected from a series of related compounds synthesized in the laboratories of the American company Parke Davisin the late 1970s. It came from research for compounds that lower plasma lipid levels in humans and in animals.[1]

Actions

Therapeutic effects

Nontherapeutic effects and toxicities

Indications

Contraindications and precautions

  • Gemfibrozil should not be given to these patients:
    • Hepatic dysfunction
  • Gemfibrozil should be used with caution in these higher risk categories:
    • Biliary tract disease
    • Renal dysfunction
    • Pregnant women
    • Obese patients

Drug interactions

Environmental data

Gemfibrozil has been detected in biosolids (the solids remaining after wastewater treatment) at concentrations up to 2650 ng/g wet weight.[3] This indicates that it survives the wastewater treatment process.

SYNTHESIS

STR1

The sodium isobutyrate (I) is metallated with lithium diisopropylamide, and the resulting compound is alkylated with 3- (2,5-dimethylphenoxy) propyl bromide.

PATENT

Paul, L. C. 2,2-Dimethyl-ω-aryloxy alkanoic acids and salts and ester thereof. U.S. 3,674,836, 1972.

http://www.google.co.in/patents/US3674836

CLIP

Production of Gemfibrozil
(1)2,5-Dimethylphenol and 1-Bromo-3-chloropropane reaction of 1-(2,5-dimethylphenoxy)-3-chloropropane. The reaction is carried out in toluene, adding new clean off reflux 5h. Just as follows:

Production of Gemfibrozil

(2)N/A can be used to manufacture Gemfibrozil.

Production of Gemfibrozil

PAPER

Improved Process for Preparation of Gemfibrozil, an Antihypolipidemic

Chemical Research and Development, Aurobindo Pharma Ltd., Survey No. 71 and 72, Indrakaran (V), Sangareddy (M), Medak District-502329, Andhra Pradesh, India
Engineering Chemistry Department, AU College of Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam-530003, Andhra Pradesh, India
Org. Process Res. Dev., 2013, 17 (7), pp 963–966

An improved process for the preparation of gemfibrozil, an antihypolipodimic drug substance, with an overall yield of 80% and ∼99.9% purity (including three chemical reactions) is reported. Formation and control of possible impurities are also described. Finally, gemfibrozil is isolated from water without any additional solvent purification.

STR1

Literature References:

Serum lipid regulating agent. Prepn: P. L. Creger, DE 1925423; eidem, US 3674836 (1969, 1972, both to Parke, Davis).

Production: O. P. Goel, US 4126637 (1978 to Warner-Lambert).

Pharmacology: A. H. Kissebach et al.,Atherosclerosis 24, 199 (1976); M. T. Kahonen et al., ibid. 32, 47 (1979).

Series of articles on metabolism, clinical pharmacology, kinetics and toxicology: Proc. R. Soc. Med. 69, Suppl 2, 1-120 (1976).

Toxicity data: S. M. Kurtz et al., ibid. 15.

Clinical trial in hyperlipidemia: J. E. Lewis et al., Pract. Cardiol. 9, 99 (1983).

Clinical reduction of cardiovascular risk in patients with low HDL levels: H. B. Rubins et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 410 (1999).

References

External links

Gemfibrozil
Gemfibrozil.svg
Systematic (IUPAC) name
5-(2,5-dimethylphenoxy)-2,2-dimethyl-pentanoic acid
Clinical data
Trade names Lopid
AHFS/Drugs.com Monograph
MedlinePlus a686002
Pregnancy
category
  • Category C
Routes of
administration
Oral
Legal status
Legal status
  • By Prescription
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability Close to 100%
Protein binding 95%
Metabolism Hepatic (CYP3A4)
Biological half-life 1.5 hours
Excretion Renal 94%
Feces 6%
Identifiers
CAS Number 25812-30-0 Yes
ATC code C10AB04 (WHO)
PubChem CID 3463
IUPHAR/BPS 3439
DrugBank DB01241 Yes
ChemSpider 3345 Yes
UNII Q8X02027X3 Yes
KEGG D00334 Yes
ChEBI CHEBI:5296 Yes
ChEMBL CHEMBL457 Yes
Chemical data
Formula C15H22O3
Molar mass 250.333 g/mol

LOPID® (gemfibrozil tablets, USP) is a lipid regulating agent. It is available as tablets for oral administration. Each tablet contains 600 mg gemfibrozil. Each tablet also contains calcium stearate, NF; candelilla wax, FCC; microcrystalline cellulose, NF; hydroxypropyl cellulose, NF; hypromellose, USP; methylparaben, NF; Opaspray white; polyethylene glycol, NF; polysorbate 80, NF; propylparaben, NF; colloidal silicon dioxide, NF; pregelatinized starch, NF. The chemical name is 5-(2,5-dimethylphenoxy)2,2-dimethylpentanoic acid, with the following structural formula:

 

LOPID® (gemfibrozil) Structural Formula Illustration

The empirical formula is C15H22O3 and the molecular weight is 250.35; the solubility in water and acid is 0.0019% and in dilute base it is greater than 1%. The melting point is 58° –61°C. Gemfibrozil is a white solid which is stable under ordinary conditions.

/////////Gemfibrozil,  Antilipemic,  Fibrates, 25812-30-0,

CC1=CC(OCCCC(C)(C)C(O)=O)=C(C)C=C1

GSK-2041706A, Potent GPR119 Receptor Agonists

str1

STR1

SCHEMBL387520.png

str1

GSK-2041706A

[2-([(1S)-1-(1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl)ethyl]oxy)-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazine]

2-[((1S)-1-{1-[3-(1-Methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl)oxy]-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazine

Potent GPR119 Receptor Agonists

CAS 1032824-43-3

Molecular Formula: C23H29N5O4S
Molecular Weight: 471.57246 g/mol

G protein-coupled receptor 119 (GPR119) is a G protein-coupled receptor expressed predominantly in pancreatic β-cells and gastrointestinal enteroendocrine cells. Metformin is a first-line treatment of type 2 diabetes, with minimal weight loss in humans. In this study, we investigated the effects of GSK2041706 [2-([(1S)-1-(1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl)ethyl]oxy)-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazine], a GPR119 agonist, and metformin as monotherapy or in combination on body weight in a diet-induced obese (DIO) mouse model. Relative to vehicle controls, 14-day treatment with GSK2041706 (30 mg/kg b.i.d.) or metformin at 30 and 100 mg/kg b.i.d. alone caused a 7.4%, 3.5%, and 4.4% (all P < 0.05) weight loss, respectively. The combination of GSK2041706 with metformin at 30 or 100 mg/kg resulted in a 9.5% and 16.7% weight loss, respectively. The combination of GSK2041706 and metformin at 100 mg/kg caused a significantly greater weight loss than the projected additive weight loss of 11.8%. This body weight effect was predominantly due to a loss of fat. Cumulative food intake was reduced by 17.1% with GSK2041706 alone and 6.6% and 8.7% with metformin at 30 and 100 mg/kg, respectively. The combination of GSK2041706 with metformin caused greater reductions in cumulative food intake (22.2% at 30 mg/kg and 37.5% at 100 mg/kg) and higher fed plasma glucagon-like peptide 1 and peptide tyrosine tyrosine levels and decreased plasma insulin and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide levels compared with their monotherapy groups. In addition, we characterized the effect of GSK2041706 and metformin as monotherapy or in combination on neuronal activation in the appetite regulating centers in fasted DIO mice. In conclusion, our data demonstrate the beneficial effects of combining a GPR119 agonist with metformin in the regulation of body weight in DIO mice.

Diabetes mellitus is an ever-increasing threat to human health. For example, in the United States current estimates maintain that about 16 million people suffer from diabetes mellitus.

Type I diabetes, also known as insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), is caused by the autoimmune destruction of the insulin producing pancreatic β-cells, and necessitates regular administration of exogenous insulin. Without insulin, cells cannot absorb sugar (glucose), which they need to produce energy. Symptoms of Type I diabetes usually start in childhood or young adulthood. People often seek medical help because they are seriously ill from sudden symptoms of high blood sugar (hyperglycemia).

Type II diabetes, also known as non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), manifests with an inability to adequately regulate blood-glucose levels. Type II diabetes may be characterized by a defect in insulin secretion or by insulin resistance, namely those that suffer from Type II diabetes have too little insulin or cannot use insulin effectively. Insulin resistance refers to the inability of body tissues to respond properly to endogenous insulin. Insulin resistance develops because of multiple factors, including genetics, obesity, increasing age, and having high blood sugar over long periods of time. Type II diabetes, sometimes called mature or adult onset diabetes, can develop at any age, but most commonly becomes apparent during adulthood. The incidence of Type II diabetes in children, however, is rising

In diabetics, glucose levels build up in the blood and urine causing excessive urination, thirst, hunger, and problems with fat and protein metabolism. If left untreated, diabetes mellitus may cause life-threatening complications, including blindness, kidney failure, and heart disease.

Type II diabetes accounts for approximately 90-95% of diabetes cases, killing about 193,000 U.S. residents each year. Type II diabetes is the seventh leading cause of all deaths. In Western societies, Type II diabetes currently affects 6% of the adult population with world-wide frequency expected to grow by 6% per annum.

Although there are certain inheritable traits that may predispose particular individuals to developing Type II diabetes, the driving force behind the current increase in incidence of the disease is the increased sedentary lifestyle, diet, and obesity now prevalent in developed countries. About 80% of diabetics with Type II diabetes are significantly overweight. As noted above, an increasing number of young people are developing the disease. Type II diabetes is now internationally recognized as one of the major threats to human health in the 21stcentury.

Type II diabetes currently is treated at several levels. A first level of therapy is through the use of diet and/or exercise, either alone or in combination with therapeutic agents. Such agents may include insulin or pharmaceuticals that lower blood glucose levels. About 49% of individuals with Type II diabetes require oral medication(s), about 40% of individuals require insulin injections or a combination of insulin injections and oral medication(s), and about 10% of individuals may use diet and exercise alone.

Current therapies for diabetes mellitus include: insulin; insulin secretagogues, such as sulphonylureas, which increase insulin production from pancreatic-cells; glucose-lowering effectors, such as metformin which reduce glucose production from the liver; activators of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor—(PPAR-), such as the thiazolidinediones, which enhances insulin action; and α-glucosidase inhibitors which interfere with gut glucose production. There are, however, deficiencies associated with currently available treatments, including hypoglycemic episodes, weight gain, loss in responsiveness to therapy over time, gastrointestinal problems, and edema.

There are several areas at which research is being targeted in order to bring new, more effective, therapies to the marketplace. For example, on-going research includes exploring a reduction in excessive hepatic glucose production, enhancing the pathway by which insulin transmits its signal to the cells such that they take up glucose, enhancing glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from the pancreatic-cells, and targeting obesity and associated problems with fat metabolism and accumulation.

One particular target is GPR119. GPR119 is a member of the rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors. In addition to the “GPR119” identifier, several other identifiers exist, including but not limited to RUP 3, Snorf 25, 19 AJ, GPR 116 (believed to be erroneous), AXOR 20, and PS1. GPR119 is expressed in human gastrointestinal regions and in human islets. Activation of GPR119 has been demonstrated to stimulate intracellular cAMP and lead to glucose-dependent GLP-1 and insulin secretion. See, T. Soga et al., Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 326 (2005) 744-751, herein incorporated by reference with regard to a background understanding of GPR119.

In type 2 diabetes the action of GLP-1 on the β-cell is maintained, although GLP-1 secretion, itself, is reduced. More recently, therefore, much research has been focused on GLP-1. Studies show glucose-lowering effects in addition to GLP-1’s ability to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion including, but not limited to, an inhibition of the release of the hormone glucagon following meals, a reduction in the rate at which nutrients are absorbed into the bloodstream, and a reduction of food intake. Studies demonstrate that treatments to increase GLP-1, therefore, may be used for a variety of conditions and disorders including but not limited to metabolic disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, inflammatory diseases, psychosomatic, depressive, and neuropsychiatric disease including but not limited to diabetes mellitus (Type 1 and Type 2), metabolic syndrome, obesity, appetite control and satiety, weight loss, stress, inflammation, myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, Alzheimer’s Disease, and other diseases of the central nervous system.

The use of exogenous GLP-1 in clinical treatment is severely limited, however, due to its rapid degradation by the protease DPP-IV. There are multiple GLP-1 mimetics in development for type 2 diabetes that are reported in the literature, all are modified peptides, which display longer half-lives than endogenous GLP-1. For example, the product sold under the tradename BYETTA® is the first FDA-approved agent of this new class of medications. These mimetics, however, require injection. An oral medication that is able to elevate GLP-1 secretion is desirable. Orally available inhibitors of DPP-IV, which result in elevation in intact GLP-1, are now available, such as sitagliptin, marketed under the brand name JANUVIA®. Nevertheless, a molecule which may stimulate GLP-1 secretion would provide a therapeutic benefit. A molecule which could stimulate both GLP-1 secretion and insulin secretion through effects on the L-cell and direct effects on the β-cell would hold much promise for type 2 diabetes therapy.

The present invention identifies agonists of GPR119 which increase glucose-disposal in part through elevation of GIP, GLP-1, and insulin. Moreover, studies demonstrate that GPR119 agonists such as the compounds of the present invention can stimulate incretins independently of glucose. GIP and GLP-1 are peptides, known as incretins, secreted from enteroendocrine K and L cells, respectively, in response to ingestion of nutrients, and have a wide variety of physiological effects that have been described in numerous publications over the past two decades. See, for example, Bojanowska, E. et al.,Med. Sci. Monit., 2005, August 11(8): RA271-8; Perry, T. et al., Curr. Alzheimer Res., 2005, July 2(3): 377-85; and Meier, J. J. et al.,Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., 2005, March-April; 21(2); 91-117 (each herein incorporated by reference with regard to a background understanding of incretins). Moreover, although the mechanisms regulating GLP-1 secretion remain unclear, the initial rapid rise in GLP-1 following a meal may be a result of hormonal stimulation of neuronal afferents involving GIP. See, for example, J. N. Roberge and P. L. Brubaker, Endocrinology 133 (1993), pp. 233-240 (herein incorporated by reference with regard to such teaching). Furthermore, later increases in GLP-1 may involve direct activation of L-cells by nutrients in the distal small-intestine and the colon. GIP and GLP-1 are potent stimulators of the body’s ability to produce insulin in response to elevated levels of blood sugar. In Type 2 diabetes, patients display a decreased responsiveness to GIP but not GLP-1, with respect to its ability to stimulate insulin secretion. The mechanism behind the decreased responsiveness to GIP remains unclear since type 2 diabetics retain sensitivity to a bolus administration of GIP but not to a continuous infusion (Meier et al. 2004 Diabetes 53 S220-S224). Moreover recent studies with a long-acting fatty-acid derivative of GIP showed beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis in ob/ob mice following 14 days of treatment (Irwin N. et al. (2006) J. Med. Chem. 49, 1047-1054.)

Agonists to GPR119 may be of therapeutic value for diabetes and associated conditions, particularly type II diabetes, obesity, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome X, hyperlipidemia, hypercholesterolemia, and atherosclerosis.

NMR

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.91 (bs, 1H), 8.40 (bs, 1 H), 8.28 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.02 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 5.17–5.09 (m, 1H), 4.09–3.95 (m, 2H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 3.16–2.99 (m, 2H), 2.80 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 1H), 1.98–1.85 (m, 2H), 1.83–1.70 (m, 1H), 1.47–1.33 (m, 2H), 1.31 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H), 1.17 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 6H).

13C NMR (100.6 MHz, DMSO-d6) 175.3, 170.9, 159.8, 142.6, 141.2, 141.0, 139.1, 135.7, 128.1, 126.9, 75.7, 46.0, 45.9, 44.0, 40.2, 27.1, 27.0, 26.7, 20.7, 16.9.

HRMS calcd for C23H30N5O4S (M + H)+ 472.2013, found, 472.2009.

str1

str1

PATENT

Jing Fang, Jun Tang, Andrew J. Carpenter,Gregory Peckham, Christopher R. Conlee,Kien S. Du, Subba Reddy Katamreddy,

http://www.google.co.ug/patents/US20120077812

Example 156(±)-2-[(1-{1-[3-(1-Methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl)oxy]-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazineFigure US20120077812A1-20120329-C00180

Step 1: A solution of 3-(1-methylethyl)-5-(trichloromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole (prepared as in Example 158, Alternative synthesis, Step 3, 179 g, 0.78 mol) in MeOH (300 mL) was treated with 4-piperidinemethanol (108 g, 0.94 mol) and stirred and heated at 50° C. overnight. The solvent was removed and the residue was purified by flash chromatography on a silica gel column to give {1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}methanol (60 g, 34%) as a pale yellow oil.

Step 2: A solution of {1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}methanol (1.50 g, 6.66 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (50 mL) at 0° C. was treated with Dess-Martin periodinane (2.91 g, 6.66 mmol). The reaction mixture was warmed to ambient temperature and stirred overnight. The reaction was quenched with aqueous 20% Na2S2O3(100 mL) and aqueous saturated NaHCO3 (100 mL) and then stirred for 10 minutes. The CH2Cl2 layer was separated and washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated to give the crude product as a cloudy colorless oil. The crude product was dissolved in 100 mL of 1:1 EtOAc/hexanes, filtered through a pad of silica gel, washed with 200 mL of 1:1 EtOAc/hexanes. The filtrate was concentrated to give 1.07 g (72%) of 1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinecarbaldehyde as a clear colorless oil, which was used without further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.68 (s, 1H), 4.15-4.00 (m, 2H), 3.30-3.20 (m, 2H), 2.86 (septet, 1H, J=7.0 Hz), 2.55-2.45 (m, 1H), 2.10-1.95 (m, 2H), 1.80-1.65 (m, 2H), 1.26 (d, 6H, J=6.8 Hz).

Step 3: (±)-1-{1-[3-(1-Methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl methanesulfonate (0.74 g, 49%) was prepared as a light brown oil from 1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinecarbaldehyde (1.07 g, 4.79 mmol) and methylmagnesium bromide (3M in Et2O, 3.51 mL, 10.54 mmol) then methanesulfonyl chloride (0.22 mL, 2.81 mmol) and Et3N (0.66 mL, 4.68 mmol) in a manner similar to Example 139, Steps 1-2. The crude product was used without further purification. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.70-4.60 (m, 1H), 4.30-4.15 (m, 2H), 3.10-2.95 (m, 5H), 2.87 (septet, 1H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.95-1.70 (m, 3H), 1.55-1.35 (m, 5H), 1.26 (d, 6H, J=6.8 Hz).

Step 4: The title compound (0.212 g, 26%) was prepared as a white foam from 5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]-2-pyrazinol (and tautomers thereof) (prepared as in Example 145, Steps 1-2, 0.43 g, 1.72 mmol), (±)-1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl methanesulfonate (0.74 g, 2.32 mmol) and K2CO3 (0.48 g, 3.44 mmol) in DMF (15 mL) in a manner similar to Example 152, Steps 3. The crude product was purified by chromatography on an ISCO silica gel column using 0 to 25% EtOAc/CH2Cl2, followed by chromatography on a silica gel column eluted with 50% EtOAc/hexanes to give (±)-2-[(1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethypoxy]-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazine as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.53 (s, 1H), 8.25 (s, 1H), 8.10 (d, 2H, J=8.5 Hz), 8.02 (d, 2H, J=8.5 Hz), 5.20-5.10 (m, 1H), 4.35-4.20 (m, 2H), 3.15-3.00 (m, 5H), 2.91 (septet, 1H, J=7.0 Hz), 2.00-1.80 (m, 3H), 1.60-1.40 (m, 2H), 1.34 (d, 3H, J=6.1 Hz), 1.28 (d, 6H, J=7.1 Hz); LRMS (ESI), m/z 472 (M+H).

Example 1572-[((1R)-1-{1-[3-(1-Methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl)oxy]-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazinFigure US20120077812A1-20120329-C00181

The racemic 2-[(1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl)oxy]-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazine (prepared as in Example 156) was subjected to Chiral HPLC [column: AS-H, column mobile phase: 70% CO2: 30% MeOH (2 mL/min), pressure 140 bar, temperature 40° C., 215 nm] analysis and then separated to give two (R and S) enantiomers. The title compound was isolated as an off-white solid with Tr of 23.42 min (first eluting peak). The (R) absolute stereochemistry was assigned by Ab initio VCD analysis.

Example 158

2-[((1S)-1-{1-[3-(1-Methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl)oxy]-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazineFigure US20120077812A1-20120329-C00182

The racemic 2-[(1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl)oxy]-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazine (prepared as in Example 156) was subjected to Chiral HPLC [column: AS-H, column mobile phase: 70% CO2: 30% MeOH (2 mL/min), pressure 140 bar, temperature 40° C., 215 nm] analysis and then separated to give two (R and S) enantiomers. The title compound was isolated as an off-white solid with Tr of 25.83 min (second eluting peak). The (S) absolute stereochemistry was assigned by Ab initio VCD analysis. Alternative preparation from enantiomerically enriched material:

Step 1: Triethylamine (315 mL, 2.26 mol) was added dropwise to formic acid (150 mL, 3.91 mol) with overhead stirring while maintaining the internal temperature below 60° C. with ice-bath cooling. Neat 4-acetylpyridine (100 mL, 0.904 mol) was then added rapidly while maintaining the temperature below 50° C. Following this addition, the reaction was allowed to cool to 28° C. and the chiral ruthenium catalyst [N-[(1R,2R)-2-(amino-N)-1,2-diphenylethyl]-2,4,6-trimethylbenzenesulfonamidato-N]chloro[(1,2,3,4,5,6-n)-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)benzene]ruthenium (CAS#177552-91-9; for catalyst preparation, see: Uematsu, N.; Fujii, A.; Hashiguchi, S.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R.; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4916-4917) (3 g, 4.46 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred under house vacuum for 4 h and then overnight under an atmosphere of nitrogen. The reaction mixture was added dropwise to a stirred solution of 10% Na2CO3 (4 L) and then extracted with EtOAc (3×1 L). The combined EtOAc layers were washed once with brine (1 L), treated with MgSO4 and Darco G-60 decolorizing charcoal and filtered through a 100 g plug of silica gel washing with 10% MeOH/EtOAc (1 L). The filtrate was concentrated to provide a dark oil that crystallized upon standing. The solid was dissolved in warm t-butyl methyl ether (250 mL) and the warm solution was filtered to remove a small amount of insoluble material. The filtrate was allowed to stir with cooling to room temperature and then to −15° C. The solids were collected by filtration, washing with cold t-butyl methyl ether and heptane, and then dried under high vacuum to yield (1R)-1-(4-pyridinyl)ethanol as a dark beige solid (62 g, 52.9% yield). This solid material was 96% ee based on chiral HPLC(HPLC conditions: AS-H column, 5% MeOH/CO2, 40° C., 140 bar, 2 mL/min). The filtrate was combined with the insoluble solid from the crystallization and concentrated in vacuo to yield additional (1R)-1-(4-pyridinyl)ethanol as a dark oil (37.5 g, 32% yield). This oily material was 78% ee based on chiral HPLC (see HPLC conditions above). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 8.47-8.43 (m, 2H), 7.32-7.28 (m, 2H), 5.37 (d, 1H, J=4.4 Hz), 4.72-4.64 (m, 1H), 1.44 (d, 3H, J=6.6 Hz).

Step 2: A solution of (1R)-1-(4-pyridinyl)ethanol (37 g, 0.3 mol, 78% ee) in MeOH (2 L) was charged with PtO2 (5 g) under nitrogen atmosphere followed by acetic acid (19 mL). The mixture was evacuated and purged with hydrogen several times and then stirred under an atmosphere of hydrogen for 2 d at room temperature. The mixture was filtered to remove catalyst and the filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and triturated with EtOAc to yield a cream-colored solid which was collected by filtration. The filter cake was dissolved in MeOH (500 mL) and 50% NaOH (15.8 g) was added. The resulting solution was stirred at 25° C. for 30 min and concentrated. The resulting solid was triturated with Et2O (700 mL) and stirred at 25° C. for 30 min, the solids were removed by filtration and the filtrate was dried over MgSO4 and filtered again. The final filtrate was concentrated to yield (1R)-1-(4-piperidinyl)ethanol (22 g, 57% yield) as a light beige solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.50 (quint, 1H, J=6.3 Hz), 3.13-3.01 (m, 2H), 2.61-2.47 (m, 2H), 1.88 (br, 2H), 1.84-1.73 (m, 1H), 1.63-1.52 (m, 1H), 1.41-1.27 (m, 1H), 1.23-1.05 (m, 2H), 1.13 (d, 3H, J=6.2 Hz).

Step 3: A stirred solution of N-hydroxy-2-methylpropanimidamide (16.33 g, 160 mmol) in pyridine (16.81 mL, 208 mmol) and dichloromethane (165 mL) at −15° C. was treated with trichloroacetyl chloride (19.63 mL, 176 mmol) over 40 min. The reaction was allowed to warm to ambient temperature and stirred for 42 h. Water (100 mL) was added and the reaction was stirred for 30 min. The dichloromethane was removed and the residue was diluted with water (50 mL) and extracted with ether (300 mL). The ether layer was washed with water, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated to afford 3-(1-methylethyl)-5-(trichloromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole (28.0 g, 76% yield) as an orange liquid.1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 3.13 (septet, 1H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.36 (d, 6H, J=7.0 Hz).

Step 4: A solution of 3-(1-methylethyl)-5-(trichloromethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole (25.8 g, 112 mmol) and (1R)-1-(4-piperidinyl)ethanol (13.4 g, 104 mmol) in MeOH (15 mL) was stirred at ambient temperature under a stream of nitrogen for 7 days. The reaction was diluted with MeOH (40 mL), cooled in an ice bath and 1N NaOH (25 mL) was added. The mixture was allowed to warm to ambient temperature and stir for 1 h. The reaction was partitioned in EtOAc (300 mL)/1N NaOH (75 mL) and the layers were separated. The aqueous layer was saturated with NaCl and extracted with EtOAc (200 mL). The combined EtOAc layers were dried over MgSO4, concentrated and placed under high vacuum for 18 h to afford (1R)-1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethanol (16.75 g, 68%) as an orange oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 4.14 (m, 2H), 3.57 (quint, 1H, J=6.3 Hz), 2.98 (m, 2H), 2.83 (septet, 1H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.90 (m, 1H), 1.86 (br, 1H), 1.67 (m, 1H), 1.45 (m, 1H), 1.33 (m, 2H), 1.23 (d, 6H, J=7.0 Hz), 1.16 (d, 3H, J=6.3 Hz); LRMS (ESI), m/z 240 (M+H).

Step 5: A solution of (1R)-1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethanol (1.68 g, 7.0 mmol) in dichloromethane (100 mL) at 0° C. was treated with Et3N (1.98 mL, 14.0 mmol) followed by methanesulfonyl chloride (0.66 mL, 8.4 mmol). The mixture was stirred at 0° C. for 1 h, then at room temperature for 2 h. The mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (50 mL), washed with 1M NaH2PO4 (75 mL×2) and brine, and dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated to give (1R)-1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl methanesulfonate (2.23 g, 7.0 mmol, 100% yield) as a brown oil, which was used without further purification.

Step 6: A mixture of 5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]-2-pyrazinol (and tautomers thereof) (prepared as in Example 145, Step 2, 1.3 g, 5.19 mmol), (1R)-1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl methanesulfonate (2.23 g, 7.0 mmol, 70% ee) and K2CO3 (1.45 g, 10.4 mmol) in DMF (35 mL) was stirred at 100° C. in a preheated oil bath overnight. The mixture was cooled to ambient temperature, treated with water, and the mixture was extracted with EtOAc (75 mL×2). The combined organic extracts were washed with water, brine and dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated to a brown oil, which was by chromatography on a silica gel column eluted with 50% EtOAc/hexanes followed by chromatography on an ISCO silica gel column using 0 to 60% EtOAc/hexanes to give 2-[((1S)-1-{1-[3-(1-methylethyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]-4-piperidinyl}ethyl)oxy]-5-[4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl]pyrazine (0.73 g, 70% ee, 30%) as a white solid. The solid was subjected to chiral separation (similar to conditions used above for Example 158) to yield 0.30 g of the title compound as a white solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.53 (d, 1H, J=1.3 Hz), 8.25 (d, 1H, J=1.3 Hz), 8.10 (d, 2H, J=8.3 Hz), 8.02 (d, 2H, J=8.5 Hz), 5.20-5.10 (m, 1H), 4.35-4.20 (m, 2H), 3.15-3.00 (m, 5H), 2.90 (septet, 1H, J=7.0 Hz), 2.00-1.80 (m, 3H), 1.60-1.40 (m, 2H), 1.34 (d, 3H, J=6.3 Hz), 1.28 (d, 6H, J=6.9 Hz); LRMS (ESI), m/z 472 (M+H).

Paper

Development of Large-Scale Routes to Potent GPR119 Receptor Agonists

Richard T. Matsuoka*, Eric E. Boros#, Andrew D. Brown, Kae M. Bullock, Will L. Canoy, Andrew J. Carpenter#, Jeremy D. Cobb, Shannon E. Condon, Nicole M. Deschamps, Vassil I. Elitzin, Greg Erickson,Jing M. Fang#, David H. Igo§, Biren K. Joshi, Istvan W. Kaldor#, Mark B. Mitchell, Gregory E. Peckham#, Daniel W. Reynolds, Matthew C. Salmon, Matthew J. Sharp, Elie A. Tabet#, Jennifer F. Toczko, Lianming Michael Wu, and Xiao-ming M. Zhou

API Chemistry Department, Analytical Science & Development Department, #Medicinal Chemistry Department, and§Particle Sciences and Engineering Department, GlaxoSmithKline, 709 Swedeland Road, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406, United States
Org. Process Res. Dev., Article ASAP
Publication Date (Web): July 13, 2016
Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society

Abstract

Abstract Image

Practical and scalable syntheses were developed that were used to prepare multikilogram batches of GSK1292263A (1) and GSK2041706A (15), two potent G protein-coupled receptor 119 (GPR119) agonists. Both syntheses employed relatively cheap and readily available starting materials, and both took advantage of an SNAr synthetic strategy.

Patent ID Date Patent Title
US2012077812 2012-03-29 BICYCLIC COMPOUNDS AND USE AS ANTIDIABETICS
US8101634 2012-01-24 BICYCLIC COMPOUNDS AND USE AS ANTIDIABETICS

/////////////GSK2041706A, GSK 2041706A, GSK-2041706A, GSK2041706, GSK 2041706, GSK-2041706

O=S(c4ccc(c3cnc(OC(C2CCN(c1nc(C(C)C)no1)CC2)C)cn3)cc4)(C)=O

ANIDULAFUNGIN

Anidulafungin Molecular Structure 2.png

OR

Anidulafungin

V-Echinocandin

CAS Number 166663-25-8

N-[(3S,6S,9S,11R,15S,18S,20R,21R,24S,25S,26S)-6-[(1S,2R)-1,2-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-11,20,21,25-tetrahydroxy-3,15-bis[(1R)-1-hydroxyethyl]-26-methyl-2,5,8,14,17,23-hexaoxo-1,4,7,13,16,22-hexaazatricyclo[22.3.0.09,13]heptacosan-18-yl]- 4-{4-[4-(pentyloxy)phenyl]phenyl}benzamide

  • LY-307853
  • LY-329960
  • LY-333006
  • LY303366
  • VEC
  • VER-002

1H NMR (700 MHz, d6-DMSO) δ 0.91 (t, 3H), 1.12 (d, 3H), 1.36 (m, 2H), 1.41 (m, 2H), 1.74 (p, 2H), 1.88 and 1.97 (overlapped, 2H), 3.85 (overlapped, 1H), 4.01 (t, 2H), 4.35 (overlapped, 1H), 4.44 (m, 1H), 4.76 (m, 1H), 4.80 (m, 1H), 5.02 (m, 1H), 5.07 (d, 1H), 5.52 (d, 1H), 7.04 (d, 1H), 7.66 (d, 1H), 7.74 (d, 1H), 7.80 (d, 1H), 7.82 (d, 1H), 7.97 (d, 1H), 8.01 (d, 1H), 8.14 (broad s, 1H), 8.60 (d, 1H). IR (cm−1)

KBr νmax; 3450 (O−H), 2932 (C−H), 2871 (C−H), 1632 (C═O), 1517 (Ar), 1488 (Ar), 1248 (C−O), 821 (C−H out-of-plane bending Ar 2 adj H’s).

Anidulafungin (brand names: Eraxis (in U.S. and Russia), Ecalta (in Europe)) is a semisynthetic echinocandin used as anantifungal drug. Anidulafungin was originally manufactured and submitted for FDA approval by Vicuron Pharmaceuticals.[1] Pfizeracquired the drug upon its acquisition of Vicuron in the fall of 2005.[2] Pfizer gained approval by the Food and Drug Administration(FDA) on February 21, 2006;[3] it was previously known as LY303366. Preliminary evidence indicates it has a similar safety profile tocaspofungin. Anidulafungin has proven efficacy against esophageal candidiasis, but its main use will probably be in invasive Candidainfection;[4][5][6] it may also have application in treating invasive Aspergillus infection. It is a member of the class of antifungal drugs known as the echinocandins; its mechanism of action is by inhibition of (1→3)-β-D-glucan synthase, an enzyme important to the synthesis of the fungal cell wall.

Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

Anidulafungin significantly differs from other antifungals in that it undergoes chemical degradation to inactive forms at body pH and temperature. Because it does not rely on enzymatic degradation or hepatic or renal excretion, the drug is safe to use in patients with any degree of hepatic or renal impairment.[7]

Distribution: 30–50 L. Protein binding: 84%.

Anidulafungin is not evidently metabolized by the liver. This specific drug undergoes slow chemical hydrolysis to an open-ring peptide which lacks antifungal activity. The half-life of the drug is 27 hours. Thirty percent is excreted in the feces (10% as unchanged drug). Less than 1% is excreted in the urine.[8][9][10]

Mechanism of action

Anidulafungin inhibits glucan synthase, an enzyme important in the formation of (1→3)-β-D-glucan, a major fungal cell wall component. Glucan synthase is not present in mammalian cells, so it is an attractive target for antifungal activity.[11]

Semisynthesis

Anidulafungin is manufactured via semisynthesis. The starting material is echinocandin B (a lipopeptide fermentation product ofAspergillus nidulans or the closely related species, A. rugulosus), which undergoes deacylation (cleavage of the linoleoyl side chain) by the action of a deacylase enzyme from the bacterium Actinoplanes utahensis;[12] in three subsequent synthetic steps, including a chemical reacylation, the antifungal drug anidulafungin[11][13] is synthesized.

Aspergillus nidulans. Anidulafungin is an echinocandin, a class of antifungal drugs that inhibits the synthesis of 1,3-β-D-glucan, an essential component of fungal cell walls.

ERAXIS (anidulafungin) is 1-[(4R,5R)-4,5-dihydroxy-N -[[4“-(pentyloxy)[1,1′:4′,1”-terphenyl]-4-yl]carbonyl]-L-ornithine]echinocandin B. Anidulafungin is a white to off-white powder that is practically insoluble in water and slightly soluble in ethanol. In addition to the active ingredient, anidulafungin, ERAXIS for Injection contains the following inactive ingredients:

50 mg/vialfructose (50 mg), mannitol (250 mg), polysorbate 80 (125 mg), tartaric acid (5.6 mg), and sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid for pH adjustment.

100 mg/vial – fructose (100 mg), mannitol (500 mg), polysorbate 80 (250 mg), tartaric acid (11.2 mg), and sodium hydroxide and/or hydrochloric acid for pH adjustment.

The empirical formula of anidulafungin is C58H73N7O17 and the formula weight is 1140.3. The structural formula is

ERAXIS™ (anidulafung in) Structural Formula Illustration

Prior to administration, ERAXIS for Injection requires reconstitution with sterile Water for Injection and subsequent dilution with either 5% DextroseInjection, USP or 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP (normal saline).

SYNTHESIS

J MED CHEM 1995, 38 3271-3281

Semisynthetic Chemical Modification of the Antifungal Lipopeptide …

pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm00017a012

by M Debono – ‎1995 – ‎Cited by 113 – ‎Related articles

Aug 1, 1995 – J. Med. Chem. , 1995, 38 (17), pp 3271–3281. DOI: 10.1021/jm00017a012 … Journal ofMedicinal Chemistry 2001 44 (16), 2671-2674

Echinocandin B (ECB) is a lipopeptide composed of a complex cyclic peptide acylated at the N-terminus by linoleic acid. Enzymatic deacylation of ECB provided the peptide “nucleus” as a biologically inactive substrate from which novel ECB analogs were generated by chemical reacylation at the N-terminus. Varying the acyl group revealed that the structure and physical properties of the side chain, particularly its geometry and lipophilicity, played a pivotal role in determining the antifungal potency properties of the analog. Using CLOGP values to describe and compare the lipophilicities of the side chain fragments, it was shown that values of > 3.5 were required for expression of antifungal activity. Secondly, a linearly rigid geometry of the side chain was the most effective shape in enhancing the antifungal potency. Using these parameters as a guide, a variety of novel ECB analogs were synthesized which included arylacyl groups that incorporated biphenyl, terphenyl, tetraphenyl, and arylethynyl groups. Generally the glucan synthase inhibition by these analogs correlated well with in vitro and in vivo activities and was likewise influenced by the structure of the side chain. These structural variations resulted in enhancement of antifungal activity in both in vitro and in vivo assays. Some of these analogs, including LY303366 (14a), were effective by the oral route of administration.

str1

PATENT

US 5965525

http://www.google.co.in/patents/US5965525

PATENT

US 4293482

http://www.google.co.in/patents/US4293482

Paper

Commercialization and Late-Stage Development of a Semisynthetic Antifungal API: Anidulafungin/d-Fructose (Eraxis)

Chemical Research and Development, Pfizer Inc. Global Research and Development Laboratories, Eastern Point Road, Groton, Connecticut 06340, U.S.A.
Org. Process Res. Dev., 2008, 12 (3), pp 447–455
DOI: 10.1021/op800055h

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/op800055h

* Corresponding author. E-mail: timothy.norris@pfizer.com. Telephone: +860 441 4406 . Fax: +860 686 5340.

Abstract Image

Many years ago anidulafungin 1 was identified as a potentially useful medicine for the treatment of fungal infections. Its chemical and physical properties as a relatively high molecular weight semisynthetic derived from echinocandin B proved to be a significant hurdle to its final presentation as a useful medicine. It has recently been approved as an intravenous treatment for invasive candidaisis, an increasingly common health hazard that is potentially life-threatening. The development and commercialization of this API, which is presented as a molecular mixture of anidulafungin and d-fructose is described. This includes, single crystal X-ray structures of the starting materials, the echinocandin B cyclic-peptide nucleus (ECBN·HCl) and the active ester 1-({[4′′-(pentyloxy)-1,1′:4′,1′′-terphenyl-4-yl]carbonyl}oxy)-1H-1,2,3-benzotriazole (TOBt). Details of the structure and properties of starting materials, scale-up chemistry and unusual crystallization phenomena associated with the API formation are discussed.

str1

References

  1.  PRNewswire. Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Files New Drug Application (NDA) for Anidulafungin for Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis/Candidemia 08-18-2005.
  2. Jump up^ PRNewswire. Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Stockholders Approve Merger With Pfizer 08-15-2005
  3.  “FDA Approves New Treatment for Fungal Infections”. FDA News Release. Food and Drug Administration. 2006-02-21. Archived from the original on 10 July 2009. Retrieved 2009-08-01.
  4.  Krause DS, Reinhardt J, Vazquez JA, Reboli A, Goldstein BP, Wible M, Henkel T (2004). “Phase 2, randomized, dose-ranging study evaluating the safety and efficacy of anidulafungin in invasive candidiasis and candidemia”. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48 (6): 2021–4.doi:10.1128/AAC.48.6.2021-2024.2004. PMC 415613. PMID 15155194.
  5. Jump up^ Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ (2005). “In Vitro Activities of Anidulafungin against More than 2,500 Clinical Isolates of Candida spp., Including 315 Isolates Resistant to Fluconazole”. J Clin Microbiol 43 (11): 5425–7.doi:10.1128/JCM.43.11.5425-5427.2005. PMC 1287823. PMID 16272464.
  6. J Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Boyken L, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Hollis RJ, Goldstein BP (2005). “Effectiveness of anidulafungin in eradicating Candida species in invasive candidiasis”. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49 (11): 4795–7. doi:10.1128/AAC.49.11.4795-4797.2005.PMC 1280139. PMID 16251335.
  7. Jump up^ “Eraxis at RxList”. 2009-06-24. Retrieved 2009-08-01.
  8.  Trissel LA and Ogundele AB, “Compatibility of Anidulafungin With Other Drugs During Simulated Y-Site Administration,”Am J Health-Sys Pharm, 2005, 62:834-7.
  9.  Vazquez JA, “Anidulafungin: A New Echinocandin With a Novel Profile,” Clin Ther, 2005, 27(6):657-73.
  10. Jump up^ Walsh TJ, Anaissie EJ, Denning DW, et al., “Treatment of Aspergillosis: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America,” Clin Infect Dis, 2008, 46(3):327-60
  11. Denning DW (1997). “Echinocandins and pneumocandins – a new antifungal class with a novel mode of action”. J Antimicrob Chemother 40 (5): 611–614. doi:10.1093/jac/dkf045.PMID 9421307.
  12.  Lei Shao; Jian Li; Aijuan Liu; Qing Chang; Huimin Lin; Daijie Chen (2013). “Efficient Bioconversion of Echinocandin B to Its Nucleus by Overexpression of Deacylase Genes in Different Host Strains”. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79 (4): 1126–1133. doi:10.1128/AEM.02792-12. PMC 3568618. PMID 23220968.
  13.  “Anidulafungin EMA Europa” (PDF).
Anidulafungin
Anidulafungin Molecular Structure 2.png
Systematic (IUPAC) name
N-[(3S,6S,9S,11R,15S,18S,20R,21R,24S,25S,26S)-6-[(1S,2R)-1,2-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethyl]-11,20,21,25-tetrahydroxy-3,15-bis[(1R)-1-hydroxyethyl]-26-methyl-2,5,8,14,17,23-hexaoxo-1,4,7,13,16,22-hexaazatricyclo[22.3.0.09,13]heptacosan-18-yl]- 4-{4-[4-(pentyloxy)phenyl]phenyl}benzamide
Clinical data
Trade names Eraxis
AHFS/Drugs.com Monograph
Pharmacokinetic data
Protein binding 84 %
Biological half-life 40–50 hours
Identifiers
CAS Number 166663-25-8 Yes
ATC code J02AX06 (WHO)
PubChem CID 166548
DrugBank DB00362 Yes
ChemSpider 21106258 Yes
UNII 9HLM53094I Yes
KEGG D03211 
ChEBI CHEBI:55346
ChEMBL CHEMBL1630215 
Chemical data
Formula C58H73N7O17
Molar mass 1140.24 g/mol

//////////FUNGIN, ANIDULAFUNGIN, Eraxis , Ecalta,  semisynthetic echinocandin, anantifungal drug, FDA 2006, PFIZER, LY-307853, LY-329960, LY-333006, LY303366, VEC, VER-002, 166663-25-8, Eli Lilly and Company Inc.

STR1

CCCCCOc1ccc(cc1)c2ccc(cc2)c3ccc(cc3)C(=O)N[C@H]6C[C@@H](O)[C@@H](O)NC(=O)C4[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)CN4C(=O)C(NC(=O)C(NC(=O)C5C[C@@H](O)CN5C(=O)C(NC6=O)[C@@H](C)O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)c7ccc(O)cc7)[C@@H](C)O

Supporting Info

Biafungin, CD 101, a Novel Echinocandin for Vulvovaginal candidiasis

STR1

str1

str1as  CH3COOH salt

UNII-W1U1TMN677.png

CD 101

Several structural representations above

Biafungin™; CD 101 IV; CD 101 Topical; CD101; SP 3025, Biafungin acetate, Echinocandin B

UNII-G013B5478J FRE FORM,

CAS 1396640-59-7 FREE FORM

MF, C63-H85-N8-O17, MW, 1226.4035

Echinocandin B,

1-((4R,5R)-4-hydroxy-N2-((4”-(pentyloxy)(1,1′:4′,1”-terphenyl)-4-yl)carbonyl)-5-(2-(trimethylammonio)ethoxy)-L-ornithine)-4-((4S)-4-hydroxy-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-L-allothreonine)-

Treat and prevent invasive fungal infections; Treat and prevent systemic Candida infections; Treat candidemia

2D chemical structure of 1631754-41-0

Biafungin acetate

CAS 1631754-41-0 ACETATE, Molecular Formula, C63-H85-N8-O17.C2-H3-O2, Molecular Weight, 1285.4472,

C63 H85 N8 O17 . C2 H3 O2
1-[(4R,5R)-4-hydroxy-N2-[[4”-(pentyloxy)[1,1′:4′,1”-terphenyl]-4-yl]carbonyl]-5-[2-(trimethylammonio)ethoxy]-L-ornithine]-4-[(4S)-4-hydroxy-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-L-allothreonine]-, acetate (1:1)

UNII: W1U1TMN677

CD101 – A novel echinocandin antifungal C. albicans (n=351) MIC90 = 0.06 µg/mL C. glabrata (n=200) MIC90 = 0.06 µg/mL  Echinocandins have potent fungicidal activity against Candida species

  • Originator Seachaid Pharmaceuticals
  • Developer Cidara Therapeutics
  • Class Antifungals; Echinocandins; Small molecules
  • Mechanism of Action Glucan synthase inhibitors

 

BIAFUNGIN, CD 101

Watch this space as I add more info…………….

U.S. – Fast Track (Treat candidemia);
U.S. – Fast Track (Treat and prevent invasive fungal infections);
U.S. – Orphan Drug (Treat and prevent invasive fungal infections);
U.S. – Orphan Drug (Treat candidemia);
U.S. – Qualified Infectious Disease Program (Treat candidemia);
U.S. – Qualified Infectious Disease Program (Treat and prevent invasive fungal infections)

Fungal infections have emerged as major causes of human disease, especially among the immunocompromised patients and those hospitalized with serious underlying disease. As a consequence, the frequency of use of systemic antifungal agents has increased significantly and there is a growing concern about a shortage of effective antifungal agents. Although resistance rates to the clinically available antifungal agents remains low, reports of breakthrough infections and the increasing prevalence of uncommon fungal species that display elevated MIC values for existing agents is worrisome. Biafungin (CD101, previously SP 3025) is a novel echinocandin that displays chemical stability and long-acting pharmacokinetics that is being developed for once-weekly or other intermittent administration (see posters #A-693 and A- 694 for further information). In this study, we test biafungin and comparator agents against a collection of common Candida and Aspergillus species, including isolates resistant to azoles and echinocandins.

The echinocandins are an important class of antifungal agents, but are administered once daily by intravenous (IV) infusion. An echinocandin that could be administered once weekly could facilitate earlier hospital discharges and could expand usage to indications where daily infusions are impractical. Biafungin is a highly stable echinocandin for once-weekly IV administration. The compound was found to have a spectrum of activity and potency comparable to other echinocandins. In chimpanzees single dose pharmacokinetics of IV and orally administered biafungin were compared to IV anidulafungin, which has the longest half-life (T1/2 ) of the approved echinocandins.

Background  Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is a highly prevalent mucosal infection  VVC is caused by Candida albicans (~85%) and non-albicans (~15%)  5-8% of women have recurrent VVC (RVVC) which is associated with a negative impact on work/social life  Oral fluconazole prescribed despite relapse, potential DDIs and increased risk to pregnant women  No FDA-approved therapy for RVVC and no novel agent in >20 years

str1

Cidara Therapeutics 6310 Nancy Ridge Drive, Suite 101 San Diego, CA 92121

The incidence of invasive fungal infections, especially those due to Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp., continues to increase. Despite advances in medical practice, the associated mortality from these infections continues to be substantial. The echinocandin antifungals provide clinicians with another treatment option for serious fungal infections. These agents possess a completely novel mechanism of action, are relatively well-tolerated, and have a low potential for serious drug–drug interactions. At the present time, the echinocandins are an option for the treatment of infections due Candida spp (such as esophageal candidiasis, invasive candidiasis, and candidemia). In addition, caspofungin is a viable option for the treatment of refractory aspergillosis. Although micafungin is not Food and Drug Administration-approved for this indication, recent data suggests that it may also be effective. Finally, caspofungin- or micafungin-containing combination therapy should be a consideration for the treatment of severe infections due to Aspergillus spp. Although the echinocandins share many common properties, data regarding their differences are emerging at a rapid pace. Anidulafungin exhibits a unique pharmacokinetic profile, and limited cases have shown a potential far activity in isolates with increased minimum inhibitory concentrations to caspofungin and micafungin. Caspofungin appears to have a slightly higher incidence of side effects and potential for drug–drug interactions. This, combined with some evidence of decreasing susceptibility among some strains ofCandida, may lessen its future utility. However, one must take these findings in the context of substantially more data and use with caspofungin compared with the other agents. Micafungin appears to be very similar to caspofungin, with very few obvious differences between the two agents.

Echinocandins are a new class of antifungal drugs[1] that inhibit the synthesis of glucan in the cell wall, via noncompetitive inhibition of the enzyme 1,3-β glucan synthase[2][3] and are thus called “penicillin of antifungals”[4] (a property shared with papulacandins) as penicillin has a similar mechanism against bacteria but not fungi. Beta glucans are carbohydrate polymers that are cross-linked with other fungal cell wall components (The bacterial equivalent is peptidoglycan). Caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin are semisynthetic echinocandin derivatives with clinical use due to their solubility, antifungal spectrum, and pharmacokinetic properties.[5]

List of echinocandins:[17]

  • Pneumocandins (cyclic hexapeptides linked to a long-chain fatty acid)
  • Echinocandin B not clinically used, risk of hemolysis
  • Cilofungin withdrawn from trials due to solvent toxicity
  • Caspofungin (trade name Cancidas, by Merck)
  • Micafungin (FK463) (trade name Mycamine, by Astellas Pharma.)
  • Anidulafungin (VER-002, V-echinocandin, LY303366) (trade name Eraxis, by Pfizer)

History

Discovery of echinocandins stemmed from studies on papulacandins isolated from a strain of Papularia sphaerosperma (Pers.), which were liposaccharide – i.e., fatty acid derivatives of a disaccharide that also blocked the same target, 1,3-β glucan synthase – and had action only on Candida spp. (narrow spectrum). Screening of natural products of fungal fermentation in the 1970s led to the discovery of echinocandins, a new group of antifungals with broad-range activity against Candida spp. One of the first echinocandins of the pneumocandin type, discovered in 1974, echinocandin B, could not be used clinically due to risk of high degree of hemolysis. Screening semisynthetic analogs of the echinocandins gave rise to cilofungin, the first echinofungin analog to enter clinical trials, in 1980, which, it is presumed, was later withdrawn for a toxicity due to the solvent system needed for systemic administration. The semisynthetic pneumocandin analogs of echinocandins were later found to have the same kind of antifungal activity, but low toxicity. The first approved of these newer echinocandins was caspofungin, and later micafungin and anidulafungin were also approved. All these preparations so far have low oral bioavailability, so must be given intravenously only. Echinocandins have now become one of the first-line treatments for Candida before the species are identified, and even as antifungal prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

CIDARA THERAPEUTICS DOSES FIRST PATIENT IN PHASE 2 TRIAL OF CD101 TOPICAL TO TREAT VULVOVAGINAL CANDIDIASIS

SAN DIEGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Jun. 9, 2016– Cidara Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq:CDTX), a biotechnology company developing novel anti-infectives and immunotherapies to treat fungal and other infections, today announced that the first patient has been dosed in RADIANT, a Phase 2 clinical trial comparing the safety and tolerability of the novel echinocandin, CD101, to standard-of-care fluconazole for the treatment of acute vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC). RADIANT will evaluate two topical formulations of CD101, which is Cidara’s lead antifungal drug candidate.

“There have been no novel VVC therapies introduced for more than two decades, so advancing CD101 topical into Phase 2 is a critical step for women with VVC and for Cidara,” said Jeffrey Stein, Ph.D., president and chief executive officer of Cidara. “Because of their excellent safety record and potency against Candida, echinocandin antifungals are recommended as first line therapy to fight systemic Candida infections. CD101 topical will be the first echinocandin tested clinically in VVC and we expect to demonstrate safe and improved eradication of Candida with rapid symptom relief for women seeking a better option over the existing azole class of antifungals.”

RADIANT is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, dose-ranging trial designed to evaluate the safety and tolerability of CD101 in women with moderate to severe episodes of VVC. The study will enroll up to 125 patients who will be randomized into three treatment cohorts. The first cohort will involve the treatment of 50 patients with CD101 Ointment while a second cohort of 50 patients will receive CD101 Gel. The third cohort will include 25 patients who will be treated with oral fluconazole.

The primary endpoints of RADIANT will be the safety and tolerability of a single dose of CD101 Ointment and multiple doses of CD101 Gel in patients with acute VVC. Secondary endpoints include therapeutic efficacy in acute VVC patients treated with CD101. Treatment evaluations and assessments will occur on trial days 7, 14 and 28.

The RADIANT trial will be conducted at clinical trial centers across the United States. More information about the trial is available at www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02733432.

About VVC and RVVC

Seventy-five percent of women worldwide suffer from VVC in their lifetime, and four to five million women in the United Statesalone have the recurrent form of the infection, which is caused by Candida. Many women will experience recurrence after the completion of treatment with existing therapies. Most VVC occurs in women of childbearing potential (the infection is common in pregnant women), but it affects women of all ages. In a recent safety communication, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA) advised caution in the prescribing of oral fluconazole for yeast infections during pregnancy based on a published study concluding there is an increased risk of miscarriage. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines recommend using only topical antifungal products to treat pregnant women with vulvovaginal yeast infections. Vaginal infections are associated with a substantial negative impact on day-to-day functioning and adverse pregnancy outcomes including preterm delivery, low birth weight, and increased infant mortality in addition to predisposition to HIV/AIDS. According to the CDC, certain species of Candida are becoming increasingly resistant to existing antifungal medications. This emerging resistance intensifies the need for new antifungal agents.

About CD101 Topical

CD101 topical is the first topical agent in the echinocandin class of antifungals and exhibits a broad spectrum of fungicidal activity against Candida species. In May 2016, the FDA granted Qualified Infectious Disease Product (QIDP) and Fast Track Designation to CD101 topical for the treatment of VVC and the prevention of RVVC.

About Cidara Therapeutics

Cidara is a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on the discovery, development and commercialization of novel anti-infectives for the treatment of diseases that are inadequately addressed by current standard-of-care therapies. Cidara’s initial product portfolio comprises two formulations of the company’s novel echinocandin, CD101. CD101 IV is being developed as a once-weekly, high-exposure therapy for the treatment and prevention of serious, invasive fungal infections. CD101 topical is being developed for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and the prevention of recurrent VVC (RVVC), a prevalent mucosal infection. In addition, Cidara has developed a proprietary immunotherapy platform, Cloudbreak™, designed to create compounds that direct a patient’s immune cells to attack and eliminate pathogens that cause infectious disease. Cidara is headquartered inSan Diego, California. For more information, please visit www.cidara.com.

REF http://ir.cidara.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=253962&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=2176474

CLIP

Cidara Therapeutics raises $42 million to develop once-weekly anti-fungal therapy

Cidara Therapeutics (formerly K2 Therapeutics) grabbed $42 million in a private Series B funding round Wednesday to continue developing its once-weekly anti-fungal therapy. Just in June 2014, the company completed a $32 million Series A financing led by 5AM Ventures, Aisling Capital, Frazier Healthcare and InterWest Partners, which was the fourth largest A round in 2014 for innovative startups[1]. FierceBiotech named the company as one of 2014 Fierce 15 biotech startups.

Cidara has an impressive executive team. The company was co-founded by Kevin Forrest, former CEO of Achaogen (NASDAQ: AKAO), and Shaw Warren. Jeffrey Stein, former CEO of Trius Therapeutics (NASDAQ: TSRX) and Dirk Thye, former president of Cerexa, have joined Cidara as CEO and CMO, respectively. Trius successfully developed antibiotic tedizolid and was acquired in 2013 by Cubist Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: CBST) for $818 million.

Cidara’s lead candidate, biafungin (SP3025), was acquired from Seachaid Pharmaceuticals for $6 million. Biafungin’s half-life is much longer than that of similar drugs known as echinocandins (e.g., caspofungin, micafungin, anidulafungin), which may allow it to be developed as a once-weekly therapy, instead of once daily. The company is also developing a topical formulation of biafungin, namely topifungin. Cidara intends to file an IND and initiate a Phase I clinical trial in the second half of 2015.

Merck’s Cancidas (caspofungin), launched in 2001, was the first of approved enchinocandins. The drug generated annual sales of $596 million in 2008. The approved echinocandins must be administered daily by intravenous infusion. Biafungin with improved pharmacokinetic characteristics has the potential to bring in hundreds of millions of dollars per year.

[1] Nat Biotechnol. 2015, 33(1), 18.

CLIP

Biafungin is a potent and broad-spectrum antifungal agent with excellent activity against wild-type and troublesome azole- and echinocandin-resistant strains of Candida spp. The activity of biafungin is comparable to anidulafungin. • Biafungin was active against both wild-type and itraconazole-resistant strains of Aspergillus spp. from four different species. • In vitro susceptibility testing of biafungin against isolates of Candida and Aspergillus may be accomplished by either CLSI or EUCAST broth microdilution methods each providing comparable results. • The use of long-acting intravenous antifungal agents that could safely be given once a week to select patients is desirable and might decrease costs with long-term hospitalizations. Background: A novel echinocandin, biafungin, displaying long-acting pharmacokinetics and chemical stability is being developed for once-weekly administration. The activities of biafungin and comparator agents were tested against 173 fungal isolates of the most clinically common species. Methods: 106 CAN and 67 ASP were tested using CLSI and EUCAST reference broth microdilution methods against biafungin (50% inhibition) and comparators. Isolates included 27 echinocandin-resistant CAN (4 species) with identified fks hotspot (HS) mutations and 20 azole nonsusceptible ASP (4 species). Results: Against C. albicans, C. glabrata and C. tropicalis, the activity of biafungin (MIC50, 0.06, 0.12 and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively by CLSI method) was comparable to anidulafungin (AND; MIC50, 0.03, 0.12 and 0.03 μg/ml, respectively) and caspofungin (CSP; MIC50, 0.12, 0.25 and 0.12 μg/ml, respectively; Table). C. krusei strains were very susceptible to biafungin, showing MIC90 values of 0.06 μg/ml by both methods. Biafungin (MIC50/90, 1/2 μg/ml) was comparable to AND and less potent than CSP against C. parapsilosis using CLSI methodology. CLSI and EUCAST methods displayed similar results for most species, but biafungin (MIC50, 0.06 μg/ml) was eight-fold more active than CSP (MIC50, 0.5 μg/ml) against C. glabrata using the EUCAST method. Overall, biafungin was two- to four-fold more active against fks HS mutants than CSP and results were comparable to AND. Biafungin was active against A. fumigatus (MEC50/90, ≤0.008/0.015 μg/ml), A. terreus (MEC50/90, 0.015/0.015 μg/ml), A. niger (MEC50/90, ≤0.008/0.03 μg/ml) and A. flavus (MEC50/90, ≤0.008/≤0.008 μg/ml) using CLSI method. EUCAST results for ASP were also low for all echinocandins and comparable to CLSI results. Conclusions: Biafungin displayed comparable in vitro activity with other echinocandins against common wild-type CAN and ASP and resistant subsets that in combination with the long-acting profile warrants further development of this compound. 1. Arendrup MC, Cuenca-Estrella M, Lass-Florl C, Hope WW (2013). Breakpoints for antifungal agents: An update from EUCAST focussing on echinocandins against Candida spp. and triazoles against Aspergillus spp. Drug Resist Updat 16: 81-95. 2. Castanheira M, Woosley LN, Messer SA, Diekema DJ, Jones RN, Pfaller MA (2014). Frequency of fks mutations among Candida glabrata isolates from a 10-year global collection of bloodstream infection isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58: 577-580. 3. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008). M27-A3. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: third edition. Wayne, PA: CLSI. 4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2008). M38-A2. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Filamentous Fungi: Second Edition. Wayne, PA: CLSI. 5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (2012). M27-S4. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: 4th Informational Supplement. Wayne, PA: CLSI. 6. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (2014). Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 4.0, January 2014. Available at: http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/. Accessed January 1, 2014. 7. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ (2010). Epidemiology of invasive mycoses in North America. Crit Rev Microbiol 36: 1-53. 8. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Andes D, Arendrup MC, Brown SD, Lockhart SR, Motyl M, Perlin DS (2011). Clinical breakpoints for the echinocandins and Candida revisited: Integration of molecular, clinical, and microbiological data to arrive at species-specific interpretive criteria. Drug Resist Updat 14: 164-176. ABSTRACT Activity of a Novel Echinocandin Biafungin (CD101) Tested against Most Common Candida and Aspergillus Species, Including Echinocandin- and Azole-resistant Strains M CASTANHEIRA, SA MESSER, PR RHOMBERG, RN JONES, MA PFALLER JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, Iowa, USA C

PATENT

https://www.google.com/patents/WO2015035102A2?cl=en

BIAFUNGIN ACETATE IS USED AS STARTING MATERIAL

Example 30b: Synthesis of Compound 31

Step a. Nitration of Biafungin Acetate

To a stirring solution of biafungin (1 00 mg, 0.078 mmol) in glacial acetic acid(1 .5 ml_) was added sodium nitrite (1 1 mg, 0.159 mmol) and the reaction was stirred at ambient temperature for 20 hours. The mixture was applied directly to reversed phase H PLC (Isco CombiFlash Rf; 50g RediSep C1 8 column, 5 to 95% acetonitrile in Dl water containing 0.1 % formic acid: 15 minute gradient). The pure fractions were pooled and lyophilized to yield 85 mg of the desired product as a light yellow solid, formate salt. 1 H-NMR (300 M Hz, Methanol-d4) δ 8.58 (d, 1 H, J = 1 1 .7 Hz), 8.47 (t, 2H, J = 8.7Hz), 8.05 (d, 1 H, J = 2.1 Hz), 7.99 (d, 2H, J = 9.3 Hz), 7.82 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.79-7.60 (m, 12H), 7.1 7 (d, 1 H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.03 (d, 2H, J = 9 Hz), 5.48 (d, 1 H, J = 6 Hz), 5.08 (dd, 1 H, J = 1 .2, 5.7 Hz), 4.95-4.73 (m, 5H), 4.68-4.56 (m, 2H), 4.53 (d, 1 H, J = 5.7 Hz), 4.48-4.39 (m, 2H), 4.31 -3.79 (m, 6H), 4.04 (t, 2H, J = 5.7 Hz), 3.72-3.44 (m,3H), 3.1 8 (s, 9H), 2.60-1 .99 (m, 5H), 1 .83 (m, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 1 .56-1 .35 (m, 5H), 1 .28 (d, 6H, J = 4.2 Hz), 1 .09 (d, 3H, J = 1 0.2 Hz), 0.99 (t, 3H, J = 8.7 Hz) ; LC/MS, [M/2+H]+: 635.79, 635.80 calculated.

Step b. Reduction of Nitro-Biafungin To Amino-Biafungin

To a stirring solution of Nitro-Biafungin (1 00 mg, 0.075 mmol) in glacial acetic acid(1 .5 ml_) was added zinc powder (50 mg, 0.77 mmol) and the reaction was stirred at ambient temperature for 1 hour. The mixture was filtered and applied directly to reversed phase HPLC (Isco CombiFlash Rf, 50g Redisep C18 column; 5 to 95% acetonitrile in Dl water containing 0.1 % formic acid: 15 minute gradient). The pure fractions were pooled and lyophilized to yield 55 mg of the desired product as a white solid, formate salt. 1 H-NMR (300 MHz, Methanol-d4) 5 8.47 (bs, 1 H), 7.99 (d, 2H, J = 1 0.8Hz), 7.82 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.80-7.67 (m, 6H), 7.62 (d, 2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.03 (d, 2H, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.77 (d, 1 H, J = 1 .9 Hz), 6.68 (d, 1 H, J = 8.2 Hz), 6.55 (dd, 2H, J = 8.2, 1 .9 Hz), 5.43 (d, 1 H, J = 2.5 Hz), 5.05 (d, 1 H, J = 3 Hz), 4.83-4.73 (m, 2H), 4.64- 4.56 (m, 2H), 4.43-4.34 (m, 2H), 4.31 -4.15 (m, 4H), 4.03-4.08 (m, 1 H), 4.1 1 -3.89 (m, 8H), 3.83 (d, 1 H, J = 1 0.8 Hz), 3.68-3.47 (m, 3H), 3.1 7 (s, 9H), 2.57-2.42 (m, 2H), 2.35-2.27 (m, 1 H), 2.14-1 .98 (m, 2H), 1 .83 (m, 2H, J = 6 Hz), 1 .56-1 .38 (m, 4H), 1 .28 (dd, 6H, J = 6.5, 2 Hz), 1 .09 (d, 3H, J = 7 Hz), 0.986 (t, 3H, J = 7 Hz); High Res LC/MS: [M+H]+ 1241 .61 63; 1241 .6136 calculated.

Step c. Reaction of Amino-Biafungin with lnt-2 to Produce Compound 31

To a stirring solution of Amino-Biafungin (50 mg, 0.04 mmol) in DM F (1 ml_) was added formyl-Met-Leu-Phe- -Ala-OSu (lnt-2) (36 mg, 0.06 mmol) and DI PEA (7 uL, 0.04 mmol). The reaction was stirred at ambient temperature for 1 8 hours. The mixture was applied directly to reversed phase HPLC (Isco CombiFlash Rf; 50g Redisep C1 8 column; 5 to 95% acetonitrile in Dl water containing 0.1 % formic acid: 15 minute gradient). The pure fractions were pooled and lyophilized to yield 26 mg of a white solid as a formate salt. 1 H-NMR (300 M Hz, Methanol-d4) 5 8.55 (bs, 1 H), 8.44 (t, 1 H, J = 10 Hz), 8.1 8 (d, 1 H, J = 6 Hz), 8.1 1 (s, 1 H), 7.99 (d, 2H, J = 1 0 Hz), 7.84-7.70 (m, 6H), 7.63 (d, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.32-7.1 9 (m, 6H), 7.03 (d, 4H, J = 9 Hz), 6.87 (d, 1 H, J = 8.1 Hz), 5.44 (d, 1 H, J = 1 0.5 Hz), 5.05 (d, 1 H, J = 4.5 Hz), 4.83-4.74 (m, 2H), 4.66-4.50 (m, 6H), 4.45-4.29 (m, 10H), 4.1 9-3.82 (m, 1 0H), 3.67-3.57 (m, 6H), 3.1 7 (s, 9H), 2.64-2.46 (m, 6 H), 2.14-1 .92 (m, 6H), 1 .84 (m, 4H, J = 6 Hz), 1 .62-1 .40 (m, 8H), 1 .32-1 .22 (m, 6H), 1 .09 (d, 3H, J = 9 Hz), 0.99 (t, 3H, J = 7.5 Hz), 0.88 (m, 6H, J = 6.8 Hz) ; High Res LC/MS, [M/2+H]+ 865.4143, 865.4147 calculated.

REFERENCES

  1. Denning, DW (June 2002). “Echinocandins: a new class of antifungal.”. The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 49 (6): 889–91. doi:10.1093/jac/dkf045. PMID 12039879.
  2.  Morris MI, Villmann M (September 2006). “Echinocandins in the management of invasive fungal infections, part 1”. Am J Health Syst Pharm 63 (18): 1693–703.doi:10.2146/ajhp050464.p1. PMID 16960253.
  3. Morris MI, Villmann M (October 2006). “Echinocandins in the management of invasive fungal infections, Part 2”. Am J Health Syst Pharm 63 (19): 1813–20.doi:10.2146/ajhp050464.p2. PMID 16990627.
  4. ^ Jump up to:a b “Pharmacotherapy Update – New Antifungal Agents: Additions to the Existing Armamentarium (Part 1)”.
  5.  Debono, M; Gordee, RS (1994). “Antibiotics that inhibit fungal cell wall development”.Annu Rev Microbiol 48: 471–497. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.48.100194.002351.

17 Eschenauer, G; Depestel, DD; Carver, PL (March 2007). “Comparison of echinocandin antifungals.”. Therapeutics and clinical risk management 3 (1): 71–97. PMC 1936290.PMID 18360617.

///////////Biafungin™,  CD 101 IV,  CD 101 Topical,  CD101,  SP 3025, PHASE 2, CIDARA, Orphan Drug, Fast Track Designation, Seachaid Pharmaceuticals,  Qualified Infectious Disease Product, QIDP, UNII-G013B5478J, 1396640-59-7, 1631754-41-0, Vulvovaginal candidiasis, Echinocandin B, FUNGIN

FREE FORM

CCCCCOc1ccc(cc1)c2ccc(cc2)c3ccc(cc3)C(=O)N[C@H]4C[C@@H](O)[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@H]5[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)CN5C(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)C(NC(=O)[C@@H]6C[C@@H](O)CN6C(=O)C(NC4=O)[C@@H](C)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)c7ccc(O)cc7)[C@@H](C)O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C

AND OF ACETATE

CCCCCOc1ccc(cc1)c2ccc(cc2)c3ccc(cc3)C(=O)N[C@H]4C[C@@H](O)[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@H]5[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)CN5C(=O)[C@@H](NC(=O)C(NC(=O)[C@@H]6C[C@@H](O)CN6C(=O)[C@@H](NC4=O)[C@@H](C)O)[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)c7ccc(O)cc7)[C@@H](C)O)OCC[N+](C)(C)C.CC(=O)[O-]

Three antifungal drugs approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin, are known to inhibit β-1 ,3-glucan synthase which have the structures shown below.

caspofungin

Anidulafungin

Other exemplary p-1 ,3-glucan synthase inhibitors include,

echinocandin B

cilofungin

pneumocandin A0

pneumocandin B0

L-705589

L-733560

A-174591

or a salt thereof,

Biafungin


or a salt thereof,

Amino-biafungin


or a salt thereof,

Amino-AF-053

ASP9726

Yet other exemplary p-1 ,3-glucan synthase inhibitors include, without limitation:

Papulacandin B

Ergokonin

//////////////