Home » Regulatory (Page 3)
Category Archives: Regulatory
Ozonization of Pharmaceutical Water and the Biocidal Products Regulation

With the new biocidal products regulation from 2013 in-situ generated ozone now also falls into the scope of this directive. Ozone generation systems with a biocide application (such as disinfection of pharma water) thus require an approval after the transitional period expires in the September 2017. The ozone registration group is active for this purpose. Read more about the Ozonization of Pharmaceutical Water and the Biocidal Products Regulation.
With the new biocidal products regulation from 2013 in-situ generated ozone now also falls into the scope of this regulation. Ozone generation systems with a biocide application (such as disinfection of pharma water) thus require an approval after the transitional period expires in the September 2017. We already reported about the impact of the new Biocidal Products Regulation – please see the GMP News “Pharmaceutical Water: Uncertainty caused by the New Biocidal Products Regulation” from 21 May 2014.
Admission will take place in two stages. In the first step, ozone is certified as an active ingredient and registered in the list of active substances authorised in the EU. In the second step, the ozone generation system is approved as a biocidal product. The major manufacturers of ozone generation systems have joined forces for this in the ozone registration group (ORG). It aims at relieving users of ozone systems from the registration procedure. That means the documents should be provided to the users. The access to the marketing authorisation dossier is supposed to be assured through a Letter of Access (LoA). One of the open questions seems to be resolved now: the question whether an authorisation document will be required for each ozone precurser (i.e. water, oxygen or air). As this seems to be unnecessary, only one authorisation document is currently being processed.
The question with regard to how reasonable it is to include ozone from pharmaceutical water systems in the biocidal products regulation cannot be clarified at this point. The same is true with regard to the question on who is supposed to control pharmaceutical companies and whether their ozone comes from approved ozone systems.
You can find more information on the page Ozone registration group.


New information about CEPs and inspections published by EDQM….see about Telangana, India
DRUG REGULATORY AFFAIRS INTERNATIONAL

The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare (EDQM) has published new information about the CEP procedure and its related inspections. Please read more about he latest updates from EDQM.
The European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & Healthcare (EDQM) has published new information about the CEP procedure and its related inspections.

1) Costs of inspections
The EDQM has published a new document which describes the inspection costs. The EDQM document PA/PH/CEP (12) 28 1R refers to a table of fees and inspection costs. The costs for the inspection as well as for the travel will be invoiced prior to the inspection. For a three day inspection, for example, the fee is 5000,- Euro. If the facility is located in Asia a flat rate of 6000,- Euro will be charged to cover the travel costs, food and accommodation for the inspector. The travel costs are less…
View original post 118 more words
ICH announces Q&A Document on Q11 Guideline – Main Focus: API Starting Materials

The ICH has recently published a Business Plan and a Concept Paper on the elaboration of a Q&A document on the ICH Q11 Guideline. Read more here.
ICH announces Q&A Document on Q11 Guideline – Main Focus: API Starting Materials
The ICH Q11 Guideline entitled “Development and Manufacture of Drug Substances” from May 2012 has been implemented in the three ICH regions EU, USA and Japan for 2 years now. It describes the approach to developing APIs based on an in-depth understanding of the manufacturing process and adequate strategies to control this process. The document indicates what information should be provided about the quality of the API in Module 3 of the CTD (Common Technical Document) within the framework of a marketing authorisation application.
In the meantime, there has been an accumulation of cases where the applicant and the regulatory authorities adopted different positions with regard to the interpretation of the requirements in this guideline. Particularly, this concerned the definition of starting materials for the manufacture of APIs. The standards according to which regulatory authorities accept a specific compound as a starting material are far from uniform across the 3 ICH regions, and, all the more across Europe. It is thus obvious that this – in the context of global authorisation procedures – costs a lot of time, energy and money.
The ICH has now faced this problem and created an Implementation Working Group (IWG) which has the task of elaborating a Q&A document on API Starting Materials. As is usual in such circumstances (see also our News from 10 December 2014), the ICH has justified the necessity of the Q&A document in a Business Plan and a Concept Paper – both entitled “Q11: Q&As on Selection and Justification of Starting Materials for the Manufacture of Drug Substances”. (Business Plan and Concept Paper are the 1st step of the ICH procedure consisting of 5 steps. The last step always ends with a “Harmonised Tripartite Guideline”.)
The Concept Paper provides further details about the benefits expected of the Q&A document for the industry, authorities and patients:
- The selection and justification of starting materials should be extensively harmonised.
- The connection between the selection of starting materials and GMP aspects, control strategies, length of the chemical syntheses (number of synthesis steps) and the relevance of the manufacturing steps with regard to the API quality should be clarified.
- It should be specified which information has to be provided in the application dossier for the justification of the selection of the starting materials.
- The expectations regarding the lifecycle management should be explained.
This Question-&-Answer document is certainly interesting for all those confronted with diverse regulatory expectations regarding starting materials in relation to supra-regional registration and marketing authorisation procedures. Yet, according to the timing indicated in both the Business Plan and the Concept Paper, a first draft of this document (as Step 2a/b) should be released in one year at the earliest, namely in November 2015.
ABBREVIATED NEW DRUG APPLICATION (ANDA) by Anthony crasto
DRUG REGULATORY AFFAIRS INTERNATIONAL
ABBREVIATED NEW DRUG APPLICATION (ANDA) by Anthony crasto
NDA, ANDA AND IND by DR ANTHONY CRASTO
DRUG REGULATORY AFFAIRS INTERNATIONAL
NDA, ANDA AND IND by DR ANTHONY CRASTO
……….
Final Concept Paper ICH Q12: Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle
DRUG REGULATORY AFFAIRS INTERNATIONAL

Final Concept Paper ICH Q12: Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle
Currently, there are no harmonised approaches to technical and regulatory considerations for the lifecycle management of pharmaceutical products. Therefore, ICH has just published a Final Concept Paper for a new ICH Q12 Guideline: Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle. The proposed ICH Guideline is intended to fill this gap. read
ICH has just published a Final Concept Paper for a new ICH Q12 guideline: Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle.
Currently, there is a lack of a harmonised approach to technical and regulatory considerations for the lifecycle management of pharmaceutical products. Although there are concepts in ICH Q8, Q9, Q10 and Q11 for a more science and risk-based approach for assessing changes across the lifecycle, several gaps exist which hinder a full realization of the benefits intended. The original aim of ‘operational flexibility’…
View original post 305 more words
QUALITY BY DESIGN (QBD) IN API
European Medicines Agency …Clinical trials in human medicines

The European Medicines Agency relies on the results of clinical trials carried out by pharmaceutical companies to reach its opinions on the authorisation of medicines. Although the authorisation of clinical trials occurs at Member State level, the Agency plays a key role in ensuring that the standards of good clinical practice (GCP) are applied across the European Economic Area in cooperation with the Member States. It also manages a database of clinical trials carried out in the European Union.
Clinical trials are studies that are intended to discover or verify the effects of one or more investigational medicines. The regulation of clinical trials aims to ensure that the rights, safety and well-being of trial subjects are protected and the results of clinical trials are credible.
Regardless of where they are conducted, all clinical trials included in applications for marketing authorisation for human medicines in the European Economic Area (EEA) must have been carried out in accordance with the requirements set out in Annex 1 ofDirective 2001/83/EC
. This means that:
- clinical trials conducted in the EEA have to comply with European Union (EU) clinical-trial legislation (Directive 2001/20/EC
); - clinical trials conducted outside the EEA have to comply with ethical principles equivalent to those set out in the EEA, including adhering to international good clinical practice
and the Declaration of Helsinki
.
In the EEA, approximately 4,000 clinical trials are authorised each year. This equals approximately 8,000 clinical-trial applications, with each trial involving two Member States on average. Approximately 61% of clinical trials are sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry and 39% by non-commercial sponsors, mainly academia.
Role of the Agency
Clinical-trial data is included in clinical-study reports that form a large part of the application dossiers submitted by pharmaceutical companies applying for a marketing authorisation via the Agency.
The Agency’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) is responsible for conducting the assessment of a human medicine for which an EU-wide marketing authorisation is sought. As part of its scientific evaluation work, the CHMP reviews the clinical-trial data included in the application.
Assessments are based on purely scientific criteria and determine whether or not the medicines concerned meet the necessary quality, safety and efficacy requirements in accordance with EU legislation, particularly Directive 2001/83/EC
.
Good clinical practice
The Agency plays a central role in ensuring application of good clinical practice (GCP). GCP is the international ethical and scientific quality standard for designing, recording and reporting clinical trials that involve the participation of human subjects.
The Agency works in cooperation with GCP inspectors from medicines regulatory authorities (‘national competent authorities’) in EEA Member States on the harmonisation and coordination of GCP-related activity at an EEA level.
The Agency does not have a role in the approval of clinical-trial applications in the EEA. The approval of clinical-trial applications is the responsibility of the national competent authorities.
EudraCT database and the EU Clinical Trials Register
The Agency is responsible for the development, maintenance and coordination of the EudraCT database. This is a database used by national competent authorities to enter clinical-trial data from clinical trial sponsors and paediatric-investigation-plan (PIP) addressees.
A subset of this data is made available through the European Union Clinical Trials Register, which the Agency manages on behalf of EU Member States and forms part ofEudraPharm
, the EU database of medicines.
Users are able to view:
- the description of phase-II to phase-IV adult clinical trials where the investigator sites are in the EEA;
- the description of any clinical trials in children with investigator sites in the EU and any trials that form part of a PIP including those where the investigator sites are outside the EU.
As of 21 July 2014, it will be mandatory for sponsors to post clinical trial results in the EudraCT database. A subset of the data included in EudraCT is made available to the public in the European Union Clinical Trials Register. The content and level of detail of these summary results is set out in a European Commission guideline and in its technical guidance. A typical set of summary results provides information on the objectives of a given study, explains how it was designed and gives its main results and conclusions.
The Agency is also working towards the proactive publication of data from clinical trials carried out on the medicines that it authorises. For more information, see release of data from clinical trials.
Clinical trials conducted in countries outside the EU
Clinical trials conducted outside the EU but submitted in an application for marketing authorisation in the EU have to follow the principles which are equivalent to the provisions of the Directive 2001/20/EC
.
In April 2012, the Agency published the final version of this paper:
This paper aims to strengthen existing processes to provide assurance that clinical trials meet the required ethical and GCP standards, no matter where in the world they have been conducted.
The number of clinical trials and clinical-trial subjects outside Western Europe and North America has been increasing for a number of years. More information is available in this document:
Revision of EU clinical trial legislation
In July 2012, the European Commission published a proposal on a regulation to revise the EU clinical trial legislation.
More information is available at: Revision of the clinical trials directive
.
Clinical Trials Facilitation Group
The Clinical Trials Facilitation Group
(CTFG) is a working group of the Heads of Medicines Agencies that:
- acts as forum for discussion to agree on common principles and processes to be applied throughout the European medicines regulatory network;
- promotes harmonisation of clinical-trial-assessment decisions and administrative processes by national competent authorities;
- operates the voluntary harmonisation procedure for assessment of clinical-trial applications involving several Member States.
The Group is composed of representatives from the clinical-trial departments of the national competent authorities.
The pharmacovigilance system in the European Union (EU)
DRUG REGULATORY AFFAIRS INTERNATIONAL

The pharmacovigilance system in the European Union (EU) operates with the management and involvement of regulatory authorities in Member States, the European Commission and the European Medicines Agency. In some Member States, regional centres are in place under the coordination of the national competent authority.
Within this system, the Agency’s role is to coordinate the EU pharmacovigilance system and to ensure the provision of advice for the safe and effective use of medicines.
More information
- Pharmacovigilance legislation
- Good pharmacovigilance practices
- Risk-management plans
- Medication errors
- Signal management
- Post-authorisation safety studies
- Medicines under additional monitoring
- Periodic safety update reports
- European Risk Management Strategy
- EudraVigilance
- Incident management plan
- Regulatory and procedural guidance

Pharmacovigilance (PV or PhV), also known as Drug Safety, is the pharmacologicalscience relating to the collection, detection, assessment, monitoring, and prevention ofadverse effects with pharmaceutical products.[1] The etymological roots for the word “pharmacovigilance” are:
View original post 7,655 more words
DRUG APPROVALS BY DR ANTHONY MELVIN CRASTO
.....










see……
