
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
Keywords: Synthesis. New drug molecules. New chemical entities. Medicine …Degarelix acetate (Firmagon®) . ….. Scheme 5. Synthesis of degarelix acetate (V).
PROUD Indian WORLD RECORD VIEWS holder on THIS BLOG, ………live, by DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO, Worldpeaceambassador, Worlddrugtracker, Helping millions, 100 million hits on google, pushing boundaries,2.5 lakh plus connections worldwide, 45 lakh plus VIEWS on this blog in 227 countries, 7 CONTINENTS ……A 90 % paralysed man in action for you, I am suffering from transverse mylitis and bound to a wheel chair, [THIS BLOG HOLDS WORLD RECORD VIEWS ] A PROUD INDIAN
Home » Uncategorized (Page 140)

lipegfilgrastim
C 864 H 1369 N 225 O 258 S 9 [C 2 H 4 O] N
pegylated granulocyte colony stimulating factor; O3.133-[N5-(N-{[ω-methoxypoly (oxyethylene)] carbonyl} glycyl)-α-neuraminyl-(2 → 6)-α-D-galactopyranosyl]-L-methionyl -des-1-L-alanine-des-37-L-valine-des-38-L-serine-des-39-L-glutamic acid-human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, pluripoietin)
Lonquex (lipegfilgrastim) has been approved to reduce the duration of neutropaenia (low white blood cell counts) and febrile neutropaenia in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy for cancer, and is given as a single subcutaneous dose per cycle of chemotherapy.
Like Neulasta (pegfilgrastim), Lonquex is a long-acting recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and is dosed at the same frequency as Amgen’s drug.
http://www.pmlive.com/pharma_news/neulasta_rival_from_teva_cleared_in_eu_495953
In experiments with mice, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center scientists have identified an enzyme involved in the regulation of immune system T cells that could be a useful target in treating asthma and boosting the effects of certain cancer therapies.
In research described online April 6 in Nature Immunology, the investigators show that mice without the enzyme SKG1 were resistant to dust mite-induced asthma. And mice with melanoma and missing the enzyme, developed far fewer lung tumors—less than half as many—than mice with SKG1.
“If we can develop a drug that blocks the enzyme in a way that mimics what happens when the enzyme is missing, we would not only have a treatment to inhibit asthma, but also a drug that could be used in conjunction with other experimental therapies aimed at helping the immune system fight cancer,” said Jonathan D. Powell, M.D., professor of oncology at the…
View original post 286 more words

The immune cell enters the nerve. Credit: Dr. Marzia Malcangio, King’s College London
Scientists have identified new pain relief targets that could be used to provide relief from chemotherapy-induced pain. BBSRC-funded researchers at King’s College London made the discovery when researching how pain occurs in nerves in the periphery of the body.
Dr Marzia Malcangio said: “We have been investigating and identifying mechanisms underlying pain generation and our findings could help chemotherapy patients who suffer pain related side effects.”
One potential side effect of some chemotherapy drugs (such as vincristine) is damage to nerves. This is particularly prominent in hands and feet as the drugs affect nerves in the periphery of the body. This causes pain which doctors treat with painkillers. However, some people find that the pain persists.
Dr Malcangio’s team investigated why the chemotherapy drugs were causing pain in hope to solve the problem. The used mice in…
View original post 257 more words
A Chinese herb called thunder god vine works better than a widely-prescribed pharmaceutical drug at easing rheumatoid arthritis, a new study has found.

The herb has long been used in China to treat this potentially crippling autoimmune disease, which typically strikes hand and foot joints. It is known in Mandarin as ‘lei gong teng’ and to botanists as Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F.
Extracts of the herb have already fired the interest of drug laboratories as they contain hundreds of compounds, including intriguing molecules called diterpenoids which are believed to ease inflammation and immune response.
read at
http://lyranara.me/2014/04/16/chinese-herb-beats-drug-at-treating-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Researchers at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine have discovered that a natural constituent isolated from a traditional Chinese medicinal herb, Triptergium wilfordii Hook F. (雷公藤, Lei Gong Teng, Thunder God Vine), used for hundreds of years to treat many conditions, works well by blocking gene control machinery in the cell. Thunder God Vine (Lei Gong Teng) is regarded as toxic and used externally to treat rheumatoid arthritis and sciatica. This report, published as a cover story of the March issue of Nature Chemical Biology, suggests that the natural constituent could be a starting point for developing new anti-cancer drugs.
The extracts of Triptergium wilfordii have been used to treat a whole host of conditions and highly lauded for anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive, contraceptive and anti-tumor activities. The researchers have known about the active compound, triptolide, which can stop cell growth, since 1972, but only now have they figured out what it does.

Triptolide, the active ingredient purified from Tripterygium wilfordii, has been shown in animal models to be effective against cancer, arthritis, and skin graft rejection. In fact, triptolide has been shown to block the growth of all 60 U.S. National Cancer Institute cell lines at very low doses, and even causes some of those cell lines to die. Other experiments have suggested that triptolide interferes with proteins known to activate genes, which gives the researchers an entry point into their research. Using information already known about these proteins and testing the rest to see if triptolide would alter their behaviors, the research team finally found that triptolide directly binds to and blocks the enzymatic activity of a protein.
Triptolide’s general ability to stop enzymatic activity explains its anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects. And its behavior has important additional implications for circumventing the resistance that some cancer cells develop to certain anti-cancer drugs. The researchers are eager to study it further to see what it can do for future cancer therapy.
Source:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-03-traditional-chinese-medicine-mystery.html
Tripterygium wilfordii, or léi gōng téng (Mandarin) (Chinese:雷公藤, Japanese: raikōtō), sometimes called thunder god vine but more properly translated thunder duke vine, is a vine used in traditional Chinese medicine for treatment of fever, chills, edema and carbuncle.
Tripterygium wilfordii recently has been investigated as a treatment for a variety of disorders including rheumatoid arthritis, cancer, chronichepatitis, chronic nephritis, ankylosing spondylitis, polycystic kidney disease as well as several skin disorders. It is also under investigation for its apparent antifertility effects, which it is speculated, may provide a basis for a Male oral contraceptive.[1]
Triptolide, a diterpene triepoxide, is a major active component of extracts derived from Tripterygium wilfordii. Triptolide has multiple pharmacological activities including anti-inflammatory, immune modulation, antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity.[2]
The Chinese herb, Lei Gong Teng, comes from the roots, leaves and flowers of the tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f. It is collected during summer and autumn. Tripterygium wilfordii Hook is a deciduous climbing vine growing to 12 meters, with brown, angular, downy twigs. The leaves are light green, smooth on top, and pale gray with light hairs underneath. They have crenate margins and pointed apexes, and are ovate to elliptic, 5-15 cm long, 2.5 – 7 cm wide. The scented hermaphroditic (having male and female organs) flowers, which bloom in September, are small and whitish with five petals and are about 9 mm across, in terminal panicles in July. The fruit is 3-winged, and brownish red, about 1.5 cm long. The plant can grow in light (sandy), medium (loamy) and heavy (clay) soils. It can survive in acid, neutral and basic (alkaline) soil. It can grow in semi-shade (light woodland) or no shade. It requires moist soil.
Source: The whole plant of Triptergium wilfordil Hook. f., family Celastraceae.
The plant contains many active compounds, at least six of which have male anti-fertility effect (triptolide, tripdiolide, triptolidenol, tripchlorolide, 16-hydroxytriplide and a compound known as T7/19, whose structure is unpublished). The mechanism by which they affect fertility is not yet understood. What is known is that daily doses of these compounds reduce sperm counts and also severely affect the formation and maturation of sperm, causing them to be immotile.
Certain extracts from Tripterygium wilfordii, as well as from Tripterygium hypoglaucum (now considered identical to T. regelii) and Tripterygium regelii, were discovered in the 1980s to have temporary antifertility effects, which has led to research on its potential as a contraceptive.
“Tripterygium wilfordii Hook.f., known as Leigongteng (Thunder God Vine) in traditional Chinese medicine, has attracted much attention for its applications in relievingautoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, and for treating cancer. Molecular analyses of the ITS and 5S rDNA sequences indicate that T. hypoglaucum and T. doianum are not distinct from T. wilfordii, while T. regelii should be recognized as a separate species. The results also demonstrate potential value of rDNA sequence data in forensic detection of adulterants derived from Celastrus angulatus in commercial samples of Leigongteng.”[3]
Not enough is known about T. wilfordii to actually test it as a contraceptive. Research thus far has dealt with establishing the mechanism by which the plant affects fertility, and investigating toxicity and side effects. What has been learned is encouraging, however: in both animals and humans, low doses of various Tripterygium extractscan produce significantly lowered sperm density and motility indices without major side effects. When the treatment was ended in the various trials, all indices returned to normal within months.
T. wilfordii could be an effective pharmaceutical alternative to contraceptives based on hormonal manipulation.
As of 2012 The Nanjing University School of Medicine is conducting a clinical trial of Tripterygium wilfordii to determine its possible beneficial effects on kidney volume and kidney function for polycystic kidney disease (PKD) patients.[4] It should report in late 2013.[dated info]
A small molecule Triptolide derived from T. wilfordii has been shown to disrupt mitochondrial function in cells and is under investigation as an anti-tumor agent or to suppress auto-immune disorders.
In China Tripterygium wilfordii has an established history of use in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The herb shows immunosuppressive, cartilage protective, and anti-inflammatory effects.[5][6] The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine has noted that one systematic review of the literature found that Tripterygium wilfordii may improve some RA symptoms, though another systematic review has stated that the serious side effects occur frequently enough to make the risks of taking this herbal supplement too high for the possible benefits.[7]
Two compounds, the diterpenoid epoxide triptolide and the quinone triterpene celastrol found in the plant may have potential as antitumor drugs.[8]
Drugs derived from the plant also show potential for reduction and elimination of pancreatic tumors in mice. Clinical trials may soon begin for the development of a drug for use in humans.[9]
At medicinal doses, T. wilfordii extract does have significant side effects, including immunosuppression. However, this may not apply to contraceptive use. Many of the side effects are caused by the other active compounds found in the plant, and do not appear when a pure extraction of its compounds with anti-fertility effect is used. In addition, the dose required to lower fertility is significantly lower than the standard medicinal dose.
In August 2011, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) published a drug safety bulletin advising consumers not to use medicines containing Lei Gong Teng. This was due to concerns over potentially serious side effects.
Baidu Baike cautions do not take internally; China State Food and Drug Administration issued a warning in April 2012 about this medicine, urging caution.[10]
However, a recent review stated that although Tripterygium wilfordii has toxic potential, careful extraction gives an acceptable frequency of adverse reactions, which are largely related to the gastrointestinal tract and amenorrhea. The review found that T. wilfordii extract is useful remedy for postmenopausal rheumatoid arthritis.[11]
The Beijing TV series of China Medicine has shown people being treated successfully with the herb in a formula for rheumatoid arthritis. and outlined some practice to alleviate problems of using the herb. As often the case of TCM, formulations need to to be adjusted for individual’s physiology for best result.
Composition:
1. Saponins
(1). Wilforgine, wilforgine-B,wilfordine, wilfornine, wilfortrine, wilfortrine-D, wilforzine, wilformine, wilfordinic acid, hydroxywilfordii acid ,wilfornine , neowilforine.
(2). Celacinnine, celafurine, celabenzine, celallocinnine.
(3). Triptofordinine A-1, A-2, triptofordin D-1, D-2, E , triptofordin A, B, C-1 C-2 , triptofordin F-1, F-2, F-3, F-4.
2. Diterpene group
(1). Triptolide, tripdiolide, triptonide,tripterolide.
(2.). Triptolidenol, tripnolide, neotriptophenolide, triptophenolide methyl ether , isoneotrip-tophenolide, hypolide methyl ether.
(3). Triptonoterpene, triptonoterpene methyl ether, triptonoterpenol 12-ydroxy-abieta-8, 11, 13 -trien-3-one, 11-hydroxy-14-methoxy-abieta-8, 11-hydroxy-14-methoxy-abieta-8, 11, 13-trien-3-one.
3. Tetra-triterpene group
(1). Wilforlide A, wilforlide B.
(2). Tritotriterpenoid lactone, tretotriterpenic acid A, tritotriterpenic acid B, tritotriterpenic acid C, 3-epikatonic acid, polpunonic acid, triptodihydroxy acid methyl ester, tripterine.
(3). 3,24-dioxofridelan-29-oic acid, salaspermic acid.
4. Wilfornide
5. 1,8-dihydroxy-4-hydroxymethyl anthraquinone
6. Syringareisno
7 Other Chemicals: dulcitol, glucose, tannin.
8. Trace mineral: iron, manganese, zinc, copper, selenium etc.
Pharmacology
PG490-88 (14-succinyl triptolide sodium salt) is a semisynthetic compound derived from the diterpene triepoxide, triptolide (PG490). PG490 was first isolated and structurally characterized in 1972 when it was extracted from the Chinese medicinal herb, Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F (TWHF), a member of the Celastraceae family. Historically, extracts of TWHF have been used for centuries in traditional Chinese medicine but in the 1970s, they were identified as being effective in the treatment of inflammatory/autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. Since then, more rigorous attempts were made to better identify biologically active constituents of TWHF responsible for its various clinical properties. We now know, for example, that diterpenoid components of TWHF, especially PG490, exert their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant effects by inhibition of cytokine production (e.g. , IL-2, IL-4, IFN) by T lymphocytes. These effects of PG490 have also been explored in mouse models where it was shown that PG490 prevents graft versus host disease (GVHD) and prolongs skin, heart, and kidney allograft survival.
The isolation of PG490 has also led to studies supporting its potential development as an antineoplastic agent. Shamon et al., for example, showed that PG490 inhibited growth of several human cancer-derived cell lines (including breast, prostate, and lung) grown in culture. PG490 was also shown to induce apoptosis of human promyelocytic leukemia, T-cell lymphoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines grown in culture. Interestingly, the inhibitory effects of PG490 on the growth of tumor cells in culture were enhanced in the presence of other inducers of apoptosis such as tumor necrosis factor- (TNF) and chemotherapeutic agents. When combined with chemotherapeutic drugs, PG490 enhanced apoptosis through signaling pathways involving both p53 and p21.
Data on the effects of PG490 on tumor cell growth in vivo , however, are limited. Previous reports have shown that PG490 inhibits tumor development in a hamster model of cholangiocarcinoma and in a murine breast cancer model. These beneficial effects of PG490, however, were counterbalanced by toxicity that was observed at high doses. In the present studies, we further examined the role of PG490 in inhibition of tumor cell growth both in vitroand in a tumor xenograft model. We show that PG490-88, a water-soluble prodrug of PG490, suppresses tumor cell growth in vivo without toxicity. We also show that PG490 acts in synergy with chemotherapy. Our results suggest a potential role of PG490-88 alone and in combination with chemotherapy as a novel antineoplastic regimen for the treatment of patients with solid tumors
The molecular target(s) for PG490 is currently unknown. Clues to the cellular target, however, are emerging from its effect on transcriptional activity. For example, we have shown along with Qiu et al. , that PG490 blocks transcriptional activation of NF- B by blocking transcriptional activation of p65 but without affecting DNA binding by p65. Additionally, we have found that PG490 blocks transcriptional activation by AP-1 and p53 without affecting DNA binding by Jun/Fos or p53. Recent studies show that the transcriptional activity of AP-1, NF-B, and p53 is regulated by a chromatin structure that is controlled, in part, by histone acetylation. In support of this, a recent study showed that p65 interacts with the histone deacetylase (HDAC) corepressors HDAC1 and HDAC2 to negatively regulate NF- B transcriptional activity. Also, silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors (SMRT) was shown to inhibit transactivation of AP-1, NF-B, and serum response factor (SRF) by binding to their cognate transcription factors. Recent studies also show that p53-mediated transcriptional activity is regulated by histone acetylation. However, we have not observed an effect of PG490 on histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity or histone acetylation.
PG490 at doses of 5–10 ng/ml does not repress basal transcriptional activity mediated by AP-1, NF-B, and p53 but it does block induction of NF-B by TNF and p53 transcriptional activity induced by chemotherapy. Also, PG490 does not affect topoisomerase I or II activity or increase topoisomerase cleavage complexes. Therefore, its synergy with chemotherapy may in large part be due to its inhibition of p21 mediated growth arrest, which activates an apoptotic pathway.
The treatment of solid tumors is evolving to more targeted treatments that may be helped by genetic profiling of tumors and targeting tumor-specific angiogenic and growth factor pathways. Also, several recent studies have shown that disrupting checkpoints in tumors drives tumor cells into apoptosis by abrogating checkpoint arrest. Here we show that PG490-88, a water-soluble derivative of PG490, reduces tumor growth, induces marked regression, or completely eradicates human tumor xenografts. Moreover, PG490-88 is a potent and well-tolerated antitumor agent that acts in synergy with DNA damaging agents and is effective in a clinically relevant dosing schedule. PG490-88 is now in phase I clinical trials for patients with solid tumors. A recent study showing that PG490 inhibits metastasis of solid tumors coupled with our findings that PG490-88 markedly enhances the cytotoxicity of DNA damaging agents suggests that PG490 or PG490-88 alone or in combination with chemotherapy may become an effective therapy for patients with solid tumors. Also, our finding that PG490 sensitizes tumor cells to TNF by blocking NF-B suggests a role for the combination in treating patients with TNF sensitive tumors such as melanoma. Identification of the target of PG490 and its mechanism of action will complement the ongoing clinical trials, and will provide insight into potential mechanisms of toxicity and the design of compounds that may be more selective and more potent.
![]()
Degarelix
214766-78-6 CAS
Degarelix is used for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Degarelix is a synthetic peptide derivative drug which binds to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptors in the pituitary gland and blocks interaction with GnRH. This antagonism reduces luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) which ultimately causes testosterone suppression. Reduction in testosterone is important in treating men with advanced prostate cancer. Chemically, it is a synthetic linear decapeptide amide with seven unnatural amino acids, five of which are D-amino acids. FDA approved on December 24, 2008.
A subgroup of patients with advanced prostate cancer could now get access to a new treatment option in England and Wales after cost regulators for the NHS issued a green light for Ferring’s Firmagon (degarelix).
In final draft guidance published this morning by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, the drug has been recommended as an option for treating advanced hormone-dependent prostate cancer but specifically in patients with spinal metastases who present with signs or symptoms of spinal cord compression.
Read more at: http://www.pharmatimes.com/Article/14-04-15/NICE_nod_for_Firmagon_s_prostate_cancer_drug.aspx#ixzz2z6tthLDT
Carin WINDERSTROM, “KIT AND METHOD FOR PREPARATION OF A DEGARELIX SOLUTION.” U.S. Patent US20100286603, issued November 11, 2010.
FIRMAGON is a sterile lyophilized powder for injection containing degarelix (as the acetate) and mannitol. Degarelix is a synthetic linear decapeptide amide containing seven unnatural amino acids, five of which are D-amino acids. The acetate salt of degarelix is a white to off-white amorphous powder of low density as obtained after lyophilization.
The chemical name of degarelix is D-Alaninamide, N-acetyl-3-(2-naphthalenyl)-D-alanyl-4-chloro-Dphenylalanyl-3-(3-pyridinyl)-D-alanyl-L-seryl-4-[[[(4S)-hexahydro-2,6-dioxo-4pyrimidinyl]carbonyl]amino]-L phenylalanyl-4-[(aminocarbonyl)amino]-D-phenylalanyl-L leucyl-N6–(1-methylethyl)-L-lysyl-L-prolyl. It has an empirical formula of C82H103N18O16Cl and a molecular weight of 1632.3 Da.
Degarelix has the following structural formula:
FIRMAGON delivers degarelix acetate, equivalent to 120 mg of degarelix for the starting dose, and 80 mg of degarelix for the maintenance dose. The 80 mg vial contains 200 mg mannitol and the 120 mg vial contains 150 mg mannitol.
Degarelix (INN) or degarelix acetate (USAN) (tradename Firmagon) is a hormonal therapy used in the treatment of prostate cancer. During development it was known as FE200486.
Testosterone is a male hormone that promotes growth of many prostate tumours and therefore reducing circulating testosterone to very low (castration) levels is often the treatment goal in the management of men with advanced prostate cancer. Degarelix has an immediate onset of action, binding to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptors in the pituitary gland and blocking their interaction with GnRH. This induces a fast and profound reduction in luteinising hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and in turn, testosterone suppression.[1]
On 24 December 2008, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved degarelix for the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer in the USA.[2] It was subsequently approved by the European Commission at the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) on February 17, 2009 for use in adult male patients with advanced, hormone-dependent prostate cancer.Ferring Pharmaceuticals markets the drug under the name Firmagon.
GnRH antagonists (receptor blockers) such as degarelix are a new type of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer. These agents are synthetic peptide derivatives of the natural GnRH decapeptide – a hormone that is made by neurons in the hypothalamus. GnRH antagonists compete with natural GnRH for binding to GnRH receptors in the pituitary gland. This reversible binding blocks the release of LH and FSH from the pituitary. The reduction in LH subsequently leads to a rapid and sustained suppression of testosterone release from the testes and subsequently reduces the size and growth of the prostate cancer. This in turn results in a reduction in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the patient’s blood. Measuring PSA levels is a way to monitor how patients with prostate cancer are responding to treatment.
Unlike the GnRH agonists, which cause an initial stimulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis (HPGA), leading to a surge in testosterone levels, and under certain circumstances, a flare-up of the tumour, GnRH antagonists do not cause a surge in testosterone or clinical flare.[3] Clinical flare is a phenomenon that occurs in patients with advanced disease, which can precipitate a range of clinical symptoms such as bone pain, urethral obstruction, and spinal cord compression. Drug agencies have issued boxed warnings regarding this phenomenon in the prescribing information for GnRH agonists. As testosterone surge does not occur with GnRH antagonists, there is no need for patients to receive an antiandrogen as flare protection during prostate cancer treatment. GnRH agonists also induce an increase in testosterone levels after each reinjection of the drug – a phenomenon that does not occur with GnRH antagonists such as degarelix.
GnRH antagonists have an immediate onset of action leading to a fast and profound suppression of testosterone and are therefore especially valuable in the treatment of patients with prostate cancer where fast control of disease is needed.
A Phase III, randomised, 12 month clinical trial (CS21) in prostate cancer[4] compared androgen deprivation with one of two doses of degarelix or the GnRH agonist, leuprolide. Both degarelix doses were at least as effective as leuprolide at suppressing testosterone to castration levels (≤0.5 ng/mL) from Day 28 to study end (Day 364). Testosterone levels were suppressed significantly faster with degarelix than with leuprolide, with degarelix uniformly achieving castration levels by Day 3 of treatment which was not seen in the leuprolide group. There were no testosterone surges with degarelix compared with surges in 81% of those who received leuprolide. Degarelix resulted in a faster reduction in PSA levels compared with leuprolide indicating faster control of the prostate cancer. Recent results also suggest that degarelix therapy may result in longer control of prostate cancer compared with leuprolide.[5]
As with all hormonal therapies, degarelix is commonly associated with hormonal side effects such as hot flashes and weight gain.[4][6][7] Due to its mode of administration (subcutaneous injection), degarelix is also associated with injection-site reactions such as injection-site pain, erythema or swelling. Injection-site reactions are usually mild or moderate in intensity and occur predominantly after the first dose, decreasing in frequency thereafter.[4]
FSH receptors are selectively expressed on the luminal surface of the blood vessels of a wide range of tumors.[8] There may be a potential role for suppression of FSH or FSH receptors. This work is in early stages. It is thought that FSH receptors are important in tumor angiogenesis by signalling via two pathways, one involving VEGF, and a Gq/11mechanism that activates VEGFR-2 independently of VEGF.[8]

Keywords: Synthesis. New drug molecules. New chemical entities. Medicine …Degarelix acetate (Firmagon®) . ….. Scheme 5. Synthesis of degarelix acetate (V).
………………………………
http://www.google.com/patents/US20120041172
Example 1
Hydantoin formation in the synthesis of degarelix. The rearrangement of the hydroorotic group to a hydantoinacetyl group in the production of degarelix has been seen at two stages and two sets of basic conditions.
The first rearrangement appeared during basic extractions of the segment Z-Ser(tBu)-4Aph(Hor)-D-4Aph(tBu-Cbm)-Leu-ILys(Boc)-Pro-D-Ala-NH2. The pH was adjusted to 9.1 in the organic/aqueous two-phase system using conc. NaOH solution, resulting in the formation of 4.5% by weight of the hydantoin analogue. The mechanism appeared to comprise two steps: (a) hydrolysis of the 6-membered hydroorotic moiety under basic conditions followed by ring closure to the 5-membered hydantoin analogue under acidic conditions.
The second rearrangement was observed during evaporation of the segment Z-Ser(tBu)-4Aph(Hor)-D-4Aph(tBu-Cbm)-Leu-OH.DCHA. After the preceding extractions, Z-Ser(tBu)-4Aph(Hor)-D-4Aph(tBu-Cbm)-Leu-OH was dissolved in a mixture of ethyl acetate and 2-butanol. DCHA (2.5 eq.) was added because the segment is isolated as the DCHA salt after evaporation of the solvent followed by a precipitation step. In the particular batch both the hydantoin analogue and the hydrolysed form (mentioned above) were identified. Quantification of the hydantoin was not possible because poor separation by HPLC from other products; the hydrolyzed form was formed in an amount of 1.34% by weight of the combined products. Experimental evidence showed that the amount of rearrangement/hydrolysis was related to the amount of DCHA used in the method.
The following experiment provided further proof of the instability of the hydrooroic moiety under basic conditions. Z-Ser(tBu)-4Aph(Hor)-D-4Aph(tBu-Cbm)-Leu-OH.DCHA (67 mM) was dissolved in wet 2-BuOH with 167 mM (2.5 eq) DCHA at 31° C. After 25 h, 1.3% of the hydantoin analogue and 0.3% of the hydrolysed intermediate had been formed.
Example 2
Stability of degarelix in DBU/DMF and piperidine/DMF. The stability of degarelix was tested under conditions corresponding to those used for removal of the Fmoc-group during SPPS. The hydroorotic group in the side chain of 4Aph(Hor), amino acid residue no. 5 in the sequence of degarelix, is known to be sensitive to base and rearrange to a hydantoinacetyl group. All SPPS procedures known to the inventors had been based on Boc-chemistry.
Samples of degarelix were dissolved in 20% piperidine/DMF; 2% DBU in DMF, and 2% DBU+5% water in DMF; respectively. The samples were analysed by HPLC after 20 h and the amount of the hydantoin analogue determined.
2% DBU/DMF resulted in the formation of 1.8% hydantoin. If 5% water was present, too (simulating wet DMF), the amount was increased to 7%. Surprisingly, the use of 20% piperidine in DMF did not result in any formation of the hydantoin analogue, indicating that this mixture might be useful for Fmoc-based SPPS of Degarelix.
Example 3 Synthesis and Purification of Degarelix Using Fmo-/Rink Amide AM Resin
Step 1. Fmoc-Rink amide AM resin (64 g; substitution 0.67 mmol/g) was placed in a reactor and washed with 1.9 L DMF. To the swollen resin 250 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF is added and stirred for 20 min. The reactor is emptied through the filter in the bottom by applying vacuum to the reactor and a second treatment with 250 ml 20% piperidine in DMF is performed for 20 min. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum to it followed by a wash of the peptide resin using 2 L of DMF. The reactor is then emptied by applying vacuum. The peptide resin is now ready for step 2.
Step 2. A solution of 27.0 g Fmoc-D-Ala-OH (2 eq.), 14.3 g HOBt and 13.2 ml DIC is dissolved in 250 ml of DMF and allowed to activate for 15 min, after which it is poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. After 1 h of reaction time, 2.2 ml of NMM is added to the solution and the reaction is allowed to proceed for another hour. Then 30 ml acetic acid anhydride and 2 ml NMM is added to the mixture, which is allowed to stand under stirring for 15 min. Then the reactor is emptied by using vacuum. The peptide resin is washed with 2 L DMF. After applying vacuum to the reactor, removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 250 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second treatment of 250 ml 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin is washed with 2 L of DMF. It is now ready for step 3.
Step 3. A solution of 29 g Fmoc-L-Pro-OH (2 eq), 14.3 g HOBt and 13.2 ml DIC is dissolved in 250 ml DMF and allowed to activate for 25 min, after which it is poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. After 75 min of reaction, 2.2 ml NMM is added to the solution, and the reaction is allowed to proceed for another hour. Then 30 ml acetic acid anhydride and 2 ml NMM is added to the mixture, which is allowed to stand under stirring for 15 min, The reactor is then emptied by using vacuum. DMF (2.6 L) is used for washing the peptide resin. After applying vacuum to the reactor, removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 250 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum, and a second treatment with 250 ml 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin is washed with 2 L of DMF. It is now ready for step 4.
Step 4. A solution of 33 g Fmoc-L-ILys(Boc)-OH (1.5 eq), 10.7 g HOBt and 10.1 ml DIC is dissolved in 250 ml of DMF and allowed to activate for 0.5 h, after which it is poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. After 2 h of reaction, 2.2 ml NMM is added to the solution and the reaction is allowed to proceed for another hour. Then 30 ml acetic acid anhydride and 2.2 ml NMM is added to the mixture, which is allowed to stand under stirring for 15 min, whereupon the reactor is emptied by using vacuum. The peptide resin is washed with DMF (3 L). After applying vacuum to the reactor, removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 250 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second treatment of 250 ml 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin is washed with 3.5 L DMF. It is now ready for step 5.
Step 5. A solution of 38 g Fmoc-L-Leu-OH (2.5 eq), 18 g of HOBt and 16.8 ml of DIC is dissolved in 250 ml of DMF and allowed to activate for 0.5 h, after which it is poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. After 2 h of reaction, 2.2 ml NMM is added to the solution, and the reaction is allowed to proceed for another 50 min. Then 30 ml acetic acid anhydride and 2 ml NMM is added to the mixture, which is allowed to stand under stirring for 15 min. Then the reactor is emptied by using vacuum. DMF (2.6 L) is used for washing the peptide resin. After applying vacuum to the reactor, removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 250 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second treatment with 250 ml 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin is washed with 2.5 L of DMF. It is now ready for step 6.
Step 6. A solution of 32 g of Fmoc-D-4Aph(tBu-Cbm)-OH (1.5 eq), 10.7 g HOBt and 10.1 ml DIC is dissolved in 250 ml of DMF and allowed to activate for 1 hour, after which it is poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. After 20 min of reaction, 22 ml NMM is added to the solution and the reaction is allowed to proceed for another 20 h. Then 30 ml acetic acid anhydride and 2 ml NMM is added to the mixture, which is allowed to stand under stirring for 15 min. Then the reactor is emptied by using vacuum. The peptide resin is washed with 4 L DMF. After applying vacuum to the reactor, removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 250 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second 20 min treatment with 250 ml 20% piperidine in DMF is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin is washed with 3.4 L DMF. It is now ready for step 7.
Step 7. A solution of 35 g Fmoc-L-4Aph(L-Hor)-OH (1.5 eq), 11 g HOBt and 10.1 ml DIC is dissolved in 350 ml DMF and allowed to activate for 1 h, after which it is poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. After 50 min of reaction, 2.2 ml NMM is added to the solution and the reaction is allowed to proceed for another 21.5 h. The reactor is emptied by using vacuum. The peptide resin is washed with 4.4 L DMF. After applying vacuum to the reactor, removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 350 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second 20 min treatment with 350 ml 20% piperidine in DMF is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin is washed with 4.4 L DMF. It is now ready for step 8.
Step 8. Fmoc-L-Ser(tBu)-OH (2.5 eq) (41 g), 17.9 g HOBt, 16.8 ml DIC and 4.9 ml of NMM is dissolved in 500 ml of DMF and poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. The reaction is allowed to proceed for 3.5 h. The reactor is then emptied by using vacuum. The peptide resin is washed with 4.2 L DMF. After applying vacuum to the reactor, removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 375 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second 20 min treatment of 375 ml 20% piperidine in DMF is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin washed with 4.2 L of DMF. It is now ready for step 9.
Step 9. A solution of 25 g Fmoc-D-3 Pal-OH (1.5 eq), 10.7 g HOBt, 10.1 ml DIC and 4.9 ml NMM is dissolved in 400 ml of DMF and poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. The reaction is allowed to proceed for 4.5 h. Then the reactor is emptied by using vacuum. The peptide resin is washed with 4.2 L DMF. After applying vacuum to the reactor, removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 375 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second 20 min treatment with 375 ml 20% piperidine in DMF is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin washed with 4.2 L of DMF. It is now ready for step 10.
Step 10. A solution of 27 g Fmoc-D-Phe(4Cl)—OH (1.5 eq), 10.7 g HOBt, 10.1 ml DIC and 4.9 ml NMM is dissolved in 400 ml of DMF and is poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. The reaction is allowed to proceed for 10 h. The reactor is emptied by using vacuum. The resin is washed with 5.5 L DMF. After applying vacuum to the reactor and removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 375 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second 20 min treatment with 375 ml 20% piperidine in DMF is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin washed with 5 L DMF. It is now ready for step 11.
Step 11. A solution of 28 g Fmoc-D-2Nal-OH (1.5 eq), 10.7 g HOBt, 10.1 ml DIC and 4.9 ml NMM is dissolved in 400 ml DMF and poured into the reactor containing the peptide resin. The reaction is allowed to proceed for 2.5 h. The reactor is emptied by using vacuum. The peptide resin is washed with 5.2 L DMF. After applying vacuum to the reactor and removing the DMF, the peptide resin is treated with 375 ml of 20% piperidine in DMF for 20 min. The reactor is emptied by applying vacuum and a second 20 min treatment of 375 ml 20% piperidine in DMF is performed. The reactor is once again emptied by applying vacuum and the peptide resin washed with 5 L DMF. It is now ready for and is ready for step 12.
Step 12. Acetylimidazole (3 eq) (14.5 g) and 4.9 ml NMM is dissolved in 400 ml DMF and poured into the reactor. After 1.5 h, the reactor is emptied by applying vacuum to the reactor. The peptide resin is washed with 5 L DMF and the reactor emptied using vacuum.
Step 13. The peptide resin is washed with WA and dried under vacuum. Peptide resin (129.8 g; yield 96%) was isolated.
Step 14. Dry peptide resin (60 g) is suspended in 600 ml TFA for 25 h at room temperature. It was then poured into a mixture of 2.4 L water, 620 g ammonium acetate, 600 ml ethanol and 600 ml acetic acid. The mixture is adjusted to a pH between 3 and 4 using TFA and filtered.
Step 15. The product is purified using a two step purification protocol. In the first step a column (2.5 cm×34 cm) packed with reversed phase C-18 material is used with a buffer system consisting of buffer A (0.12% aqueous TFA) and buffer B (99.9% ethanol) A volume from the filtered solution from step 14 corresponding to 1.6 g of the product is applied to the column. Purification is executed using a step gradient starting with 10% B for 2-3 column volumes, 29% B for 5-7 column volumes and a gradient from 29% B to 50% B over 3 column volumes at a flow rate of 70 ml/min. This procedure is followed until all the filtered solution from step 14 has been processed. All fractions collected are analyzed by analytical HPLC. Fractions containing product with a purity higher than 94% are pooled. The second purification step is performed using a column (2.5 cm×34 cm) packed with reverse phase C-18 material and a buffer system consisting of a buffer A (1% aqueous acetic acid), buffer B (99.9% ethanol), and buffer C (0.5 M aqueous ammonium acetate). From the pooled fractions containing the product an amount equivalent to 1.3 g of the product is applied to the column and purification performed by applying a step gradient starting with 10% B+90% C for 2-3 column volumes followed by 90% A+10% B for 2-3 column volumes. The product is eluted by 24% B+76% A. The fractions containing product with the acceptable purity are pooled and desalted using the same column. Desalting is performed using buffer A (1% aqueous acetic acid) and buffer B (99.9% ethanol). A volume from the pooled purified fraction corresponding to 1.6 g of product is applied to the column, 2-3 column volumes buffer A being used to wash out any ammonium acetate in the product. Then the product is eluted using 50% buffer A+50% buffer B. The solution of the purified product containing 50% ethanol is concentrated on a rotary evaporator. When all the ethanol has been removed the remaining solution containing the product is lyophilized. A total of 11.8 g (overall yield 37%) of degarelix is obtained as a fluffy solid. 4-([2-(5-Hydantoyl)]acetylamino)-phenylalanine could not be detected in the product (HPLC).
Example 4 Synthesis and Purification of Degarelix Using Fmoc-Rink Amide MBHA
Performed substantially as the synthesis and purification of Example 1. Deviations from the method of Example 1:
4-([2-(5-Hydantoyl)]acetylamino)-phenylalanine could not be detected in the product by HPLC.
………………………….
http://www.google.com/patents/EP2447276A1?cl=en
where Ac is acetyl, 2Nal is 2-naphthylalanine, 4Cpa is 4-chlorophenylalanine, 3Pal is 3-pyridylalanine, Ser is serine, 4Aph is 4-aminophenylalanine, Hor is hydroorotyl, Cbm is carbamoyl, Leu is leucine, Lys(iPr) is N6-isopropyllysine, Pro is proline and Ala is alanine.
Starting materials:
| N-t-Butyloxycarbonyl-D-4-chlorophenylalanine | Boc-D-4Cpa-OH C14H18NO4 |
| N-t-Butyloxycarbonyl-D-2-naphtylalanine | Boc-D-2Nal-OH C18H21N04 |
| D-3-Pyridylalanine hydrochloride | H-D-3Pal-OH x 2HCl C8H12Cl2N2O2 |
| N-α-t-Butyloxycarbonyl-N-4-(t-Butylcarbamoyl)-D-4-Aminophenylalanine | Boc-D-4Aph(tBuCbm)-OH C19H29N3O5 |
| N-α-t-Butyloxycarbonyl-N-4-(L-Hydroorotyl)-4-Aminophenylalanine | Boc-4Aph(L-Hor)-OH C19H24N4O7 |
| Leucine benzyl ester p-tosylate | H-Leu-OBzl x TOS C20H27NO5 |
| N-Benzyloxycarbonyl-O-t-butyl-serine | Z-Ser(tBu)-OH C8H15NO5 |
| N-t-Butyloxycarbonyl-proline | Boc-Pro-OH C10H17NO4 |
| D-Alaninamide hydrochloride | H-D-Ala-NH2 x HCl C3H8ClNO2 |
| N-α-Benzyloxycarbonyl-N-ε-t-butyloxycarbonyl-N-ε-isopropyl-lysine, dicyclohexylamine salt | Z-Lys(iPr,Boc)-OH x DCHA C34H57N3O6 |
Example 1: Synthesis of Intermediate Ac(1-3)ONa: Ac-D-2Nal-D-4Cpa-D-3Pal-ONa[7]Activation of Boc-D-4Cpa-OH and isolationStep 1 (Reaction step)
Activation of Boc-D-2Nal-OH and isolationStep 2 (reaction step)
Synthesis of Boc(2-3)OH: Boc-D-4Cpa-D-3Pal-OHStep 3 (Reaction step)
Synthesis of Intermediate Ac(1-3)ONa: Ac-D-2Nal-D-4Cpa-D-3Pal-ONa[7] (Compound of formula IIIa)Step 4 (Reaction step)
Example 2: Synthesis of Intermediate Z(4-7)OH x DCHA: Z-Ser(tBu)-4Aph(L-Hor)-D-4Aph(tBuCbm)-Leu-OHxDCHA[15]Synthesis of intermediate Boc(6-7)OBzl: Boc-D-4Aph(tBucbm)-Leu-OBzl Step 5 (Reaction step)
Synthesis of Boc-(5-7)-OBzl: Boc-4Aph(L-Hor)-D-4Aph(tBucbm)-Leu-OBzlStep 6 (Reaction step)
Synthesis of intermediate Z(4-7)OH x DCHA: Z-Ser(tBu)-4Aph(L-Hor)-D-4Aph(tBuCbm)-Leu-OH x DCHA (Compound of formula Va)Step 7 (Reaction step)
Example 3: Synthesis of Intermediate H(8-10)NH 2 :H-Lys(iPr,Boc)-Pro-D-Ala-NH 2 [21]Synthesis of Boc(9-10)NH2: Boc-Pro-D-Ala-NH2Step 8 (Reaction step)
Synthesis of intermediate H(8-10)NH2: H-Lys(iPr,Boc)-Pro-D-Ala-NH2 (Compound of formulae Vla)Step 9 (Reaction step)
Example 4: Segment Condensations to Final Intermediate (compound of Formula II)intermediate Z(4-10)NH2 : Z-Ser(tBu)-4Aph(L-Hor)-D-4Aph(tBuCbm)-leu-lys(iPr,Boc)-Pro-D-Ala-NH2[22]
Step 10 (reaction step)
Final Intermediate Ac(1-10)NH2: Ac-D-2Nal-D-4Cpa-D-3Pal-Ser(tBu)-4Aph(L-Hor)-D-4Aph(tBuCbm)-leu-Lys(iPr, Boc)-Pro-D-Ala-NH2[24]Step 11 (Reaction step)
Example 5: Deprotection of Final Intermediate Ac(1-10)NH 2 to Crude Degarelix[251]Step 12 (Reaction step)
Step 13 (purification and lyophilisation)












…………….
After conversion to the corresponding urea by treatment with tert-butyl isocyanate, the Boc group was cleaved with TFA to produce resin (XIII). Further coupling with N-alpha- Boc-L-4-(Fmoc-amino)phenylalanine (XIV), followed by Fmoc deprotection with piperidine, furnished (XV). The aniline derivative (XV) was acylated with L-hydroorotic acid (XVI) to yield, after Boc group cleavage, resin (XVII). Coupling of (XVII) with N- Boc-L-serine(O-benzyl) (XVIII) and subsequent deprotection gave (XIX), as shown in Scheme 2, below:
Peptide (XIX) was sequentially coupled with N-alpha-Boc-D-(3-pyridyl)alanine (XX) and N-Boc-D-(4-chlorophenyl)alanine (XXII) to furnish, after the corresponding deprotection cycles with TFA, the resins (XXI) and (XXIII), respectively, as shown in Scheme 3, below:
The coupling of resin (XXIII) with N-Boc-D-(2-naphthyl)alanine (XXIV) as before gave, after the corresponding deprotection cycle with TFA, resin (XXV). The peptide resin (XXV) was acetylated with Ac20 and finally deprotected and cleaved from the resin by treatment with HF to provide the target peptide, as shown in Scheme 4 below:
Alternatively, after coupling of the peptide resin (XIII) with alpha-Boc-L-4-(Fmoc- amino)-phenylalanine (XIV), the Fmoc protecting group was not removed, yielding resin (XXVI). Subsequent coupling cycles with amino acids (XVIII), (XX), (XXII) and (XXIV) as above finally produced resin (XXVII). The Fmoc group was then deprotected by treatment with piperidine, and the resulting aniline was acylated with L-hydroorotic acid (XVI) to provide resin (XXVIII), as shown in Scheme 5 below:
Resin (XXVIII) was finally cleaved and deprotected by treatment with HF, as shown in Scheme 6 below:
– See more at: http://worlddrugtracker.blogspot.in/2013/12/degarelix-nice-backs-ferrings-firmagon.html#sthash.x5FeHm6m.dpuf
A Chinese herb called thunder god vine works better than a widely-prescribed pharmaceutical drug at easing rheumatoid arthritis, a new study has found.

The herb has long been used in China to treat this potentially crippling autoimmune disease, which typically strikes hand and foot joints. It is known in Mandarin as ‘lei gong teng’ and to botanists as Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F.
Extracts of the herb have already fired the interest of drug laboratories as they contain hundreds of compounds, including intriguing molecules called diterpenoids which are believed to ease inflammation and immune response.
In a study published in the journal Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Chinese researchers recruited 207 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and gave them either the herb; the drug methotrexate; or a combination of the two.
After six months, the patients were given a doctor’s assessment and were also asked if they felt…
View original post 279 more words
![]()
Telapristone acetate
[(8S,11R,13S,14S,17R)-11-[4-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]-17-(2-methoxyacetyl)-13-methyl-3-oxo-1,2,6,7,8,11,12,14,15,16-decahydrocyclopenta[a]phenanthren-17-yl] acetate
17-acetoxy- 11 β-[4-(dimethylamino)-ρhenyl]-21-methoxy-19-noφregna-4,9-dien-3,20-dione
17-Acetoxy-llβ-f4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl)1-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3,20- dione
17α-acetoxy-llβ-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-methoxy- 19-norpregna-4, 9-diene-3,20-dione
CDB-4124; 17α-Acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-[4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione)
Telapristone (proposed trade names Proellex and Progenta) is an investigational selective progesterone receptor modulator, tested for treatment of progesterone sensitive myomata.[1] CDB-4124 was originally developed the National Institutes of Health, and as of 2012 is in Phase II clinical trials for uterine fibroids and endometriosis.[2] It also has some antiglucocorticoidactivity
17α-acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-[4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione, (also known as CDB-4124)
17α-acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-[4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione) is a selective progesterone receptor modulator, it is being tested for treatment of progesterone sensitive myomata.
International patent application WO 97/41145 disclosed for the first time the preparation of 17α-acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-[4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione). In example 9 it is characterized as light-yellow powder with a melting point of 116° C. (purity: 98.06%, characteristic FT-IR absorption bands at: 1124, 1235, 1370, 1446, 1518, 1612, 1663, 1734, 2940 cm−1).
According to the published international patent applications of WO 01/47945 and WO 01/74840 the obtained 17α-acetoxy-21-methoxy-11β-[4-N,N-dimethylaminophenyl]-19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione) was light-yellow powder as well having a melting point of 116° C. (purity: 98.87%, 98.06%, characteristic FT-IR absorption bands at: 1124, 1235, 1370, 1446, 1518, 1612, 1662, 1734, 2940 cm−1)
………………
http://www.google.com/patents/WO2001047945A1?cl=en
Preparation of 17α-hydroxy-llβ-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-methoxy- 19-norpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione (10) :
A suspension of 2-iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX, 599 mg, 2.14 mmol) in anhydrous dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) (5.0 mL; Aldrich, Sure-Seal) was stirred magnetically under nitrogen and warmed in an oil bath at 55 – 60°C. After several minutes, all of the IBX was solubilized. To the IBX solution was added a solution of the 20-alcohol (18, 500 mg, 1.07 mmol) in DMSO (5 mL). Additional DMSO (3 mL) was used to rinse in residual 18. After a period V2 hr of reaction, approximately 70% of the 20-alcohol (18) had been converted to the 20-ketone (10), as evidenced by TLC (15% acetone in methylene chloride; aliquot was diluted in water and extracted by EtOAc). After 3 hr, there was no observable change in the conversion. The reaction mixture was transferred to a separatory funnel, diluted with water, and extracted by EtOAc (3x). The EtOAc extracts were washed with additional water (2x) and brine (lx). The combined extracts were dried by filtration through sodium sulfate, evaporated in vacuo, and dried overnight under high vacuum to recover 600 mg of a brown film. The film product was taken up in EtOAc and filtered through silica on a sintered glass funnel to remove residual DMSO and highly polar impurities. Evaporation of EtOAc afforded 450 mg of a yellow film. Repeated trituration with hexane, with scratching and sonicating, produced a solid. The solid was dried overnight under high vacuum to give 349 mg of 10 as a yellow powder in 70.1% yield. The product was carried directly to the next reaction without further purification. NMR (300 MHz, CDCI3) : δ 0.408 (s, 3 H, C18-CH3),2.906 (s, 6 H, -N(CH3)2), 3.454 (s, 3 H, C21-OCH3), 4.245 and 4.388 (AB, 2 H, C21-CH2, JAB = 17.41 Hz), 4.378 (d, 1 H, Cllβ-CH, J = 7.50), 5.758 (s, 1 H, C4-CH), 6.638 (d, 2 H, 3′,5′-aromatic CH, J = 8.55 Hz) and 6.975 (d, 2 H, 2′,6′-aromatic CH, J = 8.55 Hz).
Preparation of 17α-acetoxy-llβ-[4-(N,N-dimethylamino)phenyl]-21-methoxy- 19-norpregna-4, 9-diene-3,20-dione (11) :
A mixture of trifluoroacetic anhydride (47 mL) and glacial acetic acid (19.1 mL) in methylene chloride (300 mL) was allowed to stir at room temperature under nitrogen. After 1/2 hr of stirring, the mixture was cooled to 0°C in an ice water bath and tosic acid (2.85 g, 14.98 mmol) was added. A solution of the 17α-hydroxy compound (10, 6.18 g, 13.33 mmol) was added in 50 mL of methylene chloride and rinsed in with additional CH2CI2 (50 mL). After stirring for a period of 2 hr at 0°C, examination by TLC (silica; 10% acetone in methylene chloride; neutralized with NH4OH before developing) indicated that the reaction was >95% complete. The reaction mixture was diluted with water (300 mL) and neutralized by careful addition of concentrated NH4OH (75 mL).
More NH4OH was added to a pH of 7 as indicated by a pH paper. The product obtained was extracted by CH2CI2 (3x) and the organic extracts were washed with water (2x) and brine (lx). The combined organic extracts were dried by filtration through Na2SO4 and evaporated in vacuo to give 7.13 g of the crude product (11). A pure material was obtained by flash column chromatography (silica; 10% acetone in methylene chloride). The impure fractions were combined and chromatographed a second time. The pure fractions from both chromatographic runs were combined and evaporated in vacuo, then evaporated from ether, and further dried under high vacuum to produce a pale yellow foam. Treatment with pentane followed by scratching and sonicating produced 4.13 g of 11 as a fine yellow powder in 61.3% yield; m.p. softens at 116°C.
Analysis by a reverse phase HPLC on a NOVAPAK™ Cι8 column eluted with 70% CH3OH in water with 0.03% Et3N at a flow rate of 1 mL per min and at λ = 302 indicated 98.87 % purity of 11 with retention time tR = 6.45 min.
FTIR (KBr, diffuse reflectance) : vmax 2940, 1734, 1662, 1612, 1518, 1446, 1370, 1235 and 1124 cm“1.
NMR (300 MHZ, CDCI3) : δ 0.38 (s, 3 H, C18-CH3), 2.08 (s, 3H, C17α-0Ac), 2.90 (s, 6 H, -N(CH3)2), 3.42 (s, 3 H, C21-OCH3), 4.07 and 4.33 (AB, 2 H, C21-CH2, JAB= 18 Hz), 4.37 (s, 1 H, Cllβ-CH), 5.80 (s, 1 H, C4-CH), 6.67 (d, 2 H, 3′,5′-aromatic CH, J = 9 Hz) and 7.0 (d, 2 H, 2′, 6′- aromatic CH, J = 9 Hz).
MS (El) m/z (relative intensity) : 505 (M+, 13.5), 445 (1.1), 372 (2.7), 134 (16.2) and 121 (100).
Anal. Calcd for C31H39NO5: C, 73.64; H, 7.77; N, 2.77 Found : C, 73.34; H, 7.74; N, 2.70.
…………….
synthesis
http://www.google.com/patents/WO2009001148A2?cl=en
According to the above mentioned facts, there is no such known process, which is suitable for the realization of the synthesis of CDB-4124 on industrial scale using simple reaction conditions. Our aim was to elaborate a process, which is easy to scale-up, the industrial realization of which is safe, economical and the purity of the active ingredient fulfils the requirements of the pharmacopoeia.
Surprisingly it was found, that the following process fulfils the above mentioned requirements: i) epoxide formation on the double bond in position 5(10) of 3,3-[l,2-ethandiyl- bis(oxy)]-oestr-5(10),9(l l)-dien-17-one of formula (II)
with hydrogen peroxide; ii) addition of hydrogen cyanide formed in situ on position 17 of the obtained 5,1 Oa- epoxy-3,3-[l,2-ethandiyl-bis(oxy)]-5α-oestr-9(l l)-en-17-one of formula (III)
iii) silylation of the hydroxyl group in position 17 of the formed 5,10α-epoxy-3,3-[l,2- ethandiyl-bis(oxy)]-17α-hydroxy-5α-oestr-9(l l)-en-17β-carbonitrile of formula (IV)
with trimethyl chlorosilane; iv) reacting the obtained 5,10α-epoxy-3,3-[l,2-ethandiyl-bis(oxy)]-17-[trimethyl-silyl- oxy]-5α-oestr-9(ll)-en-17β-carbonitrile of formula (V)
with 4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl magnesium bromide Grignard reagent in the presence of CuCl
(Teutsch reaction); v) silylation of the hydroxyl group in position 5 of the formed 1 lβ-[4-(dimethyl-amino)- phenyl]-3 ,3-[ 1 ,2-ethandiyl-bis(oxy)] -5-hydroxy- 17α-[trimethylsilyl-(oxy)] -5α-oestr-9-en- 17β- carbonitrile of formula (VI)
with trimethyl chlorosilane; vi) reacting the obtained llβ-[4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl]-3,3-[l,2-ethandiyl-bis(oxy)]- 5,17α-bis-[trimethyl-silyl-(oxy)]-5α-oestr-9-en-l 7β-carbonitrile of formula (VII)
with diisobutyl aluminum hydride and after addition of acid to the reaction mixture vii) methoxy-methylation of the obtained llβ-[4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl]-3,3-[l,2- ethandiyl-bis(oxy)]-5,17α-bis-[trimethyl-silyl-(oxy)]-5α-oestr-9-en-17β-carbaldehide of formula (VIII)
with methoxy-methyl Grignard reagent formed in situ, while hydrolyzing the trimethylsilyl protective groups; viii) oxidation of the hydroxy! group in position 20 of the obtained 17,20ξ-dihydroxy-
3-[4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl]-21 -methoxy- 19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3-one of formula (IX)
with dicyclohexyl carbodiimide in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide and a strong organic acid (Swern oxidation), and in given case after purification by chromatography ix) acetylation of the hydroxyl group in position 17 of the obtained l lβ-[4- (dimethylamino)-phenyl]- 17-hydroxy-21 -methoxy- 19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3 ,20-dione of formula (X)
with acetic anhydride in the presence of perchloric acid, and in given case the obtained 7- acetoxy-11 β-[4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl)]-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3 ,20-dione of formula (I) is purified by chromatography.

Example 11
17-Acetoxy-llβ-f4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl)1-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3,20- dione [compound of formula (Dl 70 % Perchloric acid (6 ml) was added to stirred and cooled ((-20) – (-25) 0C) acetic anhydride (45 ml) at such a rate to keep the temperature below (-15) °C. Then a solution of l lβ-[4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl)]-17-hydroxy-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3,20-dione (15.5 g) in dichloromethane (60 ml) was added at (-20) – (-25) 0C. After completion of the reaction – followed by thin layer chromatography – the reaction mixture was diluted with dichloromethane (50 ml), cooled to (-10) 0C and ion exchanged water (52 ml) was added to decompose the acetic anhydride. After stirring for 10 min 25 % ammonium hydroxide solution (77 ml) was added at such rate to keep the temperature below 25 0C (pH=7-8). Then the precipitated carbamide by-product was filtered off, the aqueous phase was separated, extracted with dichloromethane (2×30 ml) and the combined organic layers were concentrated to yield 16.2 g (95.8 %) of the title compound, which was purified by HPLC according to method described in the next example. NMR: 1H NMR C500 MHz. CDCl1 (TMS), δ (ppmT): 0.40 (3H, s, 18-CH3); 2.10 (3H5 s, O-CO- CH3); 2.90 (6H, s, N-CH3); 3.41 (3H, s, 0-CH3); 4.09 (IH, d, Hx-21); 4.38 (IH, m, H-Il); 4.29 (IH, d, Hy-21); 5.77 (IH, br, H-4); 6.62 (2H5 m, H-3′ & H-5′); 6.96 (2H, m, H-2′ & H-6′) 13C NMR (125 MHz. CDCU (TMS), δ fppmϊ): 15.6 (C-18); 21.1 (0-CO-CH3); (39.3 (C-Il); 40.6 (N-CH3); 59.4 (0-CH3); 76.0 (C-21); 93.9 (C-17); 112.8 (C-3′ & C-5′); 123.0 (C-4); 127.3 (C-2′ & C-6′); 129.4 (C-IO); 131.3 (C-I’); 145.5 (C-9); 148.7 (C-4′); 156.4 (C-5); 170.7 (0-CO-CH3); 199.4 (C-3); 202.7 (C-20)
Example 12 Purification of crude CDB-4124 by HPLC (eluent: cyclohexanermethyl-tert-butyl- ether;acetone = 60:30:10) (laboratory scale) [compound of formula (DI
Silicagel (51O g, ZEOPREP C-GEL C-490L, 15-35 μm of particle size; bed length about 60 cm) was filled to an axial bed compression HPLC column of 5 cm of diameter with slurry packing method and the column was equilibrated with a 60:30:10 mixture of cyclohexane – methyl-tert-butyl ether – acetone eluent. 5.1 g of the crude compound of formula (I) (CDB-4124) obtained in the previous example (content of impurities: less than 4 %) was dissolved in the eluent (100 ml), filtered and injected on the column. The product was eluted with 85 ml/min flow rate and UV detection was used. The first fraction was about 40 ml, the main fraction containing the pure CDB-4124 was about 560 ml. The solid title compound was obtained by concentration of the eluted main fraction. Yield: 4.25 g (83.33 %), content of impurities: less than 0.5 %. Melting point: 1180C.
[a^ = +127.2 ° (c=l %, chloroform)
NMR: 1H NMR (500 MHz. CDCh (TMS). δ fppmV): 0.40 (3H, s, 18-CH3); 2.10 (3H, s, O-CO-
CH3); 2.90 (6H, s, N-CH3); 3.41 (3H, s, 0-CH3); 4.09 (IH, d, Hx-21); 4.38 (IH, m, H-I l); 4.29 (IH, d, Hy-21); 5.77 (IH, br, H-4); 6.62 (2H, m, H-3′ & H-5′); 6.96 (2H, m, H-2′ & H-6′)
13C NMR (125 MHz. CDCh (TMS), δ (ppm)): 15.6 (C-18); 21.1 (0-CO-CH3); (39.3 (C-Il);
40.6 (N-CH3); 59.4 (0-CH3); 76.0 (C-21); 93.9 (C-17); 112.8 (C-3′ & C-5′); 123.0 (C-4);
127.3 (C-2′ & C-6′); 129.4 (C-IO); 131.3 (C-I’); 145.5 (C-9); 148.7 (C-4′); 156.4 (C-5); 170.7
(0-CO-CH3); 199.4 (C-3); 202.7 (C-20)
|
5-23-2012
|
Industrial method for the synthesis of 17-acetoxy-11[beta][4-(dimethylamino)-phenyl]-21-methoxy-19-norpregna-4,9-dien-3,20-dione and the key intermediates of the process
|
|
|
6-11-2010
|
Treatment of Macular Degeneratio
|
| ATTARDI BARBARA J ET AL: “CDB-4124 and its putative monodemethylated metabolite, CDB-4453, are potent antiprogestins with reduced antiglucocorticoid activity: In vitro comparison to mifepristone and CDB-2914” MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, IE, vol. 188, no. 1-2, 25 February 2002 (2002-02-25), pages 111-123, XP002496575 ISSN: 0303-7207 | ||
| 2 | * | MEALY N E ET AL: “CDB-4124” DRUGS OF THE FUTURE 200411 ES, vol. 29, no. 11, November 2004 (2004-11), page 1133, XP009118559 ISSN: 0377-8282 |
| WO2010106383A1 * | Mar 22, 2010 | Sep 23, 2010 | Richter Gedeon Nyrt | Novel crystalline form of antiprogestin cdb-4124 |
| WO2011015892A2 * | Aug 5, 2010 | Feb 10, 2011 | Richter Gedeon Nyrt. | Novel crystal form of an organic compound and process for the preparation thereof |
| US8513228 | Mar 22, 2010 | Aug 20, 2013 | Richter Gedeon Nyrt. | Crystalline form of antiprogestin CDB-4124 |




US-based clinical stage biopharmaceutical firm Arno Therapeutics (ARNI) has started enrolling patients in a Phase I/II trial (NCT02049190) assessing its oral, anti-progestin hormone blocker ‘onapristone’ in men with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after failure of abiraterone or enzalutamide.
In previous Phase II clinical trials, onapristone has shown to exhibit anti-tumour activity in patients with breast cancer.
The pre-clinical testing has showed that onapristone had blocked the activation of the progesterone receptor (PR), which is believed to be a mechanism that inhibits the growth of APR-driven breast, endometrial and other tumours.
The company said that tests for the activated form of the progesterone receptor (APR) have the potential to function as a biomarker of anti-progestin activity, as detected by a companion diagnostic under development.
Enrolment of patients in the randomised, open-label Phase I/II trial follows approval of an Investigational Medicinal Product Dossier from the UK Health Authority, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), ethics committee authorisation and subsequent site authorisation.
Arno Therapeutics president and chief executive officer Glenn Mattes said globally, prostate cancer is the second most common cancer in men, and the fifth leading cause of death from cancer in men, with an estimated 1.1 million new cases diagnosed and 307,000 deaths during 2012 alone, according to the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
“These numbers are staggering, and our ultimate goal is to evaluate onapristone in the subset of advanced CRPC patients who are more likely to respond to this personalised treatment, for which there is an immense unmet medical need,” Mattes said.
“The trial marks Arno’s second Phase I study actively enrolling this year and we are excited by the momentum generated thus far.”
The Phase I/II trial, designed to assess the safety and anti-cancer activity of onapristone in the select patient population, is being carried out at the Institute of Cancer Research, London, and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust in the UK.
A total of 60 patients will be enrolled in the trial, which additional sites are planned for in the UK.
The company has engaged Biotrial, a drug evaluation and pharmacology research company, as its contract research organisation (CRO) for the Phase I/II trial.
The trial will evaluate onapristone in extended-release tablet formulations in up to five dose levels (10mg-50mg BID) in patients with advanced CRPC where PR may be contributing to tumour progression.
Patients in the trial will be evaluated for whether their tumours express APR, which may help identify patients who are more likely to respond to onapristone.
A second group of patients will be included at the recommended Phase II dose to gain additional understanding of the onapristone safety profile and potential anti-cancer activity.
J Steroid Biochem1987,27,(4-6):851
Steroids1984,44,(4):349-72
| ATTARDI BARBARA J ET AL: “CDB-4124 and its putative monodemethylated metabolite, CDB-4453, are potent antiprogestins with reduced antiglucocorticoid activity: In vitro comparison to mifepristone and CDB-2914” MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY, ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, IE, vol. 188, no. 1-2, 25 February 2002 (2002-02-25), pages 111-123, XP002496575 ISSN: 0303-7207 | ||
| 2 | * | MEALY N E ET AL: “CDB-4124” DRUGS OF THE FUTURE 200411 ES, vol. 29, no. 11, November 2004 (2004-11), page 1133, XP009118559 ISSN: 0377-8282 |
| WO2010106383A1 * | Mar 22, 2010 | Sep 23, 2010 | Richter Gedeon Nyrt | Novel crystalline form of antiprogestin cdb-4124 |
| WO2011015892A2 * | Aug 5, 2010 | Feb 10, 2011 | Richter Gedeon Nyrt. | Novel crystal form of an organic compound and process for the preparation thereof |
| US8513228 | Mar 22, 2010 | Aug 20, 2013 | Richter Gedeon Nyrt. | Crystalline form of antiprogestin CDB-4124 |

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. through its Swiss Subsidiary receives USD 5 Mn. as milestone fee payment from Sanofi
Total Payment received for GBR 500 monoclonal antibody programme from Sanofi is USD 55 Mn
MUMBAI, April 15, 2014: Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. has informed the Stock Exchange today that the company through its Swiss subsidiary has received USD 5 million as
milestone payment from Sanofi on a collaboration of its VLA2 (alpha2-beta1) integrin monoclonal antibody. GBR 500 is a first-in-class therapeutic monoclonal antibody for chronicautoimmune disorders.
Glenmark has received from Sanofi already USD 50 Mn as an upfront payment in FY2011-12. Hence, the total amount received by Glenmark from Sanofi for its first in class VLA-2monoclonal antibody is USD 55 million
read at
http://www.moneycontrol.com/stocks/stock_market/corp_notices.php?autono=790416
(copy paste on browser)
MD and CEO Mr Glenn Saldanha
old updates
17 September 2012
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, has commenced the Phase II study of GBR 500 for ulcerative colitis.
GBR 500, an antagonist of the VLA2 (alpha2-beta1) integrin, is a first-in-class therapeutic monoclonal antibody for chronic autoimmune disorders.
The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will investigate the efficacy and safety of GBR 500 in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC).
Glenmark Pharmaceuticals chief scientific officer Dr Michael Buschle said that UC represents an area of substantial unmet medical need, despite treatment advances in recent years.
“We’re pleased with the continued progress of our partnership with Sanofi and excited about the commencement of this trial,” Buschle said.
The trial, which will be conducted at multiple clinical sites in North America and Europe, is expected to involve approximately 84 patients.
Patients participating in the study will receive multiple doses of either GBR 500 or placebo, administered over a period of several weeks.
Glenmark has completed Phase I of GBR 500 in the US, won licensing rights to all therapeutic indications from Sanofi and is conducting the clinical development programme.
The trial is part of a strategic global collaboration between Glenmark and Sanofi to investigate GBR 500 for the treatment of chronic inflammatory disorders.
MUMBAI, India, May 16, 2011
MUMBAI, India, May 16, 2011 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Glenmark Pharmaceuticals S.A (GPSA), a wholly owned subsidiary of Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Limited India (GPL), announced today that it has entered into an agreement with Sanofi to grant Sanofi a license for the development and commercialization of GBR 500, a novel monoclonal antibody for the treatment of Crohn’s Disease and other inflammatory conditions. The transaction is expected to close in the coming month subject to customary closing conditions, including the expiration or early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Antitrust Improvements Act.
Under the terms of the agreement, Glenmark will receive an upfront payment of US$ 50 million, of which US$ 25 million will be paid upon closing of the transaction and US$ 25 million, which is contingent upon Sanofi’s positive assessment of certain data to be provided by Glenmark. In addition, Glenmark could receive potential success-based development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments. The total of these payments could reach US$613 Mn. In addition, Glenmark is eligible to receive tiered double-digit royalties on sales of products commercialized under the license.
GBR 500 is an antagonist of the VLA-2 (alpha2-beta1) integrin. It is a first-in-class therapeutic monoclonal antibody and has established proof of concept in animal models across a range of anti-inflammatory conditions. Glenmark has completed Phase I dosing of GBR 500 in the US and the drug has been well tolerated with a good pharmacokinetic profile. Plans are in place to initiate clinical proof of concept studies in Crohn’s Disease. Sanofi has licensed the rights to all therapeutic indications.
“There continues to be a strong medical need for safer and more efficacious products for the treatment of Inflammatory Diseases,” said Elias Zerhouni, M.D., President, Global Research & Development, Sanofi. “GBR500 brings an innovative approach to Sanofi’s Immuno-Inflammation portfolio, which we believe may address a significant gap in treating Inflammatory Diseases which would be of huge benefit to patients”.
Glenn Saldanha MD and CEO of GPL, “This collaboration on a novel first-in-class monoclonal antibody validates Glenmark’s world-class innovative R&D capabilities in the drug discovery arena. We are pleased to have this second licensing collaboration with Sanofi, one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the world and the first one from Glenmark in the field of novel biologics”.
Significant new data presented today at the International Liver Congress 2014 indicate that liver cancer (Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)) may be treated by adoptive T-cell therapy.
This new therapeutic approach in the treatment of HCC could be very important as without treatment the 5 year survival rate is just 5%. Globally, HCC accounts for 746,000 deaths, and in the UK alone is responsible for over 4,000 deaths per year.
Glypican-3 (GPC3) is a tumour associated antigen expressed in up to 70% of HCC but not in healthy human tissue. Isolating GPC3-specific T-cell receptors and expressing them on patient’s T-cells can help treat HCC, as these T cells can recognise and eliminate GPC3-postive HCC.
The study detected and expanded MHC-multimer-positive CD8+ T-cells specific for targeted GPC3 epitopes and grew T-cell clones. From these clones, the most specific and active T-cell receptor was isolated. When this T-cell receptor was expressed on donor T…
View original post 131 more words