New Drug Approvals
Follow New Drug Approvals on WordPress.com

FLAGS AND HITS

Flag Counter
DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO

Archives

Categories

Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Researchgate

Anthony Melvin Crasto Dr.

  Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK   ...................................................................Join me on twitter Follow amcrasto on Twitter     ..................................................................Join me on google plus Googleplus

MYSELF

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D ( ICT, Mumbai) , INDIA 36Yrs Exp. in the feld of Organic Chemistry,Working for AFRICURE PHARMA as ADVISOR earlier with GLENMARK PHARMA at Navi Mumbai, INDIA. Serving chemists around the world. Helping them with websites on Chemistry.Million hits on google, NO ADVERTISEMENTS , ACADEMIC , NON COMMERCIAL SITE, world acclamation from industry, academia, drug authorities for websites, blogs and educational contribution, ........amcrasto@gmail.com..........+91 9323115463, Skype amcrasto64 View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn Anthony Melvin Crasto Dr.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 37.9K other subscribers
DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, Born in Mumbai in 1964 and graduated from Mumbai University, Completed his Ph.D from ICT, 1991,Matunga, Mumbai, India, in Organic Chemistry, The thesis topic was Synthesis of Novel Pyrethroid Analogues, Currently he is working with AFRICURE PHARMA, ROW2TECH, NIPER-G, Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, Govt. of India as ADVISOR, earlier assignment was with GLENMARK LIFE SCIENCES LTD, as CONSUlTANT, Retired from GLENMARK in Jan2022 Research Centre as Principal Scientist, Process Research (bulk actives) at Mahape, Navi Mumbai, India. Total Industry exp 32 plus yrs, Prior to joining Glenmark, he has worked with major multinationals like Hoechst Marion Roussel, now Sanofi, Searle India Ltd, now RPG lifesciences, etc. He has worked with notable scientists like Dr K Nagarajan, Dr Ralph Stapel, Prof S Seshadri, etc, He did custom synthesis for major multinationals in his career like BASF, Novartis, Sanofi, etc., He has worked in Discovery, Natural products, Bulk drugs, Generics, Intermediates, Fine chemicals, Neutraceuticals, GMP, Scaleups, etc, he is now helping millions, has 9 million plus hits on Google on all Organic chemistry websites. His friends call him Open superstar worlddrugtracker. His New Drug Approvals, Green Chemistry International, All about drugs, Eurekamoments, Organic spectroscopy international, etc in organic chemistry are some most read blogs He has hands on experience in initiation and developing novel routes for drug molecules and implementation them on commercial scale over a 32 PLUS year tenure till date Feb 2023, Around 35 plus products in his career. He has good knowledge of IPM, GMP, Regulatory aspects, he has several International patents published worldwide . He has good proficiency in Technology transfer, Spectroscopy, Stereochemistry, Synthesis, Polymorphism etc., He suffered a paralytic stroke/ Acute Transverse mylitis in Dec 2007 and is 90 %Paralysed, He is bound to a wheelchair, this seems to have injected feul in him to help chemists all around the world, he is more active than before and is pushing boundaries, He has 100 million plus hits on Google, 2.5 lakh plus connections on all networking sites, 100 Lakh plus views on dozen plus blogs, 227 countries, 7 continents, He makes himself available to all, contact him on +91 9323115463, email amcrasto@gmail.com, Twitter, @amcrasto , He lives and will die for his family, 90% paralysis cannot kill his soul., Notably he has 38 lakh plus views on New Drug Approvals Blog in 227 countries......https://newdrugapprovals.wordpress.com/ , He appreciates the help he gets from one and all, Friends, Family, Glenmark, Readers, Wellwishers, Doctors, Drug authorities, His Contacts, Physiotherapist, etc He has total of 32 International and Indian awards

Verified Services

View Full Profile →

Recent Posts

6 lakh views on New drug approvals Blog


Flag Counter

https://newdrugapprovals.org/

NEW DRUG APPROVALS

ALL ABOUT DRUGS, LIVE, BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, WORLDDRUGTRACKER, HELPING MILLIONS, 7 MILLION HITS ON GOOGLE, PUSHING BOUNDARIES, ONE LAKH PLUS CONNECTIONS WORLDWIDE, 5 LAKHS PLUS VIEWS ON THIS BLOG IN 203 COUNTRIES

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO

ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO
MY BLOGS………

DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

DR ANTHONY CRASTO

https://newdrugapprovals.org/

 

 

ORGANIC SPECTROSCOPY

Read all about Organic Spectroscopy on ORGANIC SPECTROSCOPY INTERNATIONAL

DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO …..FOR BLOG HOME CLICK HERE

Join me on Linkedin

View Anthony Melvin Crasto Ph.D's profile on LinkedIn

Join me on Facebook FACEBOOK

Join me on twitterFollow amcrasto on Twitter

Join me on google plus Googleplus

 amcrasto@gmail.com

vietnam

 

Map of vietnam country.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dalat city

hanoi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pleasures of Process Development


milkshake's avatarOrg Prep Daily

BreakingBad

A reflux in 12 molar HCl
Carefully watched for a frothing,
Painstakingly drained from the reactor,
To strip down and scrub off that gross thing.

My bosses, I tried please believe me,
I’m doing my best as you insist,
I’m ashamed of the material I burned through,
I’m ashamed of the deadlines I missed.

But if you could just see the beauty,
These things I could never describe,
These pleasures of process perfection,
This is my one lucky prize.

refrain: Product isolation…

My apologies to Joy Division

View original post

Sri Lankan traditional medicine


Sri Lanka has its own indigenous scheme of traditional medicine (Ayurveda).[1][2] This system has been practised for many centuries in the island nation. The Sri Lankan Ayurvedic tradition is a mixture of the Sinhala traditional medicine, Ayurveda and Siddha systems of India, Unani medicine of Greece through the Arabs, and most importantly, theDesheeya Chikitsa, which is the indigenous medicine of Sri Lanka.

History

Sri Lanka developed its own Ayurvedic system based on a series of prescriptions handed down from generation to generation over a period of 3,000 years. The ancient kings, who were also prominent physicians, sustained its survival and longevity. King Buddhadasa (398 AD), the most influential of these physicians, wrote the Sarartha Sangrahaya, a comprehensive manuscript which Sri Lankan physicians still use today for reference.Map of sri lanka 

  1. Sri Lanka

Ancient inscriptions on rock surfaces reveal that organized medical services have existed within the country for centuries. In fact, Sri Lanka claims to be the first country in the world to have established dedicated hospitals. The Sri Lankan mountain Mihintale still has the ruins of what many believe to be the first hospital in the world. Old hospital sites now attract tourists, who marvel at the beautiful ruins. These places have come to symbolize a traditional sense of healing and care, which was so prevalent at that time.

Historically the Ayurvedic physicians enjoyed a noble position in the country’s social hierarchy due to their royal patronage. From this legacy stems a well-known Sri Lankan saying: “If you can not be a king, become a healer.” Along with Buddhism, the interrelationship between Ayurveda and royalty continues to influence politics in Sri Lanka.

Four systems of traditional medicine have been adopted in Sri Lanka: Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani and Deshiya Chikitsa. The Ayurveda and Deshiya Chikitsa systems use mainly plant and herbal preparations for the treatment of diseases–the former uses about 2000 species, the latter about 500. The plants are used singly or as mixtures.

The traditional systems of medicine have a vast literature, mainly in the form of manuscripts. The principle of the Ayurvedic system is to consider the body as a whole, ailments of different organs not being treated separately as in modern medicine. Similarly, Ayurveda takes into account the actions of the drug in its entirety.

Research therefore must be carried out in hospitals or biological laboratories and not in chemical laboratories where plant extracts are subject inevitably to chemical reactions. Therefore the chemical approach to identify active principles is a complete deviation from the principles of traditional medicine. Research on plants should be carried out for the further development of traditional systems of medicine and not to their detriment.

The threat of extinction of certain species of plants and herbs is stressed, the causes being the destruction of jungles, the greater demand for raw materials for increased manufacture of traditional medicinal preparations, the absence of organised cultivation of medicinal plants, and unscientific harvesting. The compilation of encyclopaedias of plants used in traditional medicine is highly recommended for every country interested in preserving the traditional systems of medicine.

Traditional medicine has been practiced in Sri Lanka for 3,000 years. At present, there are four systems of traditional medical systems in Sri Lanka viz. Ayurveda, Siddha, Unani and Deshiya Chikitsa (Sri Lankan traditional treatment). The most important among them is Ayurveda, which also forms part of the national health services provided by the government of Sri Lanka including separate ministry for Indigenous Medicine. At present, Ayurveda serves a large proportion of the population with one Ayurvedic physician per 3,000 people in Sri Lanka. About 60 to 70% of the rural population relies on traditional and natural medicine for their primary health care. Therefore Herbal drugs are essential components of traditional medical system in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is identified as one of the most biologically diverse countries in Asia with about 20% of the area under forest. It has the highest species diversity per unit area in Asia and is one of the mega biodiversity hot spots. Therefore it is an urgent need to rationally utilize medicinal plants for curative purposes with proper maintenance of biodiversity. The government of Sri Lana has taken several initiatives to develop technology for the effective conservation and efficient utilization of medicinal plants, to coordinate research and developmental activities through the Department of Ayurveda, Bandaranayake Memorial Ayurvedic Research Institute and the Institute of Indigenous Medicine – University of Colombo. But lack of funding and some problems and constraints knowledge of herbal medical systems and its applications to cure illnesses has not been effectively explored fully by Sri Lanka. If this happens successfully, Sri Lanka could gain a very significant competitive edge  in the global market, especially in the herbal medical drugs, beauty care and nutraceuticals.

There is a lot of scope for Sri Lanka to achieve higher rank in global market through export of quality products from medicinal and aromatic plants. But Sri Lanka seems to be lagging behind using advanced technology and standardization procedures in herbal products and is ranked lower in the herbal medicine global market share, while China occupies nearly 30% of the global market with high tech issues. Therefore Sri Lanka need to be focused on the quality assurance with multidisciplinary researches with in the country and collaborative works with other high tech used countries. Further Good laboratory practices (GLP) and Good manufacturing practices (GMPs) are also needed to apply for produce good quality medicinal products in Sri Lanka. Without overcoming these entire measures current scenario is not sufficient to increase the global market share of herbal drug industry and herbal medical practice for Sri Lanka.

Pathirage Kamal Perera, Guest invited speaker, Topic: Current scenario of herbal medicine in Sri Lanka, ASSOCHAM , 4th annual Herbal International Summit cum Exhibition on Medicinal & Aromatic Products, Spices and finished products(hi-MAPS) at NSIC, Okhla Industrial Estate, New Delhi on 14 -15 April,2012.

TRAVEL TO SRILANKA……..http://www.kumc.edu/Documents/history%20of%20med/Abeykoon.pdf

Works Cited 1. Waxler-Morrison NE. “Plural Medicine in Sri Lanka: Do Ayurvedic and Western Medical Practices Differ?” 1988. Web. 27 Jan. 2012. . 2. Glynn, J. R. “Factors That Influence Patients in Sri Lanka in Their Choice between Ayurvedic and Western Medicine.” British Medical Journal 291 (1985): 470-72. . 3. Jeyarajah R. “Factors That Influence Patients in Sri Lanka in Their Choice between Ayurvedic and Western Medicine.” 28 Sept. 1985. Web. 27 Jan. 2012. . 4. Ediriweera ER ER. “Clinical Study on the Efficacy of Chandra Kalka with Mahadalu Anupanaya in the Management of Pakshaghata (Hemiplegia).” Jan. 2011. Web. 27 Jan. 2012. . 5. Mano H. “Mechanisms of Blood Glucose-lowering Effect of Aqueous Extract from Stems of Kothala Himbutu (Salacia Reticulata) in the Mouse.” Jan. 2009. Web. 27 Jan. 2012. . 6. Nordstrom CR. “Exploring Pluralism–the Many Faces of Ayurveda.” 1988. Web. 27 Jan. 2012. . 7. Weerasinghe MC. “Paradox in Treatment Seeking: An Experience from Rural Sri Lanka.” Mar. 2011. Web. 27 Jan. 2012. .

The contacts of mentors and other respective sources

Commissioner of western province, Ministry of Indigenous Medicine, Sri Lanka Name- Dr. Nimal Karunasiri, Designation – Commissioner of Western Province, Ministry of Indigenous Medicine Sri Lanka Address- Ministry of Indigenous Medicine, Sri Lanka Contact information- Tel 01194777675679 Email- Nimalskl@gmail.com

National Ayurvedic Medical College and hospitals Name- Dr. R.A. Jayasinghe Designation – Director of indigenous medicine – Rajagiriya Address- National Ayurvedic Medical College, Rajagiriya, Sri Lanka Contact information- Tel +94775412312

National Ayurvedic research center Name- K.D.S. Ranaweera Designation- Professor Address- Institute Bandaranayaka Memorial Research Institute, Navinna, Sri Lanaka Contact information- Tel +942850302 or 333 /0712413537

Licensed Ayurvedic medical practitioners Name- Dr. H.A.M Sriyani Designation- Doctor of Ayurvedic Medicine Institute- Ayurvedic Hospital Address- Minipe Pradeshiya Saba (provincial level hospital), Hasalaka, Sri Lanka Contact information- Tel- 01194772865364

Name- Dr. H.P Jayadasa Designation- Doctor of Ayurvedic Medicine Institute- Gampaha Ayurvedic dispensary Address- 40. A, Rahula Road, Katubadda, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka Contact information- Tel- 01194777551389

Address of the hospital where the shadowing of doctors and interviewing patients will take placeMinipe Pradeshiya Saba (provincial level hospital) Hasalaka

References

  1.  Plunkett, Richard; Ellemor, Brigitte (2003). Sri Lanka. Lonely Planet. p. 174. ISBN 1-74059-423-1.
  2. Petitjean, Patrick; Jami, Catherine; Moulin, Anne + – Marie (1992). Science and Empires. Springer. p. 112. ISBN 0-7923-1518-9.

Sri Lankan traditional medicine

http://www.indigenousmedimini.gov.lk/

Retosiban, GSK221149A


Retosiban structure.svg

Retosiban, GSK221149A

820957-38-8

MW 494.5827, MF C27 H34 N4 O5

Oxytocin antagonist

Threatened pre-term labour

PHASE 3 GSK

UNII-GIE06H28OX, GSK 221149A,  820957-38-8,

(3R,6R)-6-((S)-sec-butyl)-3-(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)-1-((R)-1-(2-methyloxazol-4-yl)-2-morpholino-2-oxoethyl)piperazine-2,5-dione

3(R)-(2,3-Dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)-1-[1(R)-(2-methyloxazol-4-yl)-2-(4-morpholinyl)-2-oxoethyl]-6(R)-[1(S)-methylpropyl]piperazine-2,5-dione

(3R.6R)-3-(2,3-dihvdro-1 H-inden-2-v0-1 -\( R)-1 -(2-methyl-1 ,3-oxazol-4- yl)-2-(4-morpholinyl)-2-oxoethyll-6-r(1S -1-methylpropyn-2.5- piperazinedione

2,​5-​Piperazinedione, 3-​(2,​3-​dihydro-​1H-​inden-​2-​yl)​-​1-​[(1R)​-​1-​(2-​methyl-​4-​oxazolyl)​-​2-​(4-​morpholinyl)​-​2-​oxoethyl]​-​6-​[(1S)​-​1-​methylpropyl]​-​, (3R,​6R)​-

Morpholine, 4-[(2R)-[(3R,6R)-3-(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)-6-[(1S)-1-methylpropyl]-2,5-dioxo-1-piperazinyl](2-methyl-4-oxazolyl)acetyl]-

Retosiban (GSK-221,149-A)[1][2] is an oral drug which acts as a selective, sub-nanomolar (Ki = 0.65 nM) oxytocin receptor antagonist with >1400-fold selectivity[3] over the related vasopressin receptors and is being developed by GlaxoSmithKline for the treatment of preterm labour.[4][5]

Retosibanis an oxytocin (OT) antagonist in phase III clinical trials at GlaxoSmithKline for the prevention of preterm labor. OT antagonism is widely known to inhibit spontaneous uterine contractions.

Retosiban is a diketopiperazine nonpeptide compound with high potency and selectivity for the OT receptor over vasopressin receptors.

This  candidate has been shown to block oxytocin-induced uterine contractions when administered intravenously and to exhibit oral activity

Preterm labor is a major clinical problem leading to death and disability in newborns and accounts for 10% of all births and causes 70% of all infant mortality and morbidity.(Goldenberg, R. L.; Rouse, D.Prevention of premature birth N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 313)
Oxytocin (OT) is a potent stimulant of uterine contractions and is responsible for the initiation of labor via the interaction with the OT receptors in the mammalian uterus. OT antagonists have been shown to inhibit uterine contractions and delay preterm delivery. So there is increasing interest in OT antagonists because of their potential application in the prevention of preterm labor.
Although several tocolytics have already been approved in clinical practice, they have harmful maternal or fetal side effects.(Enkin, M.; Kierse, M.; Neilson, J.; Preterm Labour: A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000; pp 211225. )
The first clinically tested OT antagonist atosiban has a much more tolerable side effect profile and has recently been approved for use in Europe.
Atosiban SW.svgATOSIBAN

However, atosiban is a peptide and a mixed OT/vasopressin V1a receptor antagonist that has to be given by iv infusion and is not suitable for long-term maintenance treatment, as it is not orally bioavailable.((a) Bossmar, T.Treatment of preterm labor with the oxytocin and vasopressin antagonist atosiban J. Perinat. Med. 1998, 26, 458– 465

See also,(b) Coomarasamy, A.; Knox, E. M.; Gee, H.; Khan, K. S.Oxytocin antagonists for tocolysis in preterm labour—a systematic review Med. Sci. Monit. 2002, 8, RA268RA273)

Hence there has been considerable interest in overcoming the shortcomings of the peptide OT antagonists by identifying orally active nonpeptide OT antagonists with a higher degree of selectivity toward the vasopressin receptors (V1a, V1b, V2) with good oral bioavailability. Although several templates have been investigated as potential selective OT antagonists, few have achieved the required selectivity for the OT receptor vs the vasopressin receptors combined with the bioavailability and physical chemical properties required for an efficacious oral drug.(Borthwick, A. D.Oral Oxytocin Antagonists J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 65256538)
Therefore  the objective was to design a potent, orally active OT antagonist with high levels of selectivity over the vasopressin receptor with good oral bioavailability in humans that would delay labor safely by greater than seven days and with improved infant outcome, as shown by a reduced combined morbidity score.
The most potent of these was the 2,4-difluorophenyl dimethylamide 1, which has good in vitro (pKi = 9.2) and in vivo (IC50 = 227 nM) potency and is 20-fold more potent than atosiban in vitro. Compound 1 also has good pharmacokinetics with bioavailability >50% in both the rat and the dog.
Moreover, it is >500-fold selective over all three human vasopressin receptors (hV1aR, hV2R, and hV1bR) and has an acceptable P450 profile. In addition, it has a satisfactory safety profile in the genotoxicity screens and in the four day oral toxicity test in rats.

RETOSIBAN 106

However, 1 had poor aqueous solubility and high intrinsic clearance in human and cynomolgus monkey liver microsomes, so a compound was required that retained high antagonist potency and excellent pharmacokinetics in animal species seen with 1 but was more soluble and with improved human intrinsic clearance to decrease the risk of low bioavailability in humans.
first approach was to replace the 7-aryl ring with a five-membered heterocycle, which led to the oxazole Retosiban (106) a clinical candidate.(Borthwick, A. D.; Liddle, J.The design of orally bioavailable 2,5 diketopiperazine oxytocin antagonists: from concept to clinical candidate for premature labour Med. Res. Rev. 2011, 31, 576604)
As a backup to 106, an alternative replacement of the 7-aryl ring with a six-membered heterocycle was considered and in this report we describe how we investigated the modification of the 7-aryl ring to the 7(3′-pyridyl) ring and optimized substitution in this ring as well as modifying the isobutyl group to obtain good potency, lower intrinsic clearance in human microsomes, and good pharmacokinetics in animal species.
Barusiban.pngBARUSIBAN

 

L-368,899 structure.pngL-368899

L-371,257 structure.pngL-371257

PAPER

Pyridyl-2,5-diketopiperazines as potent, selective, and orally bioavailable oxytocin antagonists: Synthesis, pharmacokinetics, and in vivo potency
J Med Chem 2012, 55(2): 783

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm201287w

 PAPER

The discovery of GSK221149A: A potent and selective oxytocin antagonist
Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2008, 18(1): 90

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960894X07013170

Full-size image (4 K)

Full-size image (30 K)

Scheme

Reagents and conditions: (a) triethylamine, MeOH; (b) H2, Pd/C, ethanol/acetic acid; (c) carbonyl diimidazole, CH2Cl2 3 h then acetone/2 N HCl; (d) benzotriazol-1-yloxytripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate, dichloromethane 1 h then morpholine.

GSK221149A and other tertiary amides were prepared in four steps via the Ugi reaction as outlined in Scheme . A 2:1 mixture of diastereoisomers 24 was formed with the desirable (R)-diastereoisomer being the minor product. Hydrogenation of crude 24 furnished the cyclised phenol 25, again enriched with the undesirable (S)-diastereoisomer.

Activation of the mixture 25 with carbonyl diimidazole followed by the addition of 2 N HCl promoted epimerisation at the exocyclic position and yielded the acids 26 with the required (R)-diastereoisomer as the major product.

Acid activation with benzotriazol-1-yloxytripyrrolidinophosphonium hexafluorophosphate followed by the addition of morpholine and subsequent column chromatography yielded homo-chiral GSK221149A.

 

PATENT

WO 2005000840

http://www.google.co.in/patents/EP1641787A1?cl=en

Example 3

(3R.6R)-3-(2,3-dihvdro-1 H-inden-2-v0-1 -\( R)-1 -(2-methyl-1 ,3-oxazol-4- yl)-2-(4-morpholinyl)-2-oxoethyll-6-r(1S -1-methylpropyn-2.5- piperazinedione ( 2R)-[(benzyloxycarbonyl)amino](2,3-dihydro-1 H-inden-2-yl)ethanoic acid (35.84g, 0.110mol) in a 500mL round bottomed flask was treated with 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol (165mL) followed by methanol (55ml) and triethylamine (11.13g, 15.33mL, 0.110mmol) the slurry was stirred for 3.5hrs until dissolution was observed. The solution was then added to (D)- allo Isoleucine methyl ester hydrochloride (20g, .110mol) in a separate flask. The slurry was stirred until dissolution was observed. 2-methyl-4- formyloxazole (12.24g, 0.110mmol) was then added followed by 2- benzyloxyphenylisocynanide (23.04g, 0.110mmol). The dark brown reaction mixture was then stirred at 20-25°C for 24hrs. The solution was then concentrated to a volume of ca. 130mL by distillation at reduced pressure.

The solution was the diluted with dichloromethane (200mL) and washed with water (2 x 200mL). The organic phase was then diluted with N-methyl pyrrolidinone (460mL) was and the dichloromethane removed by stirring at 40°C under vacuum for 2hrs. Acetic acid 46mL) was then added followed by palladium on carbon catalyst (69. Og of 10% Pd wt, 57% water, Johnson Matthey type 87L) and the mixture hydrogenated under balloon pressure of hydrogen with rapid stirring for 2hrs. The reaction mixture was then filtered, washed through with ethyl acetate (960mL) and washed with 3%w/v aq sodium chloride solution (960mL). The biphasic mixture was filtered and the organic phase separated and washed with 3%w/v aq sodium chloride solution (2 x 960mL). The organic solution was then diluted with ethyl acetate (200mL) and concentrated by distillation at atmospheric pressure by distilling out 385mL of solvent. The concentrated solution at 20-25°C was treated with 1 ,1′-carbonyldiimidazoIe (21.46g, 0.132mol) and stirred at 20-25°C for 1 hr then treated with water (290mL) and stirred rapidly at 20-25°C for 24hr. The mixture was allowed to settle and the ethyl acetate layer separated and discarded. The aqueous phase was washed with ethyl acetate (290mL) and the mixture allowed to settle and the aqueous phase was separated and acidified to pH 1-2 by the addition of concentrated hydrochloric acid (18mL).

The aqueous phase was then extracted into ethyl acetate (290mL and then 145mL). The combined ethyl acetate solution was then concentrated by distillation at atmospheric pressure to a volume of ca. 93mL. This solution was then diluted with tetrahydrofuran (62mL) and treated with triethylamine (11.02g, 15.20mL, 0.109mol) and cooled to -78°C. The solution was then treated with trimethylacetyl chloride (4.81 g, 4.92mL, 39.90mmol) and stirred at – 78°C for 7hr. The reaction mixture was then treated with a solution of morpholine (15.82g, 15.83mL, 0.181 mol) in tetrahydrofuran (23mL) and stirred at -78°C for 1hr 20mins before being allowed to warm to 20-25°C. The solution was then diluted with ethyl acetate (76mL) and washed with saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate solution (2 x 153mL) followed by water (153mL). The organic solution was then diluted with ethyl acetate (54mL) and distilled down to a volume of 69mL at atmospheric pressure. The solution was then cooled to 20-25°C at which point crystallisation of the title compound occurred. The slurry of was then cooled further to 0°C before the title compound was isolated by filtration and sucked dry. Yield 8.92g.

 SYN WILL BE UPDATED.. ……………KEEP WATCHING

References

  • 1  Liddle J, Allen MJ, Borthwick AD, Brooks DP, Davies DE, Edwards RM, Exall AM, Hamlett C, Irving WR, Mason, AM, McCafferty GP, Nerozzi F, Peace S, Philp J, Pollard D, Pullen MA, Shabbir SS, Sollis SL, Westfall TD, Woollard PM, Wu C, Hickey DM (January 2008). “The discovery of GSK221149A: A potent and selective oxytocin antagonist”. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 18 (1): 90–94. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.11.008. PMID 18032036.
  • 2
  • Borthwick, A. D.; Liddle, J. (January 2013). “Retosiban and Epelsiban: Potent and Selective Orally available Oxytocin Antagonists”. In Domling, A. Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry: Protein-Protein Interactions in Drug Discovery. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. pp. 225–256. ISBN 978-3-527-33107-9.
  • 3
  • McCafferty GP, Pullen MA, Wu C, Edwards RM, Allen M.J, Woollard PM, Borthwick AD, Liddle J, Hickey DM, Brooks DP, Westfall TD (March 2007). “Use of a novel and highly selective oxytocin receptor antagonist to characterize uterine contractions in the rat”. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 293: R299–R305. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00057.2007. PMID 17395790.
  • 4
  • USAN Council (2007). “Statement on a Nonproprietary Name Adopted by the USAN Council” (PDF).
  • 5  Borthwick AD, Liddle J (July 2011). “The Design of Orally Bioavailable 2,5-Diketopiperazine Oxytocin Antagonists: From Concept to Clinical Candidate for Premature Labour”. Medicinal Research Reviews 31 (4): 576–604. doi:10.1002/med.20193. PMID 20027670.

…………..

OTHER INFO

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jm201287w

Abstract Image

A six-stage stereoselective synthesis of indanyl-7-(3′-pyridyl)-(3R,6R,7R)-2,5-diketopiperazines oxytocin antagonists from indene is described. SAR studies involving mono- and disubstitution in the 3′-pyridyl ring and variation of the 3-isobutyl group gave potent compounds (pKi > 9.0) with good aqueous solubility. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic profile in the rat, dog, and cynomolgus monkey of those derivatives with low cynomolgus monkey and human intrinsic clearance gave 2′,6′-dimethyl-3′-pyridyl Rsec-butyl morpholine amide Epelsiban (69), a highly potent oxytocin antagonist (pKi = 9.9) with >31000-fold selectivity over all three human vasopressin receptors hV1aR, hV2R, and hV1bR, with no significant P450 inhibition. Epelsiban has low levels of intrinsic clearance against the microsomes of four species, good bioavailability (55%) and comparable potency to atosiban in the rat, but is 100-fold more potent than the latter in vitro and was negative in the genotoxicity screens with a satisfactory oral safety profile in female rats.

EPELSIBAN

(3R,6R)-3-(2,3-Dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)-1-[(1R)-1-(2,6-dimethyl-3-pyridinyl)-2-(4-morpholinyl)-2-oxoethyl]-6-[(1S)-1-methylpropyl]-2,5-piperazinedione (69)

69 as a white solid (2.4 g, 45%). Recystallisation from ethyl acetate/hexane (1:3) gave colorless needles (75%) mp 140 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ 7.49 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H, pyridyl-4H), 7.26–7.15 (m, 4H, indanyl-arylH), 7.10 (d, J =8.1 Hz, 1H, pyridyl-5H), 6.68 (s, 1H, NCHpyridyl), 6.49 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1H, lactam-NH), 4.10 (dd, J = 10.1 Hz, 4.0 Hz, 1H, NCHindanyl), 4.01 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, NCHsec-butyl), 3.75–2.71 (m, 13H, 8× morpholinyl-H, indanyl-3H, –1H, –2H), 2.62 and 2.58 (2s, 6H, pyridyl-2Me,-6Me), 1.64–1.52 (m, 1H, CHHMe), 0.98–0.79 (m, 2H, CHHMe, CHMeCH2), 0.70 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H, CH2Me), 0.45 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H, CHMe). LCMS m/z 519 (MH+) single component, gradient 2 (tR 2.70 min). HRMS calcd for C30H38N4O4 (MH+) 519.29658, found 519.29667. HPLC: 100% (tR 10.388 min).
To a warm solution of 69 (2.66 g, 5.1 mmol) in acetone (40 mL) was added a solution of benzene sulfonic acid (0.81 g, 5.1 mmol) in acetone (40 mL), and the resulting solution was heated to boiling and allowed to cool to room temperature during 48 h. The resulting crystals were filtered off, air-dried on the filter pad to give the besylate (3.214 g, 92.6%) as white crystals of 69B mp 179–183 °C. 1H NMR (CD3OD) δ 8.30 (d, 1H, J = 8.1 Hz, pyridyl-4H), 7.84–7.80 (m, 2H, PhSO3ortho-H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H, pyridyl-5H), 7.45–7.38 (m, 3H, PhSO3meta-H, para-H), 7.23–7.09 (m, 4H, indanyl-arylH), 6.08 (broad s, 1H, NCHpyridyl), 4.00 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 1H, NCHsec-butyl), 3.92 (d, J = 9.9 Hz, 1H, NCHindanyl), 3.78–3.39 and 3.14–2.80 (m, 13H, 8× morpholinyl-H, indanyl-3H, –1H, –2H)), 2.79 and 2.78 (2s, 6H, pyridyl-2Me, -6Me), 1.85–1.74 (m, 1H, CHHMe), 1.59–1.48 (m, 1H, CHHMe), 1.15–1.01 (m, 1H, CHMeCH2), 0.92 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 3H, CHMe), 0.85 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H, CH2Me). LCMS m/z 519 MH+ single components, tR 2.72 min; circular dichroism (CH3CN) λmax 225.4 nm, dE −15.70, E15086; λmax 276 nm, dE 3.82, E5172. HRMS calcd for C30H38N4O4 (MH+) 519.2971, found 519.2972. Anal. (C30H38N4O4·C6H6O3S·3.0H2O) C, H, N, S.

…………..

Updates

Inline image 1

Inline image 2
Inline image 3

ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO

THANKS AND REGARD’S
DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO Ph.D

amcrasto@gmail.com

MOBILE-+91 9323115463
GLENMARK SCIENTIST ,  INDIA
web link
Retosiban
Retosiban structure.svg
Systematic (IUPAC) name
(3R,6R)-6-[(2S)-butan-2-yl]-3-(2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-2-yl)-1-[(1R)-1-(2-methyl-1,3-oxazol-4-yl)-2-(morpholin-4-yl)-2-oxoethyl]piperazine-2,5-dione
Clinical data
Legal status
  • Non-regulated
Identifiers
CAS number 820957-38-8
ATC code None
PubChem CID 96025669
ChemSpider 23323798
UNII GIE06H28OX
KEGG D08986
Synonyms GSK-221,149-A
Chemical data
Formula C27H34N4O5 
Molecular mass 494.58 g/mol

Dabrafenib mesylate, GSK 2118436, ダブラフェニブ 达拉菲尼, An antineoplastic agent that inhibits BRAF kinase


DABRAFENIB

ダブラフェニブ

达拉菲尼,

1195765-45-7 BASE

1195768-06-9 cas of mesylate

Benzenesulfonamide, N-​[3-​[5-​(2-​amino-​4-​pyrimidinyl)​-​2-​(1,​1-​dimethylethyl)​-​4-​thiazolyl]​-​2-​fluorophenyl]​-​2,​6-​difluoro-

N-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

MW 519.56 BASE

MF C23 H20 F3 N5 O2 S2 BASE

  • Dabarefenib
  • Dabrafenib
  • GSK 2118436
  • Tafinlar
  • UNII-QGP4HA4G1B

US FDA APPROVAL….Date of Approval: May 29, 2013

update

Product details
Name
Tafinlar
Agency product number
EMEA/H/C/002604
Active substance
dabrafenib mesilate
International non-proprietary name (INN) or common name
dabrafenib
Therapeutic area (MeSH)
Melanoma
Anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC) code
L01EC02
Publication details
Marketing-authorisation holder
Novartis Europharm Limited

Date of issue of marketing authorisation valid throughout the European Union
26/08/2013

 An orally bioavailable inhibitor of B-raf (BRAF) protein with potential antineoplastic activity. Dabrafenib selectively binds to and inhibits the activity of B-raf, which may inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells which contain a mutated BRAF gene. B-raf belongs to the the raf/mil family of serine/threonine protein kinases and plays a role in regulating the MAP kinase/ERKs signaling pathway, which may be constitutively activated due to BRAF gene mutations

Dabrafenib (trade name Tafinlar) is a drug for the treatment of cancers associated with a mutated version of the gene BRAF. Dabrafenib acts as an inhibitor of the associated enzyme B-Raf, which plays a role in the regulation of cell growth. Dabrafenib has clinical activity with a manageable safety profile in clinical trials of phase 1 and 2 in patients with BRAF(V600)-mutated metastatic melanoma.[1][2]

The Food and Drug Administration approved dabrafenib as a single agent treatment for patients with BRAF V600E mutation-positive advanced melanoma on May 30, 2013.[3] Clinical trial data demonstrated that resistance to dabrafinib and other BRAF inhibitors occurs within 6 to 7 months.[4] To overcome this resistance, the BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib was combined with the MEK inhibitor trametinib.[4] As a result of this research, on January 8, 2014, the FDA approved the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma.[5]

Inhibitor of BRAF(V600) mutants

Active Ingredient: DABRAFENIB MESYLATE
Dosage Form;Route: CAPSULE;ORAL
Proprietary Name: TAFINLAR
Applicant: GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Strength: EQ 75MG BASE
NDA Application Number: N202806
Product Number: 002
Approval Date: May 29, 2013
Reference Listed Drug Yes
RX/OTC/DISCN: RX

Patent Data

Appl No Prod No Patent No Patent
Expiration
Drug Substance
Claim
Drug Product
Claim
Patent Use
Code
Delist
Requested
N202806 002 7994185 Jan 20, 2030 Y Y U – 1406
N202806 002 8415345 Jan 20, 2030 Y Y U – 1406

Exclusivity Data

NDA Appl No Prod No Exclusivity Code Exclusivity Expiration
N202806 002 I – 678 Jan 8, 2017
N202806 002 ODE Jan 9, 2021
N202806 002 NCE May 29, 2018
N202806 002 ODE May 29, 2020

PDF……http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/202806s000lbl.pdf

TERMS

I 678, TRAMETINIB, IN COMBINATION WITH DABRAFENIB, FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH UNRESECTABLE OR METASTATIC MELANOMA WITH BRAF V600E OR V600K MUTATIONS AS DETECTED BY AN FDA-APPROVED TEST

ODE ORPHAN DRUG EXCLUSIVITY

NCE NEW CHEMICAL ENTITY

image

Analogs described herein were generally prepared according to Scheme S1. When the desired benzoic acid pre- cursors were unknown, the synthetic scheme began wi th esterification of bromo-acids 15a. Subsequent palladi-um-catalyzed amination witht-butyl carbamate afforded anilino esters15b. After esterification of benzoic acids15, or amination of bromo-esters leading to 15b, the anilino esters were reacted with an arylsulfonyl chloride toform the sulfonamide headgroup. Ester16was then condensed with the lithium anion of 2-chl
oro-4-methylpyrimidine to generate ketone intermediate17. Bromination of17with NBS followed by cyclization withisopropyl ort
-butyl thioamide afforded the desired thiazole core18. The tail was then installed by SNAr dis-placement at the chloropyrimidine in18
with either methanolic ammonia or a primary basicamine to generatethe desired analogues19
.

DABRAFENIB SYNTHESIS

DABRAFENIB ROUTE

WILL BE UPDATED

Inline image 1

Inline image 2

http://www.google.com/patents/WO2011047238A1?cl=en

Method 1 : Compound B (first crystal form) – A/-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Figure imgf000016_0001

A suspension of A/-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]- 2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (196 mg, 0.364 mmol) and ammonia in methanol 7M (8 ml, 56.0 mmol) was heated in a sealed tube to 90 °C for 24 h. The reaction was diluted with DCM and added silica gel and concentrated. The crude product was chromatographed on silica gel eluting with 100% DCM to 1 :1 [DCM:(9:1 EtOAc:MeOH)]. The clean fractions were concentrated to yield the crude product. The crude product was repurified by reverse phase HPLC (a gradient of acetonitrile:water with 0.1 %TFA in both). The combined clean fractions were concentrated then partitioned between DCM and saturated NaHCO3. The DCM layer was separated and dried over Na2SO4. The title compound, /V-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 – dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide was obtained (94 mg, 47% yield). 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-c/6) δ ppm 10.83 (s, 1 H), 7.93 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.55 – 7.70 (m, 1 H), 7.35 – 7.43 (m, 1 H), 7.31 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.14 – 7.27 (m, 3 H), 6.70 (s, 2 H), 5.79 (d, J=5.13 Hz, 1 H), 1 .35 (s, 9 H). MS (ESI): 519.9 [M+H]+.

Method 2: Compound B (alternative crystal form) – A/-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2- (1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide 19.6 mg of A/-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (may be prepared in accordance with example 58a) was combined with 500 L of ethyl acetate in a 2-mL vial at room temperature. The slurry was temperature-cycled between 0-40°C for 48 hrs. The resulting slurry was allowed to cool to room temperature and the solids were collected by vacuum filtration. The solids were analyzed by Raman, PXRD, DSC/TGA analyses, which indicated a crystal form different from the crystal form resulting from Example 58a, above. Method 3: Compound B (alternative crystal form, large batch) – A/-{3-[5-(2-amino-4- pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Figure imgf000018_0001

tep A: methyl 3-{[(2,6-difluorophenyl)sulfonyl]amino}-2-fluorobenzoate

Figure imgf000018_0002

Methyl 3-amino-2-fluorobenzoate (50 g, 1 eq) was charged to reactor followed by dichloromethane (250 mL, 5 vol). The contents were stirred and cooled to ~15°C and pyridine (26.2 mL, 1 .1 eq) was added. After addition of the pyridine, the reactor contents were adjusted to ~15°C and the addition of 2,6-diflurorobenzenesulfonyl chloride (39.7 mL, 1 .0 eq) was started via addition funnel. The temperature during addition was kept <25°C. After complete addition, the reactor contents were warmed to 20-25°C and held overnight. Ethyl acetate (150 mL) was added and dichloromethane was removed by distillation. Once distillation was complete, the reaction mixture was then diluted once more with ethyl acetate (5 vol) and concentrated. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (10 vol) and water (4 vol) and the contents heated to 50-55°C with stirring until all solids dissolve. The layers were settled and separated. The organic layer was diluted with water (4 vol) and the contents heated to 50-55° for 20-30 min. The layers were settled and then separated and the ethyl acetate layer was evaporated under reduced pressure to ~3 volumes. Ethyl Acetate (5 vol.) was added and again evaporated under reduced pressure to ~3 volumes.

Cyclohexane (9 vol) was then added to the reactor and the contents were heated to reflux for 30 min then cooled to 0 °C. The solids were filtered and rinsed with cyclohexane (2 x 100 mL). The solids were air dried overnight to obtain methyl 3-{[(2,6- difluorophenyl)sulfonyl]amino}-2-fluorobenzoate (94.1 g, 91 %).

Step B: A/-{3-[(2-chloro-4-pyhmidinyl)acetyl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Figure imgf000019_0001

Methyl 3-{[(2,6-difluorophenyl)sulfonyl]amino}-2-fluorobenzoate (490 g, 1 equiv.), prepared generally in accordance with Step A, above, was dissolved in THF (2.45 L, 5 vols) and stirred and cooled to 0-3 °C. 1 M lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide in THF (5.25 L, 3.7 equiv.) solution was charged to the reaction mixture followed addition of 2- chloro-4-methylpyrimidine (238 g, 1 .3 equiv.) in THF (2.45 L, 5 vols). The reaction was then stirred for 1 hr. The reaction was quenched with 4.5M HCI (3.92 L, 8 vols). The aqueous layer (bootom layer) was removed and discarded. The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure to ~2L. IPAC (isopropyl acetate) (2.45L) was added to the reaction mixture which was then concentrated to ~2L. IPAC (0.5L) and MTBE (2.45 L) was added and stirred overnight under N2. The solids were filtered. The solids and mother filtrate added back together and stirred for several hours. The solids were filtered and washed with MTBE (~5 vol). The solids were placed in vacuum oven at 50 °C overnight. The solids were dried in vacuum oven at 30 °C over weekend to obtain A/-{3-[(2-chloro-4-pyhmidinyl)acetyl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide (479 g, 72%).

Step C: A/-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Figure imgf000020_0001

To a reactor vessel was charged /V-{3-[(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)acetyl]-2-fluorophenyl}- 2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (30 g, 1 eq) followed by dichloromethane (300 mL). The reaction slurry was cooled to ~10°C and N-bromosuccinimide (“NBS”) (12.09 g, 1 eq) was added in 3 approximately equal portions, stirring for 10-15 minutes between each addition. After the final addition of NBS, the reaction mixture was warmed to ~20°C and stirred for 45 min . Water (5 vol) was then added to the reaction vessel and the mixture was stirred and then the layers separated. Water (5 vol) was again added to the dichloromethane layer and the mixture was stirred and the layers separated. The dichloromethane layers were concentrated to -120 mL. Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was added to the reaction mixture and concentrated to -120 mL. Dimethylacetamide (270 mL) was then added to the reaction mixture and cooled to ~10°C. 2,2- Dimethylpropanethioamide (1 .3 g, 0.5 eq) in 2 equal portions was added to the reactor contents with stirring for ~5 minutes between additions. The reaction was warmed to 20-25 °C. After 45 min, the vessel contents were heated to 75°C and held for 1 .75 hours . The reaction mixture was then cooled to 5°C and water (270 ml) was slowly charged keeping the temperature below 30°C. Ethyl acetate (4 vol) was then charged and the mixture was stirred and layers separated. Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was again charged to the aqueous layer and the contents were stirred and separated. Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was charged again to the aqueous layer and the contents were stirred and separated. The organic layers were combined and washed with water (4 vol) 4 times and stirred overnight at 20-25°C. The organic layers were then concentrated under heat and vacuum to 120 mL. The vessel contents were then heated to 50°C and heptanes (120 mL) were added slowly. After addition of heptanes, the vessel contents were heated to reflux then cooled to 0°C and held for ~2 hrs. The solids were filtered and rinsed with heptanes (2 x 2 vol). The solid product was then dried under vacuum at 30°C to obtain /V-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonannide (28.8 g, 80%).

Step D: A/-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyhmidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonannide

In 1 gal pressure reactor, a mixture of A/-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrinnidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 – dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (120 g) prepared in accordance with Step C, above, and ammonium hydroxide (28-30%, 2.4 L, 20 vol) was heated in the sealed pressure reactor to 98-103 °C and stirred at this temperature for 2 hours. The reaction was cooled slowly to room temperature (20 °C) and stirred overnight. The solids were filtered and washed with minimum amount of the mother liquor and dried under vacuum. The solids were added to a mixture of EtOAc (15 vol)/ water (2 vol) and heated to complete dissolution at 60-70 °C and the aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The EtOAC layer was charged with water (1 vol) and neutralized with aq. HCI to ~pH 5.4-5.5. and added water (1 vol). The aqueous layer was removed and discarded at 60-70 °C. The organic layer was washed with water (1 vol) at 60-70 °C and the aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The organic layer was filtered at 60 °C and concentrated to 3 volumes. EtOAc (6 vol) was charged into the mixture and heated and stirred at 72 °C for 10 min , then cooled to 20°C and stirred overnight. EtOAc was removed via vacuum distillation to concentrate the reaction mixture to ~3 volumes. The reaction mixture was maintained at ~65-70°C for ~30mins. Product crystals having the same crystal form as those prepared in Example 58b (and preparable by the procedure of Example 58b), above, in heptanes slurry were charged. Heptane (9 vol) was slowly added at 65-70 °C. The slurry was stirred at 65-70 °C for 2- 3 hours and then cooled slowly to 0-5°C. The product was filtered, washed with

EtOAc/heptane (3/1 v/v, 4 vol) and dried at 45°C under vacuum to obtain A/-{3-[5-(2- amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide (102.3 g, 88%).

Method 4: Compound B (mesylate salt) – A/-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 – dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide methanesulfonate

Figure imgf000022_0001

To a solution of /V-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonannide (204 mg, 0.393 mmol) in isopropanol (2 ml_), methanesulfonic acid (0.131 ml_, 0.393 mmol) was added and the solution was allowed to stir at room temperature for 3 hours. A white precipitate formed and the slurry was filtered and rinsed with diethyl ether to give the title product as a white crystalline solid (210 mg, 83% yield). 1 H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-c/6) δ ppm 10.85 (s, 1 H) 7.92 – 8.05 (m, 1 H) 7.56 – 7.72 (m, 1 H) 6.91 – 7.50 (m, 7 H) 5.83 – 5.98 (m, 1 H) 2.18 – 2.32 (m, 3 H) 1 .36 (s, 9 H). MS (ESI): 520.0 [M+H]+.

Method 5: Compound B (alternative mesylate salt embodiment) – A/-{3-[5-(2-amino-4- pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide methanesulfonate

A/-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}- 2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (as may be prepared according to example 58a) (2.37g, 4.56 mmol) was combined with pre-filtered acetonitrile (5.25 vol, 12.4 ml_). A pre-filtered solution of mesic acid (1 .1 eq., 5.02 mmol, 0.48 g) in H2O (0.75 eq., 1 .78 ml_) was added at 20°C. The temperature of the resulting mixture was raised to 50- 60°C while maintaining a low agitation speed. Once the mixture temperature reached to 50-60°C, a seed slurry of A/-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3- thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide methanesulfonate (1 .0 %w/w slurried in 0.2 vol of pre-filtered acetonitrile) was added, and the mixture was aged while agitating at a speed fast enough to keep solids from settling at 50-60°C for 2 hr. The mixture was then cooled to 0-5°C at 0.25°C/min and held at 0-5°C for at 6 hr. The mixture was filtered and the wet cake was washed twice with pre-filtered

acetonitrile. The first wash consisted of 14.2 ml (6 vol) pre-filtered acetonitrile and the second wash consisted of 9.5 ml (4 vol) pre-filtered acetonitrile. The wet solid was dried at 50°C under vacuum, yielding 2.39 g (85.1 % yield) of product. Typically, the salts of the present invention are pharmaceutically acceptable salts.

May 29, 2013 — GlaxoSmithKline plc announced today that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Tafinlar (dabrafenib). Tafinlar is indicated as a single-agent oral treatment for unresectable melanoma (melanoma that cannot be removed by surgery) or metastatic melanoma (melanoma which has spread to other parts of the body) in adult patients with BRAF V600E mutation. Tafinlar is not indicated for the treatment of patients with wild-type BRAF melanoma. The mutation must be detected by an FDA-approved test, such as the companion diagnostic assay from bioMérieux S.A., THxID™-BRAF.

Among those with metastatic melanoma, approximately half have a BRAF mutation, which is an abnormal change in a gene that can enable some melanoma tumours to grow and spread

Tafinlar is approved for patients with the BRAF V600E mutation, which accounts for approximately 85 percent of all BRAF V600 mutations in metastatic melanoma.

GSK will be making Tafinlar available for prescription no later than in the early third quarter of 2013.

In 2010, GSK entered a collaboration with bioMérieux to develop a companion diagnostic test to detect BRAF V600 (V600E and V600K) gene mutations found in several cancers, including melanoma. bioMérieux has received FDA pre-market approval of THxID™-BRAF. Currently, it is the only FDA-approved test that detects the V600K mutation.

The primary outcome measure was the estimation of the overall intracranial response rate (OIRR) in each cohort. The OIRR for Cohort A was 18 percent (95% CI: 9.7, 28.2). For Cohort B, the OIRR was also 18 percent (95% CI: 9.9, 30.0). The median duration of response was 4.6 months (95% CI: 2.8, Not Reached) and 4.6 months (95% CI: 1.9, 4.6) in Cohort A and Cohort B, respectively.

Melanoma is the most serious and deadly form of skin cancer. According to statistics from the National Cancer Institute, in 2013 there will be an estimated 9,480 deaths resulting from melanoma in the United States. When melanoma spreads in the body, the disease is called metastatic melanoma.Approximately half of all people with metastatic melanoma have a BRAF mutation, which is an abnormal change in a gene that can enable some melanoma tumours to grow and spread.

One in two patients worldwide with metastatic melanoma is expected to survive for a year after diagnosis, while in the U.S., the five-year survival rate was 16 percent (2003-2009).The median age of a newly diagnosed metastatic melanoma patient is almost a decade younger than other cancers.

Tafinlar (dabrafenib) is now approved for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600E mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test. Limitation of use: Tafinlar is not recommended for use in patients with wild-type BRAF melanoma.

Tafinlar is not approved or licensed in Europe and may not be approved in other parts of the world for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable melanoma or metastatic melanoma.

Dabrafenib mesylate is a kinase inhibitor. The chemical name for dabrafenib mesylate is N-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzene sulfonamide, methanesulfonate salt. It has the molecular formula C23H20F3N5O2S2•CH4O3S and a molecular weight of 615.68. Dabrafenib mesylate has the following chemical structure:

TAFINLAR (dabrafenib) Structural Formula Illustration

Dabrafenib mesylate is a white to slightly colored solid with three pKas: 6.6, 2.2, and -1.5. It is very slightly soluble at pH 1 and practically insoluble above pH 4 in aqueous media.

TAFINLAR (dabrafenib) capsules are supplied as 50-mg and 75-mg capsules for oral administration. Each 50-mg capsule contains 59.25 mg dabrafenib mesylate equivalent to 50 mg of dabrafenib free base. Each 75-mg capsule contains 88.88 mg dabrafenib mesylate equivalent to 75 mg of dabrafenib free base.

The inactive ingredients of TAFINLAR are colloidal silicon dioxide, magnesium stearate, and microcrystalline cellulose. Capsule shells contain hypromellose, red iron oxide (E172), and titanium dioxide (E171).

Dabrafenib mesylate

1195768-06-9 cas of mesylate

N-[3-[5-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-tert-butyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl]-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide;methanesulfonic acid

Chemical structure

Dabrafenib Mesylate (GSK-2118436)

………………….

WO2015003571

达拉菲尼甲磺酸盐的新晶型及其制备方法

https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf;jsessionid=A1F1236472ED5D758B64CA11358EBB6C.wapp1nC?docId=WO2015003571&recNum=1&maxRec=&office=&prevFilter=&sortOption=&queryString=&tab=PCTDescription

Deficiencies of the prior art W, the main object of the present invention is to provide as follows has a better stability in an aqueous or aqueous systems Dara Feeney 曱

For purposes of this invention, the present invention provides Dallas Phoenix mesylate Form IV (hereinafter referred to as “Form IV”) and its preparation method. The type IV crystal is a hydrate; preferably each 摩尔达拉菲 Nepal mesylate contains about 1.5 moles of water.

Using Cu- Κα radiation, the crystalline form IV of X-ray powder diffraction pattern at diffraction angles 2Θ of 4.7 ± 0.2 °, 9.2 ± 0.2. , 12.8 ± 0.2. , 13.8 ± 0.2. 15.0 0.2 soil. And 16.3 ± 0.2 ° of the characteristic peaks.

Preferably, the crystalline form IV of the X-ray powder diffraction pattern at diffraction angles 2Θ of 4.7 ± 0.2. , 9.2 ± 0.2. , 12.8 ± 0 · 2. , 13 · 8 ± 0 · 2 o , 15.0 ± 0.2. , 16.3 ± 0 · 2. , 18.0 ± 0.2. , 18 · 6 ± 0.2. , 20 · 6 ± 0.2. , 22.9 ± 0.2 °, 23.8 ± 0.2. And 24.3 ± 0.2. Department characteristic peaks

Form IV of FIG differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) show: sample 151~ 105 ° C there is a large endothermic peak (solvent peak), the sample after dehydration melting range of 132 ~ 148 ° C, then at 200 ° C ~ 245 ° C with a heat transfer crystal peak at 249 ° C and finally melted.

The crystalline form IV has the following advantageous properties:

1) left at room temperature for one month and stable, stable for 1 month at room temperature for -97% RH;

2) known Form I in water suspension was stirred for 15 minutes into the free base monohydrate; and Form IV in water suspension was stirred for 15 minutes remain for 曱 salt Form IV, After stirring overnight converted to the free base monohydrate Form IV described more conducive to maintaining the solubility of the sample is larger than the free base state 曱 sulfonates, Form IV has a better stability in water / aqueous system or sex.

3) 0 to 22 hours compared to the elution amount, any detection points of Form IV of elution volume than the known polymorph I of the elution amount. Description Form IV has a better solubility and bioavailability.

4) 0 to 120 minutes elution amount compared to any detection points of Form IV gum Nang elution volume than the known polymorph I of the dissolution of glue Nang. Description Form IV gum Nang has better dissolution.

The Form IV was prepared using any one of the following methods:

1) The Dallas Feeney known mesylate polymorph I was dissolved in a mixed solution of tetrahydrofuran Yue alcohol, volatile crystallization, and then the precipitated crystals were separated and dried to obtain the Form IV;

The Yue alcohol and tetrahydrofuran in a volume ratio of 0.1 to 100: 1, preferably 0.5~50: 1, more preferably 0.5~5: 1;

2) The Dallas Phoenix Yue sulfonates known polymorph I was dissolved in acetone, volatile crystallization, and the precipitated crystals

Separated, dried, to give the Form IV;

3) The Dallas Phoenix 曱 known polymorph I salt is dissolved in isopropanol, after the addition of polyacrylic acid, volatile crystallization, and then the precipitated crystals were separated and dried to obtain the Form IV;

The polyacrylic acid in an amount of polymorph I of the known amount of 0.1% wt~10% wt, preferably

0.5% wt ~ 10% wt, more preferably 2% wt ~ 5% wt; an average molecular weight of the polyacrylic acid is 2000-5000.

Preparation of the above three methods, the known Dara Feeney 曱 sulfonate polymorph I at room temperature in an amount corresponding to its solubility in a solution of 0.1 to 1 times, preferably 0.5 to 1 times, more preferably 0.8 to 1 times;

The crystallization temperature of room temperature ~ 40 ° C, preferably at room temperature; the crystallization time is 1~14 days, preferably for two days; the dry, you can not vacuum or pressure, the pressure is preferably less than 0.09Mpa; temperature of 30 ° C ~ 120 ° C, preferably 4 (TC ~ 80 ° C, more preferably 40 ° C ~ 60 ° C; for 10 to 72 hours, preferably 10~48 hours, more preferably from 10- 24 hours;

4) The Dallas Phoenix Yue sulfonate polymorph Form II or V is placed to give the Form IV;

The placement of room temperature ~ 40 ° C, preferably room temperature; placement time from 15 minutes to 7 days, preferably

One day;

5) The temperature rise Dara Feeney 曱 sulfonate polymorph II to 120 ° C and then spontaneously cooled to room temperature to obtain the crystalline form

IV;

The preparation of Form I of Preparation Example 1 known

Methods Patent Document WO2009 / 137391 or CN200980126781.6 Example 58a and 58d known polymorph I. Preparation Specifically:

The N- {3- [5- (2- chloro-4-pyrimidinyl) -2- (1,1-Yue-yl-ethyl) -1,3-thiazol-4-yl] – 2-fluorophenyl 2,6-difluorophenyl sulfonamide (196 mg, 0.364mmol) and 7M ammonia in methanol (8ml, 56mmol) was added to a 25 ml autoclave, heated to 90 ° C for 24 hours, TLC showed the starting material the reaction was complete, The reaction system was cooled to room temperature, the solvent was concentrated and the residue was dry column chromatography to obtain N- {3- [5- (2- amino-4-pyrimidinyl) -2- (1,1-dimethylethyl ) -1,3-thiazol-4-yl] -2-fluorophenyl} -2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide 90 mg, yield: 45%.

The N- {3- [5- (2- amino-4-pyrimidinyl) -2- (1,1-Yue-yl-ethyl) -1,3-thiazol-4-yl] -2-fluorophenyl 2,6-difluorophenyl sulfonamide (204 mg, 0.393mmol) in isopropanol (2 mL) was added 曱 acid (0.131 ml, 0.393mmol) and the solution was stirred at room temperature for 3 hours. A white precipitate formed and the slurry was filtered and washed with diethyl ether to give N- [3- [5- (2- amino-4-pyrimidinyl) -2- (t-butyl) -4-thiazol-yl] -2-fluoro phenyl] -2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide 曱 sulphonates crystalline solid (221 mg, 87% yield) as a white.

1HNM (400MHz, DMSO-d6)5 ppm 10.85(s, lH)7.92-8.05(m, 1H), 7.56-7.72(m, 1H), 6.91-7.50(m, 7H), 5.83-5.98(m, 1H) , 2.18-2.32(m, 3H) , 1.36(s, 9H)。

Preparation of crystal form obtained X-ray powder diffraction pattern shown in Figure 10. Report is consistent with the patent document WO2009 / 137391 or CN200980126781.6.

DSC chart is shown in Fig. Show: Known polymorphs I melt away as 247 ° C~250 ° C.

TGA spectrum shown in Figure 12. Show: decomposition temperature of 261 ° C.

Example 1

Take 10.02 mg polymorph IV (Example 7 Preparation) in 5 ml glass vial, add 0.5 ml of water, ultrasonic resulting suspension stirred at room temperature for 15 minutes, after centrifugation without drying, the present invention is to obtain crystalline form II. The yield was 10.00 mg; 99% yield.

X-ray powder diffraction pattern shown in Figure 6.

TGA pattern shown in Figure 7. Show: Form II at 50 ° C before the weight loss of about 4.6% (about 1.5 water), 50 ° C ~ 155 ° C 1.4% weight loss (about 0.5 water), the decomposition temperature of 287 ° C.

………………….

PATENT

http://www.google.com/patents/WO2009137391A2?cl=en

WO 2009137391

Example 58a: Λ/-{3-r5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinylV2-(1.1-dimethylethylV1.3-thiazol-4-yll-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Following a procedure analogous to the procedure described in Example 51, Step B using Λ/-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1-dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (196 mg, 0.364 mmol) and ammonia in methanol 7M (8 ml, 56.0 mmol) and heating to 90 0C for 24 h, the title compound, Λ/-{3- [5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1-dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide was obtained (94 mg, 47% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm 10.83 (s, 1 H), 7.93 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.55 – 7.70 (m, 1 H), 7.35 –

7.43 (m, 1 H), 7.31 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.14 – 7.27 (m, 3 H), 6.70 (s, 2 H), 5.79 (d, J=5.13 Hz, 1 H), 1.35 (s, 9 H). MS (ESI): 519.9 [M+H]+.

Example 58b: Λ/-{3-r5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1-dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yll-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

19.6 mg of Λ/-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1-dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (may be prepared in accordance with example 58a) was combined with 500 μl_ of ethyl acetate in a 2-mL vial at room temperature. The slurry was temperature-cycled between 0-400C for 48 hrs. The resulting slurry was allowed to cool to room temperature and the solids were collected by vacuum filtration. The solids were analyzed by Raman, PXRD, DSC/TGA analyses, which indicated a crystal form different from the crystal form resulting from Example 58a, above. Example 58c: Λ/-{3-r5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinylV2-(1.1-dimethylethylV1.3-thiazol-4-yll-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Step A: methyl 3-{[(2,6-difluorophenyl)sulfonyl]amino}-2-fluorobenzoate

Methyl 3-amino-2-fluorobenzoate (50 g, 1 eq) was charged to reactor followed by dichloromethane (250 ml_, 5 vol). The contents were stirred and cooled to ~15°C and pyridine (26.2 ml_, 1.1 eq) was added. After addition of the pyridine, the reactor contents were adjusted to ~15°C and the addition of 2,6-diflurorobenzenesulfonyl chloride (39.7 ml_, 1.0 eq) was started via addition funnel. The temperature during addition was kept <25°C. After complete addition, the reactor contents were warmed to 20-250C and held overnight. Ethyl acetate (150 ml.) was added and dichloromethane was removed by distillation. Once distillation was complete, the reaction mixture was then diluted once more with ethyl acetate (5 vol) and concentrated. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate (10 vol) and water (4 vol) and the contents heated to 50- 55°C with stirring until all solids dissolve. The layers were settled and separated.

The organic layer was diluted with water (4 vol) and the contents heated to 50-55° for 20-30 min. The layers were settled and then separated and the ethyl acetate layer was evaporated under reduced pressure to ~3 volumes. Ethyl Acetate (5 vol.) was added and again evaporated under reduced pressure to ~3 volumes. Cyclohexane (9 vol) was then added to the reactor and the contents were heated to reflux for 30 min then cooled to 0 0C. The solids were filtered and rinsed with cyclohexane (2 x 100 ml_). The solids were air dried overnight to obtain methyl 3-{[(2,6-difluorophenyl)sulfonyl]amino}-2- fluorobenzoate (94.1 g, 91 %).

Step B: Λ/-{3-[(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)acetyl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Methyl 3-{[(2,6-difluorophenyl)sulfonyl]amino}-2-fluorobenzoate (490 g, 1 equiv.), prepared generally in accordance with Step A, above, was dissolved in THF (2.45 L, 5 vols) and stirred and cooled to 0-3 0C. 1 M lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide in THF (5.25 L, 3.7 equiv.) solution was charged to the reaction mixture followed addition of 2-chloro-4- methylpyrimidine (238 g, 1.3 equiv.) in THF (2.45 L, 5 vols). The reaction was then stirred for 1 hr. The reaction was quenched with 4.5M HCI (3.92 L, 8 vols). The aqueous layer (bootom layer) was removed and discarded.

The organic layer was concentrated under reduced pressure to ~2L. IPAC (isopropyl acetate) (2.45L) was added to the reaction mixture which was then concentrated to ~2L. IPAC (0.5L) and MTBE (2.45 L) was added and stirred overnight under N2. The solids were filtered. The solids and mother filtrate added back together and stirred for several hours. The solids were filtered and washed with MTBE (~5 vol). The solids were placed in vacuum oven at 50 0C overnight. The solids were dried in vacuum oven at 30 0C over weekend to obtain Λ/-{3-[(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)acetyl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide (479 g, 72%).

Step C: Λ/-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1-dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

To a reactor vessel was charged Λ/-{3-[(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)acetyl]-2-fluorophenyl}- 2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (30 g, 1 eq) followed by dichloromethane (300 ml_). The reaction slurry was cooled to ~10°C and N-bromosuccinimide (“NBS”) (12.09 g, 1 eq) was added in 3 approximately equal portions, stirring for 10-15 minutes between each addition. After the final addition of NBS, the reaction mixture was warmed to ~20°C and stirred for 45 min . Water (5 vol) was then added to the reaction vessel and the mixture was stirred and then the layers separated. Water (5 vol) was again added to the dichloromethane layer and the mixture was stirred and the layers separated.

The dichloromethane layers were concentrated to -120 ml_. Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was added to the reaction mixture and concentrated to -120 ml_. Dimethylacetamide (270 ml.) was then added to the reaction mixture and cooled to -1O0C. 2,2-Dimethylpropanethioamide (1.3 g, 0.5 eq) in 2 equal portions was added to the reactor contents with stirring for -5 minutes between additions. The reaction was warmed to 20-25 0C. After 45 min, the vessel contents were heated to 75°C and held for 1.75 hours . The reaction mixture was then cooled to 5°C and water (270 ml) was slowly charged keeping the temperature below 300C. Ethyl acetate (4 vol) was then charged and the mixture was stirred and layers separated. Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was again charged to the aqueous layer and the contents were stirred and separated.

Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was charged again to the aqueous layer and the contents were stirred and separated. The organic layers were combined and washed with water (4 vol) 4 times and stirred overnight at 20-250C. The organic layers were then concentrated under heat and vacuum to 120 ml_. The vessel contents were then heated to 500C and heptanes (120 ml.) were added slowly. After addition of heptanes, the vessel contents were heated to reflux then cooled to 0°C and held for -2 hrs. The solids were filtered and rinsed with heptanes (2 x 2 vol). The solid product was then dried under vacuum at 300C to obtain Λ/-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)- 2-(1 , 1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (28.8 g, 80%).

Step D:

Λ/-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1-dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

In 1 gal pressure reactor, a mixture of Λ/-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1- dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (120 g) prepared in accordance with Step C, above, and ammonium hydroxide (28-30%, 2.4 L, 20 vol) was heated in the sealed pressure reactor to 98-103 0C and stirred at this temperature for 2 hours. The reaction was cooled slowly to room temperature (20 0C) and stirred overnight. The solids were filtered and washed with minimum amount of the mother liquor and dried under vacuum. The solids were added to a mixture of EtOAc (15 vol)/ water (2 vol) and heated to complete dissolution at 60-70 0C and the aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The EtOAC layer was charged with water (1 vol) and neutralized with aq. HCI to ~pH 5.4-5.5. and added water (1vol). The aqueous layer was removed and discarded at 60-70 0C.

The organic layer was washed with water (1 vol) at 60-70 0C and the aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The organic layer was filtered at 60 0C and concentrated to 3 volumes. EtOAc (6 vol) was charged into the mixture and heated and stirred at 72 0C for 10 min , then cooled to 2O0C and stirred overnight. EtOAc was removed via vacuum distillation to concentrate the reaction mixture to ~3 volumes.

The reaction mixture was maintained at -65-7O0C for ~30mins. Product crystals having the same crystal form as those prepared in Example 58b (and preparable by the procedure of Example 58b), above, in heptanes slurry were charged. Heptane (9 vol) was slowly added at 65-70 0C. The slurry was stirred at 65-70 0C for 2-3 hours and then cooled slowly to 0-50C. The product was filtered, washed with EtOAc/heptane (3/1 v/v, 4 vol) and dried at 45°C under vacuum to obtain Λ/-{3-[5-(2- amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 , 1 -dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide (102.3 g, 88%).

Example 58d:

Λ/-{3-r5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinvn-2-(1.1-dimethylethylV1.3-thiazol-4-yll-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide methanesulfonate

Figure imgf000208_0001 MESYLATE

To a solution of Λ/-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1 ,1-dimethylethyl)-1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (204 mg, 0.393 mmol) in isopropanol (2 ml_), methanesulfonic acid (0.131 ml_, 0.393 mmol) was added and the solution was allowed to stir at room temperature for 3 hours. A white precipitate formed and the slurry was filtered and rinsed with diethyl ether to give the title product as a white crystalline solid (210 mg, 83% yield).

1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm 10.85 (s, 1 H) 7.92 – 8.05 (m, 1 H) 7.56 – 7.72 (m, 1 H) 6.91 – 7.50 (m, 7 H) 5.83 – 5.98 (m, 1 H) 2.18 – 2.32 (m, 3 H) 1.36 (s, 9 H). MS (ESI): 520.0 [M+H]+.WO2009137391

…………………………………………………………………

PAPER

ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2013), 4(3), 358-362.

ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 2013, 4 (3), pp 358–362
DOI: 10.1021/ml4000063

http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ml4000063

Figure
The title compound,N-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenze
nesulfonamide was obtained (94 mg, 47% yield).
Dabrafenib base
1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm 10.83 (s, 1 H), 7.93 (d,J=5.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.55 – 7.70 (m, 1 H), 7.35 – 7.43 (m, 1 H), 7.31(t,J=6.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.14 – 7.27 (m, 3 H), 6.70 (s, 2 H),5.79 (d,J=5.13 Hz, 1 H), 1.35 (s, 9 H).
MS (ESI): 519.9 [M+H]+.
13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ ppm 182.1, 164.0, 160.6, 159.4, 158.0, 154.9,
152.4, 145.8, 136.6, 135.1, 130.0,
128.4, 125.6, 124.7, 114.1, 113.9, 105.7, 38.3, 31.0.

…………………………………………………………….

Patent

http://www.google.com/patents/WO2014158467A1?cl=en

……………………………………………
WO 2014066606

Step C : N- {3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l , 1 -dimethylethyl)-l ,3-thiazol-4-yl]- 2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

To a reactor vessel was charged N- {3-[(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)acetyl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (30 g, 1 eq) followed by dichloromethane (300 mL). The reaction slurry was cooled to ~10°C and N-bromosuccinimide (“NBS”) (12.09 g, 1 eq) was added in 3 approximately equal portions, stirring for 10-15 minutes between each addition. After the final addition of NBS, the reaction mixture was warmed to ~20°C and stirred for 45 min . Water (5 vol) was then added to the reaction vessel and the mixture was stirred and then the layers separated. Water (5 vol) was again added to the dichloromethane layer and the mixture was stirred and the layers separated. The dichloromethane layers were concentrated to -120 mL. Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was added to the reaction mixture and concentrated to -120 mL. Dimethylacetamide (270 mL) was then added to the reaction mixture and cooled to ~10°C. 2,2-Dimethylpropanethioamide (1.3 g, 0.5 eq) in 2 equal portions was added to the reactor contents with stirring for ~5 minutes between additions. The reaction was warmed to 20-25 °C. After 45 min, the vessel contents were heated to 75°C and held for 1.75 hours . The reaction mixture was then cooled to 5°C and water (270 ml) was slowly charged keeping the temperature below 30°C. Ethyl acetate (4 vol) was then charged and the mixture was stirred and layers separated. Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was again charged to the aqueous layer and the contents were stirred and separated. Ethyl acetate (7 vol) was charged again to the aqueous layer and the contents were stirred and separated. The organic layers were combined and washed with water (4 vol) 4 times and stirred overnight at 20-25°C. The organic layers were then concentrated under heat and vacuum to 120 mL. The vessel contents were then heated to 50°C and heptanes (120 mL) were added slowly. After addition of heptanes, the vessel contents were heated to reflux then cooled to 0°C and held for ~2 hrs. The solids were filtered and rinsed with heptanes (2 x 2 vol). The solid product was then dried under vacuum at 30°C to obtain N-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3- thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (28.8 g, 80%).

Compound B is disclosed and claimed, along with pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof, as being useful as an inhibitor of BRaf activity, particularly in the treatment of cancer, in PCT patent application PCT/US09/42682. Compound B is embodied by Examples 58a through 58e of the application. The PCT application was published on 12 November 2009 as publication WO2009/137391, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Suitably, Compound B may be prepared according to the methods below:

Method 1 : Compound B (first crystal form) – N-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2- (1,1 -dimethylethyl)- 1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]- -fluorophenyl} -2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

A suspension of N-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3- thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (196 mg, 0.364 mmol) and ammonia in methanol 7M (8 ml, 56.0 mmol) was heated in a sealed tube to 90 °C for 24 h. The reaction was diluted with DCM and added silica gel and concentrated. The crude product was chromatographed on silica gel eluting with 100% DCM to 1 : 1 [DCM: (9: 1 EtOAc:MeOH)]. The clean fractions were concentrated to yield the crude product. The crude product was repurified by reverse phase HPLC (a gradient of acetonitrile: water with 0.1%TFA in both). The combined clean fractions were concentrated then partitioned between DCM and saturated NaHC03. The DCM layer was separated and dried over Na2S04. The title compound, N-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l-dimethylethyl)- l,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide was obtained (94 mg, 47% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- 6) δ ppm 10.83 (s, 1 H), 7.93 (d, J=5.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.55 – 7.70 (m, 1 H), 7.35 – 7.43 (m, 1 H), 7.31 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.14 – 7.27 (m, 3 H), 6.70 (s, 2 H), 5.79 (d, J=5.13 Hz, 1 H), 1.35 (s, 9 H). MS (ESI): 519.9 [M+H]+.

Method 2: Compound B (alternative crystal form) – N-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4- pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide 19.6 mg of N-{3-[5-(2-Amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l- dimethylethyl)- 1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl} -2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (may be prepared in accordance with example 58a) was combined with 500 L of ethyl acetate in a 2-mL vial at room temperature. The slurry was temperature-cycled between 0-40°C for 48 hrs. The resulting slurry was allowed to cool to room temperature and the solids were collected by vacuum filtration. The solids were analyzed by Raman, PXRD, DSC/TGA analyses, which indicated a crystal form different from the crystal form resulting from Example 58a, above.

Method 3: Compound B (alternative crystal form, large batch) – N-{3-[5-(2-amino- 4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l , 1 -dimethylethyl)- 1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl} -2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Step D : N-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3-thiazol-4-yl]-

2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

In 1 gal pressure reactor, a mixture of N-{3-[5-(2-chloro-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l- dimethylethyl)- 1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl} -2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide ( 120 g) prepared in accordance with Step C, above, and ammonium hydroxide (28-30%, 2.4 L, 20 vol) was heated in the sealed pressure reactor to 98-103 °C and stirred at this temperature for 2 hours. The reaction was cooled slowly to room temperature (20 °C) and stirred overnight. The solids were filtered and washed with minimum amount of the mother liquor and dried under vacuum. The solids were added to a mixture of EtOAc (15 vol)/ water (2 vol) and heated to complete dissolution at 60-70 °C and the aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The EtOAC layer was charged with water (1 vol) and neutralized with aq. HC1 to ~pH 5.4-5.5. and added water (lvol). The aqueous layer was removed and discarded at 60-70 °C. The organic layer was washed with water (1 vol) at 60-70 °C and the aqueous layer was removed and discarded. The organic layer was filtered at 60 °C and concentrated to 3 volumes. EtOAc (6 vol) was charged into the mixture and heated and stirred at 72 °C for 10 min , then cooled to 20°C and stirred overnight. EtOAc was removed via vacuum distillation to concentrate the reaction mixture to ~3 volumes. The reaction mixture was maintained at ~65-70°C for ~30mins. Product crystals having the same crystal form as those prepared in Example 58b (and preparable by the procedure of Example 58b), above, in heptanes slurry were charged. Heptane (9 vol) was slowly added at 65-70 °C. The slurry was stirred at 65-70 °C for 2-3 hours and then cooled slowly to 0- 5°C. The product was filtered, washed with EtO Ac/heptane (3/1 v/v, 4 vol) and dried at 45°C under vacuum to obtain N-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3- thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (102.3 g, 88%>).

MESYLATE

Method 4: Compound B (mesylate salt) – N-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l- dimethylethyl)- 1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl} -2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide methanesulfonate

To a solution of N-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3- thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (204 mg, 0.393 mmol) in isopropanol (2 mL), methanesulfonic acid (0.131 mL, 0.393 mmol) was added and the solution was allowed to stir at room temperature for 3 hours. A white precipitate formed and the slurry was filtered and rinsed with diethyl ether to give the title product as a white crystalline solid (210 mg, 83% yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO- 6) δ ppm 10.85 (s, 1 H) 7.92 – 8.05 (m, 1 H) 7.56 – 7.72 (m, 1 H) 6.91 – 7.50 (m, 7 H) 5.83 – 5.98 (m, 1 H) 2.18 – 2.32 (m, 3 H) 1.36 (s, 9 H). MS (ESI): 520.0 [M+H]+.

Method 5: Compound B (alternative mesylate salt embodiment) – N-{3-[5-(2- amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l , 1 -dimethylethyl)-l ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl} -2,6- difluorobenzenesulfonamide methanesulfonate

N- {3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l , 1 -dimethylethyl)- 1 ,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2- fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (as may be prepared according to example 58a) (2.37g, 4.56 mmol) was combined with pre-filtered acetonitrile (5.25 vol, 12.4 mL). A pre-filtered solution of mesic acid (1.1 eq., 5.02 mmol, 0.48 g) in H20 (0.75 eq., 1.78 mL) was added at 20°C. The temperature of the resulting mixture was raised to 50-60°C while maintaining a low agitation speed. Once the mixture temperature reached to 50- 60°C, a seed slurry of N-{3-[5-(2-amino-4-pyrimidinyl)-2-(l,l-dimethylethyl)-l,3-thiazol- 4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide methanesulfonate (1.0 %w/w slurried in 0.2 vol of pre-filtered acetonitrile) was added, and the mixture was aged while agitating at a speed fast enough to keep solids from settling at 50-60°C for 2 hr. The mixture was then cooled to 0-5°C at 0.25°C/min and held at 0-5°C for at 6 hr. The mixture was filtered and the wet cake was washed twice with pre-filtered acetonitrile. The first wash consisted of 14.2 ml (6 vol) pre-filtered acetonitrile and the second wash consisted of 9.5 ml (4 vol) pre-filtered acetonitrile. The wet solid was dried at 50°C under vacuum, yielding 2.39 g (85.1% yield) of product

……………………………………….
WO 2014195852
………………………………………….
WO 2014169770
…………………………………………….
CN 104109159
…………………………………………….
CN 103588767

Dara Phoenix (Dabrafenib) by the British GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) has developed Sisu threonine protein kinase (BRAF) inhibitor, as monotherapy ro ー kinds of clothes capsules for carrying BRAF V600E mutation surgical unresectable melanoma or metastatic melanoma treatment of adult patients, Dara Phoenix mesylate in May 2013 was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and is listed on the United States, the trade name Tafinlar (Da Feina). Since the European Medicines Agency (EMA) Committee for Medicinal Products for human use (CHMP) positive evaluation of Tafinlar, making the drug is expected to become after Roche’s Weiluofeini (Vemurafinib) to enter the European market, following a second BRAF inhibitors.

The chemical name Phoenix Dallas: N- [3- [5- (2- amino-4-pyrimidinyl) -2_ (tert-butyl) ~ ~ thiazol-4-yl] _2_ fluorophenyl] – 2,6_-difluorobenzenesulfonamide.

Figure CN103588767AD00031

World Patent No. W02009137391, No. W02011047238 and W02012148588 number reported Dallas and Phoenix and its medicinal value synthesis method of the composition. According to the structural characteristics of Dara Phoenix and its analogues, the synthesis of such substances currently have A, B and C are three routes.

Figure CN103588767AD00032

  A more common route is the synthetic route, by reaction of 3-amino-2-fluorobenzoate (IX) first and 2,6_-difluorobenzene sulfonyl chloride (III) to amidation reaction occurs sulfonamide intermediate ( X); intermediate (X) with 2-chloro-4-methyl pyrimidine (XI) The condensation reaction occurs under the action of a strong base to give the intermediate (XII); intermediate (XII) to give the intermediate bromo

(XIII); intermediate (XIII) with 2,2_ dimethyl thiopropionamide (VI) to give the cyclized intermediate (XIV); and finally, the intermediate (XIV) by ammonolysis to afford the title compound Dallas Phoenix (I).

Figure CN103588767AD00041

Different [0009] B is the first route by reaction of 3-amino-2-fluorobenzoate (IX) amino group protection, and thus condensation, cyclization, and bromo; then be obtained by deprotection of the amino group and the sulfonamide Intermediate (XIV); similarly, the intermediate

(XIV) obtained by ammonolysis target compound Dara Phoenix (I).

Figure CN103588767AD00042

  c route design features that first aminolysis reaction, and then give the desired product by deprotection and amino sulfonamide reaction. Clearly, this design is suitable for the route of these substituted amino ー aminolysis reaction, and for compounds such as Dallas Phoenix having pyrimidinylamino structure is not applicable. The reason is that if there are two aromatic amino groups will make the final sulfonamide ー reaction step to lose selectivity.

Example IV: the reaction flask was added N- [3- (5- formyl-2-t-butyl-ko -4_ thiazolyl) -2_ fluorophenyl] -2,6_ difluoro benzenesulfonamide (VIII) (5.4g, 11.5mmol), N, N- dimethylformamide dimethyl acetal (DMF-DMA) (2.74g, 23mmol) and xylene 50mL, heated to 140 ° C. About every four hours methanol was distilled out of the resulting reaction system, the reaction takes about 24 hours in total, the end of the reaction was detected by TLC. Cool, add hexane 40mL, have produced a yellow solid, filtered, and dried solids obtained after January nitrate melon (1.36,11.5mmol), sodium hydroxide (0.46g, 11.5mmol) and n-Ding enjoy 5OmL, warmed to 120 ° C, The reaction for 12 inches, TLC the reaction was complete. Cooling, with a crystal precipitated crystallized slowly for 3 inches, and filtered. The filter cake starched water, filtered and dried to yield an off-white solid Dara Phoenix (I) 3.58g, yield 60%.

………………………………………………….
WO 2014193898

References

“Dabrafenib/Trametinib Combination Approved for Advanced Melanoma”. OncLive. January 9, 2013.

Updates

Dabrafenib prediction
1H NMR PREDICT

logo

N-[3-[5-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-tert-butyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl]-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide NMR spectra analysis, Chemical CAS NO. 1195765-45-7 NMR spectral analysis, N-[3-[5-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-tert-butyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl]-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide H-NMR spectrum

13C NM PREDICT

logo
N-[3-[5-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-tert-butyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl]-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide NMR spectra analysis, Chemical CAS NO. 1195765-45-7 NMR spectral analysis, N-[3-[5-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-tert-butyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl]-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide C-NMR spectrum

logo

COSY NMR PREDICT

screenshot-www nmrdb org 2015-03-20 09-23-51

logo

HMBC, HSBC NMR PREDICT

screenshot-2

INTERMEDIATES

INT 1
Methyl 3-{[(2,6-difluorophenyl)sulfonyl]amino}-2-fluorobenzoate;Methyl 3-(tert-butoxycarbonylamino)-2-fluorobenzoate, 1195768-23-0

 INT2
methyl 3-bromo-2-fluorobenzylate; PC3663; fluorobromobenzoic acid methyl ester;
3-bromo-2-fluorobenzoic acid methyl ester; 206551-41-9
 INT3
methyl 3-amino-2-fluorobenzoate, CAS No. 1195768-18-3
 INT4
Methyl 3-(tert-butoxycarbonylamino)-2-fluorobenzoate, CAS No. 1195768-19-4
 INT5
CAS No. 1042055-86-6  Methyl 3-(tert-butoxycarbonylamino)-2-fluorobenzoate
 INT6
2-fluoro-3-bromobenzoic acid;3-Bromo-2-fluoro-benzoic acid, CAS No. 161957-56-8 

…………………………………….
SYNTHESIS

SYN 1

DABARAFENIB

GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC; HOOS, Axel; GRESHOCK, Joel Patent: WO2014/66606 A2, 2014 ; Location in patent: Page/Page column 20; 24 ;

SYN  2

WO2011/47238 A1, ;

SYN 3

ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, , vol. 4, # 3 p. 358 – 362

SYN 4

ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, , vol. 4, # 3 p. 358 – 362

SYN 5

ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, , vol. 4, # 3 p. 358 – 362

SYN 6
WO2011/47238 A1, ;

SYN 7

methyl 3-amino-2-fluorobenzoate, CAS No. 1195768-18-3WO2011/47238

 UPDATES WATCH REGULARLY

Brief Description

Figure 1 Form IV of the present invention an X-ray powder diffraction pattern.

Figure 2 is a schematic diagram Form IV of DSC language.

Figure 3 Form IV of the present invention TGA profiles.

Figure 4 is a dynamic water adsorption of Form IV of the invention, FIG.

Figure 5 Form IV of the present invention 1HNMR spectrum.

Figure 6 of the present invention, Form II X-ray powder diffraction pattern.

Figure 7 of the present invention, Form II TGA profiles.

Figure 8 Form III of the present invention an X-ray powder diffraction pattern.

Figure 9 Form V of the present invention, an X-ray powder diffraction pattern.

Figure 58a and in Example 10 in accordance with Patent Document WO2009 / 137391 or in CN200980126781.6

58d method described for the preparation of polymorph I of the known X-ray powder diffraction pattern.

Figure 11 is in accordance with Patent Document WO2009 / 137391 or CN200980126781.6 in the method of Example 58a and 58d described for the preparation of polymorph I of the known DSC pattern.

12 is in accordance with Patent Document WO2009 / 137391 or CN200980126781.6 in the method of Example 58a and 58d described for the preparation of polymorph I of the known TGA profiles.

Figure 13 is a known polymorph I in Comparative Example 1 in various stages XRPD comparison chart with the sample from top to bottom in the order of: Dara Phoenix free base hydrate, a known polymorph I in water was stirred for 15 After minutes to obtain a sample, and a known polymorph I.

Figure 14 Form IV in the present invention Comparative Example 1 each stage XRPD comparison chart with the sample from top to bottom in the order of: Form IV, Form IV in water with stirring for 15 minutes to obtain a sample, Form IV After stirring overnight in water to obtain a sample, as well as the free base of the hydrate Dara Phoenix. Figure 15 is a Comparative Form IV polymorph I of the known elution compared to the situation in Figure 1 (A to Form IV, ■ known Form 1).

Figure 16 is known in the polymorph I of Comparative Example 2 in various stages XRPD comparison chart (figure from top to bottom as follows: Form I is known API by “wet granulation” process of granulation (excluding section 3-step tablet) obtained by the sample, the known polymorphs I and amount of excipients formulated physically mixed formulation obtained sample, lactose monohydrate and microcrystalline cellulose according to Formulation physical sample after mixing, Dara Feeney free base hydrate, as well as known Form 1).

17 is a crystalline form IV according to the present invention in Comparative Example 2 in various stages XRPD comparison chart (from top to bottom as follows: In Form IV according to API “wet granulation” process of granulation (not included in Step 3 tableting) after the sample obtained, Form IV and excipients Formulation amount by physically mixing the obtained sample, the sample lactose monohydrate and microcrystalline cellulose according to Formulation after physical mixing, and Form IV).

FIG 5
Inline image 1
Dabrafenib
Dabrafenib.svg
Systematic (IUPAC) name
N-{3-[5-(2-aminopyrimidin-4-yl)-2-tert-butyl-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]-2-fluorophenyl}-2,6-difluorobenzenesulfonamide
Clinical data
Trade names Tafinlar
Legal status
Identifiers
CAS number 1195765-45-7
ATC code L01XE23
PubChem CID 44462760
ChemSpider 25948204
ChEBI CHEBI:75045
ChEMBL CHEMBL2028663
Chemical data
Formula C23H20F3N5O2S2
Molecular mass 519.56 g/mol

GSK 2636771


 

 

 

 

 

 

Company: GlaxoSmithKline
Meant to treat: tumors with loss-of-function in the tumor suppressor protein PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog)- 2nd most inactivated tumor suppressor after p53- cancers where this is often the case include prostate and endometrial
Mode of action: inhibitor of phosphoinositide 3-kinase-beta (PI3K-beta). Several lines of evidence suggest that proliferation in certain PTEN-deficient tumor cell lines is driven primarily by PI3K-beta.
Medicinal chemistry tidbits: The GSK team seemed boxed in because in 3 out of 4 animals used in preclinical testing, promising drug candidates had high clearance. It turned out that a carbonyl group that they thought was critical for interacting with the back pocket of the PI3K-beta enzyme wasn’t so critical after all. When they realized they could replace the carbonyl with a variety of functional groups, GSK2636771 eventually emerged. GSK2636771B (shown) is the tris salt of GSK2636771.
Status in the pipeline: Phase I clinical trials……….http://cenblog.org/the-haystack/2012/03/liveblogging-first-time-disclosures-from-acssandiego/

CARMEN

Posted By on Mar 24, 2012

Phone: 202-872-4502

Fax: 202-872-8727 or -6381

 

 

1372540-25-4

1H-​Benzimidazole-​4-​carboxylic acid, 2-​methyl-​1-​[[2-​methyl-​3-​(trifluoromethyl)​phenyl]​methyl]​-​6-​(4-​morpholinyl)​-

2-Methyl-1-[[2-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methyl]-6-(4-morpholinyl)-1H-benzimidazole-4-carboxylic acid

GSK2636771 is a potent, orally bioavailable, PI3Kβ-selective inhibitor, sensitive to PTEN null cell lines.

Formula:C22H22F3N3O3
M.Wt:433.43

WO 2014158467

http://www.google.com/patents/WO2014158467A1?cl=en

According to another embodiment, the invention relates to a method of re- sensitizing BRAF inhibitor resistant melanoma brain metastases comprising the administration of a therapeutically effective amount of

(i) a compound of formula (I)

or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof;

……………………………………………………………….

http://www.google.co.in/patents/WO2014108837A1?cl=en

 

A combination comprising:
(i) a compound of Structure (I):
I
or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof;
………………………………………………
SYNTHESIS
 GSK 2636771
………………………………………………
Example 26
Preparation of methyl 2-methyl-6-(4-morpholinyl)-l-(l-naphthalenylmethyl)-lH- benzimidazole-4-carboxylate a) 3-amino-5-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid

Under nitrogen, to a solution of t-BuOK (156.8 g) and Cu(OAc)2 (3.6 g) in DMF (1.2 L) was added a solution of 5-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid (40.0 g) and MeONH2 HCl (33.2 g) in DMF (300 mL) at 0° C. After 3h the reaction was quenched by addition of H20 (2.5 L) and acidified with 10% HC1 solution to pH= 1.The mixture was extracted with EA (2 L x 2) and the combined organic layers were then washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04, filtered and concentrated in- vacuo to afford the crude product as a yellow solid (43.2g, yield 100%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDC13): δ ppm 6.88 (s, 1H, J= 2.4Hz), 6.91 (d, 1H, J= 2.4Hz), 8.08 (br s, 2H); LC-MS: m/e = 217 [M+l]+. b) methyl 3-amino-5-chloro-2-nitrobenzoate

A mixture of 3-amino-5-chloro-2-nitrobenzoic acid (43.2 g) and HATU (2-(lH-7- Azabenzotriazol-l-yl)~l,l,3,3-tetramethyl uronium hexafluorophosphate Methanaminium, commercially available) (76 g) in MeOH (81 mL), Et3N (83 mL) and THF (300 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 3h. When TLC showed no starting material, the solvent was removed in-vacuo and the residue was then diluted with EtOAc (2 L). It was then washed with brine (1 L><3) and dried over anhydrous Na2S04, filtered and concentrated in-vacuo. The residue was then purified by silica gel chromatography eluted with EtOAc : petroleum ether = 1 : 8 to afford the desired product as a yellow solid (29.5 g, yield 64%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDC13): δ ppm 3.90 (s, 3H, s), 5.85 (br s, 2H), 6.80 (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz), 6.90 (d, 1H, J = 2.4 Hz); LC-MS: m/e = 231 [M+l]+ . c) methyl 3-amino-5-(4-morpholinyl)-2-nitrobenzoate

A mixture of combined batches of methyl 3-amino-5-chloro-2-nitrobenzoate (39 g), morpholine (29.5 g) and K2C03 (47 g) was stirred in DMF (200ml) at 110 0 C for 5 h. The mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into water (1 L). It was extracted with EtOAc (500 mL x 3). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous Na2S04, filtered and concentrated in-vacuo to afford the desired product as a yellow solid (22 g, yield 46%). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDC13): δ ppm 3.31 (t, 4H, J= 4.8 Hz), 3.82 (t, 4H, J= 4.8 Hz), 3.89 (s, 3H), 6.03 (d, 1H, J= 2.4 Hz), 6.34 (d, 1H, J= 2.4 Hz); LC- MS: m/e = 282 [M+l]+ . d) methyl 2-methyl-5-(4-morpholinyl)-lH-benzimidazole-7-carboxylate

To a solution of methyl 3-amino-5-(4-morpholinyl)-2-nitrobenzoate (22 g) stirring at reflux in HOAc (400 mL) was added iron powder in portions (13 g). After the addition, the mixture was stirred at reflux for 5 h. It was cooled to room temperature and the solvent was removed in- vacuo. The residue was neutralized with aqueous Na2C03 solution (1 L). It was extracted with EtOAc (500 mL x3). The combined organic layers were then concentrated in-vacuo and the residue was purified by silica gel chromatography eluted with MeOH : DCM = 1 : 30 to afford the desired product as a solid (16.6 g, yield 77%).

1H NMR (300 MHz, CDC13): δ ppm 2.67 (s, 3H), 3.17 (t, 4H, J= 4.8 Hz), 3.90 (t, 4H, J= 4.8 Hz), 3.98 (s, 3H), 7.44 (d, IH, J= 1.8 Hz), 7.54 (d, IH, J= 1.8 Hz);

LC-MS: m/e = 276 [M+l]+ .

Example 30

Preparation of methyl 2-methyl-l- {r2-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl1methyl|-6-(4- morpholinyl)- 1 H-benzimidazole-4-carboxylate

A solution of methyl 2-methyl-5-(4-morpholinyl)-lH-benzimidazole-7-carboxylate prepared as described in Example 26

Figure imgf000072_0001 methyl 2-methyl-5-(4-morpholinyl)-lH-benzimidazole-7-carboxylate

, step d (500mg, 1.8 mmol), l-(bromomethyl)-2-methyl-3- (trifluoromethyl)benzene (483 mg, 1.9 mmol)

l-(bromomethyl)-2-methyl-3- (trifluoromethyl)benzene

and K2C03 (497 mg, 3.6 mmol) in DMF (50 mL) was stirred at 80° C for 3 h. The reaction mixture was cooled to rt and poured into water (50 mL), extracted with EtOAc (30 mL x 3). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2S04 and concentrated. The resulting residue was purified by silica gel chromatography eluted with DCM : MeOH = 50 : 1 to give the crude product IE METHYL ESTER (230 mg, yield 29%), as a white solid.

1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ ppm 2.39 (s, 3H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 3.08 (t, 4H, J=4.8 Hz), 3.72 (t, 4H, J=4.8 Hz), 3.89 (s, 3H), 5.57 (s, 2H), 6.27 (d, IH, J=7.5 Hz), 7.22 (t, IH, J=7.5 Hz), 7.27 (d, IH, J=2.4 Hz), 7.38 (d, IH, J=2.4 Hz) 7.60 (d, IH, J=7.5 Hz);

LC-MS: m/e = 448 [M+l]+

Example 31

Preparation of 2-methyl- 1 – { [2-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyllmethyl| -6-(4-morpholiny0- 1 H-benzimidazole-4-carboxylic acidAn aqueous solution of 2 N LiOH (1.2 mL) was added to a solution of methyl 2-methyl- 1- {[2-methyl-3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methyl}-6-(4-morpholinyl)-lH-benzimidazole-4- carboxylate, prepared as described in Example 30 (180 mg, 0.4 mmol) in THF (10 mL) and stirred at 50° C for 1 h. When TLC showed no starting material remaining, the mixture was cooled to rt and THF was removed under reduced pressure. The pH of the mixture was acidified to pH 3. The suspension was filtered and the filtrate was collected, and washed with water (lOmL) to give the product as a white solid (152 mg, yield 88%).

1H NMR (300 MHz,DMSO-d6):

δ ppm 2.46 (s, 3H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 3.10 (t, 4H, J=4.8 Hz), 3.73 (t, 4H, J=4.8 Hz), 5.63 (s, 2H), 6.37 (d, IH, J=7.8 Hz), 7.26 (t, IH, J=7.8 Hz), 7.35 (d, IH, J=2.4 Hz), 7.44 (d, IH, J=2.4 Hz), 7.62 (d, IH, J=7.8 Hz);

LC-MS: m/e = 434 [M+l]

 

 

WO2010006225A1 * 10 Jul 2009 14 Jan 2010 Novartis Ag Combination of (a) a phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor and (b) a modulator of ras/raf/mek pathway
WO2011038380A2 * 28 Sep 2010 31 Mar 2011 Glaxosmithkline Llc Combination
WO2012061683A2 * 4 Nov 2011 10 May 2012 Glaxosmithkline Llc Methods for treating cancer
US20120088767 * 3 Oct 2011 12 Apr 2012 Junya Qu Benzimidazole derivatives as pi3 kinase inhibitors
O2013019620A2 * Jul 27, 2012 Feb 7, 2013 Glaxosmithkline Llc Method of treating cancer using combination of braf inhibitor, mek inhibitor, and anti-ctla-4 antibody
US20120202822 * Oct 12, 2010 Aug 9, 2012 Kurtis Earl Bachman Combination

 

 

CARMEN DRAHL

Links

Carmen Drahl (@carmendrahl) | Twitter

www.linkedin.com/in/carmendrahl/en

http://www.ddn-news.com/

http://cenblog.org/the-safety-zone/

Carmen Drahl – Google+

Carmen Drahl

 

Award-winning science communicator and social media power user based in Washington, DC.

Specialties: interviewing, science writing, social media, Twitter, Storify, YouTube, public speaking, hosting, video production, iPhone videography, non-linear video editing, blogging (WordPress and Blogger), HTML website coding

Education

Princeton University

Ph.D., Chemistry

2002 – 2007

Ph.D. with Erik J. Sorensen
She was on a team that completed the first total synthesis of abyssomicin C, a molecule found in small quantities in nature that showed hints of promise as a potential antibiotic. I constructed molecular probes from abyssomicin for proteomics studies of its biological activity.

M.A. with George L. McLendon
worked toward developing a drug conjugate as a potential treatment for cancer. I synthesized a photosensitizer dye-peptide conjugate for targeting the cell death pathway called apoptosis.

image

At a reception before the Alumni Day luncheon, President Tilghman (third from left) congratulated the winners of the University’s highest awards for students: (from left) Pyne Prize winners Lester Mackey and Alisha Holland; and Jacobus Fellowship recipients Sarah Pourciau, Egemen Kolemen and Carmen Drahl. Unable to attend the event was Jacobus Fellowship winner William Slauter. (photo: Denise Applewhite

 

 

B.A., Chemistry

1998 – 2002

Graduated summa cum laude with specialized honors in chemistry. Honors thesis entitled “Structural, kinetic, and mechanistic studies: the protein tyrosine phosphatases CD45 and PTP1B”

Activities and Societies: Phi Beta Kappa

Carmen Drahl, Class of 2002,

 

Experience

Science Journalist

Freelance

January 2014 – Present Washington D.C. Metro Area

Multimedia science journalist – I deliver clean products on time. Experience in reporting on chemistry, food science, history of science, drug development, science education.

Senior Editor, Chemical & Engineering News

American Chemical Society

August 2007 – December 2014 (7 years 5 months)Washington D.C. Metro Area

Reporting:
Cover the science of chemistry for C&EN, the American Chemical Society’s weekly magazine, circulation 160,000. Track new research findings daily, particularly in forensic science, drug discovery, organic chemistry, and food science.

Video:
Doubled circulation to C&EN’s YouTube channel in 2013. Scripted, narrated, edited footage.
Managed a core team of 4 and collaborated with other reporters to produce 30 videos, some reproduced in The Atlantic, Scientific American, Eater National, The Daily Mail.

Incepted, scripted, and co-hosted “Speaking of Chemistry”, a monthly web show that summarizes top chemistry news for the busy scientist.

Social Media:
Developed magazine-wide best practices for YouTube videos and Twitter. Ran staff workshops about Storify, Slashdot, and Reddit.

Hosting/Public Speaking:
Topics include communicating chemistry simply, transitioning from a Ph.D. to careers in science communication. Moderated discussions on chemophobia, social media usage in the chemical sciences. On-camera co-host for web newscasts produced by ACS.

Innovation:
With C&EN art and web teams, developed first-for-the-magazine features, including a 90th anniversary commemorative timeline poster, a pullout guide to top conference speakers, interactive quizzes and database searches.

Carmen Drahl, senior editor of Chemical and Engineering News, used her Ph.D. in chemistry as a springboard into the career she envisioned for herself. Here she shares some advice that helped her make the decision.

Carmen Drahl made the transition to a writing career while earning a Ph.D. in chemistry at Princeton University. Born and raised in New Jersey, she now lives in Washington, D.C., and reports for Chemical and Engineering News (C&EN). At C&EN she has written about how new medications get their names, explained the science behind a controversial hair-straightening product, and covered the scientific firestorm sparked by an alleged arsenic life form. Her work has been featured on SiriusXM’s Doctor Radio, Radio New Zealand’s This Way Up, and elsewhere. Her coverage has also been recognized by MIT’s Knight Science Journalism Tracker.

(Open)1 honor or award
Scientific Cocktails: Award-winning video

Scientific Cocktails: Award-winning video

Speaking of Chemistry: All About Tinsel

Speaking of Chemistry: All About Tinsel

Carmen Drahl

Twitter Maven

World Central Kitchen

March 2013 – August 2014 (1 year 6 months)Washington D.C. Metro Area

I was the “voice of Twitter” for World Central Kitchen, the humanitarian organization founded by renowned Chef José Andrés. Doubled followers to Twitter account in 2013, developed Twitter strategy for projects and events. Edited Annual Report, press releases and other communication materials. Volunteered in person at outreach events.

Contributing Editor, AWIS Magazine

Association of Women in Science

December 2005 – August 2007 (1 year 9 months)

sHE reported and wrote profiles of prominent women scientists in a range of fields (molecular biology, physics, geoscience) for the Research Advances column in AWIS Magazine.

Writer, various publications

Princeton University

April 2005 – May 2007 (2 years 2 months)

She reported and wrote news for the Princeton University News Office’s Research Notes, and wrote news and features for the Princeton University Chemistry Department’s Industrial Affiliates Program Newsletter and Chemistry Alumni Newsletter.

Honors & Awards

Eddie Digital Award- Best Video (B-to-B)

FOLIO Magazine

December 2014

Porter Ogden Jacobus Fellowship

Princeton University

February 2007

NSF Graduate Research Fellowship

National Science Foundation

2002

Volunteer Experience & Causes

Board Member

Princeton Alumni Weekly Magazine

October 2013

Advisory Committee

American Institute of Physics News and Media Services

October 2013

Member, Graduate Alumni Leadership Council

Princeton University

2009 – 2012 (3 years)

INTERVIEW

Continuing with the tradition from last two years, I will occasionally post interviews with some of the participants of the ScienceOnline2010 conference that was held in the Research Triangle Park, NC back in January. See all the interviews in this series here. You can check out previous years’ interviews as well: 2008 and 2009.

Today, I asked Carmen Drahl, Associate Editor for Science/Technology/Education at Chemical & Engineering News (find her as @carmendrahl on Twitter) to answer a few questions.

Welcome to A Blog Around The Clock. Would you, please, tell my readers a little bit more about yourself? Where are you coming from (both geographically and philosophically)? What is your (scientific) background?

i-b183f89fe33d3d9f0b308a6cb30d9b5b-Carmen Drahl pic1.JPGIt’s a pleasure and a privilege to be interviewed, Bora.

Good conversations make me happy. School was fun for me (well, maybe not grad school) and that’s evolved into a desire to always be learning something new. I enjoy doing nothing as much as I enjoy doing things. On Mondays, if I’m not too busy, I take hip-hop dance classes.

My hometown is Hackettstown, New Jersey. M&M’s are made there. I got a bachelor’s in chemistry from Drew University and a Ph.D. in chemistry at Princeton. Scientifically my expertise hovers somewhere around the interface between organic chemistry and biochemistry. A short while after defending my dissertation, I moved to Washington DC to write for Chemical & Engineering News, and that’s where I’ve been for almost three years now.

When and how did you first discover science blogs?

Scandal led me to science blogs. Seriously. In March 2006 I was still an organic chemistry grad student. Everyone in my lab was buzzing about a set of retractions in the Journal of the American Chemical Society (disclosure: today I work for the American Chemical Society, which publishes JACS). A rising young organic chemistry star retracted the papers because work by one of his graduate students couldn’t be reproduced. It was a big deal and became an even bigger deal as the inevitable rumors (salacious and otherwise) surfaced. The blogosphere had the details first. So that’s where Google pointed me and the other members of my lab when we searched for more information. I learned about the awesome (but sadly now defunct) blogs Tenderbutton and The Endless Frontier, by Dylan Stiles and Paul Bracher, both chemistry grad students like me. I also discovered the solid mix of chemistry and pharma at Derek Lowe’s In the Pipeline, which is still the first blog I visit every day.

Tell us a little more about your career trajectory so far: interesting projects past and present?

i-b7bd4d4568d9689c2daf400303c886c3-Carmen Drahl pic2.JPGBy the time I discovered science blogs I knew my career goals were changing. I’d already been lucky enough to audit a science writing course at Princeton taught by Mike Lemonick from TIME, and thought that maybe science writing was a good choice for me. After reading chemistry blogs for a while I realized “Hey, I can do this!” and started my own blog, She Blinded Me with Science, in July 2006. It was the typical grad student blog, a mix of posts about papers I liked and life in the lab.

At C&E News I’ve contributed to its C&ENtral Science blog, which premiered in spring 2008. I’ve experimented with a few different kinds of posts- observations and on-the-street interviews when I run into something chemistry-related in DC, in-depth posts from meetings, and video demos of iPod apps. One of my favorite things to do is toy with new audio/video/etc technology for the blog.

What is taking up the most of your time and passion these days? What are your goals?

In March I just started a new era in my web existence- I’m becoming a pharma blogger. I’m the science voice at The Haystack, C&E News’s new pharma blog and one of seven new blogs the magazine launched last month. My co-blogger is the talented Lisa Jarvis, who’s written about the business side of pharma for ten years and who brings a solid science background to the table as well. I kicked us off by liveblogging/livetweeting a popular session at the American Chemical Society’s meeting in San Francisco where drug companies reveal for the first time the chemical structures of potential new drugs being tested in clinical trials. The whole thing synced to FriendFeed as well. Folks followed the talks from all three venues, which was great. I hope I can continue doing that sort of thing in the future.

For this August, I’m co-organizing a mini-symposium at the American Chemical Society meeting in Boston about the chem/pharma blogosphere and its impact on research and communication. I’m in the process of inviting speakers right now. It’s my first time doing anything like this and part of me is petrified that no one will show up. Tips on organizing a conference session and how not to stress when doing so are welcome!

More broadly, I’d love to get more chemistry bloggers to connect with the community that attends ScienceOnline. I don’t ever want to become that old (or not-so-old) person who is clueless about them-thar newfangled whosiwhatsits that the kids are using nowadays.

What aspect of science communication and/or particular use of the Web in science interests you the most?

A few things come to mind, actually. I’d like to think that the web has made grad school a helluva lot less isolating for science grad students. You have the virtual journal clubs like Totally Synthetic, posts like SciCurious’s letter to a grad student, etc.

As a journalist the web’s capacity to equalize fascinates me. I’m extremely lucky to have a staff gig as a science writer without having gone to journalism school or landed a media fellowhip and it’s weird to think that my old blog might’ve helped my visibility. I didn’t know Ed Yong’s story until Scio10 but I think he’s a highly talented example of how the web can open doors.

The web’s equalizing power goes to readers of science content as well as writers, of course. In the ideal situation a reader can give a writer instant feedback and you can get a real conversation going, something that was much harder with the snail-paced system of letters to the editor and reader surveys. Not that the conversation is always civil. Most of C&EN’s readers have a decent amount of scientific training, but the debate that rages whenever we run an editorial about climate change is as intense as any I’ve seen.

In cases like that I don’t know that the web gives people a good representation of what the consensus is. For folks who don’t have scientific training, how do you ensure that people don’t just go to the content that already confirms their pre-existing beliefs about autism or global warming? John Timmer touched on this more eloquently in his interview with you, and I agree with him that I don’t think we have an answer yet. Though on a slightly different note, I will mention that I’ve been enjoying the New York Times’s recent attempts to recapture the spontaneity of flipping through the newspaper in online browsing, like the Times Skimmer for Google Chrome.

What are some of your favourite science blogs? Have you discovered any cool science blogs by the participants at the Conference?

In addition to the blogs I’ve already mentioned I enjoy Carbon-Based Curiosities, Wired Science, Chemistry Blog, and Terra Sigillata, to name a few of the 50 or so blogs on my feed reader.

I discovered scads of new blogs at Scio10 but I’ll focus on the one that’s become required reading for me these days: Obesity Panacea. I’d covered obesity drug development for C&EN but I’d never met Travis Saunders and Peter Janiszewski or heard of their blog until the conference.

What was the best aspect of ScienceOnline2010 for you? Is there anything that happened at this Conference – a session, something someone said or did or wrote – that will change the way you think about science communication, or something that you will take with you to your job, blog-reading and blog-writing?

Dave Mungeris my hero – his blogging 102 session was packed with practical tips that I brought back to C&EN for incorporating into our blogs, such as the use of the Disqus plugin for catching conversations on social networks, getting smart about using stats and surveys, etc. Some of that’s already happened, and some of the ideas are still in the works.

I came for the nuts-and-bolts blogging tips but I stayed for the conversations, especially the ones at the bar after the official program was done for the night. And the icing on the cake was seeing folks I’d worked with but never met, like Cameron Neylon and you, Bora, and catching up with people I hadn’t seen in months, like Jean-Claude Bradley, Aaron Rowe, Jennifer Ouellette and Nancy Shute.

It was so nice to meet you in person and thank you for the interview. I hope to see you again next January.

Probable GSK 2245035


 

Figure imgf000047_0002 GSK 2245035 PROBABLE

8H-​Purin-​8-​one, 6-​amino-​2-​butoxy-​7,​9-​dihydro-​9-​[[1-​(2-​hydroxyethyl)​-​4-​piperidinyl]​methyl]​-

CAS NO 1264370-20-8

GSK 2245035

PHASE 2, Allergic asthma; Allergic rhinitis

Toll-like receptor 7 agonist

Immunomodulators; Interferon alfa 2a stimulants; Toll-like receptor 7 agonists

  • 01 Aug 2014 GlaxoSmithKline completes a phase II trial in Allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis in Canada (NCT01788813)
  • 31 Jul 2013 GlaxoSmithKline completes a phase II trial in Allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis in Canada (NCT01607372)
  • 29 Mar 2013 GlaxoSmithKline initiates enrolment in a phase II trial for Allergic asthma and allergic rhinitis in Canada (NCT01788813)

WP_000297

Patent

WO2011098451

 https://www.google.com/patents/WO2011098451A1?cl=en

Example 2: 6-Amino-2-(butyloxy)-9-([1 -(2-hvdroxyethyl)-3-piperidinyllmethyl|-7,9-dihydro-8/-/-purin-8- one

2-(Butyloxy)-8-(methyloxy)-9-(-piperidinylmethyl)-9/-/-purin-6-amine (for example, as prepared for Intermediate 14) (33.4 mg, 0.1 mmol) was suspended in DMF (0.3 mL) was added to 2- bromoethanol (commercially available, for example, from Aldrich) (0.0071 mL, 0.100 mmol). DIPEA (0.040 mL, 0.23 mmol) was added. The reaction was shaken in a stoppered vial at ambient temperature overnight. The reaction mixture was diluted with DMSO (0.4 mL) and the resultant solution purified by MDAP (Method A). Appropriate fractions were combined and evaporated in vacuo. The residues was dissolved in 4M HCI in dioxane (0.4 mL) and allowed to stand at room temperature overnight. The solvent was dried under a stream of nitrogen in the Radleys blowdown apparatus. The residue was redissolved in methanol (0.5 mL) and applied to the top of a 0.5 g aminopropyl SPE (preconditioned with methanol, 2 CV). The cartridge was washed with methanol (2 mL). The solvent was dried under a stream of nitrogen in the Radleys blowdown apparatus to give the title compound (0.022 g).

LCMS (System A): tRET = 0.57min; MH+ 365

 

REF

pdf (892 KB), English, Pages 211

hrcak.srce.hr/file/138695
by K BENDELJA – ‎2012 – ‎Related articles

titis B vaccine both manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. MPL is a nontoxic derivate … GSK2245035 compound that is a highly selective TLR7 agonist. Intranasal …

Study ID Status Title Patient Level Data
116392 Completed A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety, pharmacodynamics and efficacy against allergic reactivity of repeat intranasal administration of the TLR7 agonist GSK2245035 in subjects with respiratory allergies
116958 Completed A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety, pharmacodynamics and effect on allergic reactivity of repeat intranasal administration of the TLR7

FDA approves Cholbam to treat rare bile acid synthesis disorders


03/17/2015

http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm438572.htm?source=govdelivery&utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery

Today the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Cholbam (cholic acid) capsules, the first FDA approved treatment for pediatric and adult patients with bile acid synthesis disorders due to single enzyme defects, and for patients with peroxisomal disorders (including Zellweger spectrum disorders). Patients with these rare, genetic, metabolic conditions exhibit manifestations of liver disease, steatorrhea (presence of fat in the stool) and complications from decreased fat-soluble vitamin absorption.

March 17, 2015

Release

Today the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Cholbam (cholic acid) capsules, the first FDA approved treatment for pediatric and adult patients with bile acid synthesis disorders due to single enzyme defects, and for patients with peroxisomal disorders (including Zellweger spectrum disorders). Patients with these rare, genetic, metabolic conditions exhibit manifestations of liver disease, steatorrhea (presence of fat in the stool) and complications from decreased fat-soluble vitamin absorption.

Individuals with these rare disorders lack the enzymes needed to synthesize cholic acid, a primary bile acid normally produced in the liver from cholesterol. The absence of cholic acid in these patients leads to reduced bile flow, accumulation of potentially toxic bile acid intermediates in the liver (cholestasis), and malabsorption of fats and fat-soluble vitamins in the diet. If untreated, patients fail to grow and can develop life-threatening liver injury.

Cholbam is approved as an oral treatment for children aged three weeks and older, and adults. The manufacturer of Cholbam was granted a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher–a provision that encourages development of new drugs and biologics for the prevention and treatment of rare pediatric diseases.

“This approval underscores the agency’s commitment to making treatments available to patients with rare diseases,” said Julie Beitz, M.D., director of the Office of Drug Evaluation III in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). “Prior to today’s approval, patients with these rare bile acid synthesis disorders had no approved treatment options.”

The efficacy of Cholbam for the treatment of patients with bile acid synthesis disorders due to single enzyme defects was assessed in an uncontrolled trial involving 50 patients treated over an 18 year period. An extension trial followed 21 of these patients and enrolled an additional 12 patients with interim efficacy data available for an additional 21 months. On average, patients were 4 years of age at the start of cholic acid treatment (range 3 weeks to 36 years). Response to treatment was evaluated by improvements in baseline liver function tests and weight. Responses were noted in 64 percent of patients with evaluable data. Two-thirds of patients survived greater than three years. Literature reports also supported the efficacy of Cholbam in this population.

The efficacy of Cholbam for the treatment of peroxisomal disorders, including Zellweger spectrum disorders, was assessed in an uncontrolled, treatment trial involving 29 patients treated over an 18 year period. An extension trial followed 10 of these patients and enrolled an additional two patients with interim efficacy data available for 21 additional months. The majority of patients were less than 2 years of age at the start of cholic acid treatment (range 3 weeks to 10 years). Response to treatment was evaluated by improvements in baseline liver function tests and weight. Responses were noted in 46 percent of patients with evaluable data.  Forty-two percent of patients survived greater than 3 years.

Cholbam did not affect other manifestations of bile acid disorders due to single enzyme defects or peroxisomal disorders such as neurologic symptoms.

The most common side effect in patients treated with Cholbam was diarrhea. The use of Cholbam should be carefully monitored by an experienced hepatologist or pediatric gastroenterologist, and treatment discontinued in patients developing worsening liver function.

An observational study to assess the long-term safety of Cholbam will be required post-approval.

Cholbam is marketed by Baltimore, Maryland-based Asklepion Pharmaceuticals LLC.

GSK 2256294


Figure imgf000077_0001

GSK 2256294

GSK 2256294A

CAS  1142090-23-0

MF C21H24F3N7O
MW 447.46

Antiasthmatics, soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease COPD …PHASE 1

(1R,3S)- Cyclohexanecarboxamide, N-[[4-cyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methyl]-3-[[4-methyl-6-(methylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-,

cis-N-[[4-Cyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methyl]-3-[[4-methyl-6-(methylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]cyclohexanecarboxamide

(1R,3S)-N-(4-cyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-3-(4-methyl-6-(methylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-ylamino)cyclohexanecarboxamide

cis-N-((4-Cyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methyl)-3-((4-methyl-6-(methylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino)cyclohexanecarboxamide

Cyclohexanecarboxamide, N-((4-cyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methyl)-3-((4-methyl-6-(methylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)amino)-, (1R,3S)-rel-

  • Originator GlaxoSmithKline
  • Class Antiasthmatics
  • Mechanism of Action Epoxide hydrolase inhibitors

GSK 2256294 is a soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor in phase I clinical trials at GlaxoSmithKline for the oral treatment of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

GSK2256294A is a potent, reversible, tight binding inhibitor of isolated recombinant human sEH (IC50 value 27 pM), and displays potent inhibition against the rat (IC50 = 61 pM) and murine (IC50 = 189 pM) orthologs of sEH. GSK2256294A also displays potent cellular inhibition (IC50 = 0.66 nM) of sEH in a cell line transfected with the human sEH enzyme.The selectivity of the compound has been demonstrated by testing against a large panel of enzymes, receptors and ion channels, including the phosphatase activity of EPHX2.

  • 01 Jan 2015GlaxoSmithKline initiates enrolment in a phase I trial in Healthy volunteers in USA (NCT02262689)
  • 09 Oct 2014GlaxoSmithKline plans a phase I trial in Healthy volunteers in USA (NCT02262689)
  • 01 May 2014GlaxoSmithKline completes a phase I pharmacokinetics trial for Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (in the elderly, in volunteers) in USA (NCT02006537)

 

PATENT

http://www.google.com/patents/WO2009049157A1?cl=en

Step 1:

4- (bromomethyl) -3- (trifluoromethyl) benzonitrile

 

Figure CN101896065BD00313

 A mixture of 4-methyl-3- (trifluoromethyl) benzonitrile (10g, 54mmOl) was dissolved in 200mL of carbon tetrachloride, and acid imide with N- desert shot glass (10.5g, 59mmol) and peroxybenzoate (benzoyl peroxide) (1.3g, 0.54mmol) processing. The reaction mixture was heated to reflux temperature and stirred for one week. SOmL water was then added, and the layers separated. The aqueous layer with methylene chloride (2X50mL) and extracted. The organic layers were washed with water (2X50mL), dried over magnesium sulfate, and concentrated to give 4- (bromomethyl) -3- (trifluoromethyl) benzonitrile (14g, 53mm0l), as a yellow oil which was used without further purification for the subsequent steps.

Step 2:

4- (aminomethyl) -3- (trifluoromethyl) benzonitrile

 

Figure CN101896065BD00314

 4- (bromomethyl) -3- (trifluoromethyl) benzonitrile (14g) was dissolved in 500mL of 5M methanol solution of ammonia, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The solvent was removed in vacuo to give a yellow solid, which was dissolved in IM HCl and extracted with diethyl ether (3X30mL). Then, with IM NaOH and the aqueous layer was adjusted to pH 9-10 and extracted with dichloromethane (3X80mL). Thus obtained 4- (aminomethyl) -3- (trifluoromethyl) benzonitrile (4.7g, 23mm0l, 43%), as a yellow solid. MS (ES) m / e 201 [M + H] + “1H NMR (400MHz, DMS0-D6) δ 8.2 (s, 1H), 8.15 (d, 1H), 8.0 (d, 1H), 3.9 (s, 2H).

Step 1:

4-chloro -N, 6- dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine

 

Figure CN101896065BD00411

 Intermediate 13 (500mg, 3.07mmol) was added 25-30% methylamine (300uL, 3.07mmol) in aqueous CH3CN / H20 (15mL) in a solution. The mixture was cooled to (TC, with the pH adjusted to 9_10.pH IMNaOH maintained at 9-10 for 0.5 hours. The reaction progress was monitored by LCMS, the mixture was used in the subsequent step without any treatment.

Intermediate 19

 3 – {[methyl (methyl-amino) triazin-2-yl 4 -1,3,5_ -6-] amino} cyclohexanecarboxylic acid was prepared

 

Figure CN101896065BD00303

 To 2,4-dichloro-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazine (2.291g, 13.97mmol) and methylamine (6.98ml, 13.97mmol) was added dropwise IN NaOH, to maintain the pH of 10. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 minutes. Subsequently, a solution of 3-amino-cyclohexane – carboxylic acid (2.0g, 13.97mmol), was added dropwise to maintain a pH of 10 INNaOH. The reaction mixture was heated to 70 ° C overnight. Cooling the reaction mixture was directly purified by preparative HPLC. MS (ES +): m / e266.2 [M + H] +. 1H NMR (400MHz, DMS0-D6) δ 9.0_8.5 (bm, 2Η), 3.9 (bs, 1Η), 2.9 (m, 2Η), 2.3 (s, 3Η), 2.2 (s, 3Η), 1.9- 1.7 (bm, 4Η), 1.4-1.1 (bm, 4Η).

Step 2:

3 – {[4_-methyl-6- (methylamino) _1,3,5_ triazine _2_ yl] amino} cyclohexanecarboxylic acid

 

Figure CN101896065BD00412

 in (TC, 4-chloro -N, 6- dimethyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-amine mixture (485mg, 3.07mmol) was added 3-amino-cyclohexyl burning acid (527mg, 3.68mmol). The mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature .pH maintained between 9 to 10 for 3 hours. The mixture was concentrated and the product was purified by HPLC to afford 0.6g (2.26mmol, 74% yield) of the desired product, as a white solid .MS (ES +): m / e 266.2 [M + H] + “

 

 

Example 74

(cis)-N-{[4-cyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methyl}-3-{[4-methyl-6-(methylamino)-1 ,3,5- triazin-2-yl]amino}cyclohexanecarboxamide

Figure imgf000077_0001

To a solution of 3-{[4-methyl-6-(methylamino)-1 ,3,5-triazin-2- yl]amino}cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (0.100 g, 0.264 mmol) in N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF) (4 ml) was added 4-(aminomethyl)-3-(trifluoromethyl)benzonitrile (0.053 g, 0.264 mmol) followed by diisopropylethylamine (0.101 ml, 0.580 mmol) and 1 H-1 ,2,3- benzotriazol-1-yloxy-tris(dirnethylamino)-phosphonium hexafluorophosphate (BOP reagent, 0.128 g, 0.290 mmol). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 4 hours and then purified by preparative HPLC to provide (cis)-N-{[4-cyano-2- (trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methyl}-3-{[4-methyl-6-(methylamino)-1 ,3,5-triazin-2- yl]amino}cyclohexanecarboxamide (83 mg, 0.148 mmol, 56 %). MS (ES) m/e 448

[M+H]+. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-D6) D 7.8 (bs, 1 H), 7.3 (bs, 1 H), 7.2 (m, 1 H), 6.9 (m, 1 H), 3.8 (bs, 2H), 3.3 (bm, 1 H), 2.2 (bm, 4H), 1.8 – 1.5 (bm, 4H), 1.3 – 1.1 (bm, 4H), 0.8 – 0.5 (bm, 4H)

PATENT

http://www.google.com/patents/CN101896065B?cl=en

(cis) -N – {[4- cyano-2- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} -3 – {[4_-methyl-6- (methylamino) _1,3, .5- triazin-2-yl] amino} cyclohexanecarboxamide

Figure CN101896065BC00051

 

Example 74

(cis) -N- {[4- cyano-2- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} -3- {[4_ methyl _6_ (methylamino) -1,3 , 5-triazin-2-yl] amino} cyclohexanecarboxamide

 

Figure CN101896065BD00571

 To 3 – {[4_-methyl-6- (methylamino) -l, 3,5- triazin-2-yl] amino} cyclohexanecarboxylic acid (0.1OOg,

0.264mmol) in N, N- dimethylformamide (DMF) (4ml) was added 4- (aminomethyl) -3- (trifluoromethyl) benzonitrile (0.053g, 0.264mmol), followed by the addition of diisopropylethylamine (0.1Olml, 0.580mmol) and 1H-1,2,

3- benzotriazol-1-yloxy – tris (dimethylamino) _ scale hexafluorophosphate (Β0Ρ reagent, 0.128g, 0.290mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 4 hours, and then purified by preparative HPLC to afford (cis) -N- {[4- cyano-2- (trifluoromethyl) phenyl] methyl} -3 – {[4_ methyl-6- (methylamino) -1,3,5_ triazin-2-yl] amino} cyclohexane carboxamide (83mg, 0.148mmol, 56%) “MS (ES) m / e 448 [ M + H] +. 1H NMR (400MHz, DMS0-D6) δ 7.8 (bs, 1H), 7.3 (bs, 1H), 7.2 (m, 1H), 6.9 (m, 1H), 3.8 (bs, 2H) , 3.3 (bm, 1H), 2.2 (bm, 4H),

1.8-1.5 (bm, 4H), 1.3-1.1 (bm, 4H), 0.8-0.5 (bm, 4H).

SMILES  Cc1nc(nc(n1)N[C@H]2CCC[C@H](C2)C(=O)NCc3ccc(cc3C(F)(F)F)C#N)NC

P.L. Podolin et al. In vitro and in vivo characterization of a novel soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitor. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2013, 104-105, 25-31.
L.A. Morgan et al. Soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibition does not prevent cardiac remodeling and dysfunction after aortic constriction in rats and mice. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2013, 61, 291-301. 

GSK 2126458, Omipalisib, PI3K/mTOR inhibitor


GSK 2126458

CAS 1086062-66-9

OMipalisib;GSK2126458;GSK-2126458;GSK2126458 (GSK458);GSK212;

2,4-Difluoro-N-[2-methoxy-5-[4-(4-pyridazinyl)-6-quinolinyl]-3-pyridinyl]benzenesulfonamide;

2,4-Difluoro-N-[2-Methoxy-5-[4-(pyridazin-4-yl)quinolin-6-yl]pyridin-3-yl]benzenesulfonaMide

2,4-Difluoro-N-[2-methoxy-5-[4-(4-pyridazinyl)quinolin-6-yl]pyridin-3-yl]benzenesulfonamide

phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitor

idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

PHASE 1

MW 505.49598

MF C25H17F2N5O3S

GSK…….http://www.gsk.com/media/280387/product-pipeline-2014.pdf

Omipalisib (GSK2126458): Omipalisib, also known as GSK2126458, is a small-molecule pyridylsulfonamide inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) with potential antineoplastic activity. PI3K inhibitor GSK2126458 binds to and inhibits PI3K in the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway, which may trigger the translocation of cytosolic Bax to the mitochondrial outer membrane, increasing mitochondrial membrane permeability and inducing apoptotic cell death. Bax is a member of the proapoptotic Bcl2 family of proteins. PI3K, often overexpressed in cancer cells, plays a crucial role in tumor cell regulation and survival.

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is developing omipalisib (GSK-2126458), a phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/mTOR) inhibitor as well as mTOR complex 1 and 2 inhibitor, for the potential oral treatment of cancer and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

MEDKOO

Certificate of Analysis:

View current batch of CoA

QC data:

View NMR, View HPLC, View MS

GSK2126458 is a highly potent PI3K and mTOR inhibitor. In vivo, GSK2126458 showed anti-tumor activity in both pharmacodynamic and tumor growth efficacy models. GSK2126458 reduced the phosphorylated AKT, p70S6K contents in a dose and time dependent way. The IC50 of GSK2126458 is 2 nM for pAKT in the HCC1954 breast carcinoma cell line. In various human tumor cells, GSK2126458 had a width of inhibitory activity for potent cell growth and induced cell death. Notably, GSK2126458 acted mainly by not induction of apoptosis but cell cycle arrest, particularly in G1-phase

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is developing omipalisib (GSK-2126458), a phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/mTOR) inhibitor as well as mTOR complex 1 and 2 inhibitor, for the potential oral treatment of cancer and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

GSK-2126458 is a phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase (PI3K) inhibitor in early clinical development for the oral treatment of solid tumors and for the oral treatment of lymphoma. Early clinical studies are ongoing for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The compound is being developed b GlaxoSmithKline.

In August 2009, a phase I trial began for solid tumors and lymphoma . In April 2012, phase Ib co-clinical trials in advanced prostate cancer (PC) were underway . In March 2013, a phase I trial was initiated in the UK in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

In April 2014, a phase I, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study (study number P3K113794) and safety data were presented at the 105th AACR meeting in San Diego, CA. Advanced solid tumor patients (n = 69) received oral continuous GSK-2126458 or intermittent GSK-2126458 bid  + trametinib. For GSK-2126458 and trametinib, the MTD in QD cohort was 2 and 1 mg, respectively, and also 1 and 1.5 mg, respectively

PAPER 

Discovery of GSK2126458, a highly potent inhibitor of PI3K and the mammalian target of rampamycin
ACS Med Chem Lett 2010, 1(1): 39

 

Abstract Image

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase α (PI3Kα) is a critical regulator of cell growth and transformation, and its signaling pathway is the most commonly mutated pathway in human cancers. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a class IV PI3K protein kinase, is also a central regulator of cell growth, and mTOR inhibitors are believed to augment the antiproliferative efficacy of PI3K/AKT pathway inhibition. 2,4-Difluoro-N-{2-(methyloxy)-5-[4-(4-pyridazinyl)-6-quinolinyl]-3-pyridinyl}benzenesulfonamide (GSK2126458, 1) has been identified as a highly potent, orally bioavailable inhibitor of PI3Kα and mTOR with in vivo activity in both pharmacodynamic and tumor growth efficacy models. Compound 1 is currently being evaluated in human clinical trials for the treatment of cancer.

 ……………….. 

synthesis

omalipisib

 

Figure imgf000151_0002

Figure imgf000145_0002

………………..

PATENT

WO 2008144463

http://www.google.co.in/patents/WO2008144463A1?cl=en

Example 345

2,4-difluoro-N-{2-(methyloxy)-5-[4-(4-pyridazinyl)-6-quinolinyl]-3- pyridinyl } benzenesulf onamide

a) 6-bromo-4-(4-pyridazinyl)quinoline

Dissolved 6-bromo-4-iodoquinoline (17.43 g, 52.2 mmol), 4- (tributylstannanyl)pyridazine (19.27 g, 52.2 mmol), and PdC12(dppf)-CH2C12 (2.132 g, 2.61 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (200 mL) and heated to 105 °C. After 3 h, added more palladium catalyst and heated for 6 h. Concentrated and dissolved in methylene chloride/methanol. Purified by column chromatography (combiflash) with 2% MeOH/EtOAc to 5% MeOH/EtOAc to give the crude title compound. Trituration with EtOAc furnished 6-bromo-4-(4-pyridazinyl)quinoline (5.8 g, 20.27 mmol, 38.8 % yield). MS(ES)+ m/e 285.9, 287.9 [M+H]+.

b) 2,4-difluoro-N-{2-(methyloxy)-5-[4-(4-pyridazinyl)-6-quinolinyl]-3- pyridinyl } benzenesulf onamide A slurry of 6-bromo-4-(4-pyridazinyl)quinoline (4.8 g, 16.78 mmol), bis(pinacolato)diboron (4.69 g, 18.45 mmol) , PdC12(dppf)-CH2C12 (530 mg, 0.649 mmol) and potassium acetate (3.29 g, 33.6 mmol) in anhydrous 1,4-dioxane (120 ml) was heated at 100 °C for 3 h. The complete disappearance of the starting bromide was observed by LCMS. The reaction was then treated with N-[5-bromo-2- (methyloxy)-3-pyridinyl]-2,4-difluorobenzenesulfonamide (6.68 g, 17.61 mmol) and another portion of PdC12(dppf)-CH2C12 (550 mg, 0.673 mmol), then heated at 110 °C for 16 h. The reaction was allowed to cool to room temperature, filtered, and concentrated. Purification of the residue by chromatography (Analogix; 5% MeOH / 5% CH2C12 / 90% EtOAC) gave 6.5 g (76%) desired product. MS(ES)+ m/e 505.9 [M+H]+.

 

INTERMEDIATES:

Intermediate 1  Similar but not same

Scheme A:

Conditions: a) Tributyl(vinyl)tin, Pd(PPh3)4, dioxane, reflux; b) OsO4, NaIO4, 2,6- lutidine, r-BuOH, dioxane, H2O, rt; c) (4-pyridyl)boronic acid, Pd(PPh3)4, 2 M K2CO35 DMF, 100 DC.

4-(4-pyridinyl)-6-quinolinecarbaldehydeSimilar but not same

a) 4-chloro-6-ethenylquinoline

A mixture of 6-bromo-4-chloroquinoline (6.52 g, 26.88 mmol; see J. Med. Chem., H 268 (1978) ), tributyl(vinyl)tin (8.95 g, 28.22 mmol), and tetrakistriphenylphospbine palladium (0) (0.62 g, 0.54 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (150 mL) was refluxed for 2.0 h, cooled to room temperature, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (0-4% MeOH:CH2Cl2) to give the title compound (5.1 g) as a pale yellow solid. MS (ES)+ m/e 190 [M+H]+. This material was used directly in the next step.

b) 4-chloro-6-quinolinecarbaldehyde

A mixture of 4-chloro-6-ethenylquinoline (5.1 g, 26.88 mmol), 2,6-lutidine

(5.76 g, 53.75 mmol), sodium (meta) periodate (22.99 g, 107.51 mmol), and osmium tetroxide (5.48 g of a 2.5% solution in tert-butanol, 0.538 mmol) in l,4-dioxane:H2θ (350 mL of 3: 1 mixture) was stirred for 3.5 h at room temperature and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (CH2Cb) to give the title compound (4.26 g, 83% for 2 steps) as a pale yellow solid. MS (ES)+ m/e 192 [M+H]+.

c) 4-(4-pyridmyl)-6-qumolinecarbaldehyde

A mixture of 4-chloro-6-quinolinecarbaldehyde (3.24 g, 16.92 mmol), A- pyridylboronic acid (3.12 g, 25.38 mmol), tetrakistriphenylphosphine palladium (0) (0.978 g, 0.846 mmol), and 2M aqueous K2CO3 (7.02 g, 50.76 mmol, 25.4 mis of 2M solution) in DMF (100 mL) was heated at 100 °C for 3.0 h and cooled to room temperature. The mixture was filtered through Celite and the Celite was washed with EtOAc. The filtrate was transferred to a separatory funnel, washed with water and saturated NaCl, dried (Na2SO4), filtered and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel (5% MeOH:CH2Cl2) to give the title compound (2.03 g, 51%) as a tan solid. MS (ES)+ m/e 235 [M+H]+.

Intermediate 2

Preparation of 2-amino-5 -bromo-N,N-dimethyl-3 -pyridinesulfonamideSimilar but not same

a) 2-ammo-5-bromo-3-pyridinesulfonyl chloride

To a cooled (0 °C) solution of chlorosulfonic acid (58 mL) under vigorous stirring was added 5-bromo-2-pyridinamine (86.7 mmol) portionwise. The reaction mixture was then heated at reflux for 3 hrs. Upon cooling to room temperature, the reaction mixture was poured over ice (-100 g) with vigorous stirring. The resulting yellow precipitate was collected by suction filtration, washing with cold water and petroleum ether to provide the title compound as an orange-yellow solid (18.1 g, 77% yield). MS(ES)+ m/e 272.8 [M+H]+.

* Other sulfonyl chlorides can be prepared using this procedure by varying the choice of substituted aryl or heteroaryl.

b) 2-amino-5-bromo-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinesulfonamide

To a cold (0 DC) suspension of 2-amino-5-bromo-3-pyridinesulfonyl chloride (92.1 mmol) in dry 1,4-dioxane (92 mL) was added pyridine (101.3 mmol) followed by a 2M solution of dimethylamine in THF (101.3 mmol). The reaction was allowed to warm to rt for 2 h, heated to 50 DC for 1 h, then cooled to rt. After standing for 2 h, the precipitate was collected by filtration and rinsed with a minimal amount of cold water. Drying the precipitate to constant weight under high vacuum provided 14.1 g (55%) of the title compound as a white solid. MS(ES)+ m/e 279.8, 282.0 [M+H]+.

 

Intermediate 3

Preparation of 2-amino-N,N-dimethyl-5-(4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-l,3.2-dioxaborolan-2- yl)-3 -pyridinesulfonamideSimilar but not same

c) To a solution of 2-amino-5-bromo-N,N-dimethyl-3 -pyridinesulfonamide (7.14 mmol) in 1,4-dioxane (35 mL) was added 4,4,4′,4′,5,5,5′,5′-octamethyl-2,2′-bi-l,3,2- dioxaborolane (7.86 mmol), potassium acetate (28.56 mmol) and [1,1 ‘- bis(diphenylphosphmo)-ferrocene] dichloropalladium(II) dichloromethane complex (1 :1) (0.571 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred at 100 °C for 18 h. The reaction was concentrated in vacuo, re-dissolved in ethyl acetate (50 mL) and purified on silica using 60% ethyl acetate/hexanes to yield the title compound as a tan solid (86 %). IH ΝMR (400 MHz, DMSOd6) δ ppm 8.41 (d, 1 H, J =1.52), 7.92 (d, 1 H, J = 1.77), 2.68 (s, 6 H), 1.28 (s, 12 H).

* Other boronate or boronic acids can be prepared using this procedure by varying the choice of aryl or heteroaryl bromide. Scheme 17:

Conditions: a) NaO(Rl), (Rl)OH, O 0C to room temperature; b) SnCl2-2H2O, ethyl acetate, reflux; c) (R2)SO2C1, pyridine, O 0C to room temperature.

Intermediate 4

Preparation of N-r5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-pyridinyll-2,4- difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Figure imgf000151_0002N-[5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-pyridinyl]-2,4- difluorobenzenesulfonamide

a) 5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-nitropyridine

To a cooled (0 °C) solution of 5-bromo-2-chloro-3-nitropyridine (50 g, 211 mmol) in methanol (200 mL) was added dropwise over 10 minutes 20% sodium methoxide (50 mL, 211 mmol) solution. The reaction, which quickly became heterogeneous, was allowed to warm to ambient temperature and stirred for 16 h. The reaction was filtered and the precipitate diluted with water (200 mL) and stirred for 1 h. The solids were filtered, washed with water (3 x 100 mL) and dried in a vac oven (40 °C) to give 5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-nitropyridine (36 g, 154 mmol, 73.4 % yield) as a pale yellow powder. The original filtrate was concentrated in vacuo and diluted with water (150 mL). Saturated ammonium chloride (25 mL) was added and the mixture stirred for 1 h. The solids were filtered, washed with water, and dried in a vac oven (40 °C) to give a second crop of 5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3- nitropyridine (9 g, 38.6 mmol, 18.34 % yield). Total yield = 90%. MS(ES)+ m/e 232.8, 234.7 [M+H]+.

b) 5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-pyridinamine

To a solution of 5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-nitropyridine (45 g, 193 mmol) in ethyl acetate (1 L) was added tin(II) chloride dihydrate (174 g, 772 mmol). The reaction mixture was heated at reflux for 4 h. LC/MS indicated some starting material remained, so added 20 mol% tin (II) chloride dihydrate and continued to heat at reflux. After 2 h, the reaction was allowed to cool to ambient temperature and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was treated with 2 N sodium hydroxide and the mixture stirred for 1 h. The mixture was then with methylene chloride (1 L), filtered through Celite, and washed with methylene chloride (500 mL). The layers were separated and the organics dried over magnesium sulfate and concentrated to give 5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-pyridinamine (23 g, 113 mmol, 58.7 % yield). The product was used crude in subsequent reactions. MS(ES)+ m/e 201.9, 203.9 [M+H]+.

c) N-[5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-pyridinyl]-2,4-difluorobenzenesulfonamide

Figure imgf000151_0002

To a cooled (0 °C) solution of 5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-pyridinamine (20.3 g, 100 mmol) in pyridine (200 mL) was added slowly 2,4-difluorobenzenesulfonyl chloride (21.3 g, 100 mmol) over 15 min (reaction became heterogeneous). The ice bath was removed and the reaction was stirred at ambient temperature for 16 h, at which time the reaction was diluted with water (500 mL) and the solids filtered off and washed with copious amounts of water. The precipitate was dried in a vacuum oven at 50 °C to give N-[5-bromo-2-(methyloxy)-3-pyridinyl]-2,4- difluorobenzenesulfonamide (12 g, 31.6 mmol, 31.7 % yield) MS(ES)+ m/e 379.0, 380.9 [M+H]+.

 

 

References

1. Knight et al., ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 39-43.
2. Hardwick et al., Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8(12), Supplement I, Abstract C63.
3. Greger et al., Combinations of BRAF, MEK, and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors overcome acquired resistance to the BRAF inhibitor GSK2118436 dabrafenib, mediated by NRAS or MEK mutations. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11(4), 909-920.

1: Zhang Y, Xue D, Wang X, Lu M, Gao B, Qiao X. Screening of kinase inhibitors targeting BRAF for regulating autophagy based on kinase pathways. Mol Med Rep. 2014 Jan;9(1):83-90. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1781. Epub 2013 Nov 7. PubMed PMID: 24213221.

2: Villanueva J, Infante JR, Krepler C, Reyes-Uribe P, Samanta M, Chen HY, Li B, Swoboda RK, Wilson M, Vultur A, Fukunaba-Kalabis M, Wubbenhorst B, Chen TY, Liu Q, Sproesser K, DeMarini DJ, Gilmer TM, Martin AM, Marmorstein R, Schultz DC, Speicher DW, Karakousis GC, Xu W, Amaravadi RK, Xu X, Schuchter LM, Herlyn M, Nathanson KL. Concurrent MEK2 mutation and BRAF amplification confer resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors in melanoma. Cell Rep. 2013 Sep 26;4(6):1090-9. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.08.023. Epub 2013 Sep 19. PubMed PMID: 24055054; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3956616.

3: Kim HG, Tan L, Weisberg EL, Liu F, Canning P, Choi HG, Ezell SA, Wu H, Zhao Z, Wang J, Mandinova A, Griffin JD, Bullock AN, Liu Q, Lee SW, Gray NS. Discovery of a potent and selective DDR1 receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor. ACS Chem Biol. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):2145-50. doi: 10.1021/cb400430t. Epub 2013 Aug 13. PubMed PMID: 23899692; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3800496.

4: Khalili JS, Yu X, Wang J, Hayes BC, Davies MA, Lizee G, Esmaeli B, Woodman SE. Combination small molecule MEK and PI3K inhibition enhances uveal melanoma cell death in a mutant GNAQ- and GNA11-dependent manner. Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Aug 15;18(16):4345-55. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-3227. Epub 2012 Jun 25. PubMed PMID: 22733540; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3935730.

5: Greger JG, Eastman SD, Zhang V, Bleam MR, Hughes AM, Smitheman KN, Dickerson SH, Laquerre SG, Liu L, Gilmer TM. Combinations of BRAF, MEK, and PI3K/mTOR inhibitors overcome acquired resistance to the BRAF inhibitor GSK2118436 dabrafenib, mediated by NRAS or MEK mutations. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Apr;11(4):909-20. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0989. Epub 2012 Mar 2. PubMed PMID: 22389471.

6: Wang M, Gao M, Miller KD, Sledge GW, Zheng QH. [11C]GSK2126458 and [18F]GSK2126458, the first radiosynthesis of new potential PET agents for imaging of PI3K and mTOR in cancers. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2012 Feb 15;22(4):1569-74. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.12.136. Epub 2012 Jan 10. PubMed PMID: 22297110.

7: Schenone S, Brullo C, Musumeci F, Radi M, Botta M. ATP-competitive inhibitors of mTOR: an update. Curr Med Chem. 2011;18(20):2995-3014. Review. PubMed PMID: 21651476.

8: Leung E, Kim JE, Rewcastle GW, Finlay GJ, Baguley BC. Comparison of the effects of the PI3K/mTOR inhibitors NVP-BEZ235 and GSK2126458 on tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011 Jun 1;11(11):938-46. Epub 2011 Jun 1. PubMed PMID: 21464613; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3127046.

Follow New Drug Approvals on WordPress.com

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 37.9K other subscribers

ORGANIC SPECTROSCOPY

Read all about Organic Spectroscopy on ORGANIC SPECTROSCOPY INTERNATIONAL 

DISCLAIMER

I , Dr A.M.Crasto is writing this blog to share the knowledge/views, after reading Scientific Journals/Articles/News Articles/Wikipedia. My views/comments are based on the results /conclusions by the authors(researchers). I do mention either the link or reference of the article(s) in my blog and hope those interested can read for details. I am briefly summarising the remarks or conclusions of the authors (researchers). If one believe that their intellectual property right /copyright is infringed by any content on this blog, please contact or leave message at below email address amcrasto@gmail.com. It will be removed ASAP