New Drug Approvals

Home » 2014 (Page 57)

Yearly Archives: 2014

DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO .....FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE

Blog Stats

  • 4,817,864 hits

Flag and hits

Flag Counter

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 37.9K other subscribers
Follow New Drug Approvals on WordPress.com

Archives

Categories

Recent Posts

Flag Counter

ORGANIC SPECTROSCOPY

Read all about Organic Spectroscopy on ORGANIC SPECTROSCOPY INTERNATIONAL 

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 37.9K other subscribers
DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, Born in Mumbai in 1964 and graduated from Mumbai University, Completed his Ph.D from ICT, 1991,Matunga, Mumbai, India, in Organic Chemistry, The thesis topic was Synthesis of Novel Pyrethroid Analogues, Currently he is working with AFRICURE PHARMA, ROW2TECH, NIPER-G, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Govt. of India as ADVISOR, earlier assignment was with GLENMARK LIFE SCIENCES LTD, as CONSUlTANT, Retired from GLENMARK in Jan2022 Research Centre as Principal Scientist, Process Research (bulk actives) at Mahape, Navi Mumbai, India. Total Industry exp 32 plus yrs, Prior to joining Glenmark, he has worked with major multinationals like Hoechst Marion Roussel, now Sanofi, Searle India Ltd, now RPG lifesciences, etc. He has worked with notable scientists like Dr K Nagarajan, Dr Ralph Stapel, Prof S Seshadri, etc, He did custom synthesis for major multinationals in his career like BASF, Novartis, Sanofi, etc., He has worked in Discovery, Natural products, Bulk drugs, Generics, Intermediates, Fine chemicals, Neutraceuticals, GMP, Scaleups, etc, he is now helping millions, has 9 million plus hits on Google on all Organic chemistry websites. His friends call him Open superstar worlddrugtracker. His New Drug Approvals, Green Chemistry International, All about drugs, Eurekamoments, Organic spectroscopy international, etc in organic chemistry are some most read blogs He has hands on experience in initiation and developing novel routes for drug molecules and implementation them on commercial scale over a 32 PLUS year tenure till date Feb 2023, Around 35 plus products in his career. He has good knowledge of IPM, GMP, Regulatory aspects, he has several International patents published worldwide . He has good proficiency in Technology transfer, Spectroscopy, Stereochemistry, Synthesis, Polymorphism etc., He suffered a paralytic stroke/ Acute Transverse mylitis in Dec 2007 and is 90 %Paralysed, He is bound to a wheelchair, this seems to have injected feul in him to help chemists all around the world, he is more active than before and is pushing boundaries, He has 100 million plus hits on Google, 2.5 lakh plus connections on all networking sites, 100 Lakh plus views on dozen plus blogs, 227 countries, 7 continents, He makes himself available to all, contact him on +91 9323115463, email amcrasto@gmail.com, Twitter, @amcrasto , He lives and will die for his family, 90% paralysis cannot kill his soul., Notably he has 38 lakh plus views on New Drug Approvals Blog in 227 countries......https://newdrugapprovals.wordpress.com/ , He appreciates the help he gets from one and all, Friends, Family, Glenmark, Readers, Wellwishers, Doctors, Drug authorities, His Contacts, Physiotherapist, etc He has total of 32 International and Indian awards

Verified Services

View Full Profile →

Archives

Categories

Flag Counter

Chlorination with convenience: Palau’chlor


developingtheprocess's avatarDeveloping the Process

I came across this article in JACS recently.  I remember using chlorine gas myself and being a little trepidacious with it.  It is a nasty gas to deal with.  I had to remember to clean out the regulator after every use so it didn’t corrode and make it difficult to close at the most inopportune time.  I used thionyl chloride a lot and that had a tendency to wreak havoc on my Rotovap at the time.  Not nice stuff.  Anyways.

What caught my eye with this article was that it was written by Phil Baran at Scripps and Martin Eastgate at Bristol-Myers Squibb in Chem. Dev., so it was worth a gander to take a look and see if this paper was a keeper for later use.  The article I am referring to is “Palau’chlor: A Practical and Reactive Chlorinating Reagent”, by Phil S. Baran et al, J. Am. Chem…

View original post 109 more words

In battle of IPF drugs, Boehringer Ingelheim’s nintedanib impresses


Nintedanib

NINTEDANIB

656247-17-5

  • UNII-G6HRD2P839
  • Vargatef
  • BIBF 1120

methyl (3Z)-3-{[(4-{methyl[(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)acetyl]amino}phenyl)amino](phenyl)methylidene}-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole-6-carboxylate

Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh

In battle of IPF drugs, BI’s nintedanib impresses

As an eagerly-anticipated debate kicks off at the American Thoracic Society conference in San Diego on drugs for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, Boehringer Ingelheim has posted promising late-stage data on its offering, nintedanib.

Read more at: http://www.pharmatimes.com/Article/14-05-18/In_battle_of_IPF_drugs_BI_s_nintedanib_impresses.aspx#ixzz32K0f3NqQ
Follow us: @PharmaTimes on Twitter

Nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, is currently being evaluated against advanced HCC in phase I/II clinical trials. Here, we report the underlying molecular mechanism by which nintedanib (BIBF-1120) induces an anti-HCC effect.

 

NCI: An orally bioavailable, indolinone-derived, receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) inhibitor with potential antiangiogenic and antineoplastic activities. Multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor BIBF 1120 selectively binds to and inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) tyrosine kinases, which may result in the induction of endothelial cell apoptosis; a reduction in tumor vasculature; and the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation and migration. In addition, this agent also inhibits members of the Src family of tyrosine kinases, including Src, Lck, Lyn, and FLT-3 (fms-like tyrosine kinase 3). VEGFR, FGFR and PDGFR RTKs play key roles in tumor angiogenesis

Nintedanib (formerly BIBF 1120; trade name Vargatef) is a small molecule of angiokinase inhibitor class inhibiting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and platelet derived growth factor receptor(PDGFR) being developed by Boehringer Ingelheim for use as an anti-vascular anti-cancer agent.

Mechanism of action

Nintedanib is an indolinone-derived drug that inhibits the process of blood vessel formation (angiogenesis) in tumours. Angiogenesis inhibitors stop the formation and reshaping of blood vessels in and around tumours, which reduces the tumour’s blood supply, starving tumour cells of oxygen and nutrients leading to cell death and tumour shrinkage. Unlike conventional anti-cancer chemotherapy which has a direct cell killing effect on cancer cells, angiogenesis inhibitors starve the tumour cells of oxygen and nutrients which results in tumour cell death. One of the advantages of this method of anti-cancer therapy is that it is more specific than conventional chemotherapy agents, therefore results in fewer and less severe side effects than conventional chemotherapy.[citation needed]

The process of new blood vessel formation (angiogenesis) is essential for the growth and spread of cancers. It is mediated by signaling molecules (growth factors) released from cancer cells in response to low oxygen levels. The growth factors cause the cells of the tumour’s blood vessel to divide and reorganize resulting in the sprouting of new vessels in and around the tumour, improving its blood supply.[citation needed]

Angiogenesis is a process that is essential for the growth and spread of all solid tumours, blocking it prevents the tumour from growing and may result in tumour shrinkage as well as a reduction in the spread of the cancer to other parts of the body. Nintedanib exerts its anti-cancer effect by binding to and blocking the activation of cell receptors involved in blood vessel formation and reshaping (i.e. VEGFR 1-3, FGFR 1-3 AND PDGFRα and β). Inhibition of these receptors in the cells that make up blood vessels (endothelial cells, smooth muscle cells and pericytes) by Nintedanib leads to programmed cell death, destruction of tumor blood vessels and a reduction in blood flow to the tumour. Reduced tumour blood flow inhibits tumor cell proliferation and migration hence slowing the growth and spread of the cancer.[1]

Adverse effects

Preclinical studies have shown that nintedanib binds in a highly selective manner to the ATP binding domain of its three target receptors, without binding to similarly shaped ATP domains in other proteins, which reduces the potential for undesirable side effects.[2]

The most common side effects observed with nintedanib were reversible elevation in liver enzymes (10-28% of patients) and gastrointestinal disturbance (up to 50%). Side effects observed with nintedanib were worse with the higher 250 mg dose, for this reason subsequent trials have used the equally clinically effective 200 mg dose.[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]

Nintedanib inhibits the growth and reshaping of blood vessels which is also an essential process in normal wound healing and tissue repair. Therefore a theoretical side effect of nintedanib is reduced wound healing however, unlike other anti-angiogenic agents, this side effect has not been observed in patients receiving nintedanib.[citation needed]

Studies

Preclinical studies have demonstrated that nintedanib selectively binds to and blocks the VEGF, FGF and PDGF receptors, inhibiting the growth of cells that constitute the walls of blood vessels (endothelial and smooth muscle cells and pericytes) in vitro. Nintedanib reduces the number and density of blood vessels in tumours in vivo, resulting in tumour shrinkage.[1][2] Nintedanib also inhibits the growth of cells that are resistant to existing chemotherapy agents in vitro, which suggests a potential role for the agent in patients with solid tumours that are unresponsive to or relapse following current first line therapy.[10]

Early clinical trials of nintedanib have been carried out in patients with non-small cell lung, colorectaluterineendometrialovarian and cervical cancer and multiple myeloma.[4][5][7][8][9] These studies reported that the drug is active in patients, safe to administer and is stable in the bloodstream. They identified that the maximum tolerated dose of nintedanib is 20 0 mg when taken once a day.

Clinical studies

In the first human trials, nintedanib halted the growth of tumours in up to 50% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and 76% of patients with advanced colorectal cancer and other solid tumours.[4][8] A complete response was observed in 1/26 patients with non-small cell lung and 1/7 patients with ovarian cancer treated with nintedanib. A further 2 patients with ovarian cancer had partial responses to nintedanib.[8][9]

Two phase II trials have been carried out assessing the efficacy, dosing and side effects of nintedanib in non-small cell lung and ovarian cancer. These trials found that nintedanib delayed relapse in patients with ovarian cancer by two months[6] and that overall survival of patients with non-small cell lung who received nintedanib was similar to that observed with the FDA approved VEGFR inhibitor sorafenib. These trials also concluded that increasing the dose of the nintedanib has no effect on survival.[3]

Current clinical trials

Nintedanib is currently undergoing investigation in phase II and III clinical trials and is yet to be licensed by the FDA. Angiogenesis inhibitors such as nintedanib may be effective in a range of solid tumour types including; lung, ovarian, metastatic bowel, liver and brain cancer.

Several further phase I and II clinical trials with nintedanib are underway. Patients are also being recruited for three phase III clinical trials that will evaluate the potential benefit of nintedanib when added to existing 1st line treatments in patients with ovarian.[11] and 2nd line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer [12][13] The phase III trials of nintedanib in lung cancer have been named LUME-Lung 1 and LUME-Lung 2.

Current phase II trials are investigating the effect of nintedanib in patients with metastatic bowel cancer, liver cancer and the brain tumour: glioblastoma multiforme.[14]

Phase III trials are investigating the use of nintedanib in combination with the existing chemotherapy agents permexetred and docetaxel in patients with non-small cell lung cancer,[15] and in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as a first line treatment for patients with ovarian cancer.[16]

A phase III clinical trial is also underway examining the safety and efficacy of nintedanib on patients with the non-cancerous lung condition idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.[17]

……………………….

J. Med. Chem.200952 (14), pp 4466–4480
DOI: 10.1021/jm900431g

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm900431g

Abstract Image

Inhibition of tumor angiogenesis through blockade of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway is a new treatment modality in oncology. Preclinical findings suggest that blockade of additional pro-angiogenic kinases, such as fibroblast and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (FGFR and PDGFR), may improve the efficacy of pharmacological cancer treatment. Indolinones substituted in position 6 were identified as selective inhibitors of VEGF-, PDGF-, and FGF-receptor kinases. In particular, 6-methoxycarbonyl-substituted indolinones showed a highly favorable selectivity profile. Optimization identified potent inhibitors of VEGF-related endothelial cell proliferation with additional efficacy on pericyctes and smooth muscle cells. In contrast, no direct inhibition of tumor cell proliferation was observed. Compounds 2 (BIBF 1000) and 3 (BIBF 1120) are orally available and display encouraging efficacy in in vivo tumor models while being well tolerated. The triple angiokinase inhibitor 3 is currently in phase III clinical trials for the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

References

  1.  Hilberg, F.; G. J. Roth, M. Krssak, S. Kautschitsch, W. Sommergruber, U. Tontsch-Grunt, P. Garin-Chesa, G. Bader, A. Zoephel, J. Quant, A. Heckel, W. J. Rettig (2008). “BIBF 1120: triple angiokinase inhibitor with sustained receptor blockade and good antitumor efficacy”. Cancer Res 68 (12): 4774–82. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-6307ISSN 1538-7445PMID 18559524.
  2.  Hilberg, F.; U. Tontsch-Grunt, F. Colbatzky, A. Heckel, R. Lotz, J.C.A. van Meel, G.J. Roth (2004). “BIBF1120 a novel, small molecule triple angiokinase inhibitor: profiling as a clinical candidate for cancer therapy”. European Journal of Cancer Supplements 2(50).
  3.  Reck, M.; R. Kaiser, C. Eschbach, M. Stefanic, J. Love, U. Gatzemeier, P. Stopfer, J. von Pawel (2011). “A phase II double-blind study to investigate efficacy and safety of two doses of the triple angiokinase inhibitor BIBF 1120 in patients with relapsed advanced non-small-cell lung cancer”. Ann OncolISSN 1569-8041.
  4.  Okamoto, I.; H. Kaneda, T. Satoh, W. Okamoto, M. Miyazaki, R. Morinaga, S. Ueda, M. Terashima, A. Tsuya, A. Sarashina, K. Konishi, T. Arao, K. Nishio, R. Kaiser, K. Nakagawa (2010). “Phase I safety, pharmacokinetic, and biomarker study of BIBF 1120, an oral triple tyrosine kinase inhibitor in patients with advanced solid tumors”. Mol Cancer Ther 9 (10): 2825–33. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0379ISSN 1538-8514PMID 20688946.
  5.  Mross, K.; M. Stefanic, D. Gmehling, A. Frost, F. Baas, C. Unger, R. Strecker, J. Henning, B. Gaschler-Markefski, P. Stopfer, L. de Rossi, R. Kaiser (2010). “Phase I study of the angiogenesis inhibitor BIBF 1120 in patients with advanced solid tumors”.Clin Cancer Res 16 (1): 311–9. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0694ISSN 1078-0432PMID 20028771.
  6. Ledermann, J.A. (2009). “A randomised phase II placebo-controlled trial using maintenance therapy to evaluate the vascular targeting agent BIBF 1120 following treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (OC)”. J Clin Oncol 27 (15s): (suppl; abstr 5501).
  7.  Kropff, M.; J. Kienast, G. Bisping, W. E. Berdel, B. Gaschler-Markefski, P. Stopfer, M. Stefanic, G. Munzert (2009). “An open-label dose-escalation study of BIBF 1120 in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma”. Anticancer Res 29 (10): 4233–8.ISSN 1791-7530PMID 19846979.
  8.  Ellis, P. M.; R. Kaiser, Y. Zhao, P. Stopfer, S. Gyorffy, N. Hanna (2010). “Phase I open-label study of continuous treatment with BIBF 1120, a triple angiokinase inhibitor, and pemetrexed in pretreated non-small cell lung cancer patients”. Clin Cancer Res 16 (10): 2881–9. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2944ISSN 1078-0432.PMID 20460487.
  9. du Bois, A.; J. Huober, P. Stopfer, J. Pfisterer, P. Wimberger, S. Loibl, V. L. Reichardt, P. Harter (2010). “A phase I open-label dose-escalation study of oral BIBF 1120 combined with standard paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with advanced gynecological malignancies”. Ann Oncol 21 (2): 370–5. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdp506.ISSN 1569-8041PMID 19889612.
  10.  Xiang, Q. F.; F. Wang, X. D. Su, Y. J. Liang, L. S. Zheng, Y. J. Mi, W. Q. Chen, L. W. Fu (2011). “Effect of BIBF 1120 on reversal of ABCB1-mediated multidrug resistance”.Cell Oncol (Dordr) 34 (1): 33–44. doi:10.1007/s13402-010-0003-7ISSN 2211-3436.
  11.  “Boehringer Ingelheim – AGO-OVAR 12 / LUME-Ovar 1 Trial Information”. 2011.
  12.  “Boehringer Ingelheim – LUME-Lung 2 Trial Information”. 2011.
  13.  “Boehringer Ingelheim – LUME-Lung 1 Trial Information”. 2011.
  14.  http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=++%09+BIBF+1120&phase=1
  15.  http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00805194 Phase III LUME-Lung 1: BIBF 1120 Plus Docetaxel as Compared to Placebo Plus Docetaxel in 2nd Line Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
  16.  http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01015118 Phase III BIBF 1120 or Placebo in Combination With Paclitaxel and Carboplatin in First Line Treatment of Ovarian Cancer
  17.  http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01335477 Safety and Efficacy of BIBF 1120 at High Dose in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Patients II

 

ChemSpider 2D Image | Nintedanib esylate | C33H39N5O7S

Ethanesulfonic acid – methyl (3Z)-3-{[(4-{methyl[(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)acetyl]amino}phenyl)amino](phenyl)methylene}-2-oxo-6-indolinecarboxylate (1:1)

Nintedanib esylate

656247-18-6 [RN]

Methyl (3Z)-3-[({4-[N-methyl-2-(4-methylpiperazin-1-yl)acetamido]phenyl}amino)(phenyl)methylidene]-2-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-indole-6-carboxylate ethanesulfonate

Nintedanib esylate [USAN]

(3Z)-2,3-Dihydro-3-[[[4-[methyl[2-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)acetyl]amino]phenyl]amino]phenylmethylene]-2-oxo-1H-indole-6-carboxylic acid methyl ester ethanesulfonate

Nintedanib esylate, 656247-18-6, UNII-42F62RTZ4G, , NSC753000, NSC-753000, KB-62821
Molecular Formula: C33H39N5O7S   Molecular Weight: 649.75706

Cardamom: Courage in a Bottle


earthayurveda's avatarNiight Wind- Ayurveda

Flowers Floating in Herbal Tea  I don’t think there could be a more perfect herb to help counteract the windy, rainy, cold, warm spring of Colorado than Cardamom.  Weather you are looking for some courage and grounding or want get rid of a little excess Kapha, Cardamom can do that and a whole lot more.  In ancient Egypt soldiers would put on Cardamom essential oil to increase their courage, before going into battle, so maybe you could use some before work.

Cardamom V-P+K-  (Having trouble understanding these symbols?  Click here.)

Cardamom can be used as an Essential Oil for smelling or as a spice in food.

Foods that use cardamom:  Chai, Pumpkin Pie, Rice Pudding and Oatmeal.  Spices are great for stoking the digestive fire and Cardamom is known for getting rid of Vata gas and Kapha mucous.  Side note: its antispasmodic qualities, can be helpful for getting rid of hiccups, and intestinal cramping (Dillute…

View original post 54 more words

Herpes-loaded stem cells used to kill brain tumors


Lyranara.me's avatarLyra Nara Blog

Herpes-loaded stem cells used to kill brain tumors

This shows tumor cells in green. This shows oHSV-loaded stem cells in red. This shows oHSV-infected tumor cells in yellow. Credit: Khalid Shah/Massachusetts General Hospital

Harvard Stem Cell Institute (HSCI) scientists at Massachusetts General Hospital have a potential solution for how to more effectively kill tumor cells using cancer-killing viruses. The investigators report that trapping virus-loaded stem cells in a gel and applying them to tumors significantly improved survival in mice with glioblastoma multiform, the most common brain tumor in human adults and also the most difficult to treat.

The work, led by Khalid Shah, MS, PhD, an HSCI Principal Faculty member, is published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Shah heads the Molecular Neurotherapy and Imaging Laboratory at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Cancer-killing or oncolytic viruses have been used in numerous phase 1 and 2 clinical trialsfor brain tumors but with limited success. In preclinical studies…

View original post 535 more words

Virus combination effective against deadly brain tumor


Lyranara.me's avatarLyra Nara Blog

A combination of the myxoma virus and the immune suppressant rapamycin can kill glioblastoma multiforme, the most common and deadliest malignant brain tumor, according to Moffitt Cancer Center research. Peter A. Forsyth, M.D., of Moffitt’s Neuro-Oncology Program, says the combination has been shown to infect and kill both brain cancer stem cells and differentiated compartments of glioblastoma multiforme.

The finding means that barriers to treating the disease, such as resistance to the drug temozolomide, may be overcome. The study, by Forsyth and colleagues in Canada, Texas and Florida, appeared in a recent issue ofNeuro-Oncology.

“Although temozolomide improves survival for patients with glioblastoma multiformedrug resistance is a significant obstacle,” said Forsyth, the study lead author. “Oncolytic viruses that infect and break down cancer cellsoffer promising possibilities for overcoming resistance to targeted therapies.”

The authors note that oncolytic viruses have the potential to provoke a multipronged attack…

View original post 571 more words

Orphan Drugs: Top 2013 Selling Drugs Launched


Orphan Druganaut Blog's avatarOrphan Druganaut Blog

.

.

Last week, GEN (Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News), publishes an online list of the top 18 best-selling drugs that are launched in 2013, for those companies who provide 2013 sales information.

The chart below shows the 8 orphan drugs and the following data fields:

•   GEN ranking out of 18

•     Manufacturer

•     2013 Sales in $Millions

•     FDA and EC approval dates

•     Indication.

Top 8 Selling Orphan Drugs Launched in 2013

GEN #ProductManufacturer2013 SalesFDA App/EC App DtsIndication
2Pomalyst (Pomalidomide)Celgene$30502.08.13/ 08.09.13Multiple Myeloma
6Juxtapid (Lomitapide)Aegerion Pharmaceuticals$48.512.21.12/ 07.31.13Homozygous  Familial

Hypercholester-olemia (HoFH)

7Iclusig (Ponatinib)Ariad Pharmaceuticals$45.212.14.12/ 07.03.13CML/ Ph+ ALL
10Gattex (Teduglutide)NPS Pharmaceuticals$31.812.21.12/ 08.30.12Short Bowel

Syndrome (SBS)

11Tafinlar (Dabrafenib) *GlaxoSmithKline$26.905.29.13/ 09.02.13Metastatic

Melanoma

with

BRAF V600E

mutation

13Mekinist (Trametinib) *GlaxoSmithKline$16.805.29.13/ 09.02.13

View original post 172 more words

Lung cancer screening could cost Medicare billions


atasteofcreole's avatarAtasteofcreole's Blog

http://www.goerie.com/article/20140515/LIFESTYLES07/305159930/Lung-cancer-screening-could-cost-Medicare-billions

Every person covered by Medicare would shell out an additional $3 a month if the government agreed to pay to screen certain current and former smokers for lung cancer, a new study estimates.

It would cost Medicare $2 billion a year to follow recent advice to offer these lung scans, the study found.

Joshua Roth of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle said the researchers were merely tallying the cost and were not “judging value” or saying whether Medicare should pay it. He led the study, which was released Wednesday.

Lung cancer is the world’s top cancer killer, mainly because it’s usually found too late for treatment to do much good. Most deaths involve Medicare-age people, and most are due to smoking.

Recently, a major study found that annual CT scans could cut the chances of dying from lung cancer by up to…

View original post 35 more words

FORMACION INTENSIVA EN MASAJE AYURVÉDICO. HUELVA 4 AL 8 DE AGOSTO 2014


Astellas’ Dificlir (fidaxomicin) could save NHS thousands of pounds


 

Fidaxomicin2DCSD.svg

Fidaxomicin

873857-62-6 

3-(((6-Deoxy-4-O-(3,5-dichloro-2-ethyl-4,6-dihydroxybenzoyl)-2-O-methyl-β-D-mannopyranosyl)oxy)-methyl)-12(R)-[(6-deoxy-5-C-methyl-4-O-(2-methyl-1-oxopropyl)-β-D-lyxo-hexopyranosyl)oxy]-11(S)-ethyl-8(S)-hydroxy-18(S)-(1(R)-hydroxyethyl)-9,13,15-trimethyloxacyclooctadeca-3,5,9,13,15-pentaene-2-one

C52H74Cl2O18   Molecular Weight: 1058.03916 

US FDA:link         Launched – 2011   Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

OPT-80  
PAR-101

Astellas' Dificlir could save NHS thousands of pounds

Using Astellas’ Dificlir (fidaxomicin) as a first-line treatment for clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is not only clinically effective but could also save the National Health Service thousands of pounds compared to the standard of care, according to data from a late-stage study

Read more at: http://www.pharmatimes.com/Article/14-05-14/Astellas_Dificlir_could_save_NHS_thousands_of_pounds.aspx#ixzz31qrtFXlT

 

Fidaxomicin (trade names DificidDificlir, and previously OPT-80 and PAR-101) is the first in a new class of narrow spectrummacrocyclic antibiotic drugs.[2] It is a fermentation product obtained from the actinomycete Dactylosporangium aurantiacum subspecies hamdenesis.[3][4] Fidaxomicin is non-systemic, meaning it is minimally absorbed into the bloodstream, it is bactericidal, and it has demonstrated selective eradication of pathogenic Clostridium difficile with minimal disruption to the multiple species ofbacteria that make up the normal, healthy intestinal flora. The maintenance of normal physiological conditions in the colon can reduce the probability of Clostridium difficile infection recurrence.[5] [6]

It is marketed by Cubist Pharmaceuticals after acquisition of its the originating company Optimer Pharmaceuticals. The target use is for treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Fidaxomicin is available in a 200 mg tablet that is administered every 12 hours for a recommended duration of 10 days. Total duration of therapy should be determined by the patient’s clinical status. It is currently one of the most expensive antibiotics approved for use. A 20 tab pack costs upwards of £1350.[7]

Fidaxomicin works by inhibiting the bacterial enzyme RNA polymerase, resulting in the death of Clostridium difficile.[8] It is active against Gram positive bacteria especially clostridia. The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) range for C. difficile (ATCC 700057) is 0.03–0.25 μg/mL.[3]

Approvals and indications

For the treatment of CDAD (Clostridium difficile-Associated diarrhea), the drug won an FDA advisory panel’s unanimous approval on April 5, 2011.[14] and full FDA approval on May 27, 2011.[15]

Fidaxomicin is an antibiotic approved and launched in 2011 in the U.S. for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) in adults 18 years of age and older. In September 2011, the product received a positive opinion in the E.U. and final approval was assigned in December 2011. First E.U. launch took place in the U.K. in June 2012. Optimer Pharmaceuticals is conducting phase III clinical trials for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Preclinical studies are ongoing for potential use in the prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) infection. Early clinical studies had been under way for the prevention and treatment of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) infection; however, no recent development has been reported for this indication.

The compound is a novel macrocyclic antibiotic that is produced by fermentation. Its narrow-spectrum activity is highly selective for C. difficile, thus preserving gut microbial ecology, an important consideration for the treatment of CDAD.

In May 2005, Par Pharmaceutical and Optimer entered into a joint development and collaboration agreement for fidaxomicin. However, rights to the compound were returned to Optimer in 2007. The compound was granted fast track status by the FDA in 2003. In 2010, orphan drug designation was assigned to fidaxomicin in the U.S. by Optimer Pharmaceuticals for the treatment of pediatric Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). In 2011, the compound was licensed by Optimer Pharmaceuticals to Astellas Pharma in Europe and certain countries in the Middle East, Africa, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and Japan for the treatment of CDAD. In 2011, fidaxomicin was licensed to Cubist by Optimer Pharmaceuticals for comarketing in the U.S. for the treatment of CDAD. In July 2012, the product was licensed by Optimer Pharmaceuticals to Specialised Therapeutics Australia in AU and NZ for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated infection. OBI Pharma holds exclusive commercial rights in Taiwan, where the compound was approved for the treatment of CDAD in September 2012, and in December 2012, the product was licensed to AstraZeneca in South America with commercialization rights also for the treatment of CDAD. 

Clinical trials

Good results were reported in 2009 from a North American phase III trial comparing it with oral vancomycin for the treatment ofClostridium difficile infection (CDI)[9][10] The study met its primary endpoint of clinical cure, showing that fidaxomicin was non-inferior to oral vancomycin (92.1% vs. 89.8%). In addition, the study met its secondary endpoint of recurrence: 13.3% of the subjects had a recurrence with fidaxomicin vs. 24.0% with oral vancomycin. The study also met its exploratory endpoint of global cure (77.7% for fidaxomicin vs. 67.1% for vancomycin).[11] Clinical cure was defined as patients requiring no further CDI therapy two days after completion of study medication. Global cure was defined as patients who were cured at the end of therapy and did not have a recurrence in the next 4 weeks.[12]

Fidaxomicin was shown to be as good as the current standard-of-care, vancomycin, for treating CDI in a Phase III trial published in February 2011.[13] The authors also reported significantly fewer recurrences of infection, a frequent problem with C. difficile, and similar drug side effects.

References

  1.  “DIFICID®” (PDF). TGA eBusiness Services. Specialised Therapeutics Australia Pty Ltd. 23 April 2013. Retrieved 31 March 2014.
  2.  Revill, P.; Serradell, N.; Bolós, J. (2006). “Tiacumicin B”. Drugs of the Future 31 (6): 494. doi:10.1358/dof.2006.031.06.1000709.
  3.  “Dificid, Full Prescribing Information”. Optimer Pharmaceuticals. 2013.
  4.  “Fidaxomicin”. Drugs in R&D 10: 37. 2012. doi:10.2165/11537730-000000000-00000.
  5.  Louie, T. J.; Emery, J.; Krulicki, W.; Byrne, B.; Mah, M. (2008). “OPT-80 Eliminates Clostridium difficile and is Sparing of Bacteroides Species during Treatment of C. Difficile Infection”Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 53 (1): 261–3. doi:10.1128/AAC.01443-07.PMC 2612159PMID 18955523.
  6.  Johnson, Stuart (2009). “Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: A review of risk factors, treatments, and outcomes”. Journal of Infection58 (6): 403–10. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2009.03.010PMID 19394704.
  7. http://www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/bnf/current/PHP18388-dificlir.htm#PHP18388-dificlir
  8.  Srivastava, Aashish; Talaue, Meliza; Liu, Shuang; Degen, David; Ebright, Richard Y; Sineva, Elena; Chakraborty, Anirban; Druzhinin, Sergey Y; Chatterjee, Sujoy; Mukhopadhyay, Jayanta; Ebright, Yon W; Zozula, Alex; Shen, Juan; Sengupta, Sonali; Niedfeldt, Rui Rong; Xin, Cai; Kaneko, Takushi; Irschik, Herbert; Jansen, Rolf; Donadio, Stefano; Connell, Nancy; Ebright, Richard H (2011). “New target for inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase: ‘switch region'”Current Opinion in Microbiology 14 (5): 532–43.doi:10.1016/j.mib.2011.07.030PMC 3196380PMID 21862392.
  9.  “Optimer’s North American phase 3 Fidaxomicin study results presented at the 49th ICAAC” (Press release). Optimer Pharmaceuticals. September 16, 2009. Retrieved May 7, 2013.
  10.  “Optimer Pharmaceuticals Presents Results From Fidaxomicin Phase 3 Study for the Treatment” (Press release). Optimer Pharmaceuticals. May 17, 2009. Retrieved May 7, 2013.
  11.  Golan Y, Mullane KM, Miller MA (September 12–15, 2009). “Low recurrence rate among patients with C. difficile infection treated with fidaxomicin”. 49th interscience conference on antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. San Francisco.
  12.  Gorbach S, Weiss K, Sears P, et al (September 12–15, 2009). “Safety of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in treatment of Clostridium difficile infection”. 49th interscience conference on antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. San Francisco.
  13.  Louie, Thomas J.; Miller, Mark A.; Mullane, Kathleen M.; Weiss, Karl; Lentnek, Arnold; Golan, Yoav; Gorbach, Sherwood; Sears, Pamela; Shue, Youe-Kong; Opt-80-003 Clinical Study, Group (2011). “Fidaxomicin versus Vancomycin forClostridium difficileInfection”. New England Journal of Medicine 364 (5): 422–31. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0910812PMID 21288078.
  14.  Peterson, Molly (Apr 5, 2011). “Optimer Wins FDA Panel’s Backing for Antibiotic Fidaxomicin”. Bloomberg.
  15.  Nordqvist, Christian (27 May 2011). “Dificid (fidaxomicin) Approved For Clostridium Difficile-Associated Diarrhea”Medical News Today.

 

http://www.pharmatimes.com/Article/14-05-14/Astellas_Dificlir_could_save_NHS_thousands_of_pounds.aspx

India business robust in terms of growth: Glenmark….videos


 

SOME LINKS ON VIDEOS

CLICK TO VIEW

India business robust in terms of growth: Glenmark on Q1 

profit.ndtv.com/…/news/video-india-business-robust…

Aug 2, 2013

NDTV Profit News Video Clip on India business robust in terms of growth: … chairman and managing director …